A. Qualitative Analysis. 3
a) Company Background. 3
b) Macro Environment Forces. 6
PESTLE Analysis. 6
Political 6
Economical 6
Social 6
Technological 7
Legal 7
Environmental 7
c) Microeconomic Forces. 7
Employees. 7
Customers. 8
Level of competition. 8
d) Industry Research. 8
e) Industry Revenues. 8
f) Characteristics of Industry. 9
B. Quantitative Analysis. 9
a) Growth. 9
b) Profitability. 11
c) Asset Management 14
d) Coverage. 16
e) Leverage. 17
C. Valuation Conclusion. 19
References. 20
Financial Reporting and Analysis
A.
Qualitative Analysis of Financial Reporting
and Analysis of Almarai Company
a) Company Background of Financial Reporting
and Analysis of Almarai Company
v Almarai Company
a) Description of Financial Reporting and
Analysis of Almarai Company
Almarai Company was established
in 1977 as a food and beverage selling the company. The company currently
operates in the markets of North Africa and the Middle East. Almarai Company has
some brands which include L’usine, ALYOUM, 7Days, and Nuralac. However, the
product portfolio includes juices, bakery, dairy products, and poultry
products.
b) SWOT Analysis of Almarai Company
Strengths of Almarai Company
|
Weaknesses of Almarai
Company
|
v Highly
Qualified Staff members are having an understanding of market requirements
and customer demand.
v The
brand has strong customer equity.
v The distribution system of Almarai Company
is highly efficient and advanced.
|
v The
operating cost of Almarai Company is quite high which can reduce profit
margin.
v Limited
products included in the product portfolio
|
Opportunities of Almarai
Company
|
Threats of Almarai Company
|
v Advanced
technology is an opportunity for Almarai Company to interact with customers
and build customer equity
v Increasing
the population rate is an opportunity to enhance sales.
|
v Changing
trends in the targeted market are threats against Almarai Company
v New
entrants in the market are a threat to business.
|
v NADEC
a) Description of Almarai Company
NADEC is the abbreviated name of National
Agricultural Development Company. NADEC is working in Saudi Arabia as a food
and beverage selling company. The company is headed quartered in Riyadh. NADEC
was founded in 1981 by royal decree.
b) SWOT Analysis of Almarai Company
Strengths of Almarai Company
|
Weaknesses of Almarai
Company
|
v NADEC
has huge financial resources that enable the company to operate well in the
targeted market.
v NADEC's
goodwill is a positive factor for the growth of business operations.
|
v Limited
availability of flavors and a fixed product line.
v The
company is not paying enough attention to geographical expansion.
|
Opportunities of Almarai
Company
|
Threats of Almarai Company
|
v Increase
in population is a positive opportunity for growth
v The
company can have a partnership with many companies working in the
international market to expand business operations.
|
v Changing
prices of raw materials
v Dynamic
requirements of customer markets.
v Advancement
of technology is shifting business from physical markets to e-markets.
|
b)
Macro Environment Forces
PESTLE Analysis
of Almarai Company
Political of Almarai Company
The political factors play a
major rule in the development and growth of the business. The political
stability in the country is needed by the corporations so that they can perform
their operations efficiently. Saudi Arabia is currently facing political stability,
and the government of Saudi Arabia has created such laws that support the food
& beverage industry.
Economical of Almarai Company
The economic outlook of Saudi
Arabia indicates that in the future the economy of the country will experience
growth. The Saudi vision of 2030 has created positive outlook in the Saudi
economy and many industries including Food & beverage industries will
experience growth in near future.
Social of Almarai Company
Almarai Corporation will have to
focus on the needs and preferences of the customers. The customers’ needs keep
on changing with the passage of time, and these changes have huge impact on the
performance and sales of the organization. Therefore Almarai should keep on
performing market analysis to get deeper insights into the market.
Technological of Almarai Company
With the passage of time, the
technology around the world is rapidly changing. Almarai uses the latest
technologies and software to improve its production. So it can be said that the
technological factor won’t have much impact on the performance of the corporation.
