Introduction of Ethical Issues in Research
Research
has been considered as the main pillar of knowledge which organizes an
essential part of the process. Ethics are actually a set of principles or
rules, both written and unwritten, that rule our anticipation of others’ and
our own behavior. Ethics in research involved various requirements on the
entire tasks, the shield of the subject's dignity, along with the publication
of the entire information included in the research (Beins, 2017).
The Importance of Research Ethics
Before
we discuss the importance of research ethics, we need to understand properly
the definition of research ethics. Research ethics defined as a series of
ethics that have a purpose to govern the method of how scientific and other
types of researches are presented and also disseminated. Research by Resnick
(2015) has noted some reasons for the importance of research ethics (Resnik, Elliott, Soranno, & Smith, 2017) such as:
Research ethics encourage the research’s
aims, such as escalating knowledge
Research ethics assist the various values
that prerequisites for cooperative work, such as equality along with mutual
respect. This is highly fundamental with the reason that scientific research
relies completely on the collaboration performed by the researchers.
Research ethics mean that the researchers
are accountable for all of their activities
Research ethics sustenance the
essentiality of both moral and social values
Research ethics guarantee the validity and
authenticity of the research itself
Ethical Issues in Research
Various
ethical issues in research (Code, 2017)
are mentioned such as:
1. Study
designs along with ethics sanction
Good
research is the type of research that is well-planned, well-organized, properly
designed, and also ethically sanctioned. Research which has a low standard
might able to create misconduct. Even though this might occur to be a strict
standard, but it underlines the fundamental requirement of a researcher which
is to perform research reliably. In order to accomplish this, a specific
protocol should be formatted and followed. In fact, research must search for
accurate answers for particular questions instead of only collecting data.
2. Data
Analysis
The
researchers have the responsibility to appropriately analyze the data gathered.
Even though inaccurate analysis might not lead to misconduct, but a deliberate
exclusion of results might be able to trigger whether misinterpretation or
mislead the readers. In addition to this, the falsification of data is
potentially leading to misconduct. For this reason, in order to make sure an
accurate analysis of data, then there should be fully disclosed of the entire
resources along with the methods utilized to gain and analyze data.
3. Authorship
Up
till now, there is no generally fixed description of authorship itself.
Instead, authorship is, by large and general, fixed that an author must have
performed significant contribution and support to the intellectual content, as
well as hypothesizing and designing the study, obtaining, and ultimately, both analyzing
and interpreting the entire data. It is a responsibility of an author to
guarantee that the paper embodies valid work, and the author would also take
the work’s public responsibility as well. Lastly, an author would typically be
engaged in conscripting or else revising the research, in addition to approving
the submitted research. On the other hand, the various contexts such as data
collection, grammar or language editing, and any further regular works by
itself, do not warrant authorship.
4. Conflicts
of Interest
The
conflicts of interest might appear in case if the researchers have some
interests which are not completely ostensible, and that might be able to
influence their own judgments on the published work. These types of conflicts
include personal, political, academic, financial, or commercial interest. For
this reason, those interests, if relevant, must be discussed right from the
initial stage of research itself. In fact, the researchers have an extra
responsibility to take an effort in making sure that their conflicts of
interest will not impact the methodology, as well as the result of research. At
the time of publishing, all of these conflicts of interest must be stated to
the editors, and the readers have the right to judge whether the findings of
the research are reliable or not.
5. Plagiarism
and terminated publication
Terminated
publication might have appeared if there are two or more researches share a
similar hypothesis, data, the points discussed or maybe the same conclusions,
without a complete cross-reference. This circumstance is also considered as a
self-plagiarism. Though the ranges of plagiarism are varied, it started from
unreferenced utilization of others' ideas, whether published or unpublished, to
the submission of research with new authorship of previous research which has
converted into a different language. Thus, it is crucial to reveal the entire
resources of information presented, along with permission in case if research
uses others' written or demonstrative materials.
Conclusion of Ethical Issues in Research
Research
which has been considered as the main pillar of knowledge must be conducted in
a proper manner, in which, the researches properly understand and apply all of
the standards in research ethics. In fact, the researches need to acknowledge
the importance of research ethics before they would conduct any type of
research. In addition to this, the researchers also should able to tackle some
ethical issues in research such as study designs along with ethics sanction, data
analysis, authorship, the conflicts of interest, as well as the plagiarism and
terminated publication. In brief, it is definitely the responsibility of the
researcher to make sure that research that he or she conducted is performed
reliably and ethically right from the planning stage to the final publication
of research.
References of Ethical Issues in Research