Report on Racist of Toys and the popular culture and how the toys effect on the kids and popular culture

The racist’s toys are also harmful for the children and the popular culture of any society. The racist toys have developed by different racists of the world as there is a constant war over the racism in different parts of the world, so to continue this war and to expand its people stated develop the racist toys to change the mindset of the children and to continue the racism in the world. The racial toys have provide the insights that how the racists and the stereotypes have been dominated in the society and are affecting the children over the past two centuries. According to the sociologist, he said that:

For what reasons the toys do stand for? The toys are meant for the entertainment and the diversion for the children, moreover the toys should be used for the purpose of the society and help the society to develop a more racism free society, because the racism will end if the children of society are brought up with the beliefs that there is no races and everyone is equal. But if we continue on making the racists toys, then we cannot diminish racism from the society and the people cannot grow outwards in the society and the popular culture of the society cannot grow properly. According to the sociologist, he advice the manufactures of the toys and the retailers, that the they should consider developing the toys that inherent the values of the culture, not the racism, so that the children will learn about the values of nay popular culture rather than the racism and the discrimination that is going on in the word. The racist’s toys are just a beginning of war for the different culture and different societies. Develop such toys that provide peace in the culture not conflicts and the wars against each other.

Sexist Toys:

The sexist toys are another type of toys that are developed and manufactured in different parts of the world. These toys are more developed in different parts of the world and they define gender inequality. These sexist toys define gender inequality in different parts of the world and gender equality among the children and the youngsters. There is a long history of the development and the marketing of the gender toys. A sociologists known as the Elizabeth Sweet has observed the marketing of the sexist toys in different parts of the world. She observed at the California State University, that more than 7300 sexist toys were distributed in the 20^th century. She also monitored and discovered that the Sex based toys and their ads have been promoting in the world since the 1920’s and were this increase in the 1950’s. The sexist toys mostly occur in the gender revealing colors like the pink and blue and it shows inequality between the genders. The children in this way will learn gender inequality and will not treat each other as equal. There will be more inequality on the basis of the toys that are produced and manufactured in different parts of the world. Moreover, this will also have an affect on the popular culture, as the children will not treat the other genders equally, then how will the popular culture grow in the society and the how will the children learn the traditions of different culture and how will they treat equally every gender. Children re more socialized and they conform to the traditional gender role of the stereotypes. These are the developmental processes that re affected by the popular culture and its elements. Because the popular culture associates the masculinity with the agency, the power, and the aggression but they associate the feminity with the nurturance, passivity and the emotional and its expressivity. Toys most often reflect all these stereotypes that are in the popular culture. Some previous research have identified this gender inequality pattern in different areas of the world. And in the market, the gender differentiated items and things are displays and the differences in terms of the names, the logos and the colors in the marketing of the toys. All these inequalities are often occurred in the popular culture and due to this the people are thinking and considering to make the toys that show the gender inequality. Sometimes the toys do not have any affect n the popular culture, but the popular culture has effect on the manufacturing and the development of the toys and all these things have effect on the children and their mentality and they will learn gender inequality. This will have negative effect in the children and the sexist toys influence the children more negatively.

Hazardous Toys:

The hazardous toys are of many kinds and these toys affect the children in many ways. To ensure the safety of the children is more important and to protect them form the harmful toys is necessary because the new toys that are manufactured and develop are more hazardous for the children. The most common danger of the toys include the lead exposures, as lad exposures causes the health problems and these problems generally occur in the young child. The lead can affect the brain of the children and the nerves that re responsible for connecting the brain to the resto the body. When most of the young children’s eat lead or inhale it, this will lead to many problems in the children including the learning difficulties, behavioral problems and the lower intelligence in the children. All these problem are hazardous for the children and their mental growth. Another harmful product that is used in the toys is the Phthalates. The Phthalates is also known as the Plasticizers. Plasticizers are basically the chemicals that are used in the making of the plastics and ha to make the plastics more flexible and more durable and soft as well. These chemicals are dangerous for the human as they can also act the like the hormones in the body of the humans and the uses of this chemical can also increase the risk of different problems that can occur in the body including the Developmental problems and the reproductive problems. These chemicals are harmful and also result in the different types of the cancer including the testicular and the cancer of the prostrate. We should not utilize these kinds of toys in the homes as they affect the mental growth of the children and are hazardous for the children as well.

The next hazardous things in the toys include the magnets. Since nowadays there are many toys that are developed using the magnets. The magnets are another harmful material that are used in the manufacturing of t toys. If any child or any person swallow the magnets then it will have a negative reaction on the body.  Swallowing the magnets will be more harmful for the children as they can attract in the body and can pinch or twist the intestines and this will cause sever condition including the holes, infections and the blockages and eventually death. And some other diseases that also occur due to this including, vomiting, nausea, diarrhea and other things. Moreover the small parts in the toys and the electrical and tthe burning hazards also occur in the toys and are very harmful for the children. These things are effecting negatively the popular culture because the people do not have enough knowledge and they don’t know that what kind of toys should be used by the children. So these kinds of toys are harmful for the popular culture and the children and kids that are utilizing these toys.

