Discussion on Critique on Brexit

On 23 June, 2016, at the end of the day it seemed like the entire world was going to alter. It is so because 52% of the Britain population cast the votes for leaving the European Union. In the year 2019, the Parliament cast the votes that made the Prime Minister Theresa May to rethink over the issue. It led to the “no deal arrangement” for the same. 

For the discussion about the benefits of Brexit, we come to know as given. Brexit may make the country to experience the cost savings immediately up to the maximum extent. As the membership cost for the European Union is so much. The amount spent by Britain for the membership purposes is £13.1 billion. In return only £4.5 billion was received for the spending purposes. For Britain, the emphasis of the trade can better be shifted. If we talk about the drawbacks or the cons of Brexit, then we come to know that due to Brexit, the protections related to equality in the payments, safety to the workplace as well as the maternity leaves will be eliminated. The equality rights, which are provided by European Union to the minorities & the women, after the efforts of many years, will be eliminated. 

How much you agree with the author’s arguments, and Why?

I highly agree with the author’s arguments due to the following reasons:

• The financial firms will lose the opportunity for having the free passport for trade with the Britain. 

• Due to Brexit, the labor shortage will be created which will ultimately affect the economic growth of the country. 

• The sharing of intelligence information will be prevented due to Brexit (ig, 2019).

• The protections, which are available to health, food as well as animal rights in Britain, might be reserved by Brexit.

• The U.S., which is the primary partner of Britain for the trading purposes, might be lost due to Brexit (vittana, 2019).

It also helps to create the link with the language, which is explanatory and narrative for the said discussion.

Discuss the style of language and references (link to reliability)

The Brexit language discovers the different paths in which the activists used the language very influentially rather than their counterparts. Furthermore, the language of Brexit is exploring the massive divisive problems of modern politics in the UK. It is telling about the fight with the desire of one side for continuing with the caution failed to inspire, but others have a knowledge that it is the uphill fight without losing anything (Ginsburgh & Weber, 2017).

 References of Critique on Brexit

Ginsburgh, V., & Weber, J. D.-T. (2017). Ranking languages in the European Union: Before and after Brexit. European Economic Review, 139-151.

ig. (2019). Benefits of being in the EU: the debate. Retrieved from https://www.ig.com/uk/financial-events/brexit/pros-and-cons-of-brexit

vittana. (2019). 22 Pros and Cons of Brexit. Retrieved from https://vittana.org/22-pros-and-cons-of-brexit