Vertical integration is a strategy
adopted by the companies to involve the acquisition of business operations
within the same production vertical. For example, a world-famous company “Target"
works in the retail industry with a vertical integration strategy. The company offer
its own brand products in the store. They manufacture and distribute brand
products by cutting out the middleman from channel intermediaries. Thus the
company saves the cost of the middleman and get benefit by dealing their
customers directly to understanding by their requirements and demands. Furthermore,
because of this vertical integration target company is capable to offer their products
at lower prices which attracts their targeted customers and results in the
increase of their sales revenue. However, vertical integration does not prove
as an effective strategy in all cases. Some important considerations are
required to be taken in the mind while deciding to vertically integrate or
outsource. Vertical integration is associated with a cost-cutting strategy.
Organizations make extra profit by lowering the cost of operations. However, in
some cases, vertical integration can be relatively more expensive. Thus to
avoid such negative consequences managerial staff of an organization need to analyze
all possible outcomes of their integration strategy on business in the long
run. Sometimes outsourcing can be a better option for the companies rather than
vertical integration because vertical integration causes to influence
organizational expenditures and reputation in the market. For instance, if a
restaurant applies vertical integration strategy and starts establishing farms
for required vegetables, poultry, fish, and fruits then it will result in the
decrease of a profit margin because the cost of production will be increased
unless efficient practices are taken.
Outsourcing is
opposite to vertical integration. In outsourcing, companies draw a contract
with employees or resources providing firms and execute their business
operation with the support of external services providers. Outsourcing is the
best solution to take advantage of the external talent when the company do not
have skills and required talent in the workforce. Somehow, outsourcing causes
to increase hold-up problems for the company. Companies cannot consider outsiders
as their internal assets and similarly, assets used in the outsourcing process (owned
by the outsourcer) cannot be considered as assets of a company. Such hold-up
problems require ownership right which can be provided with the vertical
integration strategy. Although, asset specificity also relates to vertical integration.
An argument for vertical integration is referred to as asset specificity. The
idea behind this asset specificity is that it induces opportunistic behaviour while
on the other hand, opportunism preventing cost is controlled by vertical
integration.
There are some
advantages and disadvantages of vertical integration and outsourcing which are
enlisted below:
v Vertical Integration
v
Some advantages and
disadvantages are presented below in the table to represent the critical
analysis of a vertical integration approach for organizations working in the
local and international markets.
Advantages
|
v Reduces
the cost of production as the company produces products and distribute them
directly without involving middleman.
v Increase
control over supply chain as the company use their own supply chain
resources.
|
Disadvantages
|
v Reduces
focus on market trends which is unacceptable to deal with customers’ needs
and requirements.
|
v Outsourcing
Outsourcing
strategy has some advantages and disadvantages which are presented below in the
table:
Advantages
|
v Acquire
external talent from other countries and communities to get work done in a
better way when the internal workforce is unable to fulfil the required
standards.
v Provide
competitive advantage by supporting businesses to meet the demand of targeted
market efficiently in seasons.
|
Disadvantages
|
v Causes
to decrease control of management on the workforce.
v Causes
issues for quality standards as sometimes external labour or resources does
not meet the required standards.
|
Emergent strategy and
strategy that has been developed in an intended, designed, deliberate, planned
way.
Emergent strategy relates to the
identification of organizational outcomes in response to the execution and
implementation of the corporate strategy. The key purpose of the emergent
strategy is to learn how unexpected outcomes integrate to develop better future
plans for the company. Take the example of a company which uses the social
website to promote a marketing plan. However, the emergent strategy is mostly
in use of organizations to provide a reaction to an uncertain condition. While on the other hand, the intended
strategy is related to the strategy that a company wants to add in the
strategic plan. It can be directly focused or sometimes it remains as the
indirect but prime factor behind a strategic plan. The strategy a company
follows up is known as the realized strategy. In other words, implementing
intended strategies are realized strategy for a firm as it relates to the
business operations execution. However, another strategy is a deliberate
strategy. Deliberate strategy is also a part of the intended organizational
strategy. The strategies that the company decided to keep all the same to
execute future business operations are known as a deliberate strategy.