Legal of Almarai Company
Saudi Arabia laws support the
food and beverage industries that operate in Saudi Arabia. The Operations of
Almarai organization are in accordance with the rules and regulations which
Saudi Government has created regarding the food beverage industries. So it can
be said that Alamari does not need to worry about the legal factors (Fridson & Alvarez, 2011).
Environmental of Almarai Company
The global warming across the
globe has become major issues, and many corporations around the world are now implementing
such measures through which they can control their overall carbon footprint.
Almarai operations are sustainable, and the company is taken steps for
controlling the environmental pollution.
c) Microeconomic Forces of Almarai Company
Employees of Almarai Company
The employees are the ones who
perform the business activities of the organization. Due to employee activities
the organization meets its desired goals. If the performance of the employees
is not great than the corporation cannot experience growth. Almarai Corporation
pays special attention to its employees and provides them various incentives so
that the employees remain motivated. The performance of the employees at
Almarai remains high because the employees get all the facilities that are
required in the corporation.
Customers of Almarai Company
The customers are the ones who
are responsible for the sales of the corporation. The variety of products which
Almarai provides to its customers is one of the main reason for higher revenues
(Campbell, Edgar, & Stonehouse, 2011).
Level of competition of Almarai Company
The competition in the food
industry is moderate. The food companies compete with each other so that they
can enhance their market share.
d) Industry Research of Almarai Company
The Saudi Arabia Food industry is
experiencing growth with the passage of time. The revenues of the industry in
the year 2018 were 19% higher than the last year's revenue, which is sign of
industry growth. The market segment penetration in the year 2018 was 15.3%,
which is expected to reach 18.3% in the upcoming years. The average amount of purchase
regarding the food product in Saudi Arabia is $28.68 which is growing with rate
of 10.3%.
e) Industry Revenues of Almarai Company
The Saudi Arabian food industry
earns $150 million in revenue in the year 2018. The total market size is
estimated to be around $12 billion. Saudi Arabia accounts for 90% of the total
food & beverage in the GCC. Saudi Arabia is the largest consumer market in
the GCC (Fridson & Alvarez, 2011).
f)
Characteristics of the Industry of Almarai
Company
The Saudi Arabia Food industry is
experiencing growth with the passage of time. The revenues of the industry in
the year 2018 were 19% higher than last year's revenue, which is sign of
industry growth. The Saudi Arabian food industry earns $150 million in revenue
in the year 2018.
B. Quantitative Analysis
of Almarai Company
1)
Analysis
of subject company on the basis of:
a)
Growth of Almarai Company
In the following table sales
growth rate for the last 3 years is presented for Almarai Company and NADEC.
Source: (Morning Star, 2019)
Key Ratios -> Growth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12
|
2010-12
|
2011-12
|
2012-12
|
2013-12
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
Latest Qtr
|
Revenue %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year over Year
|
16.68
|
18.1
|
14.72
|
24.3
|
13.52
|
12.36
|
9.43
|
6.55
|
-5.19
|
-1.53
|
6.01
|
3-Year Average
|
28.64
|
22.51
|
16.49
|
18.97
|
17.42
|
16.6
|
11.76
|
9.42
|
3.4
|
-0.17
|
|
5-Year Average
|
|
|
23.59
|
21.26
|
17.4
|
16.52
|
14.76
|
13.08
|
7.11
|
4.11
|
|
10-Year Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.22
|
13.97
|
10.56
|
|
Operating Income %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year over Year
|
20.54
|
14.12
|
3.4
|
5.74
|
11.96
|
8.58
|
16.6
|
12.37
|
9.94
|
-2.02
|
-0.9
|
3-Year Average
|
33.73
|
23.19
|
12.46
|
7.66
|
6.97
|
8.73
|
12.33
|
12.47
|
12.93
|
6.57
|
|
5-Year Average
|
|
|
23.06
|
15.37
|
10.99
|
8.69
|
9.16
|
10.99
|
11.86
|
8.91
|
|
10-Year Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.87
|
13.6
|
9.94
|
|
Net Income %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year over Year
|
20.18
|
15.6
|
-9.84
|
26.42
|
4.27
|
11.46
|
14.41
|
8.6
|
4.89
|
-7.95
|
|
3-Year Average
|
33.04
|
23.76
|
7.8
|
9.63
|
5.93
|
13.69
|
9.97
|
11.47
|
9.23
|
1.6
|
|
5-Year Average
|
|
|
19.67
|
16.66
|
10.55
|
8.9
|
8.67
|
12.79
|
8.66
|
5.99
|
|
10-Year Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.18
|
12.59
|
8.24
|
|
EPS %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year over Year
|
13.91
|
15.6
|
-48.16
|
119.78
|
3.33
|
8.87
|
15.19
|
7.77
|
4.66
|
-7.58
|
-4.92
|
3-Year Average
|
|
21.57
|
-11.95
|
9.62
|
5.59
|
35.22
|
9.02
|
10.56
|
9.12
|
1.39
|
|
5-Year Average
|
|
|
|
15.41
|
9.17
|
8.18
|
8.1
|
25.14
|
7.89
|
5.5
|
|
10-Year Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.58
|
7.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: (Morning Star, 2019).
