Introduction of
Making business decisions
The
case is about the investigation of different factors that induce impact on the
sale price of the oceanside condominium units. These condominium units were
sold in the public auction. The sales were done after 20 years and the
relationship was determined for different factors and sale prices (McClave, James, Benson, George, Sincich, Terry,
2001).
The condominium complex was first completed in 1975 and because of recession
sales became slow. In this case, the developer was forced to sell condominium
units at the auctions. The aim of the present work is to conduct a regression
analysis and regression model that can be used to predict the sale prices of
the condominium unit sold at auction. The report presents the results of the analysis
that include a graphical representation of independent variables in the model
that affect the price of the auction (Sincich, 2000).
Background of the case of Making business decisions
The ocean view is facing south side and faces the ocean and beach. Only a
single elevator in the complex is located at the east end of the building 1.
The people are moving to and from the high sides of building 2. The building
units are ending on the number 11 and 14 that are apart from each other. The
auction data is complete for the specific buyer and oriented over the estate
sales data. There is a number of unsold units that are complex and furnished by
the developer. The services were further provided to the rented auctions. The
condominium complex is complex for the single elevator that is located at the
end of the complex producers. The developers are unsure about the height of
units, the distance between the units, presence of ocean view, the effect of
the prices (McClave & Sincich, Statistics, 2009). The single elevator
is in the complex process and it requires greater great effort for the
management of private services and houses. The condominium complex is unique
and produces a remarkable level of privacy. Consequently, the complex and
unique infrastructure is developed with different heights of the unit. The data
used in the analysis of 106 units sold at the auction include the sale price,
flood height, distance from elevator, view of the ocean, end units and
furniture. The layout of the condominium complex presented in figure 1. The
relevant details of the condominium complex are listed below,
1.
There are eight identical floors of the complex.
2.
The size of the units is the same for the
complex.
3.
The units
are on the first floor towards the south and beach pool are known as an ocean
view.
4.
The units on the other floor are towards the
north and facing the parking lot and called bay-view.
5.
The single elevator of the building is complex,
and it is located towards the east end of the building.
6.
Some of the units are end units that are viewed
from the partially blocked region.
Purpose of the study of Making business decisions
The
goal of the present work is to identify different factors that induce influence
on the sales prices of condominium units. The report will find quantification
of effects with the factors. The information is further used by the owner and
help in identifying sales prices and possible rental rates in the future (Prentice-Hall Publishers, 2010). Before having
analysis, anticipated effects for the explanatory variables are considered. The
variables used in the analysis are listed below in table 1.
Table 1: Price and Unit sale price
PRICE
|
Unit sale price
|
FLOOR
|
Unit floor
|
DISTELEV
|
The
distance of units from the elevator
|
OCEAN
|
1 for the ocean view unit and 0 in another case
|
END UNIT
|
1
for the end unit and 0 in the other case
|
FURN
|
1 if the units are furnished and 0 in the other
case
|
Data analysis of Making business decisions
On
every floor, the furnished and unfurnished units are sold to the customer. On
three floors, the units are unfurnished. Half of the bay view units were sold
furnished and one-third of the ocean view units were sold as furnished (McClave, James, Benson, George, Sincich, Terry,
2001).
Model 1: The “Naive” Regression of Making business decisions
In
the analysis, the descriptive statistics are carried out for the marginal
distributions of the variables. The variables used in the analysis are price,
floor, distance from elevator, ocean, end unit and Furnish. The descriptive
statistics include calculation of mean, median, standard deviation, minimum
value and maximum value. The values are mentioned in table 2.
Table 2: Statistical analysis of
price, floor, distance, view, end, furnish, and auction
|
PRICE100
|
FLOOR
|
DISTANCE
|
VIEW
|
END
|
FURNISH
|
AUCTION
|
Mean
|
201.2871
|
4.488038
|
7.803827751
|
0.516746411
|
0.033492823
|
0.344497608
|
0.50717703
|
Median
|
195
|
4
|
9
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Standard Deviation
|
33.88987
|
2.274673
|
4.605054152
|
0.500919287
|
0.180351556
|
0.476345121
|
0.50114885
|
Minimum
|
130
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Maximum
|
306
|
8
|
15
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
The model
includes five explanatory variables for the analysis and detail information is
under statistical analysis. The variables used in the regression analysis are
coefficient, standard deviation, t-value and P-value (McClave, James, Benson, George, Sincich, Terry, 2001). The results of the statistical analysis
carried out for the five explanatory variables in the raw forms are mentioned
below in table 3. Table 3 provides a cross-tabulation of furnished units with
both ocean view and floor levels. The correlation matrix is used to provide an
idea about the interrelation of six variables.
