This change came when electronic data phenomena got common and computers started using for data of citizens. The police department ensured that using the data of citizens who applied for the police job, as he must be having a clean criminal record at the time of applying for police job and else no room for such applicant in the police department. I support this change in the requirement as a person having a criminal record must be something wrong with him and he can apply bad practices of his life in the profession means he would not be a good professional and hurt the common people. This is one of the best usages of electronic data because the police officer is having big authority and can do many things with ordinary citizens. A criminal police officer would make the big harm to the innocent citizen and ultimately the commando will be responsible (Brakke, 2019).

Effect of Law Enforcement Organizations for Criminal Record

The availability of citizens' history date whether he has been involved in crime or not, facilitating the police department but also creating the challenges for them. In case, the police department is negligent while hiring process and hire the police officer having a criminal record, which could easily hold the leader responsible for this act. This data would also be easily available to the courts, which can hold the leader responsible in the police department. Therefore, the accountability process gets stricter through data availability and this matter has become more sensitive (French, 2018).

2. Two areas in which federal courts have placed limits on officers constitutional rights

There are the following two areas in which federal courts placed limits on officers

Do not initiate the fire of Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law

The federal courts limit the police officer on the ground that he must not initiate the gunfire and killing the suspect. It is the court’s duty to hold the suspect guilty and announce the punishment for such a person. The police officer can only fire to protect own life and as firing the suspect back in the return of gunfire. However, he has to prove that he killed the suspect in the exchange of fire and did not imitate the fire. The police officer can be fired or even punished behind the bars. It is evident that police can initiate fire and shoot him on legs but not allowed which makes the criminal shoot the police officer instead and injury becomes fate. Police officers are told always to be defensive which is not good from the laws (Rushin, 2017).

Most of the time, criminals are very good at shooting and can hide them from the eyes of the forces. In the persuasion of the criminal, police officers often is shot in following the law and it means the output of this law is not effective and having positive results. It is creating challenges and difficulties for law enforcement persons and not helping in eliminating crimes. In the modern age, too much restriction is not good (Urbina, 2015).

Warrants Mandatory of Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law

The police officer cannot arrest the suspect without having the warrants from the court. It would be illegal to arrest the suspect and this can be challenged in the courts, this can lead to the police officer suspension orders. According to the police department, the warrant condition may give the criminal an opportunity to run away out of the hands. It is evident that to have the warrants from an authority, law enforcement agencies have to be engaged in lots of activity and having evidence then the warrants are given (Brakke, 2019). This kills the spirit of a police officer as every second matter in the criminal case and removing the evidence is the most common thing from the criminal side. It becomes the liability for investigating officer instead of power, it can take days to issue a warrant and then go for the arrest. Meanwhile, the suspect can make other arrangements to dump the evidence and prove himself as innocent.

3. Identify Three Constraints Placed on Law Enforcement

There are three constraints placed on law enforcement, which affects its performance, discussed in the following.

Protect the Privacy of Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law

The first major constraint is protecting the privacy of the suspect. When the police start, the suspecting who is more likely the criminal, the police also needs to protect its privacy at most. This is the major constraint as police have to collect more information about the suspect to arrest him and make sure that he is the one full of evidence before going court. It puts the major limitation because it is not possible to protect privacy and to gather the appropriate amount of information about the suspect (French, 2018).

America is a free country where freedom of speech and privacy are the two most important things in individual life. Law Enforcement agencies cannot disturb the privacy for the sake of inquiring the suspect unless they are confirmed and warrants in the hands. This thing becomes the major hurdle as they have circumstantial evidence, which makes them ensure that they have reached the culprit and criminal, but still if no warrants then privacy cannot be disturbed. It is evident that law enforcement agencies are being expected a lot more than what the expectations should be from them. Criminals are so fast and organized in the modern age, such relaxations would allow them to play smarter and protect themselves before the time (Rushin, 2017).

Long Process of Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law

There is a long process involved to arrest the suspect or criminal. The law enforcement agencies have to be following the long process, which allows the criminal to remove the evidence and achieve a clean history. The long and complex process is going to create many challenges and making the job tougher for law enforcement agencies. This is very frustrating for the police officers to perform their duty smoothly as most of the time are unable to catch the criminal. The long process goes into the favor of the criminals and not the police officer (Brakke, 2019). Federal courts have established such a process in order to ensure that no innocent man is killed, which allows the criminals taking advantage of it.

