Assignment on Social Responsibility in Research

Introduction of Social Responsibility in Research

The social responsibility of researchers integrates the moral responsibility for the entire researchers to analytically reveal the context of socio-ethical derived from every work they made. This normative point of view is not actually exceptional, in which the dispute appears from philosophers and science sociologists around the subject that all of the researchers must be able to integrate broader and comprehensive ethical along with the social considerations in their deliberations.

Social Responsibility in Research

            Social responsibility defines as an ethical theory, whereas the individuals are responsible for accomplishing their public duty, which is the activities that should be able to deliver benefit to the whole society (Shamoo, 2015).  

The broader ethical consideration along with the social implementations of innovative research progressions could have appeared at various phases of the Research & Development practice. The comprehension of social responsibility research practice’s broadened conception directs to two particular requirements. The first requirement was mentioned as the willingness or eagerness of the researchers to analytically deliberate on their work’s socio-ethical context cannot be persuasively realized, instead, it requires to be inspired. Interestingly, the opinion of social responsibility has the potential capability to entail both evaluation and also reproach, which rely on the explanation of the term ‘responsibility’ itself. On one side, integrity or elsesustainability are the terms that used to explain the definition of social responsibility.

On another side, social responsibility also could be applied as a criticism, in which the researchers have been considered to become socially responsible for all of the negative results of the research that they have conducted and published. Research by Schuurbiers (2010) has assumed that science has articulated that, along with the growing determination and principle toward the society in the past millennium. In fact, science has not only measured the technical progress, economic schemes and also social structures. Instead, it has as well constructed the world's experience daily, the mindful believed, and even insensible feelings derived from society. In brief, clear observation and explanation of the importance of considering social responsibility in every single research needed to be understood and applied by the researchers, with a purpose to implement the proper science to be informed and published to the public (Schuurbiers, 2010).

How Researchers should be Socially Responsible?

 The social responsibility theory is created on an ethical system, whereas both actions and decisions should be ethically authorized first before they will proceed. From this point, it is clear that the researches have a responsibility to conduct their work in ethical authorization before they would proceed to publish their research. For example, in case if the findings or conclusions from research cause damage to society, then the research published is definitely be considered as socially irresponsible.

  Moreover, social responsibility in research is where the moral values that are integral in research, in which there is a clear difference between what is right and wrong, are aligned with the moral values in society. Another research made by Wing in 2002 has clearly proposed that it is a big challenge for the researchers to work along with the society to build questions and then conducting proper research to generate the answers with respect to the social concerns by analyzing them with the finest technical methods to improve the society input while analyzing data. Furthermore, the author also has suggested that, in the context of social responsibility, the researchers should acknowledge that they have full responsibilities regarding the publication of their academic findings, publishing all of those scientific findings in proper methods, and might also take part in the processes that engage the policy-makers and media as well.

            There are some further focused and applicable methods in how ethics along with social sciences have currently emerged in various scientific studies. As a consequence, the researchers, indeed, have a moral responsibility to reveal the broader socio-ethical scopes of research. In addition to this, both social scientists and ethicists have a shared responsibility to convey the social and ethical considerations to endure on the research practices. Moreover, social values have been approved to have a significant role in the measurement of research objectives. The reason is due to research typically performs particular social functions, which depend on the situations on which subsidy is accredited. Thus, the broadened view of research itself within society also denotes a broadened idea to describe the responsibility of the researchers. The inclusive arguments regarding the social responsibility of researchers are summarized as:

Researchers have a responsibility for the improvement of scientific or academic knowledge. In a feature of the contribution delivered by the researchers to the improvement of knowledge, they are, indeed, responsible for all of the socio-ethical consequences of the research that they have conducted. In addition to this, the researchers also have a responsibility for all of their activities as a part of the influence derived from their research on society, and for this reason, they are responsible to analytically reveal the socio-ethical context of their research (Wing, 2002).

Conclusion of Social Responsibility in Research

The social responsibility in the research described how the researchers have to take both morally and socially relevant implementations as their responsibility more than only a simple task. In fact, a thing to be noted by all the researchers is that social responsibility also could be applied as a criticism, in which the researchers have been considered to become socially responsible for all of the negative results of the research that they have conducted and published.