Arguments for and against
Capital punishment
The Reasons for Capital Punishment
Capital
punishment or also famous as the death penalty defines as a punishment practice
given to a criminal which approved and sanctioned by the government, whereas a
criminal will be killed by the country due to committing a crime. In ancient
history, this capital punishment was applied for various reasons that today’s
people will see those reasons as cruel ones. Many cultures in past days used
this type of punishment for criminals who have done magic, blasphemy, sexual
crimes, or violation of Sabbath. Nowadays, some countries punish criminals with
a death penalty, or so-called ‘execution' for committing murders, treason, and
espionage. The countries in the Middle East punishes the criminals with
execution for committing human trafficking and some several corruption n cases,
rape, and apostasy. In some countries, the death penalty practiced by using an
electric chair or lethal injection. On the other hand, some other countries
still use old styles such as hanging the criminals until death (Durlauf, Fu,
& Navarro, 2013).
Countries that Pro and Against Capital Punishment
Capital Punishment or the death
penalty, or else execution is still being a serious argument across the world. The
reason is due to this death penalty basically is a subject matter that can be
described vary depends on the ideology and political state in a country. For
example, Nigeria and the United States are two countries which listed amongst those
that use this death penalty to punish the criminals. On the other hand, the
United Kingdom and Brazil are the two countries that abolished the use of the
death penalty for the criminals (Durlauf, Fu, & Navarro, 2013).
Why the United Kingdom does not allow the Use of Capital
Punishment
The United Kingdom is one of the countries
across the world that does not allow the use of capital punishment or execution
for the criminals. If we take a look at history, this death penalty was
actually used in the United Kingdom from ancient times up till the middle of
the 20th century. In fact, the last death penalty was practiced in
the country by hanging a criminal held in 1964. The death penalty was abolished
in the country since 1969 but still remained to be legal for some crimes like
treason. Finally, this death penalty was totally abolished in the United
Kingdom in 1998 (Kent, 2010).
The
main reason stated by the United Kingdom was regarding the value of human life.
The society in this country believes that even the wickedest murderers must not
be underprivileged of their lives’ value. In addition to this, the United
Kingdom also believes that by giving a death penalty to the criminals, then
they will only lead to brutalizing the society and even will lead to more
murder cases in the country. The reason is due to the family or relatives of
the executed criminals might unable to accept this death penalty, and thus,
they might take an act of revenge on behalf of the executed.
Moreover,
some lawyers and justice officers in the United Kingdom also have proposed that
this death penalty should be abolished due to it has the capability to generate
an unacceptable connection between the violence and the law. This applies
significantly to the violence since the death penalty punishes violent crimes,
and it also applies the types of punishments that extremely and violently
restrict the freedoms of humans. Also, philosophically the laws will always get
involved with the violence since one of its functions is to preserve society
from any type of violent occasion. Thus, the United Kingdom has strictly
described that a strong case should be performed in the context that legal
violence is totally different from criminal violence. Another reason for the
country to abolish the death penalty is due to the assumption that civilized
societies would never tolerate any kind of torture. In the same case, numbers
of the citizens in the United Kingdom believe that this death penalty is an
appropriate method to be performed in the modern and civilized society to
punish the criminals, even those who have committed the most dreadful crimes (William W.
Berry III, 2010).
Why Nigeria uses capital punishment in the country?
On
the other side, Nigeria has known as one of the countries in the world that use
the death penalty to punish criminals. A report from the international watchdog
has even mentioned that in 2017, about 621 people were condemned to death in
Nigeria, notwithstanding for more than 2,000 people were being listed on death
row (Timeslive.co.za,
2018).
Furthermore, the death penalty has been
known as a legal punishment in this country. The methods of performing this
death penalty are by shooting, hanging, stoning, and also lethal injection. The
types of crimes that punished with this death penalty are mentioned such as
murder, rape, kidnapping, terrorism-related crimes, blasphemy, robbery, sodomy,
adultery, homosexuality, and all types of indigenous beliefs that applying the
Shariah law, which is the traditional Islamic law. Furthermore, the Federal Constitution of Nigeria
includes a number of provisions that associate to the subject of the death
penalty in Nigeria (Peiffer, 2004).