Table 3: The results of statistical
analysis including co-efficient, standard deviation, t-value, and the p-value
of all the variables
|
FLOOR
|
DISTANCE
|
VIEW
|
END
|
FURNISH
|
AUCTION
|
Co- efficient
|
217.6
|
183.36
|
181.04
|
201.78
|
201.41
|
211.03
|
Standard
Deviation
|
5.05
|
4.4
|
2.75
|
2.38
|
2.90
|
3.21
|
T – value
|
43.07
|
41.667
|
65.68
|
84.67
|
69.39
|
65.76
|
P – value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The regression
statistics of the price floor, end, distance, furnished units and auction are
mentioned in table 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. The relation between the price and floor
relation analysis are measured. The price probably drives the correlation
between all the factor. The correlation matrix is used for the
cross-tabulations. The negative correlation is measured between the other
parameters with the price considerations. In the analysis negative correlation
is observed between the floor and ocean view of the units (McClave & Sincich, 2009).
1. Regression analysis of price and floor
value
The
plot indicates the observation regarding price and floor value in the analysis.
In the analysis the floor value is the level of floor and location of the unit
as 1, 2, . . .. 8. The graphical representation shows the fluctuation between
changing the price and floor value in figure 1. The highest and lowest floor
value is observed that define dropping values and other parameters. The multiple
R-value for the price and floor relation is 0.24. The R – square value in the
regression analysis is 0.059. The adjusted R square value is 0.05. The total
number of observations in the analysis is 209 units. The standard error
measured in the analysis is 32.95. The significant factor of the regression
analysis is evaluated as 0.0003 with factor value as 13.03. The values measured in the regression
analysis are mentioned in table 4. The correlation between the floor and price
is negative that means the positive effect of the lower floors on the price and
it is measured by the regression analysis. The correlation defines the
relationship between these variables. For instance, in case of negative
correlation between ocean and floor, it means that on an average smaller number
of units were sold on the high floors (Sincich, 2000).
Table 4: Regression statistics of
price and floor relation analysis
Regression
Statistics
|
Multiple R
|
0.243369768
|
R Square
|
0.059228844
|
Adjusted R Square
|
0.054684056
|
Standard Error
|
32.950221
|
Observations
|
209
|
Figure 1: Relation between price and
floor value
2. Regression analysis of price and floor
value
The
summary of regression statistics for price and end relation analysis of
continuum units is mentioned below in table 5. According to the statistical
analysis, the value of multiple R is 0.077, R square value is 0.006, and value
of adjusted R-square is 0.001. The standard error value is 33.86. The total
number of observations is the number of units that is 209 in the statistical
analysis. The significant factor is 0.26 and regression factor is 1.26. The
residual of analysis is 207. The graphical representation in figure 2
demonstrates the relation between the price of units and the end relation. The
value of the end unit fluctuates between zero and one. In the end unit, the
partial reduction is measured for the view of end units on the ocean side. The
number of ending units reduces their sale price. In the case of end units of
ocean view, the building is blocked under the building 2. The qualitative
variable is under analysis with the dummy variable and the number end for 0 and
1. While comparing the values it is estimated that the FLOOR coefficient is not
significant in the model (McClave, James, Benson, George, Sincich, Terry, 2001). The graphical
representation shows non-linearity and the regression is used to underestimate
the prices of first-floor units. The regression seems to demonstrate the prices
that are overestimated for the third and fourth units of the floors. The
residuals are accurate for the remaining floors. There are different methods to
model the nonlinearity and floor effect that is linear spline and polynomial.
The two indicators and variables under the addition with the linearity forms.
According to the analysis, the first floor seems to be different from the
remaining other floors. In the analysis, the fact of the higher floor may
induce a positive impact on the value and price of the unit under the linearity
model. The analysis shows that the variables of the first floor and second
floor have positive and significant effects.
Table 5: Regression statistics of
price and end relation analysis
Regression
Statistics
|
Multiple R
|
0.07787967
|
R Square
|
0.00606524
|
Adjusted R Square
|
0.00126363
|
Standard Error
|
33.8684463
|
Observations
|
209
|
Figure 2: Relation between price and end
unit
3. Regression analysis of price and unit
distance
The distance of
the unit is measured in length from the elevator and it is a complex value that
represents the number of condominium units. In this analysis, two units of
distance are also added to the building number two. The measured length takes
into account the walking distance of the units from the elevators (Sincich, 2000). The distance of
unit 105 from the elevator is measured as 3. The distance between elevator and
unit 113 is 9 and the variable values are changing in the analysis from level
1, 2, 3 . . . 15.
To allow the
possibility of partial effect for the given variable, it is possible to vary
the values with the levels of floor and another variable. In the model, we will
introduce interaction terms. According to the results, one might expect a
positive effect on the value of the floor by changing the ocean view and
distance of the elevator for all the floor levels. The summary of regression
analysis is mentioned in table 6. The regression analysis shows the value of
multiple R is 0.31. The R- Square value and adjusted R square value is 0.097
and 0.093 respectively. The standard error was measured as 32.27 for 209
observations in the analysis. The significant factor is 4.2. The factor of
regression is measured as 22.34. The coefficient measured in the relation
between the price of the unit and the distance of the unit from the elevator is
183.36. The graphical representation in figure 3 demonstrates the relation
between price and distance of the unit from the elevator.
