There
is an enormous impact of microfinancing on rural development, especially in
emerging economies. Governments of different countries play a vital role in the
building of favorable conditions for poor households and they also use it as an
important tool for the social-economic revival of the poor.Formal financial
services are not easily accessible to every citizen in emerging and developing
countries, a substantial amount of individual especially women don’t have
access to financial credit facilities. According to (Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D. and
Oudheusden, 2015)
worldwide near about 2 billion adults in 2014 don’t have their bank accounts
and were unable to access the financial services from commercial or
non-commercial banks.
Microfinance
which is also called microcredit is a kind of banking sector is giving facilities
to a jobless or needy independent person or set of people who would have no
other way in a monetary act of assistance (karim, 2011).Fundamentally
microfinance presuming loans, credits, and approach to a savings account- even
financial protection and transfer of funds to the owner of the small business
and business executive (karim, 2011).The
microfinance industry was commenced in Bangladesh and some sections of Latin
America in the mid -1970s to supply financial standing to the indigent people.
This representation obtained popularity
It really
essential for poor households to have access to financial services, research
shows that it helps them to smoothly fulfill their daily consumption needs,
opportunity of establishing their own business and become part of the formal
economy in the long run. (Makokha, 2014)
Micro financial services growth
was picked a pace in the late 1970s, when poor in developing countries get
access to it. Figures show that clients had increased from 10 million in 1997
to grow over 200 million in 2010. (Reed, 2011)
We
need to know the factors that help these institutions to fulfill their
financial and social goal which eventually help these MFIs to be part of the economy
in the long run and easily accessible to poor households. Financial sustainability
is an important debate for an MFI which is aiming for maximum outreach because
still many MFIs are under financial support of government bodies, NGOs, etc. (Hudom, &
Hermes, 2018).
Report results show that in 2010 roughly only 20 to 25 percent of MFIs are not
using subsidies provided by different bodies to conduct their activities. (Beatriz Armendáriz,Bert D’Espallier ,Marek Hudon ,
2011)
It
is not considered a sustainable business model of an MFI to depend on subsidy
for a long period of time. A review study’s results will help the policymakers
to define the determinants of the performance and efficiency of MFIs that how
micro-financial institutions do poverty alleviation in a financially
sustainable way. The research on MFI efficiency is still in its early stages. (Roy Mersland,Ludovic Urgeghe, 2013)
In the early
1990s, the number of papers had been published to address this pressing matter
but there is a controversy among these papers and no evident result was
concluded and measurement of MFIs performance is still considering a research
gap to be fulfilled by researchers.
Sri Lanka – Country
Context of The microfinancing industry of Sri Lanka.
Sri
Lank is an island state located off the south – eastern direction of India,
it’s a small country compared to other Asian countries with a surface area of
around 65,000 sq km. The latest census figure shows that the Sri Lanka
population was estimated at around 21.7 million people in 2018.
It
is a land of multi-religious and multi-ethnic society. The majority of the
population of Sir Lanka are Sinhalse by ethnicity and religion-wise Buddhist,
with the large presence of Tamil, Muslim and Christian community. For the past
25 years, a dispute has been going on between Sri Lanka Government and Tamil
separatists, the Liberation Tigers. It has critically disrupted the country's
economic, social and well-fare activities. The country’s topography is
irregular and divided. It has a coastal belt which is less than 100m above the
sea level and along it, rolling plains of changing width leading to the
foothills of the central hill. It has an equatorial and tropical climate. The
country’s climate is divided into two zones (wet-zone in the south west & a
dry zone covers the reminder part) due to uneven rainfall
Microfinance Industry in Sri lanka
MFIs
have been practicing different models in Sri Lanka. Historically, In 1990s most
popular term is in use was Village Revolving Funds and community-based
organizations were operational in the form of credit Co-operatives, Village
Societies. In the early century, credit co-operatives were only introduced for
those salaried employees who come under the middle-class category than in the
1980’s, it was introduced to rural masses. In 1986, SEEDS and the majority of
NGOs adopted the village society model. Limitations of these models made new
organizations like Lakyaya, Ceylinco Grameen and BMI to employ methods of
client lending directly. (Atapattu, 2009).