The
first perform of the death penalty in Nigeria was conducted in the 18th
century B. C. where King Hammurabi of Babylon decided to apply the death
penalty for 25 types of crimes. It appears that Nigeria uses the death penalty
to punish the criminals to make them realize almost each painful or
unpleasantness that has suffered from their crimes’ victims. In addition to
this, Nigerian also declared that this death penalty is a quite realistic one
for a criminal who has taken another person's life, or those criminals who have
intimidated the life or survival of a country. In fact, they even added that
this death penalty is basically an attempt to melt down or prevent those offenders of violent crimes to
become incapable of committing other serious crimes or some acts which
could bother the society in the country (Onuoha, 2013).
Compare Reasons of Arguments for and against Capital
punishment
If we observe the use of capital
punishment for criminals across the world, we should be able to see from both
sides of arguments. In the United Kingdom, this type of punishment is not being
used due to the people there are concern around the human rights, norms, and
they more believe that a civilized society would never use the type of
punishment that would cause death even for the most dreadful criminals. This is
due to the United Kingdom is one of the countries across the world who believe
that every single human being has their rights, even for those criminals as
well. They also have the same right to value their lives.
On
the other hand, there are still some countries that use this death penalty to
punish criminals such as Nigeria. In this context, Nigeria has presented some
of the reasons why they still use this type of punishment in the country. The
government along with the legislative there believes that by giving the death
penalty to punish the criminals in Nigeria will make the people there be fear
and think twice to do any types of crime that would take the lives of others.
For this reason, the country performs capital punishment or death penalty to
make the criminals feel exactly the same way as their victims' felt.
In
my opinion, this capital punishment should be abolished, The United Kingdom has
presented a stronger
reason than Nigeria as this death penalty will only brutalize the society
rather than preventing them to do the crimes. In fact, the United Kingdom also
has stated that those relatives of the executed ones might unable to accept the
punishment, and thus, will lead them to take revenge and perform other murders.
Hence, it has brutalized society and lead this death penalty to become a
never-ending case (Brook, 2014).
Even
though some countries like Nigeria states that this death penalty is part of
their laws since ancient times, but they have to accept that society nowadays
is more civilized and some of them might unable to accept this type of
punishment to have existed any longer. In addition to this, our generation
these days are more critical when it comes to human rights violation. Since the
death penalty was considered to violate the human rights to live, then this
type of punishment is really needed to be abolished.
Conclusion of Arguments for and against Capital punishment
Capital punishment or death penalty, or else
execution has been a big and serious argument that appears among the countries
whole over the world. Some countries such as the United Kingdom have been
abolished this punishment with perfect reasons such as it violates human rights
and brutalizes society. On the other hand, there are still some other countries
such as Nigeria that up till now still practicing this death penalty to punish
the criminals in the country. The main reason stated from Nigeria is to make
the criminals feel what their victims' feel, and thus, it would prevent the
criminal cases in the country by making the people fear of the death penalty.
Despite
these two opposite arguments, the world needs to realize that crimes will not
stop with answering with crimes. But still, since there are many countries. For example,
Nigeria and the United States are two countries which listed amongst those that
use this death penalty to punish the criminals.
On the other hand, the United Kingdom and Brazil are the
two countries that abolished the use of the death penalty for the criminals.
Thus, this might be an ongoing and never-ending topic to be discussed.
References of Arguments for and against Capital punishment
Brook, D. (2014, July 15). Kill the Death
Penalty: 10 Arguments Against Capital Punishment. Retrieved from https://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/07/15/kill-death-penalty-10-arguments-against-capital-punishment
Durlauf, S. N.,
Fu, C., & Navarro, S. (2013). Capital punishment and deterrence:
understanding disparate results. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 103-121.
Kent, S. L.
(2010). Predicting abolition: A cross-national survival analysis of the
social and political determinants of death penalty statutes. International
Criminal Justice Review, 56-72.
Onuoha, C. C.
(2013). The Quality of Justice is Strained: The Death Penalty in Nigeria. p. 7.
Peiffer, E.
(2004). The death penalty in traditional Islamic law and as interpreted in
Saudi Arabia and Nigeria. p. 507.
Timeslive.co.za.
(2018, April 12). Amnesty International flags rising death penalty sentences
in Nigeria. Retrieved from
https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/africa/2018-04-12-amnesty-international-flags-rising-death-penalty-sentences-in-nigeria/
William W. Berry
III. (2010). Ending Death by Dangerousness-A Path of the De Facto Abolition
of the Death Penalty. p. 889.