Key Ratios ->
Growth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-12
|
2009-12
|
2010-12
|
2011-12
|
2012-12
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
Latest Qtr
|
Revenue %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year over Year
|
|
-0.31
|
8.47
|
7.47
|
11.04
|
9.53
|
13.59
|
-2.45
|
-11.5
|
3.13
|
0.65
|
3-Year Average
|
|
16.15
|
10.14
|
5.14
|
8.98
|
10.03
|
10.87
|
7.37
|
-0.65
|
-3.8
|
|
5-Year Average
|
|
|
|
12.81
|
9.78
|
9.2
|
10.21
|
8.1
|
3.31
|
3.27
|
|
10-Year Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
6.49
|
4.59
|
|
Operating Income %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year over Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.02
|
-8.24
|
-41.83
|
46.45
|
5.98
|
3-Year Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-11.01
|
-7.88
|
|
5-Year Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-Year Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year over Year
|
|
|
|
772.46
|
4.8
|
5.86
|
31.84
|
-29.11
|
-60.13
|
-95.64
|
|
3-Year Average
|
|
|
-54.75
|
9.88
|
|
5.5
|
13.89
|
1.16
|
-28.04
|
-76.9
|
|
5-Year Average
|
|
|
|
1.18
|
-3.26
|
|
68.31
|
1.88
|
-16.03
|
-48.69
|
|
10-Year Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
-9.87
|
-30.76
|
|
EPS %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year over Year
|
|
|
|
772.46
|
|
|
60.17
|
-29.46
|
-60.17
|
-95.74
|
41.46
|
3-Year Average
|
|
|
-60.47
|
9.88
|
|
-1.04
|
|
|
-23.37
|
-77.13
|
|
5-Year Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.4
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
10-Year Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-13.48
|
-30.95
|
|
According to the following
graphs, the overall sales growth trend in 2017 was negative for both companies.
However, sales growth for 2018 and 2016 is positive.
b)
Profitability of Almarai Company
Profitability ratios include
gross profit and profit margin ratios. According to the following table, the
gross profit margin ratio of Almarai Company and NADEC are almost the same. The
lower Gross profit shows that companies are inefficient in controlling the cost
of operations therefore a high percentage of revenue is spent to cover the cost
(Tadawul.com.sa, 2019).
