In the case study
Welcome Aboard, there is a discussion on the company Lakeland Wonders how
management changes in the company. Lakeland wonders are them company that is
producing the high-quality wooden toys, however, the company is the 94-year old
manufacturer of the toys. Moreover, the company has almost 5,000 employees and
the company has three plants. Following are two facts of the company:
Fact
1: Lakeland Wonders wants to reach the aggressive sales objectives so hired
Cheryl Hailstorm as a current CEO:
Cheryl Hailstorm hired
in the company six months ago. The vision or goals of the Lakeland Wonders is
to reach or going beyond the core upscale market of the Lakeland's. However,
the company wants to reach the new customers in mid-market by bringing the exclusive
toy contract. Other aims of Lakeland Wonders are bringing collaborative
corporate culture and make a contract with the Bulls-Eye stores; therefore,
Cheryl Hailstorm hired in the company.
Fact
2: Cheryl Hailstorm adopted a wrong approach to bring change:
Cheryl Hailstorm is
concerned with adapting to the change that is based or insists on quick
compliance as well as the actions of the company employees. Cheryl Hailstorm is
moving too quickly in order to change the employees. Cheryl Hailstorm is doing
the right thing in order to fulfill the goals of Lakeland Wonders and
therefore, as a leader she is planning things. Cheryl Hailstorm is failing to
win the minds and hearts of employees.
b.
Stakeholders: Which individuals and groups have an important stake in the
outcome?
I believe that
employees are an important stake in the outcome of every business. For Lakeland
Wonders employees are important as if they are satisfied and given the best
leadership then there could be the production of the fantastic product or a
unique service in the market. If Lakeland Wonders cannot satisfy or cannot
provide the training effects to the clients then the business cannot improve
and there could be poor performing employees, which could result in customers
frustrated.
c.
Relevance: Is this case still applicable? In other words, do you believe the
main issue is common in today’s organization? Explain.
The case is related to
today’s companies or organizations as in Lakeland Wonders, Cheryl Hailstormis
concerned about quick compliance; therefore, it is difficult for staff members
in order to embrace change. Cheryl Hailstorm is worried about adjusting to the
change and the activities of the organization representatives. Cheryl Hailstorm
is moving excessively rapidly so as to change the workers. Cheryl Hailstorm,
therefore, failed to win. Moreover, the change process is there in companies
and cannot be readily adaptable because people or employees face difficulties.
If change is implemented in the companies then there could be issues related to
the failure to communicate or the lack of trust; therefore, brainstorming
sessions are needed, which is not there in the case of Lakeland Wonders or
Cheryl Hailstorm. There is a need for successful planning before introducing a
new system.
2.
Topic Analysis and Integration; do not discuss the case in this section.
Address the following (4 pages):
a.
Provide substantial overviews of the following topics
I.
Transformational Leadership
Transformational
leadership is the leadership style in which the leaders encourage or motivate
employees to do that they can be inspired in order to innovate and create
change. However, Transformational leadership can help the company to grow as
well as shape the future at the executive level. Transformational leadership is
the authority style in which the pioneers are empowered so their skills can be
enhanced and they can embrace or make the change.
Moreover, with
transformational leadership, there can be a strong sense of corporate culture
and there could be effective in employee ownership and independence. Be that as
it may, also assist the organization with growing just as shape the future at
the official level. Employees with transformational leadership can get a solid
feeling of corporate culture and there could be adequacy and freedom. Thus, it
could be said that transformational leadership can effectively inspire and
motivate employees; so that they could be creative and, in this way, they could
efficiently find solutions to old problems. Transformational leaders can
effectively manage the team by providing mentorship and training. The
transformational pioneers can adequately deal with issues related to culture in
the company (Marques & Dhiman, 2016).
ii.
Political Skill
There is the
importance of political skills in the company as it can help the employees so
that they could be effective in the workplace. Political skills focus on
constructive results through implementing truthfulness in employees; it also t
progressively helpful connections so as to satisfy the strategic association.