These models have been discussed in detail below;
Village Banking
of The microfinancing industry of Sri Lanka.
Another
name of Village Banking is Community Banking in which semi-formal or formal
institutes are made which treats the whole community as one unit and also
disperse microfinance in community. NGOs and other organizations put their
great effort in the establishment of these institutions, who also conduct
training sessions of community members to handle the various matters of
finances of the community bank. (Atapattu, 2009)
Village banks firstly start with
the creation of savings accounts than eventually provides emergency loans and
finally, it leads to larger loans. They operate the bank accordingly to their
own needs, they appoint their own officers, dedicate their own bylaws,
authorized to distribute loans to individuals, do recovery of payments and
collect savings. A moral collateral (a promise made by a group to back each
individual) has been used as a guarantee of payback for these loans instead of
papers of property or goods.
Garmeen Type
Group Collateral Lending
These are grassroots level institutes
especially focus on poor people. Origin of Garmeen banks is from Bangladesh, it
is the initiative of Prof. Mohammad Yunus. This establishment is consisting of
a Field Manager and a number of bank workers and it covers normally 15 to 22
villages. To understand the environmental settings of these villages, field
managers and workers pay a number of visits to these villages. Their main
purpose is to identify their clientele and let them know about the purpose and
function of the bank. Potential borrowers are identified and make groups of
five of them. Initially, at the first level, only two of them are given the
opportunity to apply for and receive, a loan. They observe the group for at
least a month to check that if group members are following the specified rules
of the bank. If all installments have been paid by the first two borrowers
within fifty weeks than the rest of the group members are given the opportunity
to receive a loan from the bank. Such a practice of restrictions put a group
pressure on each group individual to keep their records clear. Such responsible
behavior from a group effort considered as collateral for a bank to give loans
to them. (Silva, 2012)
Numerous Sri Lankans’ agencies tried to
follow the approach of Grameen but Ceyline Gareem Credit Co.Ltd is the only one
who keenly adopted and followed the Grameen model. Now they operate in Sri
Lanka with a new name “Grameen Credit
Company”
Group acts as a focal
point for an individual borrowing
This approach is adapted from ASA model
where a group of 25 to 30 members becomes a point of contact for individual-level
borrowing. Group is only formed to bring efficiency in loan collection and
ensure provision of other services, they don’t consider as a form of
collateral. These groups do minimum savings and the majority of time two
members volunteer to provide a guarantee. Weekly or monthly group meetings are
held at specific times and venues where new applications are submitted and all
loan collections are done by the credit officer of the MFIs. (Silva, 2012)
Lak Jaya and Berendina Microfinance institutions
follow ASA model with some changes accordingly. Lak Jaya implements this ASA
model to get weekly recovery results with women.
The model implemented by BRAC Sri Lanka is
similar to the Bangladesh BRAC model. In this model, only women are allowed to
take a loan and give them a form of small groups. The payment method is made
once in a week which is another difference of this model from other Sri Lanka
models. They work in close geographical area and door to door surveys are being
done with 4 sq meter to find out potential clientele. (Atapattu,
2009)
Individual
Borrowing of The microfinancing industry of Sri Lanka.
It is the simplest model to be adopted in
which lending is given directly to a borrower. It does not require to form a specific
number of groups or put peer pressure for recovery of these loan payments.
Commercial and regional development banks both followed this model to give
loans in Sri Lanka. Groups are not involved to put pressure but individuals
will be asked for collateral or letters from guarantors. Since the 1960’s, both
commercial and private banks are giving loans based on this model and presently
it is still the most popular mode of loan model for commercial banks to lend
money to people. The majority of loans issued by regional development banks are
based on the approach of this model. (Atapattu, 2009). It is also increasingly in practice of
NGOs like SEEDS (MFI) to lend large loans or products specific loans, for
example, solar loans and business development loans of specific types.
