Company
Background of AT&T
AT&T
is one of the largest Multinational telecommunication Corporation in the world.
The organizations headquarter is located in Dallas Texas USA. The organization
is the largest mobile telephone service provider in the world. The corporation
was formed in the year 1983. The key products of the corporation include
Broadband, Network Security, Cable Television, Pay Television and many other
products. As per 2017 statistics, the corporation has employed 254000
employees. AT&T started its operations as Southwestern Bell Telephone
Company but later involved in the business of American Telephone &
Telegraph. The organization is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and is the
component of S&P 100 and S&P 500.
Financial
Analysis of AT&T
Company:
|
AT&T
(T)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio
|
Formula for Calculation
|
Calculation
|
2017 Ratio
|
2016 Ratio
|
2015 Ratio
|
Indsutry Average
|
Trend Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
Short-term solvency, or liquidity, ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current ratio
|
Current
assets
|
79146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
81389
|
0.97
|
0.76
|
0.75
|
0.84
|
better
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quick ratio
|
Current
assets - Inventory
|
79146-2225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
81389
|
0.95
|
0.72
|
0.67
|
0.79
|
better
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash ratio
|
Cash
|
50498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
81389
|
0.62
|
0.11
|
0.11
|
|
better
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Long-term solvency, or
financial leverage, ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt ratio
|
Total
assets - Total equity
|
444097-140861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
444097
|
0.68
|
0.70
|
0.70
|
|
worse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Multiplier
|
Total
assets
|
444097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Equity
|
140861
|
3.15
|
3.28
|
3.28
|
|
worse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Coverage Ratio
|
EBIT
+ Depriciation
|
23863+19761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
-6300
|
-6.92
|
-9.31
|
-10.80
|
|
better
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.Assets utilization, or turnover,
ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Turnover
|
COGS
|
|
8707.00
|
9710.00
|
11940.00
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
2225.00
|
2039.00
|
4033.00
|
|
|
|
|
ANSWER:
|
3.91
|
4.76
|
2.96
|
59.2
|
better
|
Receivables Turnover
|
Sales
|
|
34917.00
|
36003.00
|
32544.00
|
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
|
1249.00
|
1579.00
|
2993.00
|
|
|
|
|
ANSWER:
|
27.96
|
22.80
|
10.87
|
15.75
|
better
|
Total Asset Turnover
|
Sales
|
|
34917.00
|
36003.00
|
32544.00
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
444097.00
|
403821.00
|
402672.00
|
|
|
|
|
ANSWER:
|
0.08
|
0.09
|
0.08
|
0.52
|
better
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Profability Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit Margin
|
Net
Income
|
|
29450.00
|
12976.00
|
13345.00
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
34917.00
|
36003.00
|
32544.00
|
|
|
|
|
ANSWER:
|
84%
|
36%
|
41%
|
6.16
|
better
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROA
|
Net
Income
|
|
29450.00
|
12976.00
|
13345.00
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
444097.00
|
403821.00
|
402672.00
|
|
|
|
|
ANSWEWR:
|
7%
|
3%
|
3%
|
3.62
|
better
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
Net
Income
|
|
29450.00
|
12976.00
|
13345.00
|
|
|
|
Total
Equity
|
|
140861.00
|
123135.00
|
122671.00
|
|
|
|
|
ANSWER:
|
21%
|
11%
|
11%
|
10.49
|
better
|
5.Market value ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
Earnings Ratio
|
Price
Per Share
|
|
38.88
|
40.38
|
34.41
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per share
|
|
4.77
|
2.10
|
2.37
|
|
|
|
|
ANSWER:
|
8.15
|
19.23
|
14.52
|
55.54
|
worse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price-sales ratio
|
Price
Per Share
|
|
38.88
|
40.38
|
34.41
|
|
|
|
Sales
Per Share
|
|
5.66
|
5.84
|
5.78
|
|
|
|
|
ANSWER:
|
6.86
|
6.92
|
5.95
|
1.53
|
better
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market-to-book ratio
|
Market
value per share
|
|
38.88
|
40.38
|
34.41
|
|
|
|
Book
value per share
|
|
22.85
|
19.96
|
21.80
|
|
|
|
|
ANSWER:
|
1.70
|
2.02
|
1.58
|
2.28
|
better
|
Liquidity Ratios: The liquidity
ratios of the corporation indicate the short-term solvency position of the
corporation. Through liquidity ratios, one can determine whether the
organization is in the position to pay its short-term obligations or not. The
current ratio & quick ratio of the AT&T Corporation in the year 2017
was 0.97 and 0.95 which is higher than the previous year. In 2016 the current
& quick ratio was 0.76 and 0.72. It means over time the short-term
liquidity position has improved. The corporation is currently in the position
to pay back its short-term obligation. If the liquidity position of the company
is compared with the industry average than it is quite clear that the
performance of the company is better than the industry average (Finch, 2010).
