Introduction of Existentialism
Existence of God and the reality of
human being in this world are the topic of interest for philosophers from the
very beginning. Many philosophers studied these questions to answer the reality
of human being and God. One of these philosophes is existentialism philosophy. Existentialism
is considered as humanism. Existentialism followers claim that the human being
is an independent creature who even doesn't need any limitation related to
religion and social norms. According to them, the human being is entirely
independent who can take his own decision based on his will rather than
accepting what is desired by the society or what is instructed to him by God.
Existentialism theory was elaborated by Jean- Paul Sartre. Jean-Paul Sartre
presented this theory of Existentialism also known as humanism and freedom
theory in the 1900s as a thought of philosophy. His construction of philosophy
is quite old now however still is considered as one of most influencing
philosophy regarding human being and his freedom. In this easy, existentialism
is discussed in the light of statement of Jean- Paul Sartre.
Existentialism by
Sartre
The main idea behind this
Existentialism philosophy is blurred now however still many themes are in the
application in modern societies. Key themes related to Atheism and religion,
social criticism, the importance of own choices, authenticity, the importance
of individual opinion, and anxiety. In the anxiety theme, he studied the
behaviour of human being toward thoughts of contingencies, extreme situations,
uncertainties, and death. Following Existentialism philosophy, boundaries drawn
by the social norms and idea regarding life and death are causes for enhancing
anxiety in the human being. Following his perception about the human being, the
human is born with independent behaviour therefore when something is imposed on
them regarding their life or end of life they become anxious and upset.
Existentialism followers claim that
human being creates his own meaning for life while thinking independently. Human
being tries to make rational choices and decisions regarding the facts of this
world including life and death rather than following irrational claims and
decisions of the community. According to Jean Paul Sartre, the word freedom
(that he used to represent behaviour and philosophy human being) is philosophical
and technical. However, following his belief, this word is not quite popular
and empirical. Jean Paul Sartre claims that freedom is the existence of a human
being in this world that permeates every aspect of the human condition.
While supporting Existentialism
philosophy Sartre claim that “Existentialism is nothing other than an attempt
to draw all of the consequences of a coherent atheistic position”. In this
statement, the word atheistic represents that Jean Paul Sartre was the supporter
of the atheistic school of thought about Existentialism. Historical literature
represents that Existentialism supporter is divided into two main groups. One
of these group is known as Christians which includes two Catholic: Gabriel
Marcel and Jaspers. While on the other hand atheistic existentialist includes
Jean Paul Sartre, French existentialists, and Heidegger (Baird, 2016).
In the statement, Sartre limited
the philosophy of Existentialism to the consequences of a coherent atheistic
position which means that Existentialism philosophy only represents the
position of disbelief by its followers and supporter regarding the facts of
this world. Existentialism of atheistic school of thought disbelief the
existence of God and his control over the universe. Prior to the 18th
century, they were used to accept the limited control and concept of God in the
life of human being however after that they start disbelieving about the
existence of God in this universe. The statement of Sartre is projecting their
poor belief about God (D.R.Bhandari, 1998).
According to the Jean Paul Sartre
statement about Existentialism, we can say that Sartre limits the ideas and
philosophy of aesthetic existentialist just to an argument against the
existence of God. Following, his claim the philosophy of Existentialism has
nothing more than disbelieving as it does not cover other important areas and
aspects of this universe and human being which are mainly discussed by many
other philosophers in past. In actual, atheistic condition show that Existentialism
is against the existence of God while other groups of Existentialism such as
Catholic believe the existence of God and his control over the life of human
being. Thus, elaborating on the statement of Sartre regarding atheistic
coherent position it can be said that when human being started thinking that
they are the human nature and they have control over their life with their
decisions and personal opinions then they started refusing the existence of any
external entity or power (Baird, 2016).
They started believing that they are independent and they can do what they
want.
While regarding life and death they
consider such fact as part of human nature. Thus, by refusing such external
power and control concept they started claiming that human being is independent
of everything. Atheistic existentialist started considering themselves as the
ruler of this world with enough power and capabilities to make the whole world
according to their choices and rational decisions. Advancing these ideas and
thoughts they, later on, started refusing the existence of God and presented
the philosophy of human freedom because of which Sartre claimed that Existentialism
is nothing other than an attempt to draw all of the consequences of a coherent
atheistic position. Thus Jean Paul Sartre claimed that all attempts made by
existentialists are just presenting their state of disbelieving about their
realities of this universe.
Following his statement, these
atheistic existentialists are just accepting the existence of human being in
this world while the rest of all is not in their belief. As he further
explained that if there is no God then there should be at least one being in whom
existence precedes essence (Baird, 2016; Alexvermeer.com, 2011). Then it requires
the existence of someone before the concept of human being was defined. For
instance, we can say that each object created in the world was once an idea or
a concept in the mind of the creator. To explain this he presented an example
of a paper cutter which was a concept or idea in the mind of its creator before
it was created and presented in the society. According to him, if we accept the
philosophy of atheistic existentialist then there comes a question in our mind.
If there is no God in this world then who had the concept of the human being
before human being was created. Then what is the reality of human being? What
is meant by existence precedes essence? Explaining these questions in the light
of philosophies and ideas presented by Sartre it is said that human being
appeared on this earth before he was defined. Firstly, the existence of human
being was completed then he himself defined his reality. In such a situation, if
a man is indefinable then his existence is nothing in this world.
Considering this there is no God and
man is created by himself. Human being existence is even not a concept of human
nature. Human being created himself and then defined himself that is the
concept that seems rational and logical to the atheistic existentialists and
based on this the attempt to disbelieve the existence of God (Baird, 2016). Moreover, they
claim that as there is no God so there is no one in the world who can convince
them about something. In general, atheistic existentialist claimed that when
man created himself he thought about his future and thus made himself the part
of the future. For them, the man was already aware of his existence and reality
when he started his life therefore man has superiority over all other objects
of this world including garbage and stones.
Considering the statement of Sartre
it is clear that atheistic existentialist’s philosophy is entirely focused on
the consequences that help them claim that there is no God in this universe.
However, they searched for evidence and created philosophes to deny the
existence of God rather than searching for the truth. The term atheistic, it-self
present that it is about refusing something that is fact and reality. Thus, to
Sartre, existentialists are just disbelievers about the reality of God rather
than the philosopher of human reality and the existence of human being in this
world.
Conclusion of Existentialism
The whole discussion concludes that
existentialism is based on the freedom and self-made existence of human being
in this world. Existentialist presented views about the originality and
existence of man and the meaning of his life in this world. Jean Paul Sartre studied
this philosophy and presented another image of this philosophy. Jean Paul
Sartre limited this philosophy to an argument about the existence of God. Summarizing
discussion on this philosophy, existentialist is focused on disbelieving rather
than searching for truth and reality of human being. Existentialist disbelieve
the existence of God as according to them, the man was created first by himself
and then he defined himself. Before, this there was no concept and idea of man
in the mind of anyone else. Thus, man is independent and free to control his
life and the whole universe.
References of Existentialism
Alexvermeer.com. (2011). “Existentialism is a
Humanism” by Jean-Paul Sartre. Retrieved from Alexvermeer.com:
https://alexvermeer.com/%E2%80%9Cexistentialism-is-a-humanism%E2%80%9D-by-jean-paul-sartre/
Baird, F. (2016). Philosophic Classics: From
Plato to Derrida. Routledge.
D.R.Bhandari. (1998). Existentialist Perception Of
The Human Condition: With Special Reference To Sartre. The Paideia
Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, 6(1), 31-34.