Source: (Morning Star, 2019)
Key Ratios ->
Profitability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margins % of Sales
|
2009-12
|
2010-12
|
2011-12
|
2012-12
|
2013-12
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
TTM
|
Revenue
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
COGS
|
59.69
|
60.53
|
62.31
|
64.47
|
64.78
|
64.02
|
61.7
|
60.31
|
59.93
|
60.32
|
61.57
|
Gross Margin
|
40.31
|
39.47
|
37.69
|
35.53
|
35.22
|
35.98
|
38.3
|
39.69
|
40.07
|
39.68
|
38.43
|
SG&A
|
18.52
|
18.42
|
6.69
|
6.8
|
6.53
|
6.23
|
7.15
|
7.6
|
5.06
|
4.74
|
5.26
|
R&D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12.01
|
12.58
|
12.77
|
14.35
|
14.75
|
14.79
|
14.95
|
14.98
|
14.49
|
Operating Margin
|
21.79
|
21.06
|
18.98
|
16.15
|
15.93
|
15.39
|
16.4
|
17.29
|
20.05
|
19.95
|
18.69
|
Net Int Inc &
Other
|
-2.55
|
-1.83
|
-4.14
|
-1.06
|
-2.18
|
-1.47
|
-2.88
|
-2.62
|
-4.25
|
-4.81
|
-4.97
|
EBT Margin
|
19.24
|
19.23
|
14.84
|
15.09
|
13.75
|
13.92
|
13.52
|
14.68
|
15.8
|
15.14
|
13.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profitability
|
2009-12
|
2010-12
|
2011-12
|
2012-12
|
2013-12
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
TTM
|
Tax Rate %
|
2.59
|
1.95
|
2.81
|
3.42
|
2.72
|
4.05
|
3.53
|
3.45
|
1.92
|
3.39
|
3.62
|
Net Margin %
|
18.63
|
18.24
|
14.33
|
14.58
|
13.39
|
12.87
|
13.52
|
13.71
|
15.15
|
14.23
|
12.77
|
Asset Turnover
(Average)
|
0.61
|
0.59
|
0.56
|
0.56
|
0.52
|
0.53
|
0.54
|
0.52
|
0.46
|
0.43
|
0.43
|
Return on Assets %
|
11.41
|
10.73
|
8.07
|
8.19
|
7.02
|
6.87
|
7.27
|
7.15
|
6.93
|
6.08
|
5.52
|
Financial Leverage
(Average)
|
2.03
|
2.03
|
2.33
|
2.59
|
2.3
|
2.2
|
2.27
|
2.23
|
2.2
|
2.32
|
2.31
|
Return on Equity %
|
24.21
|
21.82
|
17.66
|
20.19
|
16.98
|
15.43
|
16.26
|
16.06
|
15.34
|
13.75
|
12.96
|
Return on Invested
Capital %
|
14.21
|
13.07
|
10.11
|
10.5
|
9.26
|
8.82
|
9.34
|
9.55
|
9.36
|
8.29
|
7.95
|
Interest Coverage
|
8.66
|
12.05
|
9.74
|
10.47
|
7.88
|
9.44
|
9.12
|
7.14
|
6.48
|
5.94
|
4.82
|
In the above charts it can be
seen that Almarai Corporation is generating profit however there is a lot of
room for improvement. Almarai Corporation can improve its profitability by
increasing its sales. The declining trend in profitability should be a matter
of concern for the organization. The reason behind declining trend in
profitability might be underutilization of its assets (SINHA, 2012).
Source: (Morning Star, 2019)
Key Ratios ->
Profitability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margins % of Sales
|
2008-12
|
2009-12
|
2010-12
|
2011-12
|
2012-12
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
TTM
|
Revenue
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
COGS
|
64.37
|
68.31
|
66.95
|
64.78
|
63.15
|
62.6
|
60.21
|
58.24
|
64.03
|
63.02
|
62.37
|
Gross Margin
|
35.61
|
31.69
|
33.05
|
35.22
|
36.62
|
37.4
|
39.79
|
41.76
|
35.97
|
36.98
|
37.63
|
SG&A
|
69.68
|
61.74
