The merger and acquisition activity in the company has long-term ramifications for the company to acquire the dominant entity in the merger. The company that is targeted in an acquisition or the firm is subsumed in a merger. The target company in the merger and acquisition gives its shareholders more opportunity for the cash out and significant premium. The transaction is all cash deal and its acquirer provide the cash partly from the stock. The shareholders of the target company become a stake in the acquirer and provide vested interest. The Larger potential target there is a big risk for the acquirer (I. Asimakopoulos & Athanasoglou, 2013). The company may have become able to withstand the failure of small sizes due to failure of Huge purchase. Reaction to the news of merger and acquisition activity in the company can be favorable or unfavorable. This depends upon the perception of market participants. In some cases, the target company shares increase and become close to the acquirer offer. The target offers and shares make trade over the price of perception. There become some situations in which the target company may trade below the announced price of offer (N. N. Brueller, Carmeli, & Markman, 2018).

In general case, the Purchase consideration is to be considered for stock plummets and acquirer's shares. There is the number of reasons about selecting the appropriate acquirer's shares and it may decline with the price tag of services. From the perception of acquirer’s future growth prospects and profitability, the ideal condition is to enhance the core business of company, analysis and investigation of the organic growth rate of revenues and operating margins of the company. Indifferent cases, the acquirer must consider different hostile bid for the target company. At this point, management can recommend or reject the deal. The common cause of rejection is believed of acquirer offer. At the bottom line of transactions merger and acquisition activity in the company can generate a long-lasting effect on acquisitive companies. The flurry of deals shows a signal for the impending market and development of the company in the market (S. Cartwright & Cooper, 1993).

Limitations, implications, and perspective of merger and acquisition

Merger and acquisition is best term to save a business in the collapsed situation, but there are still negative issues in the merger and acquisition which could be faced by the business when it is going to merge or acquire the business. These limitations are explained below:

· As a result of merger and acquisition, the employees of the merging company have to acquire new skills which are suggested by the acquiring company, so the existing skills of the employees wasted without any return.

· There may be a loss of experience in merger and acquisition as the key positions are held by the acquirer, which have no idea about the new business, and it could have resulted in the worrying of the exchange of the information in the business entity.

· Organizations have to face many difficulties in the competition, which could arise in the staff of the companies were working together in a unit. There are always risk that there will be surplus of employees, which could not downsize in the organization.

·  To modify and implication the merger and acquisition in the organization, there must need time which increases the cost of the business.

· When two firms having same productivity in production and services, there might be chances that there would be excess of similar activities that may be less demanded by the public, and it will affect the price of the product in the market.

· There may be chances of uncertainty, which could be approved by the proper assurance in the different departments.

· It may decrease the share value of the company as it increases the number of shares in the market, which give negative impact on the performance of the business.

In many cases, mergers and acquisitions reduce the flexibility of the business. The merger of two organizations creates the rivalry which may currently see as vital source but later it could be turned in inferior quality of the product which is not good in the business market. The changing environment may create the value of large distinction but it would be highly on risk (R. Klendauer & Deller, 2009).

The perspective of Merger and Acquisition

Merger and acquisition are considered as the difficult phenomenon to understand as it owns wide range of the data to keep in view to combine the functions of a certain business with the structural change in the organization’s work. Source of opportunities for the Merger and acquisition are contingent. Along with the advantages which are related to the operational, managerial, and marketing work the other perspectives could be affected by the other perspectives within the organization.  As a result of mergers and acquisitions, there may be changes in the management style, culture, workforce perspective and employee’s perspective to deal with the organization. These changes give chance to come close in respect of asset liabilities and other elements of the business which could affect the decision of merging the business of two organizations.

Furthermore, there is also the perspective of dependence on the success of business in case where acquirer required to measure the financial perspective following the external and internal resources which are being used in the financial perspective of the business. Ignorance of this perspective may create issues in the business which are not affordable by the business in current business market. There may be different further perspectives which could influence the Merger and acquisition in deeply such as:

· Customer’s perspective

· Government perspective

· Competitor’s perspective

These perspectives are going to influence the Merger and acquisition with other perspectives to decide on the diversified business unit. There may be multiple other perspectives that could influence decision making and management in the business. Merger and acquisition are derived in different causes, which is enough to analyze the financial and non-financial elements in the Merger and acquisition in the performance of business.  