Self Help Groups of The microfinancing industry of Sri
Lanka.
In this model, credit is generated
via group members’ savings, it usually a small group of 10 to 20 women. In a
few cases, agencies facilitate initial training and capital to the group to
encourage the activity. In Sri Lanka, the existence of this model is limited to
specific areas but popular among them. It trains the local people to become the
supporting pillar of each other and develops habits of saving among them.
Credit
Unions/ Cooperatives of The microfinancing industry of Sri
Lanka.
These
are self-help financial institutions in which members of a particular group or
organization make an agreement to do saving than give loans to each other on a
reasonable rate of interest.
Rosca’s
(Seettu) of The microfinancing industry of Sri Lanka.
Rosca stands for
Rotating Saving Credit Association other name of it is ‘Seettu”. It is a group
of people who does cyclical contributions to generate a common fund and this
lump sum amount is given to one member in each cycle. For example, 12 members
make a group and decided to contribute Rs. 10 by each member at the end of each
month. This collection of Rs. 120 monthly will be given to each member once in
12 months cycle. This practice is really popular in urban and rural areas of
Sri Lanka. (Atapattu, 2009)
Financial
provides of The microfinancing industry of Sri Lanka.
Srilankan’s
financial system consists of wide range of financial provides . they are
·
Formal
financial institution: commercial,financial
companies and specialized bank
·
Semi-formal
financial institution: such as cooperative
organization, non-government organization, self help groups and government
carried outing programmes like divineguma, samurdhi etc.
·
Informal
institution: such as money lenders , credit and
saving service
Regulation
and supervision of The microfinancing industry of Sri Lanka.
Central
bank of srilanka regulates and superving the commercial banks n specialized
banks , financial companies and leasing companies ,insurance board of srilanka
supervising the insurance companies and brokers , increasing the development of
micro finance in the last decade by effective
requlatoty of srilanka can help to the substainability. To the substainable
development of micro microfinance sector and its inclusion in the financial
system depends on how micro finance effort to adopt the best pratices and to
ensure the conductive to growth. An
oview of financial regulation and supervision of micro finance institutions its
presenting in the following (Table1.1 )
Table 1.1
Regulation and supervision of micro
finance institution (modoran, 2009)
Type
of Institution
|
|
|
legistation
|
Sanana TCCSs
|
|
Depertment
of cooperative development
|
Cooperative act
05 (1972)
|
CRBs
|
Depertment
of cooperative development
|
Depertment of cooperative development
|
Cooperative
act 05 (1972) subsequent and
amendments
|
SBSs
|
Samurdhi authority
|
Samurdhi authority
|
Samurdhi
authority act No.30 of 1995
|
NGOs
|
-
|
-
|
No specificly ligistation
|
RDBs
|
Central bank of srilanka
|
central
bank of srilanka
|
Act No.6 of 1997
|
BANKs
and OFIs
|
Banks and other finances companies :
central bank of srilanka
Insurance companies : insurance board of
srilanka
|
Banks and other finances companies :
central bank of srilanka
Insurance companies : insurance board of
srilanka
|
Banks act No.30 of 1988 and subsequent
and amendments
Financial companies act no 78 of 1988
and subsequent and amendments
Insurance industry act No. 43 of 2000
|
Micro-finance
institutions" take a vital role in the current "financial field"
and they could carry a double social and financial responsibility. The
population of Sri Lanka is almost 21 million among which approx 70% of people
are staying in the "rural areas", whose primary profession is
agriculture. Per capita earnings of this country have been increased remarkably
starting from 871 dollars to 3835 dollars by the end of 2015. In a country like
Sri Lanka
"microfinance" has a practical and unique developmental approach.
There is agreement that those "microfinance institutions" generally
provide "financial services" to comparatively weak, avoided by
conventional financial intermediaries. Retrieve to capital is essential for
poor for raising the productivity range, generate income, create wealth,
empower women, encourage entrepreneurship, access education, reduce poverty and
improve wealth.