|
61.09
|
55.21
|
59.54
|
30.27
|
31.5
|
33.96
|
0.18
|
10.79
|
10.82
|
R&D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.66
|
18.91
|
18.01
|
Operating Margin
|
-35.87
|
-30.04
|
-28.04
|
-20
|
-22.7
|
7.13
|
8.29
|
7.79
|
5.12
|
7.28
|
8.79
|
Net Int Inc &
Other
|
41.6
|
27.84
|
26.85
|
26.7
|
29
|
-1.92
|
-1.95
|
-3.18
|
-3.27
|
-7.05
|
-8.46
|
EBT Margin
|
5.73
|
-2.21
|
-1.19
|
6.7
|
6.31
|
5.21
|
6.33
|
4.62
|
1.86
|
0.22
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profitability
|
2008-12
|
2009-12
|
2010-12
|
2011-12
|
2012-12
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
TTM
|
Tax Rate %
|
10.23
|
|
|
12.49
|
12.19
|
0.68
|
5.2
|
5.5
|
|
62.75
|
34.07
|
Net Margin %
|
5.14
|
-2.88
|
0.72
|
5.87
|
5.54
|
5.17
|
6
|
4.36
|
1.97
|
0.08
|
0.22
|
Asset Turnover
(Average)
|
0.62
|
0.54
|
0.59
|
|
0.66
|
0.6
|
0.65
|
0.59
|
0.5
|
0.52
|
0.53
|
Return on Assets %
|
3.17
|
-1.55
|
0.43
|
|
3.66
|
3.13
|
3.9
|
2.56
|
0.99
|
0.04
|
0.12
|
Financial Leverage
(Average)
|
2.31
|
2.57
|
2.44
|
|
2.41
|
2.72
|
2.8
|
2.81
|
2.87
|
2.74
|
2.73
|
Return on Equity %
|
6.48
|
-3.78
|
1.07
|
|
8.83
|
8.52
|
10.77
|
7.18
|
2.8
|
0.12
|
0.32
|
Return on Invested
Capital %
|
8.37
|
-1.18
|
3.1
|
|
7.13
|
5.01
|
6.33
|
5.36
|
3.06
|
1.66
|
1.93
|
Interest Coverage
|
4.07
|
0.22
|
0.3
|
4.89
|
|
3.87
|
4.26
|
2.57
|
1.63
|
1.07
|
1.1
|
The profitability condition of
NADEC is not as much better as Almarai. There is a need to take steps on urgent
basis to improve the profitability of the corporation. The increasing trend in
the profitability of the company is good sign for NADEC (Spender, 2014).
c)
Asset Management of Almarai Company
Return on asset ratios of Almarai
Company and NADEC is less than 1. Comparatively, Almarai Company has a return
on asset ratio better than NADEC. However, the overall trend is negative and
declining, which is not a suitable trend. According to ratios. Companies are
earning less than their assets capacity to generate profit. A major reason
behind this can be the inefficiency of managerial staff in utilizing resources (Tadawul.com.sa, 2019).
The efficiency ratios of the
organization are indicating that the organization is utilizing its assets
efficiently for generating sales. However, the corporation has the opportunity
to further improve its efficiency. The declining trend in efficiency indicates
that the organization is not utilizing its assets accurately for generating sales
(Jonathan, 2010).
Source: (Morning Star, 2019)
Key Ratios -> Efficiency
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency
|
2009-12
|
2010-12
|
2011-12
|
2012-12
|
2013-12
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
TTM
|
Days Sales
Outstanding
|
26.91
|
28.15
|
25.33
|
20.1
|
20.14
|
19.78
|
19.9
|
20.77
|
25.38
|
28.55
|
62.1
|
Days Inventory
|
120.62
|
109.54
|
110.37
|
114.97
|
122.11
|
120.17
|
120.18
|
123.61
|
137.46
|
154.25
|
169.18
|
Payables Period