Strong political skills can help the company to grow and there can be better
performance in this way, moreover, political skills can also enable the
organization so that there could be costiveness and effectiveness in the
operations (Marques & Dhiman, 2016).
Political skills can
result in getting the positive outcomes and made the employees make or
implement interventions; as political skills enable employees to focus on the
interpersonal influence, thinking before speaking, ability, and sincerity while
networking or managing up. There is the significance of political skills in the
organization as it can support the work environment to be successful. Thus,
political skills focus on a fair manner also result in more cooperative
relationships in order to fulfill the mission of the organization. Solid
political skills can assist the organization with growth and there can be
better execution and also empowers the people to work effectively or viability
in the activities.
iii.
Emotional Intelligence
Emotional intelligence
could be explained as the ability or the capability of individuals so that they
could recognize their own emotions. However, Emotional intelligence can also be
related with the emotional leadership because in this stance, through emotional
intelligence there could be guidance to the leaders because they know
themselves as well as others, if a person knows himself/herself better then
there could be adjusted emotions or behavior according to the environments.
Emotional intelligence is the ability of people with the goal that they could
perceive their very own feelings (Marques & Dhiman, 2016).
With emotional
intelligence, there could be a guide thinking one so that there could be
results or actions in order to achieve one's goal. In any case, Emotional
insight can likewise be related with the enthusiastic administration that
posses through passionate knowledge. Emotional intelligence also helps to
modify feelings or conduct as per the situations. Emotional intelligence also
results in empathy which could tell one's mental health, job performance
ability, and leadership skills or the specific personality traits in order to
manger the employees. Emotional intelligence is known as the general
intelligence, ability and furthermore personality that maybe produce effective leaders
(Chrusciel, 2006).
b.
Integration of topics: How do you believe the topics above integrate (are
related to each other)? Be specific; go deeper than, “emotional intelligence is
important to transformational leaders.” Get into the specific dimensions of
each, and how they impact each other.
Transformational
leadership, political skills, and emotional intelligence can be related to each
other as if the leader has effective skills then there could be better
management of the people. However, transformational leadership could be
explained as the effectiveness of leaders in which the person focuses to get the
missions to need and there is also focus on the performance goals.
Transformational leadership helps the person so that there could be the
fulfillment of the project on time specified and also within budget (Sanchez, 2018).
Enthusiastic knowledge
is viewed as a significant trait of the initiative, it is believed that high
levels of Emotional Intelligence can result in good transformational leadership
or there could be more effective leaders. Emotional Intelligence helps the leaders
at the workplace to perform better and so that they can also achieve greater
success (Rubin et al., 2005). However, in the study, it is noticed that
transformational leadership can be better through emotional intelligence
because the leader can be better self-sustaining and he also has the ability in
order to perceive accurate emotions. Be that as it may, transformational
leadership could be clarified as the viability of pioneers wherein the
individual concentrations to get the missions to require and there is
additionally focus on the exhibition objectives and there could be the
satisfaction of the employees and leaders (Ferris et al., 2007).
Emotional intelligence
also helps to access or generate feelings and then solve the problem-based on
emotional knowledge. People with better emotional intelligence can result in
outstanding performance and they are successful leaders. In the article Frangos (2015), it is known that emotional
intelligence results in in-person relationship management, social-awareness,
self-awareness and also self-management. However, transformational leadership
based on emotional intelligence can result in inspirational motivation,
individualized consideration, idealized influence, intellectual stimulation,
etc. Emotional intelligence also helps an individual to focus on inspiration,
social-mindfulness, mindfulness and furthermore self-administration, there
could be enthusiastic insight impact and so forth (Frangos, 2015).
Political,
transformational leadership and human skills are equally important as emotional
intelligence support both of them (Marques & Dhiman, 2016). With the assistance
of passionate insight, there could be a successful working environment to help
the transformational administration capacity (Northouse, 2013). Emotional
intelligence can contribute to initiatives that need to be followed or
obtained. Transformational leadership help pioneer in getting successful
abilities then there could be better administration of the individuals. It is accepted that significant levels of
emotional intelligence can bring about great transformational leadership or there
could be progressive results. Emotional intelligence helps the leaders to focus
on prominent progress (Mayer et al., 2016).