Microfinance’
sector in srilanka can be catercarized by following ways
·
Cooperatavie rural bank
and other co-operativies
·
Thift and credit
co-operative societies
·
Samurdhi societies
·
NGOs- MFIs
·
Licensed specialised
banks
·
Others micro finance
institution( commercial banks , registered
financial companies )
Microfinance
industry report in srilanka providing the types of institution and their
outlets its presenting the following( Table 1.2)
Table
1.2
Micro
finance industry report in srilanka (microfinance industry, 2010)
Type of institution
|
No of Outlets
|
Somurdhi
banks societies
|
1040 societies
|
CRBs
and women’s development co-operativies
|
1905
|
Sanana
and TCCs
|
4071 activies societies
|
Other
MFIs (NGOs, companies limited by gurantee)
|
2500
|
Licensed
specialised banks(reginal development bank and sanasa development bank)
|
318
branches
|
A
new discipline for academic research is micro-finance which is based on an
effective and unique approach. Traditional financial intermediaries have not
enough focused on this new discipline. Normally ignored by the traditional
financial intermediaries, consensus results present that financial services are
extended to the poor people by the microfinance institutes. Access to the
finance is essential in order to meet the objectives of empower women, improved
healthcare system, utilization of goods and services, access to the educational
institutes for all, create wealth, raise of productivity, encourage
entrepreneurship, and reduction in poverty. Research findings of Kipesha
elaborate on the maximization of goods production. Research explains that to
maximize the production of the goods and services of the firms, efficiency as a
better use for the utilization of resources in better order. Just like Sri Lanka, regarding the efficiency
of microfinance institutions very limited research work is done, particularly
in the developing and poor countries.
Some studies which considered only financial efficiency did not give
attention to social efficiency. To
include microfinance services, this social efficiency research work has vital
importance for the policy makers and managerial staff, considering this
requirement many new financial institutions are opened in the rural areas of
Srilanka after the year 2005. Furthermore, many activities of the commercial
banks are diversified to serve the poor Srilanka microfinance industry is
evolved as a key player (charitonenko, 2002)
Cooperative rural bank of The microfinancing industry of Sri Lanka.
Colombo
District Co Operative Rural bank, incorporated in 1994, to personal and
corporate customers. The prime purpose of this group is to provide various
services related to finance and banking in the market of Sri Lanka. The Company
working in three areas: Commercial, wholesale and retail. To do business, these
services are centred upon the commercial banking wholesales services. Moreover,
this service of retail is also licensed. By the establishment of a huge network
in a socially responsible way covering the entire country SriLanka the bank
exists to deliver services in all customer segments. Considering distinct
objectives, strategic action plan, a monitoring system, and success sharing
system with relevant people, the bank has made it possible to achieve success
goals and superior financial services in the competitive banking sectors during
last few years. In the cooperative rural bank reaching greater heights as good
cooperate governance and corporate management based on directors who are fully
committed towards organizational goals bank is projecting accomplishment of its
aims and goals. Although, the overall wellbeing of the banking system has
become instrumental.
The
supply and demand for microfinance have a major difference in the financial
system of the country. In the formal sector, private commercial banks great
concentrate in the short term lending to medium and large enterprises and also
salaried employees. Only a few micro finance programs are profitable for the
banks and give them long term benefits (crbbank.lk, 2017)
Thrift
and credit co-operative societies of The microfinancing industry of Sri Lanka.
The areas of
township and rural sites in the country are populated with the Tamil people who
can only understand the Tamil language. Although these are named Tamil people
as the name implies in the north and east areas of the country. Umbrella
organizations working in these federations of thrift and credit cooperative
societies are dealing with around eight thousand societies and communities to
ensure appropriate micro-finance services for these territories and rural areas
of the country.
A primary society
that serves the population living in the villages and communities of east and
north areas is known as “Primary SANASA
Society”. Additionally, the organization is also famous as SANASA federation
because it concerns with the movement of people in this area. Federation is
also named as the movement in some areas. Federation is mainly working for the
largest group of people. Services supported by this organization are also in
the Sinhala language as the majority of people living in these areas speak the
Sinhala language. People of this area have given credit to the SANASA for
improvement in their lives and the success of this movement.
