In
order to answers the particular research questions, the studies are analysed,
but only three of them are selected only to provides critical review related to
the particular topic. This question is answered
by comparing all of these studies of the various authors in order to know about
the strength of the topic. The weaknesses of all of these articles are explained
in this paper In order to evaluate the exact answers to the question. From the
numbers of the articles, the published articles are selected, and these
articles are published in well-known journals. These articles are related to
the effects of integrated care; Patient Perceptions of Health Care and Chronic
Illness and Patient Satisfaction. All of these articles are related to the
particular research question, and these are illustrating that these articles
can provide extensive answers to the particular research question.
Strength and weaknesses of articles
After
reviewing the articles, it has been critically analysed that there are a few of
the particular points that must be improved in all of these articles as well as
these points would not be repeats in the future studies. There are the numbers of the strong points
that are the clear cut answers to the particular research question, and these
points must be considered while conducting the research on this particular topic.
Strength
Article One: Effects of
integrated care
The
one most important strength of this article is; it is published in well-known
journals, e.g. (BMC Health Services Research). The publications in the well-known
journal are leads towards authentications of the articles. The proper format is
followed by the researcher in this article. The clear and easy English language
is chosen to explore the concepts on this particular topic. In these articles,
the models of integrated care are developed which can enhance patient
satisfaction. It follows the particular way of the research. The proper in-text
citation is used for referring to the concepts of various other studies (Baxter, 2018).
Article Two: Patient Perceptions
of Health Care
The
publications in the well-known journal are leads towards authentications of the
articles. This article is also published in the Well-known journal named;
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health. This study is totally based
upon the reviews of several other authors. The concepts are explored by analysing
the studies of various authors in this study. The specific way of research is
chosen for conducting this research study, and all of the requirements of the research
criteria are fulfilled in this study. This article discusses the perception of
the patients for their socio-economic status. It analyses the socio-economic
status that can affect the patient’s perceptions (Nicholas C.
Arpey, 2017).
Article Three: Chronic Illness
and Patient Satisfaction
One
of the most important strong points of the article is hidden in the title of
the articles that is related satisfaction of the patients for their chronic
illness. The data is used from the national survey of people with different
numbers and types of chronic illnesses to examine relationships between patient
characteristics. Seemed like other articles this is also published in good and
effective journals such as; health services research. The topic of this
research is one of the favourite topics and due to its concepts, I feel this is
one of the most important topic that must be discussed world widely (Carlin, 2012).
Weaknesses
Article Three: Chronic Illness
and Patient Satisfaction
There
is the various weakness of these articles that must avoid in the potential
studies. There is the only single
measure that has been used in this article in order to measure satisfaction with
care. These scales and measures have seemed like points of the reporting of public
performance. For the complexity, single measures are also used in order to
measure the numbers of chronic conditions. This study must be used more nuanced
complexity measures. In this analysis, the direct control for a physician is
not concerned in this article.
Article Two: Patient Perceptions
of Health Care
This
study is being conducted for the population of the patients in one particular
geographic area. This study is conducted for the generalizability to other
populations and settings. Another major weak point of this study is that this conducted
in various time periods for several changes in health care.
Article One: Effects of
integrated care
There
are the various weaknesses of these articles as well, and these are; the study
has used sample size that is leading towards the inadequate statistical power. It has also offered a few of the concerns that
are most relevant to the allocation processes. For the reduction of potential
bias, this article is not meeting with particular criteria.
Camporee and contrast of these
articles
Important
points
|
Article
One
|
Article
Two
|
Article
Three
|
Objective
|
·
The objective of this study is
conducting a systematic review for measuring the impacts of the coordination
and integration among the social and health care; and services related to
healthcare.
|
·
Clinician perceptions of
patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) have been shown to affect
clinical decision making and health care delivery in this group.
|
·
To examine how the
relationship between patient characteristics, patient experience and overall
satisfaction with care varies with illness complexity with the health care
system
|
Methods
|
·
Both kinds of research methods
are used in this study as qualitative and quantitative.
·
Data is collected from the pre-existing
sources related to the topic.
|
·
In order to identify recurrent
themes in their perceptions of care, In-depth interviews with 80 enrolees in
a state Medicaid program were analysed.
·
The primary source of data collection
is used in this study.
|
·
Structural equation modelling
was used to examine how relationships among the patient characteristic
·
A telephone survey in 14 U.S.
geographical area
|
Data
analysis methods
|
·
The electronic database is
used as; MEDLINE; Embase;
PsycINFO; CINAHL
·
Quantitative primary studies
and systematic reviews are collected from the literature of the various
studies.
·
The data is collected from the
literature that is published during the time period of 2006-2017
|
·
The data has been analysed by
the structured interviews of the study.
·
Most subjects perceived that
their SES affected their health care.
|
·
A random digit dial telephone
survey of adults with one or more chronic illnesses.
|
Results
and analysis
|
·
167 studies are examined in
this article as the sample size.
·
These are eligible for
inclusion
·
Evidence of perceived improved
quality of care has been indicated by these analyses
·
Evidence of increased patient
satisfaction is proved by this critical analysis.
·
Evidence of improved access to
care has been examined in this study critically
|
·
The complex perceptions
are highlights in this study, and the patients
have around how SES affects their health care
|
·
Patients with more chronic
illnesses report higher overall satisfaction.
·
The latter effect increases
with illness burden
·
The total effects of better
patient-provider interaction
|
Conclusion
|
·
The patient’s satisfaction can
be enhanced by the Models of
integrated care.
·
This model can be used to
increase the perceived quality of care
|
·
This work can inform
interventions that can be used to promote health equity by using the
multifaceted approach, that is usually engaged in targeting both providers
and the health care system as a whole
|
·
Providers seeking to improve
their patient satisfaction scores could do so by considering patient
characteristics when accepting new patients or deciding who to refer to other
providers for treatment.
|
References of Health Care article
Baxter, S. J. (2018). The
effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international
evidence. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1).
Carlin, C. S. (2012). Chronic Illness and Patient Satisfaction. Health
Services Research. 47(6), 2250–2272.
Nicholas C. Arpey, A. H. (2017). How Socioeconomic Status Affects Patient
Perceptions of Health Care:A Qualitative Study. Journal of Primary Care
& Community Health, 8(3), 169–175.