However, emotional
intelligence is considered an important characteristic of leadership because it
helps the employees and mentor or leader to build commitment. Through emotional
intelligence, leaders can be willing to listen and also take risks through
considering the new innovative approach. With the help of emotional
intelligence, there could be an effective workplace as support the
transformational leadership ability (Schaffer, 2017). Transformational
leadership can focus or greatly contributing towards the performance of a job
and also leadership and if not managed by the leaders then there could be poor
interpersonal relations. Through emotional intelligence or knowledge, there
could be the capacity to see precise or accurate feelings and there could be
better passionate information. Individuals with better enthusiastic knowledge
can bring about extraordinary execution (Chrusciel, 2006).
3)
Case Analysis and Recommendations; address the following (4 pages):
a)
Case Examples: Describe the case in terms of transformational leadership,
political skill, and emotional intelligence. Do not simply summarize the case;
instead, identify 3-5 examples that you believe represent the topics. The
examples can be positive or negative.
Transformational
leadership, political skill, and emotional intelligence have a negative link
with the case study of Lakeland Wonders; new CEO Cheryl Hailstorm. However,
failed in her leadership approach as she was following the Cheryl Hailstorm was
using the transactional approach.
Example
1: Cheryl Hailstorm used transactional approach and she failed in her
leadership style:
Cheryl Hailstorm's leadership
style was not effective as Cheryl noticed that there was a problem with her
subordinates as most of her managers are were agreeable to her face but they
did not agree or they were “deliberately moving slowly behind her back”. Cheryl
Hailstorm flopped in her administration approach as the group was failing to
meet expectations because of the reasons for the change progress and there was
a focus on the strong traditional culture.
Example
2: Mark Dawson did not show interest in implementing Cheryl's vision:
Therefore, Cheryl's
vision not proved to be effective as Mark Dawson also had problems in
understanding Cheryl's vision; there was attention on the solid customary
culture. Mark Dawson also not showed interest in implementing Cheryl's vision
or her strategy. Between Cheryl and her team, there was the Lack of trust as
well as communication. Cheryl's vision cannot gain support because the team was
underperforming due to the reasons of the change progress.
Example
3: Problems in Bulls-Eye project:
There were problems in
the bulls-eye project because of the lack of participation of the employees as
the employees cannot follow Cheryl Hailstorm's strategic decisions because of
the change direction. The project failed because there was no common vision between
Cheryl and the management team. She believed in the Hard HRM model and also
Theory X. Cheryl Hailstorm focuses on reactive planning and there was a lack of
cooperation, slow down production, engagement and commitment issues, loss of
productivity, cost of time, and decision latitude in the bulls-eye project.
b)
In retrospect: What could Cheryl have done differently? What could the company
and/or its current employees do differently?
I believe that Cheryl
Hailstorm's leadership style was a transactional approach; she should follow
transformational leadership and focus on theory Y:
Cheryl Hailstorm's
leadership style should be based on transformational leadership, political
skill, and emotional intelligence so that she may not fail in her leadership
approach. However, between Cheryl and her team, there was a lack of trust as
well as communication so it could be said that when Cheryl Hailstorm's given
the opportunity in the company to manage the team she needs to make a good
rapport with the company employees.
Transformational
leadership should be the part of Cheryl Hailstorm's leadership style as it can
effectively inspire and motivate employees; so that they could be creative,
however, as transformational leaders can effectively manage the team through
providing the mentorship and training. There should understand Cheryl's vision
and there should be training first gain so that support can be given to the
team because there was the underperforming team due to the reasons for the
change progress. Political skills also need to be followed by Cheryl
Hailstorm's because it helps the manager to work in a fair manner also result
in more cooperative relationships in order to fulfill the mission of the
organization
Moreover, there were
issues related to the bulls-eye project because of the lack of participation of
the employees as the employees cannot follow Cheryl Hailstorm's strategic
decisions. However, in this way, Cheryl Hailstorm's need to understand the
employees and should imply theory Y, so that there could be an encouragement in
the work environment and so that there could be opportunities to
employees. Theory Y, believes in
initiative and self-direction and organizational well-being therefore, Cheryl
Hailstorm's strategic decisions should be based upon it.
c)
Recommendations: Here, we can’t change the past (what’s done is done). Based on
your research, what should Cheryl do now? Provide practical, specific
recommendations related to the topics and the research you’ve conducted.