Table 6: Regression statistics of
price and distance relation analysis
Regression
Statistics
|
Multiple R
|
0.312147803
|
R Square
|
0.097436251
|
Adjusted R Square
|
0.09307604
|
Standard Error
|
32.27418456
|
Observations
|
209
|
Figure 3: Relation between price and
unit distance
4. Regression analysis of price and view of
the ocean from the unit
In the analysis of the view of the ocean from the unit is also
considered. The consideration includes the absence and presence of ocean view
that is recorded for all the units and specified it by considering the dummy
variable (McClave, James, Benson, George, Sincich, Terry, 2001). The value 1 is used
in the unit processing system for units that have a view of the ocean and zero
shows absence of ocean view from the unit. The data under investigation is not
enough to evaluate the interaction between floor and ocean view from the unit.
The interaction between the end unit and the ocean view is not accurate and
authentic because no bay view end unit was sold in the current data. The
summary of regression analysis for the price of units and the view of units
from the ocean is mentioned below in table 7. The results of regression
statistics show the value of Multiple regression as 0.57 and value of
Regression square as 0.33. The adjusted R square value is 0.33 and the standard
error was measured as 27.70 for 209 observations. The graphical representation
in figure 4 shows the relation between the price of the unit and ocean view
units in the building. The values fluctuate between highest as one and lowest
as zero.
Table 7: Regression statistics of
price and view of units under the relation analysis
Regression
Statistics
|
Multiple R
|
0.578867205
|
R Square
|
0.335087241
|
Adjusted R Square
|
0.331875102
|
Standard Error
|
27.70120546
|
Observations
|
209
|
Figure 4: Relation between price and ocean
view
5. Regression analysis of price and unit
auction
The regression
analysis for auction show relation between auction of units in the buildings
and price for the units. The observation is not seeming strange for any reason.
There is a significant influence of the evaluations on the regression that can
cause the inclusion of the interaction terms (McClave & Sincich, 2009). In the regression
statistics of price and unit auction, the value of multiple R is 0.28 and the
value of R- the square is estimated as 0.08. The value of adjusted R – the
square is 0.07. The analysis was based on 209 observations and the standard
error of the regression statistics was measured as 32.56.
Table 8: Regression statistics of
price and auction of units under the relation analysis
Regression
Statistics
|
Multiple R
|
0.284328265
|
R Square
|
0.080842562
|
Adjusted R Square
|
0.076402188
|
Standard Error
|
32.56951474
|
Observations
|
209
|
Figure 5: Relation between price and
auction
6. Regression analysis of price and furnished
units
The
consideration of price and furnished units deal with presence and absence of
the furniture that is recorded for each unit. The single dummy variable is used
in the process and regression analysis. the value of 1 shows that the unit is
furnished and zero show that it is not furnished (McClave & Sincich, 2009). According to the
economic theory, the interaction between the values of furnished units with the
other variables must yield an estimate of zero. The main reason is that if any
significant effect that is different from zero is observed for any value of the
furnished unit's interaction terms it would lead to finding that is considered
for the interest of owners. The analysis of data shows that all the furnished
interactions are insignificant from zero that is already predicted in the
economic theory. The value of end unit interaction is also considered as
insignificant, but the regression shows a bit surprising result. The regression
statistics of price and furnished units are provided below in table 9.
According to the regression statistics the value of multiple regression factor
is 0.005. The value of regression square is 2.76 with adjusted R square is
0.004. The standard error is measured as 33.97 for 209 observations. The
graphical representation in figure 6 shows the relation between price and
furnished units.
Table 9: Regression statistics of
price and furnished units under the relation analysis
Regression
Statistics
|
Multiple R
|
0.005262331
|
R Square
|
2.76921E-05
|
Adjusted R Square
|
-0.004803092
|
Standard Error
|
33.97115569
|
Observations
|
209
|
Figure 6: Relation between price and furnished
units
Conclusion of Making business decisions
The objective of
present work was to develop a model that demonstrates the relation between
price and other five variables including the distance of the units from the
elevator, floor level, end unit, ocean view from the unit, and auction. The
statistical analysis carried out in the report for these variables is
regression analysis. Besides the regression analysis, the correlation between
all the variables is measured by comparing mean, standard deviation, minimum
value and maximum value. The graphical representation is used to show the
relationship between all parameters and their significance. On the basis of the
current analysis, we have settled different possible models that can be used to
analyze the significance of the correlation between all variables. In different
models, the different analysis was settled invariably. One of the important
considerations is that the proposed model has captured all the main patterns of
the data. In the whole analysis, first-floor units were considered different
from the rest of the units. The distance of the elevator from the unit is also
measured. The analysis shows that it will be more beneficial to drop the
first-floor units from all the sample data and consider only the ground floor
units. The results of statistical analysis should be applied to all the above
units of the building in the case.
References of Making business decisions
McClave, J. T., & Sincich, T. (2009). Statistics.
Pearson Prentice Hall.
McClave, James, Benson, George, Sincich,
Terry. (2001). Statistics for business and economics, Volume 1.
Prentice-Hall.
Prentice-Hall Publishers. (2010). A
First Course Business Statistics, 8th Ed, McClave-Benson-Sincich,: A First
Course Business Statistics,. Bukupedia.
Sincich, T. (2000). Statistics by
Example. Prentice Hall.