|
85.03
|
96.41
|
78.05
|
66.82
|
68.77
|
57.76
|
57.83
|
63.81
|
71.66
|
66.69
|
130.77
|
Cash Conversion
Cycle
|
62.49
|
41.29
|
57.65
|
68.25
|
73.48
|
82.2
|
82.24
|
80.56
|
91.18
|
116.11
|
100.5
|
Receivables Turnover
|
13.57
|
12.96
|
14.41
|
18.16
|
18.12
|
18.45
|
18.35
|
17.58
|
14.38
|
12.78
|
5.88
|
Inventory Turnover
|
3.02
|
3.33
|
3.3
|
3.17
|
2.99
|
3.04
|
3.04
|
2.95
|
2.66
|
2.37
|
2.16
|
Fixed Assets
Turnover
|
1.01
|
0.98
|
0.87
|
0.83
|
0.79
|
0.81
|
0.79
|
0.73
|
0.64
|
0.61
|
0.62
|
Asset Turnover
|
0.61
|
0.59
|
0.56
|
0.56
|
0.52
|
0.53
|
0.54
|
0.52
|
0.46
|
0.43
|
0.43
|
Key Ratios -> Efficiency Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency
|
2008-12
|
2009-12
|
2010-12
|
2011-12
|
2012-12
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
TTM
|
Days Sales Outstanding
|
73.51
|
76.79
|
67.3
|
|
57.1
|
56.26
|
51.99
|
53.8
|
44.58
|
37.66
|
86.89
|
Days Inventory
|
127.86
|
154.94
|
136.22
|
|
106.94
|
133.69
|
125.64
|
147.3
|
169.83
|
170.26
|
162.55
|
Payables Period
|
156.94
|
61.31
|
54.23
|
|
96.21
|
95.21
|
101.77
|
139.63
|
136.17
|
98.3
|
154.53
|
Cash Conversion Cycle
|
44.42
|
170.42
|
149.3
|
|
67.83
|
94.73
|
75.85
|
61.46
|
78.24
|
109.63
|
94.91
|
Receivables Turnover
|
4.97
|
4.75
|
5.42
|
|
6.39
|
6.49
|
7.02
|
6.78
|
8.19
|
9.69
|
4.2
|
Inventory Turnover
|
2.85
|
2.36
|
2.68
|
|
3.41
|
2.73
|
2.91
|
2.48
|
2.15
|
2.14
|
2.25
|
Fixed Assets Turnover
|
1.12
|
0.97
|
0.99
|
|
1.14
|
0.93
|
0.99
|
0.88
|
0.78
|
0.86
|
0.93
|
Asset Turnover
|
0.62
|
0.54
|
0.59
|
|
0.66
|
0.6
|
0.65
|
0.59
|
0.5
|
0.52
|
0.53
|
d)
Coverage of Almarai Company
Coverage ratios include cash
coverage ratio and interest coverage ratios. The cash coverage ratios of
Almarai Company and NADEC are 2.3 and 0.47, respectively. A ratio of less than
1 indicates that the company has interest expenses lower than available cash
thus company would not have difficulty to meet its interest expenses. While
interest coverage ratios of Almarai Company and NADEC are 5.2 and 2.5 in order (Tadawul.com.sa, 2019).
Coverage of Almarai Company
|
Cash Coverage Ratio
|
|
Total Cash
|
1182902
|
2.32184
|
|
Interest
Expense
|
509467
|
Interest Coverage Ratio
|
|
EBIT
|
2,652,155
|
5.20574
|
|
Interest expense
|
509,467
|
Coverage of NADEC
|
Cash Coverage Ratio
|
|
Total Cash
|
35,219
|
0.472186842
|
|
Interest Expense
|
74587
|
Interest Coverage Ratio
|
|
EBIT
|
193,435
|
2.593414402
|
|
Interest
expense
|
74,587
|
e) Leverage
of Almarai Company
According to
the following table leverage and debt ratios of Almarai Company and NADEC are relatively
similar. Debt to asset ratio of less than 1 for both companies indicates that
the company has more assets than liabilities. While on the other hand, the
debt-to-equity ratio of greater than 1 shows that both companies have debt more
than equity. Such a situation indicates that companies need to have attention
to debt control strategies.