Leverage
Ratios: The financial leverage ratios indicate the long-term
solvency position of the corporation. The company's finance its assets or
operations through debt or equity. It is preferred that the company should
maintain the optimum capital structure. The total debt ratio of the AT&T in
2017 was 68% which shows a bit of improvement from the previous year in which
the debt ratio was 70%. The debt ratio of the organization indicates that most
of the organization's assets are financed through debt. The equity multiplier
ratio is also indicating that high financial leverage of the corporation. It
would be more appropriate that in future the company should finance its
activities through equity rather than debt (Tennent, 2008).
Efficiency
Ratios: The efficiency ratios show how efficiently the
organization is utilizing its assets to generate its sales. The efficiency
ratios of the AT&T indicate that the business is not utilizing its assets
properly to generate sales. In the year 2017, the total asset turnover ratio is
0.08 which is way lower than the industry average that is 0.52. The receivable turnover ratio shows how
efficiently the corporation is converting sales into cash and it can be seen
that the company's receivable turns over in the year 2017 is 27.96 which is
higher than industry average of 15.75. The high inventory turnover ratios
indicate huge sales and low inventory turnover shows the decrease in the number
of sales. The inventory turnover in 2017 is 3.91, which is lower than industry
average of 59.2. It means AT&T is not generating many sales (Pandey, 2015).
Profitability
Ratios: The profitability ratios indicate how much profit organization
is generating in the specific period of time. After analyzing the profitability
ratios of the AT&T it can be said that the organization is generating the
significant amount of profit. In 2017, the profit margin of the corporation is
84% which is way higher than the industry average that is 6.16%. The return on
asset (ROA) of the company is 7% which is also above the industry average. The
ROE of the corporation in 2017 was 21% which is way higher than the industry
average of `10.40% (Finch, 2010). The profitability ratios of the
corporation have indicated that the company is generating profit which shows
growth of the business and in the future the company can expand its business
even further. Moreover, the investors invest in such corporations whose profitability
is high and provide the significant amount of return on their investment (SINHA, 2012).
Market
Ratios: The market ratios of the AT&T indicate the
price-earnings ratio is lower than the industry average. In 2017, the P/E ratio
was 8.15 which is way behind the industry that is 55.54. However, the price to
sales ratio of the corporations is better as in 2017 it is 6.86, which is
higher than industry’s average of 1.53. The market to book ratio is relative to
the industry average.
Stock Graphs of AT&T
Source: http://charts.equityclock.com/seasonal_charts/T_RelativeToSPX.PNG
The
above graph indicates the performance of AT&T stock in comparison with the
S&P 500 index. The performance of the AT&T is not good as compared to
S&P 500 index. The above chart shows the performance of the year 2017. Only
in the month of October, the performance shows improvement otherwise the
stock's performance remains lower than the S&P 500 index. The company
should take steps to improve its performance (Pandey, 2015).
Source: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/T/chart?p=T
The
above graph shows the performance of the AT&T stocks over the period of the
past 4 years. It shows that in the past few years, the price of the stock has
experienced fluctuations. In 2017 the price has experienced an increase but in
2018, it experienced a decrease. After 2017 the stocks prices are showing the
downward trend. The corporation has to take steps in order to increase the
prices of its stocks (Tennent, 2008).
Summary
of Article: “Why AT&T's stock went up when its Time Warner deal got in trouble”
In this news article, the information about the stock
prices and the deal with the Time Warner is provided in detail. In 2017 the
deal of the AT&T with Time Warner got in trouble however it does not have
any impact on the prices of the stocks. The AT&T stock prices move in the
opposite direction instead of showing the decline. The reason for the stock’s
prices increases even the deal does not go well is that the market does not
believe the deal will be beneficial for the corporation. The stock prices might
show a decrease if the market believes there would be the significant impact of
the deal (Schnurman, 2017).
Conclusion on AT&T
After discussing all aspects, it is evident that
profitability and liquidity position of the AT&T Corporation is exceptional
however the corporation has to improve its efficiency & stock performance. The
current ratio & quick ratio of the AT&T Corporation in 2017 was 0.97
and 0.95, which is higher than the previous year. In 2016 the current &
quick ratio was 0.76 and 0.72. It means over time the short-term liquidity
position has improved. After analyzing the profitability ratios of the AT&T
it can be said that the organization is generating the significant amount of
profit. In 2017, the profit margin of the corporation is 84% which is way
higher than the industry average. However, the company should take steps to
improve stocks performance.
References of AT&T
Finch, B. (2010). Effective Financial Management.
Kogan Page Publishers.
Pandey, I. (2015). Financial Management. Vikas
Publishing House.
Schnurman, M. (2017). Why AT&T's stock went up when
its Time Warner deal got in trouble. Retrieved from https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2017/11/16/atts-stock-went-time-warner-deal-got-trouble
SINHA, G. (2012). FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS. PHI
Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Tennent, J. (2008). Guide to Financial Management
(illustrated ed.). John Wiley & Sons.