It is important that the process must be minimized and efficient for the law enforcement agencies as they are entrusted with the sensitive responsibility, eliminating the crime and fighting against the criminals, which are sometimes larger than law enforcement agencies. The criminals play faster and remove the evidence while police officers are following the process (French, 2018). This has become the common phenomena and public representatives do not care about the police on the ground whose life at stake. There is a serious lag in rules designed by the government and it raises serious attention to re-design them in the modern technological world where criminals are using the technology.

Rules & Regulations of Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law

Law enforcement agencies have to be following the rules & regulations established by the democratic people and this is really hurting the agencies. These rules do not represent the ground realities in which criminals have become so powerful and intelligent that they cannot even imagine to catch them following these regulations. These rules & regulations need to be updated as quickly as possible so that criminals do not run away before even police think of catching them. The latest technology has contributed a big positive role in the job of law enforcement agencies but still help is not coming from its own rules & regulations. This is the system flaw and crime is mixing up with the democrats and public representatives (Urbina, 2015).

These rules & regulations most of the times are quite irrelevant and do not strengthen the law enforcement agencies. There is a wide gap between the laws and its practical application, in the real world the speed matters but it is not supported by rules & regulations established by the democrats and public representatives. The law enforcement agencies should be actively engaged in designing and establishing the rules & regulations because they are the ultimate users and have to be functioning according to them (Brakke, 2019).

4. Two Current Events in Which Police Supervisors Held Criminally Liable

There have been two events where police supervisors were held responsible for the acts of their officers discussed in the following.

Sexual Abuse of Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law

It is evident that American police have been committed the sexual abuse on the arrested female which then came into the media and as a result, his supervisor was held responsible for the policeman’s illegal actions. This is a very sensitive matter and issue in America as it is merely against human rights. A Supervisor had to go to jail as per the laws because it was his duty to keep the strict check on his police officer and made him conversant with the laws (Urbina, 2015). In this case, it did not happen or might be a police officer who got crazy and went to sexual abuse, which cannot even imagine in a country like America. The police officer has to keep the conduct where they are not allowed to perform any other task than the all tasks listed in his duties.

In this case, the supervisor was held responsible, as supervisors are responsible according to the laws. The police officer was fired from the department and the Supervisor had to face the strict legal consequences, which came into existence (Brakke, 2019).

Support Drugs Mafia of Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law

There was a case when its police officer was supporting the drugs mafia and part of it. He never tried to catch them up and bring them into the media or behind the bars. The drugs are a serious issue in America as it is directly associated with the youth. It would never be acceptable that a police officer would be in the partnership with drugs mafia where they were supposed to be catching such mafias and putting them in jail (French, 2018). The supervisor was held responsible, as he was not conversant with the fact that a police officer working under him is engaged in serious illegal activity. It would never be acceptable by the courts that a supervisor is such a negligent person that an officer working under him engaged in legal activity and he is not aware of.

Supervisors are held for the sole purpose of keeping the check on its police officers and their conduct. Police officers are supposed to interact with the public, which must be having manners, it can only be ensured by his supervisor with the strict authority to punish him, and else the law would punish the supervisor. This is going to be the whole responsibility of the supervisor then; this is how the system has been controlled under the law (Rushin, 2017). To eliminate the drug mafia and cut them down to zero is one of the main objectives of the USA police; engagement in activities, which promotes the drug mafia, is never acceptable by the federal courts.

5. References of Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law

Brakke, P. (2019). Crime in America: Conservatives' Approaches Toward Criminals, Police, Criminal Justice, and the Opioid Crisis. New York City: Changemakers Publishing.

French, L. (2018). The History of Policing America: From Militias and Military to the Law Enforcement of Today. London: Wiley.

Rushin, S. (2017). Federal Intervention in American Police Departments. London: Wiley.

Urbina, M. (2015). LATINO POLICE OFFICERS IN THE UNITED STATES: An Examination of Emerging. London: Wiley.