Does social theory provide a platform where social scientists can address salient issues of contemporary society? Which way of addressing the public do you consider most productive in public dialogues on controversial topics such as multiculturalism, migration, globalization, etc.?

The social scientist were engaged in solving the world’s most significant social issues, such as cybersecurity, alternative energy, and crime, and social scientist were found the most active part of society. And the social scientist is also demanding in the world of business as well. As they are struggling in the field of research they are facing the two types of challenges utilitarianism and over-specialization. The social science provides a way to discuss social problems and solve these problems. The issues which were confronted by the social scientists were how to improve the capacity of the social science discipline and how to cope with the social problems, as social factors and variables are the social scientific problem of the scientific analyses. In the few decades the internal tendency had been developed in social science, which just defines the problem not to accept this problem, and the social scientist is the one who understands and undertakes and works on the practical problem. Ans social theory provides the platform where the scientists examine the real world because this will offer him the scientific part to solve the issue which is related to the society. The theory offers a scientist a drawback about the fundamental questions where they bear the less resemblance for the problem unless and until the problem appears to be irrelevant. The theory gives way to the scientist who have genuine interest to solve the issue of contemporary society and raised the way to take on their lives and become disassociated initially from the general problem. (Mokong Simon Mapadimeng, 2010)

The best to address the people in your debate, engage the young people in your discussion by the debate should be held on current events instead of having argumentation; the aim of the discussion should be famous that this will include the valuable contributions that they inspire the participants. They reward the arguments instead of productive discourse because the audience is so busy as they supposed to defend their positions. And choose the simple issues on which discussion is helding, choose the main topic which includes significant problems in the world, and this will help the participants to recognize the essential values and contributions of the other in the world. The discussion on the civil topic involves truly listening to perspectives of the other and their concerns, which peoples sharing it’s own. And through globalization the issues will be considered widely by everyone, and each of the participants considered the significant points of the debate and raised different matters related to the topic, and through this, people will engage effectively and take interest and understands the tricky issues which were included in the study. And after hearing the debate, they will try to think and find the new solutions, options, new approaches, and the participants will innovatively try to solve the problem. The debates on the controversial topics were reinforcing and thought-provoking this type of conversation will change the environment of the place, and discussion should be held on simple conversational issues. Watching the reviews about the controversial topic reinforce the assumptions that are already existed and positions, despite helping the participants to answer the questions of their perspective with important consideration. (Bruno Turnheim, 2018)

References

Bruno Turnheim, P. K. (2018). Innovating Climate Governance. Cambridge University Press.

Mokong Simon Mapadimeng, S. K. (2010). Contemporary Social Issues in Africa. African Books Collective.