Essay on Criminal Justice in United States

Formulation of the principles and regulations in the country involves a different kind of behavior to implement in the society to discourage some issues which are not affordable in society. A reasonable appraisal must be approved by the different behavior of the people living in society to save the self-interest in society. These rules and principles should be based on morality, which is commonly accepted by the people of society, but in some cases there is negligence in the values while conducting a specific task which ignores the factor of appraisal in the society. All these concerns in the society are allowed to protect the individuals in the society to conduct unethical or immoral actions which could give harm to anybody in society. The aspects of criminal justice are known as justification, which is used to defend the rights of individuals.  Problem-related to criminal justice is burden of proof, which is hard to decide on whom it will be laying. This could only be resolved with the help of specific analysis of the work or action done by the guilty. The case of self-defense is provided in these criteria which means to implement forces to save ourselves from the misconducting of anybody, which could cause damage. Self-defense is a common rule to safety of his own body or other, which should be dealing with a competent authority.

The castle doctrine is basic theory of the common law enforced in the country. It means that it is widely accepted by the judicial authority of any country. Under the implementation of law the castle doctrine, people have right to save their homes and their loves one from damage by taking action against the forces which are not suitable. People who successfully proved that they conduct any action under self-defense rule, are eligible to be cleared by the court as they are not guilty of committing any fraud or harm to anyone. In legal practice of the castle doctrine is limited in some cases where it involves the actions which are conducted on self-defense basis. In court and judicial practice of the castle doctrine, there must be four elements that discuss the implementation of the castle doctrine in the court. These elements are must be included in the case, such as defendant’s overview and the reasonability of the case as it is adopted by the individual to save himself. The person who is claiming that he had done some action for self-defense is not liable to charge with the punishment. Some challenges may along with the castle doctrine, especially in retreat duty, which is interpreted by the attacker, which could be used in the proof of understanding complexity of the case, which is referred by the defendant in the court (C. L. Carpenter, 2002).

Diplomatic immunity is a key element that is related to the many citizens of America used in different cases of harassment. If the diplomates are not related to risk, which are connected with that immunity, which is under pressure. Diplomates are different representatives who are popular in foreign diplomates who are not popular. The government should not ignore the abuse at the domestic level to commit the diplomates in society; this will also help the citizens who are used in the self-defense in society. These diplomates are serving people in the world with great endanger in the U.S.

Entrapment is considered as the perfect charge of self-defense in the criminal charge. There are many theories that are used to explain criminal designs to originate the implant of practice of innocent one and secure him from punishment. A valid Entrapment has two basic elements. The first one is government inducement, and the other one is lack of predisposition by defendants. There may be issues in the inducement of the entrapment defense. The government prefers to use the artifice and establishment which shows that promise is used to perform the duties in the United States. If the elements are not used properly it shows findings in entrapment defense. The inquiry will focus predisposition of the laws which are considered necessary to get the opportunity available in the court of law, which is used in the self-defense system (R. Roiphe, 2002).

In the case of self-defense, there is also terminology used in law to treat the problem is known as three-strike law, which is approved by the major changes in the organization of the society. The law was enforced by the different legislatures and with the minimum punishment of 25 years if any misbehave for three times in the to repeat the offenders in the conviction. It is considered that three strikes in you are out. The evolution is discussed in the court, and last decision of court is considered as final decision. Three strikes are used to manage the system of which are used to handle most difficult task to do in society. The rationale for three strikes imposed on the prison which are enforced on repeating the mistake. It required that the person who conducts fault is subject to create more violence in society therefore three-strike law is enforced o them to overcome the problem. Three strike law is explained with following actions:

·         If a person commits a fault that is serious and committed by one by twice, offenders subject to provision as second strike.

·         If a person has two or three actions and got imprisonment of 25 years has referred to provision as three strikes.

·         The status convicted as 50 years, which are subject to violate in the life, which is consecutive as three strikes.

Three strikes are used in self-defense to increase the length of the imprisonment which will be considered as prior conviction of the assaulted crime in the society, which are implemented in different criteria to work on. There is number of challenges which are faced by the implementation of the three strike law in the society, which made possible 25 years in the once life which are against punishment in the society. The main system is based on the state and federal system which means that both should be working properly in the country. State refers to the criminal justice which relates to the crimes within the boundaries and federal criminal justice related to the crime which are committed on property of the individuals. The criminal system is most likely to be overwhelmed and intimating for anybody who is the victim of the case. There is automatic notification of the issue which have to resolve by the system (A. Bottoms & Tankebe, 2012).

REFERENCES of Criminal Justice

A. Bottoms & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 102, 119.

C. E. Silberman. (1978). Criminal violence, criminal justice (. New York: New York: Random House.

C. L. Carpenter. (2002). Of the Enemy Within, the Castle Doctrine, and Self-Defense. Marq. L. Rev., 86, 653.

R. Roiphe. (2002). The Serpent Beguiled Me: A History of the Entrapment Defense. Seton Hall. L. Rev., 33, 257.