Occult Toys:

The occult toys are type of the toys that affect the children badly and there is effect on the society due to all these things. For the past years, in the many areas, the manufacturers and the retailers have been producing the different toys and the demonic toys are developed for the children and more specifically for the boys. These toys are manufactured it develop a sense of the evil in the children. This is a new way to attract the children and the kids and to teach them the evil and dark side of the world and attract them towards the demonic activities. These things have negative effect on the children as well as the popular culture. The people will come to know about such kinds of the toys and the children will buy these toys. These things affect negatively, person and its values and the cultures. There are the toys that are affecting the kids and the popular culture. Sometimes the activiti3s in the popular culture influence the manufacturers to develop such kinds of the toys.

Different famous toys in the previous times that affect the popular culture and the kids:

Many toys were developed the in the past years from vehicles to the dolls and other innovative toys were developed, that has bring a change in the market place. But later on these iconic toys were introduced in the market and these toys have create the excessive demand of the consumers and due to this demand, these toys were developed in the bulk in the past few years. These toys were sold in the market and remain at the top in the marketed the in the kids of the kids an as well. Below further, we will see the toys that changed the world and the mind of the kids and the popular culture.

In the year 1963; the easy bake oven kit was launched and these are the manufacturing of the Kenner Products. This became popular in the past year because the development of the toys the children were able to work with the miniature oven and cook the food by themselves. His light bulb in the miniature oven was the main hating source and this toy was very popular among the children.

The development and the manufacturing of the Hot Wheels in the 1988 is another invention of the new toys that become very famous and this toy was manufactured by the Mattel. These wheels that were nature in size were developed to maintain the speed of the car and to increase the speed of the car as well.

In the 1974; the manufacturing of the Rubik’s Cube was one of the major and most important manufacturing of that time. Hungarian educator Erno Rubik looked for an approach to show his understudies three-dimensional issues in manners they could fathom. He concocted a 3D square that wandered aimlessly, making another kind of bewilder. The notorious riddle shape discovered its mark look utilizing 54 shaded stickers. By the mid-1980s, the solid shape showed up at toy fairs and the riddle increased worldwide notoriety. In excess of 400 million Rubik's Cubes have been sold since 1980. This was one of the most famous games of that time that was popular among the children and it has an impact on the society as well. The popular culture was devastated with the manufacturing of the Rubik’s Cube. The Rubik’s Cube was an oy that indulge the children in the healthy activities and promote the children and encourage them to play with these types of toys as this toy was capable to test the IQ level of the children and their capability as well. So this toy was useful for the kids and bring a devastating and positive change in the popular culture as well.

Craftsman Xavier Roberts discovered approval in the late 1970s for his carefully assembled Little People Originals texture figures. The next decade, he made these dolls directly from the Cabbage Patch, and they turned into a popular toy as a huge number of children started receiving the yarn-haired companions.

Hasbro propelled the primary Transformers line in 1984, an assortment of figures with a decent versus-fiendish backstory. The figures, in view of the TV arrangement of a similar name, changed into an alternate item by unfurling and turning in a particular request.

"Beanie Babies was the greatest toy rage I've at any point seen. Ty made mind boggling request that had purchasers arranging for cute extravagant that would sell out the subsequent it hit store racks. As a teenaged Hallmark store assistant, I was astounded to see our peaceful store with a line out the entryway and clients attempting to sneak into the stock space to get Beanie Babies as they were unloaded from new shipments."– Jackie Breyer, distributer, the Toy Book

"The animal's forefront innovation was imperceptible. There was no on/off switch; Furby was customized to reenact a living thing. It was anything but a 'watch me' toy. It was receptive to horde upgrades, for example, light, solid, and contact. It had two vocabularies, Furbish and English, [and they] spoke with one another. Furby was the ideal companion, steadfast and genuinely cherishing."– Richard Levy, Furby co-innovators.

"Razor bikes were absolutely progressive. The hued wheels, the smooth plan, the metal casing, and the collapsing ability made it stand apart from everything else available. It was anything but difficult to ride and sufficiently light to take anyplace. Razor made a toy that made scootering around town cool. It genuinely gave children, adolescents, and grown-up the same an entirely different method of transportation."– Laurie Schacht, boss toy official, the Toy Insider

"They were extremely three-dimensional and the hues were simply so unique in relation to whatever else in the commercial center. There weren't a ton of decisions in the design doll walkway. At the time, the Disney Channel was truly taking off, Hilary Duff, Lindsay Lohan—there was this mainstream society development for tween young ladies simply beginning to occur. It gave a feeling of strengthening, and it was unquestionably the opportune time for a design doll to come on the scene that mirrored that." – Dave Malacrida, previous VP, open and media relations, MGA Entertainment

Following the achievement of other gaming frameworks, for example, Xbox and PlayStation, the imaginative Nintendo Wii propelled in 2006. The smooth gaming console included multiplayer games, current showcase designs, and remote controllers. The new Wii Remote Controllers enabled clients to control ongoing interaction with physical signals, because of inherent accelerometers and infrared recognition.