The change plans need
to be effectively implemented in order to achieve the overall goals of Lakeland
Wonders. However, Cheryl Hailstorm's strategic decisions need to be advanced so
by clearly and efficiently communicating everyone's roles and responsibilities.
For the effective engagement and commitment of the employees, there was a need
to focus on building a strong relationship. Other HR aspects also need to be
noticed by Cheryl Hailstorm's strategic decisions example training and
development, performance management, compensation can bring the positive things
in the company and there can be a better performance by the employees.
In order to achieve
the goals of Lakeland Wonders and for the smooth, continuous and efficient
performance Cheryl Hailstorm's should focus on the Kotter's 8 step Change Model
as it was efficient to be implemented by the company or leader:
It helps to follow the following
eight steps while management performance.
1. Create
urgency: Managers can create an environment and employees can be aware of
problems and there could be a focus on the possible solutions.
2.
Powerful coalition
formation: The manager can create a building range of skills.
3. Create
a vision for change: Generating support vision or generating bolster vision to
be simple and understandable.
4.
Communicate the
vision: Excellent opportunities are there to make use of the coalition.
5.
Remove obstacles:
Strength the change initiative.
6.
Short-term wins:
Useful tools for motivation to reach shorter-term targets.
7.
Build on the change:
Setting goals and continued improvement.
8. Secure
the changes in corporate culture: encouraging new employees and also promote
the change.
d)
Implications: If Cheryl were to follow your advice, what would be the outcome?
Cheryl
Hailstorm's if follow the Kotter's 8 steps Change Model then there could be
positive outcomes as it is the model that can be explained as the top of
traditional organization structures and also ensure success. Kotter's 8 steps
Change Model helps to focus on straightforward and justifiable vision; it helps
to open doors and also strengthens the change activity. This Change Model
results in getting the shorter-term targets and also help to secure the
progressions in a corporate culture that helps in empowering new workers and
furthermore advance the change (Marques & Dhiman, 2016). Lakeland Wonders
can remain competitive with the help of Kotter's 8 steps Change Model as there
was the change in the company and employees suffered because of the change and
Cheryl Hailstorm's strategies that were not helpful. This change model can help
staff members to embrace change because of the cooperation of the leader, successful
planning, brainstorming sessions, etc.
References of welcome
aboard
Chrusciel, D.
(2006). Considerations of emotional intelligence (EI) in dealing with change
decision management. Management Decision, 44(5), 644-657.
Ferris, G. R.,
Treadway, D. C., Perrewe´, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C., & Lux, S.
(2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33(3),
290-320.
Frangos, N. (2015). Leaders, Emotional Intelligence &
Transformational Leadership - Part 1. Retrieved from
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/leaders-emotional-intelligence-transformational-part-frangos
Marques, J., & Dhiman, S. (2016). Leadership Today: Practices for
Personal and Professional Performance. Springer.
Mayer, J. D.,
Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2016). The ability model of emotional
intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8(4), 290-300.
Rubin, R. S.,
Munz, D. C., & Bommer, W. H. (2005). Leading from within: The effects of
emotion recognition and personality on transformational leadership behavior.
Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 845-858.
Sanchez, P.
(2018). The Secret to Leading Organizational Change Is Empathy. Harvard
Business Review Digital Articles, 6–9.
Schaffer, R.
(2017). All Management Is Change Management. Harvard Business Review Digital
Articles
Transformational
Leadership. Excerpt from Northouse (2013). Leadership: Theory and Practice, 6th
Edition, Sage Publications