In
Sri Lanka, the SANASA is the Sinhala acronym for the credit cooperative
societies and movement of thrift. Records present that for 8424 primary
societies the only working network of micro-finance is SANASA in the east and
north areas of Sri Lanka. Additionally,
SANASA also covers other provinces of the country. Around 805000 people
belonging to different religions and races are a member of this organization
and movement in Sri Lanka. In Srilanka, the total population coverage. By
multiple sociocultural political and economic issues, The internal strengths of
this movement and organization were the reason that contributed in its survival
and resulted in the growth of movement while protecting it from getting
devasted by ethnic conflicts. An area designated for the societies is used for
the primary societies function and operation.
There are several reasons behind the unique name and objective
of "Sanasa movement” in Sri Lanka:
·
It is the
organization which follows a cooperative philosophy among the whole community
and its members.
·
From the last 100
years, the organization has successfully managed to work independently on cooperative
principles.
·
In its service to
humanity, Nonpartisan and nonpolitical present
·
as Sanasa
Community, Sanasa family has members
from various castes, religions, and ethnicities.
·
by the centre has
the democratic right for governance, Bottom up management style where each village
entity guided.
·
to the corporate
institutions, Utmost transparency from the grass root level. to express opinion and vote, Supremacy of
the member (sanasa.coop, 2019)
Samurdhi
societies of The microfinancing industry of Sri Lanka.:
The
Samurdhi programme also known as prosperity program was implemented in 1995.
The program was focused on public participation based development in the
country. Moreover, the prime objective of the program was to bring down the
poverty level in Sri Lanka. In the late 1990s, Samurdhi was successfully
working in 21 districts of the country. However, total districts are around 25.
The main goal was to reduce poverty thus under this program many resources
including food stamps were distributed and divided in the families of poor
people in accordance with their requirements and needs. After this, one-third
of the national poverty line was developed for households in 1998. Samurdhi
programme had these components:
1.
Total 80% of the
programme budget was spent on the distribution of food stamps in the eligible
and needy households.
2.
Samurdhi banks
presented a programme for credit services, savings in the banks, and a fixed
interest rate based loans offered to businessman and entrepreneurs for the
startup of a new business.
3.
Through various
social forces and workfare development and rehabilitation of community was
ensured. Moreover, various training programs were offered regarding this e.g.
training in accounting functions, productivity training, and materials
resources development.
In 2003, the government of Sri Lanka requested to world
bank for the provision of non-lending technical assistance for team working in
the Samudhi program. From the beginning to now, Samudhi program has been
changed a lot as reforms are made. Currently, reforms have divided this program
into two main categories which include empowerment program and relief program.
In this
relief program, some other programs are introduced with different themes. For
instance, nutrition program, social security program and cash transfer program
are included in this relief program. The Department of the Commissioner General
of Samurdhi (DCGS) was established in 2008 as a kerosene program of relief
in Sri Lanka. Moreover, this program was related to the dry ration stamps
distribution. This program was mainly started for IDPs (internally displaced
people). For these IDPs, ministries and financial departments are responsible
to accomplish financial allocations and needs.
While on the
other hand, the program started with the theme of empowerment was based on 5
sub-programs including Samurdhi housing programmes, social development,
micro-finance program, a rural infrastructure program, and livelihood (Irigoyen, 2017).