Source: (Morning Star, 2019)
Liquidity/Financial
Health
|
2009-12
|
2010-12
|
2011-12
|
2012-12
|
2013-12
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
Latest
Qtr
|
Current
Ratio
|
1.51
|
1.15
|
0.92
|
0.97
|
1.44
|
1.21
|
1.28
|
1.11
|
1.18
|
1.31
|
1.29
|
Quick
Ratio
|
0.67
|
0.45
|
0.27
|
0.28
|
0.66
|
0.44
|
0.62
|
0.37
|
0.57
|
0.49
|
0.58
|
Financial
Leverage
|
2.03
|
2.03
|
2.33
|
2.59
|
2.3
|
2.2
|
2.27
|
2.23
|
2.2
|
2.32
|
2.31
|
Debt/Equity
|
0.74
|
0.7
|
0.85
|
0.96
|
0.82
|
0.71
|
0.77
|
0.78
|
0.73
|
0.84
|
0.79
|
Liquidity/Financial
Health
|
2008-12
|
2009-12
|
2010-12
|
2011-12
|
2012-12
|
2014-12
|
2015-12
|
2016-12
|
2017-12
|
2018-12
|
Latest
Qtr
|
Current
Ratio
|
0.33
|
0.59
|
0.68
|
|
0.95
|
0.84
|
0.92
|
0.75
|
0.76
|
0.65
|
0.96
|
Quick
Ratio
|
0.24
|
0.23
|
0.31
|
|
0.42
|
0.35
|
0.42
|
0.29
|
0.27
|
0.23
|
0.5
|
Financial
Leverage
|
2.31
|
2.57
|
2.44
|
|
2.41
|
2.72
|
2.8
|
2.81
|
2.87
|
2.74
|
2.73
|
Debt/Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
0.91
|
0.77
|
0.75
|
0.46
|
0.78
|
In the above table and charts,
the liquidity ratios of both organizations can be seen. Almarai Corporation has
enough cash to pay its short term obligations however NADEC needs to improve
its liquidity position. NADEC currently does not have enough cash from which it
can pay its short term loans.
C. Valuation Conclusion of Almarai Company
It is concluded that Return on
asset ratios of Almarai Company and NADEC is less than 1. Comparatively,
Almarai Company has a return on asset ratio better than NADEC. However, the
overall trend is negative and declining, which is not a suitable trend.
According to ratios. The profitability condition of NADEC is not as much better
as Almarai. There is need to take steps on urgent basis to improve the profitability
of the corporation. The increasing trend in the profitability of the company is
good sign for NADEC. Almarai Corporation has enough cash to pay its short term
obligations however NADEC needs to improve its liquidity position. NADEC
currently does not have enough cash from which it can pay its short term loans.
References of Almarai Company
Campbell, D., Edgar, D., & Stonehouse, G. (2011). Business
Strategy: An Introduction (3 ed.). Macmillan International Higher
Education.
Fridson, M. S., & Alvarez, F. (2011). Financial
Statement Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Jonathan, B. (2010). Financial Management.
Pearson Education, India.
Morning Star. (2019). Almarai Co. Retrieved
from http://financials.morningstar.com/ratios/r.html?t=2280
Morning Star. (2019). National Agriculture
Development Co. Retrieved from
http://financials.morningstar.com/ratios/r.html?t=6010®ion=sau&culture=en-US
SINHA, G. (2012). FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS.
PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Spender, J.-C. (2014). Business Strategy: Managing
Uncertainty, Opportunity, and Enterprise. OUP Oxford.
Tadawul.com.sa. (2019). Almarai Co. Retrieved
from www.tadawul.com.sa: https://www.tadawul.com.sa/wps/portal/tadawul/market-participants/issuers/issuers-directory/company-details/!ut/p/z1/04_Sj9CPykssy0xPLMnMz0vMAfIjo8zi_Tx8nD0MLIy83V1DjA0czVx8nYP8PI0MDAz0I4EKzBEKDEJDLYEKjJ0DA11MjQzcTfW99KPSc_KTIGZllJQUWKkaqBqUJKYklpfmqBroRy
Tadawul.com.sa. (2019). National Agricultural
Development Co. Retrieved from www.tadawul.com.sa:
https://www.tadawul.com.sa/wps/portal/tadawul/market-participants/issuers/issuers-directory/company-details/!ut/p/z1/04_Sj9CPykssy0xPLMnMz0vMAfIjo8zi_Tx8nD0MLIy83V1DjA0czVx8nYP8PI0MDAz0I4EKzBEKDEJDLYEKjJ0DA11MjQzcTfW99KPSc_KTIGZllJQUWKkaqBqUJKYklpfmqBroRy