The implication of the merger and acquisition is most likely to deal with the activities in the wealth effect of the business which acquiring the companies during the working on the methodology of the acquisition in the announcement of the merger of different business. The announcement of the different changes in the activities which are resulted in the implication of merger and acquisition. Moreover, outcomes are measured by the actual and budgeted stock price of the shares, which are needed to be examined in the market, when the actual return of the merger and acquisition is post-event for the firm by the event and date, which is mentioned in the contract. When there is budgeted return in normal events it must be announced that merger and acquisition do not occur as it is not beneficial for the state of business. The study found that the average number of abnormal returns that are acquired by the shareholders which are important in numbers and considered by the acquirer.

Conclusion of Merger and Acquisition

The implications of mergers and acquisitions in the business are to evaluate the get the outcomes of acquisition and merger in the accumulated business economy in the business world. It is summarized that all the aspects of merger and acquisition in the way which are highly affected the decision of merger and acquisition. The study of merger and acquisition is used to ascertain the link between the different aspects of the organization’s issue. While the merger or acquisition takes place between different organizations, it is considered that the benefits and the privileges are distributed according to the equal portion or in specific portion. The estimated model to use in acquisition are significantly distributed in a way that put aggregate impact on both the organization. The outcomes show a certain percentage to contribute to the consumption of the total revenue of the business. Different sorting methods are used in generating the advantages related to merger and acquisition.

The study is also concern with the allocations of the resources which are being used in the business for the common benefits of the firms. It also discussed with the changing management of the business and taking hold of new management, which has to face different challenges to stable the economy of the firms. The purpose of the study is to establish the impact of mergers and acquisitions in the performance of the business. Finance theories are recommended both negative and positive important impact of mergers and acquisition in the performance of business market. There may be empirical rules to merger and acquisition which have no important influence on the corporate firms. The economy has to face the issue of dealing the policies with the improvement of the firm’s business condition, so after all the research on the merger and acquisition is best part to combine the business activities which are competitive enough in deciding on the company. The merger and acquisition are considered to save the weak entity and to expand the business of strong one, which is best used to save the business in recession (O. Gupta & Roos, 2001).

References of Assignment on Effect of ramifications for the company

A. Agrawal, & Jain, P. K. (2015). Multiple perspectives of mergers and acquisitions performance. In Systemic Flexibility and Business Agility, 385-398.

I. Asimakopoulos, & Athanasoglou, P. P. (2013). Revisiting the merger and acquisition performance of European banks. International review of financial analysis,, 29, 237-249.

J. David. (2017). The aggregate implications of mergers and acquisitions. Available at SSRN 2033555.

J. G. Lynch, & Lind, B. (2002). Escaping merger and acquisition madness. Strategy & Leadership, 30(2), 5-12.

M. G. Seo, & Hill, N. S. (2005). Understanding the human side of merger and acquisition: An integrative framework. . The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(4), 422-443.

N. N. Brueller, Carmeli, A., & Markman, G. D. (2018). Linking merger and acquisition strategies to postmerger integration: a configurational perspective of human resource management. Journal of Management,, 44(5), 1793-1818.

O. Gupta, & Roos, G. (2001). Mergers and acquisitions through an intellectual capital perspective. Journal of Intellectual capital,, 2(3), 297-309.

R. Klendauer, & Deller, J. (2009). Organizational justice and managerial commitment in corporate mergers. Journal of Managerial Psychology,, 24(1), 29-45.

S. C. CARTWRIGHT, & Cooper, C. L. (2016). Managing mergers acquisitions and strategic alliances. Routledge.

S. Cartwright, & Cooper, C. L. (1993). The psychological impact of merger and acquisition on the individual: A study of building society managers. Human relations,, 46(3), 327-347.

V. M. Papadakis. (2005). The role of broader context and the communication program in merger and acquisition implementation success. Management Decision,, 43(2), 236-255.