Table 1.3
Process of poverty alleviation
programs (divineguma, 2015)
No
|
Type of project
|
No of projects
|
Contribution of the dep(Mn)
|
Contribution of the beneficiaries (Mn)
|
No of beneficiaries
|
1
|
Agriculture development
|
8393
|
111.11
|
22.59
|
5264
|
2
|
Live development
|
3715
|
118.39
|
24.44
|
3.715
|
3
|
Fisheries development
|
556
|
18.83
|
3.80
|
556
|
4
|
Enterprise development
|
9481
|
267.65
|
71.63
|
9,481
|
5
|
Marketing development
|
2225
|
52.99
|
13.35
|
2225
|
6
|
Vocational training
|
55
|
2.04
|
1.94
|
58
|
Avove the chart (seeTab1-3) relieved
that process of poverty alleviation program in
department of divinuguma development. chart shows project that what kind
of project , how many percentage each contributed in the field. Project are agriculture development ,live development
,fisheries development,enterprise development marketing development and
vocational training. here the statistic report indicated that specially
enterprise development contribution is high than others and 71.6 (Mn) got
contribution of the beneficiaries and 9,481 number of beneficiaries secondly
agriculture and live development are mostly contrituted to the poverty
alleviation.below the table (seeTab1-4) shows that number of benficiaties from
2013 to 2017 in department of divineguma development and statistic shows that
many many peoples get benefits from the department of diveneguma development
throuth the all project in srilanka.
Table 1.4
No of Samurdhi Beneficiaries During the
past 05 years (annual report of divineguma, 2017)
Years
|
No of beneficiaries
|
2013
|
1.477,173
|
2014
|
1,479,811
|
2015
|
1,453,078
|
2016
|
1,407,235
|
2017
|
1,388,242
|
Above the
chart(seeTab1.4) shows that those who got benefits from the samurdhi bank
during the past 05 years.chart shows that 2013 to 2017 of beneficiaries from
all the samurdhi project
References of enormous emerging economies
annual report of divineguma.
(2017). department of divineguma development.
Atapattu, A. (2009). State of
Microfinance in Sri Lanka.
Beatriz Armendáriz,Bert D’Espallier
,Marek Hudon . (2011). Subsidy Uncertainty and Microfinance Mission Drift.
CBS. (2010). Annual Report of the
Monetary Board To the Hon Minister of Finance.
charitonenko, S. (2002).
Commercialization of micro finance in sri lanka. 3-20.
crbbank.lk. (2017). Colombo District
Cooperative Rural Bank Union Limited. Retrieved from
https://www.crbbank.lk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CRB-Bank-Annual-Report-2017.pdf
Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer,
D. and Oudheusden. (2015). The Global Findex Database 2014: Measuring
Financial Inclusion around the World.
divineguma, P. r. (2015). department
of divineguma development.
G Tilakaratna,U Wickramasinghe, . (2005).
Microfinance in srilanak: A household level analysis of outreach and
impact on poverty.
Hudom, & Hermes. (2018). Determinants
of the Performance of Microfinance Institutions: a Systematic Review.
Irigoyen, c. (2017, may 30). the
samurdhi programme in srilanka. Retrieved from
https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/case-study/samurdhi-programme-srilanka/
Jayamaha, A. (2012). Efficiency of Small
Financial Institutions in Sri Lanka using Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal
of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences. 565-573.
karim, L. (2011). Microfinance and its
discontents:Women in Debt in Bangladesh.
kelegama, S. (2014). Kelegama, S. (2014).
Financial Inclusion in Sri Lanka: Issues and Challenges. Seminar of the
Association of Professional Bankers -.
kobbekaduwa, H. (2016). Microfinance
institution in srilanka:examination of different models to identify the
success factors .
Makokha, M. G. (2014). FACTORS THAT
DETERMINE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS .
microfinance industry. (2010). micro
finance industry report in srilanka.
modoran, c. (2009). micro finance
institution in srilanka. In c. modpran. colombo.
Reed, L. (2011). State of the
Microcredit Summit Campaign Report. Microcredit Summit Campaign 750 First
Street, NE, Suite 1040, Washington, DC, 20002.
Roy Mersland,Ludovic Urgeghe. (2013). International
Debt Financing and Performance ofMicronance Institutions. Wiley Online
Library.
sanasa.coop. (2019). federation of
thrift and credit cooperative societies in srilanka. Retrieved from
https://sanasa.coop/
Silva, I. D. (2012). Evaluating the
Impact of Microfinance on Savings and Income in Sri Lanka:Quasi-experimental
Approach Using Propensity Score Matching. 47-74.