Introduction of Feasibility Study
For
getting on the job on time, public transportation is no longer a rational
decision. Therefore, it has been decided to purchase a new car. However, it is
not known whether purchasing a new car will be an economically rational
decision or not. Therefore, a feasibility study has been performed to know how
profitable it will be to purchase a new car. The approaches such as NPV, ROI
and Cost and benefit analysis have been performed to evaluate the decision.
Identifying possible solutions
of Feasibility Study
The
key problem that is currently occurring is that it is not known whether
purchasing a new car would be a good decision or not. In order to evaluate this
decision, there are different ways through which the benefit and profitability
of the decision can be analyzed. The project appraisal methods such as Net
Present Value (NPV) method can provide a brief overview of the profitability of
the project. Through risk analysis, Return on investment (ROI), and cost-benefit
analysis the effectiveness of the decision can be easily understood (Kurowski & Sussman, 2011).
Economic Considerations of Feasibility Study
The
net present value method is utilized to know whether the decision to acquire a
car will be useful or not. The net present value approach is among the most
commonly used approach for evaluating the profitability of the investment (GUPTA, 2017). While using this
approach cash flows of 5 years are evaluated. It has been decided to purchase a
non-luxury new car. The cash flows include the amount which is saved from
operations. The estimated cash flow each year would be $10,000. The acquisition
cost of the car is estimated to be $37,000. The Cashflow is discounted with the
estimated discount rate of 10%. The Net present value (NPV) of getting a car is
$907.87 which is a positive figure (GUPTA, 2017).
The
NPV of getting a new car is positive; it means that this decision will be
profitable in the future so buying a new car will be a wise decision (Kurowski & Sussman, 2011). In order to find
the Return on Investment (ROI) the IRR function is used. By using the IRR function
in the excel the value of ROI is evaluated to be around 11%. The rate of return
is higher than the cost of capital which means that it will be feasible to
purchase a car. It can be seen that the NPV is positive which means that buying
a new car is profitable decision. Through IRR it can be said that it provides
significant amount of value as well (Jonathan, 2010).
Discount Rate
|
10%
|
|
Initial Investment
|
37000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
Cash flow
|
Discounted Cashflows
|
|
|
|
0
|
-37000
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
10000
|
9091
|
|
|
|
2
|
10000
|
8264
|
|
|
|
3
|
10000
|
7513
|
|
|
|
4
|
10000
|
6830
|
|
|
|
5
|
10000
|
6209
|
|
|
|
|
Total PV
|
37908
|
|
|
|
|
NPV
|
$907.87
|
|
|
|
|
IRR
|
11%
|
The
risk should also be considered while making a purchase decision. Owning a car
comes up with different kinds of risks such as income tax, repair, and
maintenance charges and coverage charges, etc.
The average car maintenance charges in year are round d about $400 to
$700. However the maintenance charges depend on the usage and type of car that
is purchased by the individual. As it is a new car, there will be quite fewer
repair charges in the first year however as the time pass due to depreciation,
the repair and maintenance charges will begin to increase. Therefore it is highly
important to include different kind of risks which the car owner will have to
face after acquiring the car (Kurowski & Sussman, 2011).
Cost-benefit
Analysis of
Feasibility Study
Cost-Benefit Analysis
|
|
Costs
|
Amount
|
|
|
Acquisition Cost
|
37000
|
|
|
Repair Cost
|
$200
|
|
|
Maintenance Cost
|
$500
|
|
|
Operational cost
|
$500
|
|
|
Total Cost
|
38200
|
|
|
Benefits
|
Amount
|
|
|
Save lease cost
|
$1,000
|
|
|
Owning Asset
|
$37,000
|
|
|
Public transportation
cost
|
$200
|
|
|
Reach office on time
|
$200
|
|
|
Total Benefit
|
$38,400
|
|
The
cost-benefit analysis provides deep insights into whether the chosen decision
has more cost or benefit. Usually, such decision is selected which is higher in
benefit and lower costs. In the above table the cost-benefit analysis of
purchasing a car has been performed. It can be seen that benefit of purchasing
a car is more than the cost of the decision. Therefore it has been decided to
purchase the car (Kurowski & Sussman, 2011).
Conclusion
of Feasibility Study
If
all the above analysis is summarized than it can be said that The NPV of
getting a new car is positive; it means that this decision will be profitable
in the future, so buying a new car will be a wise decision. In order to find
the Return on Investment (ROI), the IRR function is used. By using the IRR
function in excel the value of ROI is evaluated to be around 11%. The rate of
return is higher than the cost of capital which means that it will be feasible
to purchase a car. The average car maintenance charges in year are round d
about $400 to $700. However the maintenance charges depend on the usage and
type of car that is purchased by the individual. As it is a new car, there will
be quite fewer repair charges in the first year however as the time pass due to
depreciation, the repair and maintenance charges will begin to increase.
References
of
Feasibility Study
GUPTA, A. (2017). PROJECT APPRAISAL AND FINANCING
(illustrated ed.). PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Jonathan, B. (2010). Financial
Management. Pearson Education, India.
Kurowski, L., &
Sussman, D. (2011). Investment Project Design: A Guide to Financial and
Economic Analysis with Constraints (illustrated ed.). John Wiley &
Sons.