The way through which we have load our children with different toys and different things to get entertain with is the wrongdoing of the age; it is a transgression against our youngsters; it defiles their effortlessness; it invigorates their ruinous tendency; it satiates and blunts their curiosity and rushes the hour of their general discontent with life. What with the flawlessness of smaller than normal ponies, watches, house-goods, trains, ships, steamboats, and so forth., leaving extravagant entirely to do, and the satiety of such things which our luxurious guilty pleasure gives, it is extremely faulty whether kids ever lived it up short of what they do now.

To start with, while our picture of the small kid settled inside the customary family may misrepresent how well kids were shielded from the bigger society, youngsters' extra-familial contacts are expanding.' notwithstanding school and church, progressively little youngsters wind up investing energy outside the home in childcare, preschool, and different composed exercises (e.g., sports groups, music exercises, etc. . Besides, outside impacts progressively interfere into youngsters' homes, especially by means of TV programming and advertisements went for youngsters. Along these lines, little youngsters have more presentation to non-familial associations and establishments.

Second, the present youngsters claim, by and large, more toys than kids in prior ages. Responsibility for, as other shopper products, spread with developing prosperity. At the equivalent time, mechanical advancements, especially the improvement of plastics, encouraged the mass creation of minimal effort toys; and the way of life of utilization, by praising the buy what's more, responsibility for products, legitimizes purchasing considerably more toys. These improvements are not new; they have proceeded all through the vast majority of the twentieth century.

Third, changes in the toy business, especially since the Second World War, have changed how kids obtain toys. Toy buying has gotten less regular; huge retail toy store chains that sell toys all year have to a great extent supplanted the retail chain's toy segment, extended each winter for the occasion purchasing season. Progressively, toy makers create lines of items, with the goal that the acquisition of one toy from the line supports further buys (e.g., purchasing a Barbie doll prompts purchasing extra outfits, dolls, playsets, etc.). Toy bundling routinely remembers promoting for different items for the line. On account of youngsters' customizing on Toys as Social Problems 201 business TV, toy producers have sufficient chance to arrive at youngsters by means of publicizing consistently.

In the nineteenth century the manufacturing of the toys started. And the development, the marketing of the toys started in the different areas of the world.

Argument upon the toys of different Claims makers:

Most of the Claims makers have argued about the toys and their development and distribution in the society and they are telling that the toys that are now manufactured have the undesirable ales that are no needed in the popular culture an that are not necessary in the areas. And these types of toys having the undesirable values also lead to the undesirable behavior from the people. Toys depict the culture of any society and it represents the culture that is dominate in the society. So the toys are necessary in depicting the ways of the living. The Child knowledge will increase about the world and his will broaden their view about the world and the society and they will know more about the culture that is prevailing in the society. The toys have differ capacities to represent the reality of the World. "Toys convey with them a lot of ideological stuff, which is very effectively absorbed into play and into youngsters' perspectives on the world" Toys recreate the bigger culture: "A toy has the ability to speak to emblematically to the youngster entire groups of stars of social ways, to structure the kid's creative mind, reproducing the specific adaptation of reality that the grown-up age picks. Toys play.... a noteworthy job in the upkeep of the predominant culture...." Playing with an inappropriate toys can have grave results; one history specialist contends that "the Edwardian toy trooper blast . . . made and continue the militarism" prompting the First World War. This contention is at the center of the moderate Christian scrutinize of mysterious toys: "Mysterious toys . . . show black magic, viciousness, sex, and Humanism..." This debasement might be purposeful: "The New Age has schemed to utilize the toy business to entice our youngsters and to undermine a whole age's trust in God. Toy after toy is intended to acquaint little youngsters' brains with New Age and mysterious thoughts and images" The impact is to impart unconventional qualities and encourage disturbing conduct:

What occurs if a toy has mysterious symbology or has been intended to be utilized as it were that has mysterious hints? Once more, the youngster suspends skepticism and starts to trust in what the individual in question is playing. Also, later, on the play area at school when the toys are mysteriously absent, what do kids imagine in their recess? Levitation, mind control, and astral projection!

"Mattel [Barbie' s manufacturer] advances obligatory heterosexuality by making it resemble the most regular and alluring decision; it advances free enterprise and the inconsistent conveyance of assets by glamourizing a character with an enormous measure of clearly unmerited discretionary cash flow and, to downplay horribly, a lopsided measure of extravagance things; it advances ageism and sexism by recommending that a lovely youthful body is a lady's most important product; it advances prejudice by making 'white' Barbie the standard.

While most investigators have related Barbie dolls with unwanted qualities, the dolls have a few protectors. In this view, Barbie is a genuinely progressive doll, one that propelled,  opposed to persecuted, little youngsters' minds; ... the one toy that, since the mid-sixties, has exemplified for young ladies the term 'having everything"' Playing with Barbie turns into a type of opposition: infuriate play with their educational Barbie’s as they generally have, playing out the "mean sitter" situation. frantically acting endlessly, with no parent-satisfying qualities to it is her absence of recovering social worth that causes keep her consistent with the youngster's feeling of play, rather than the guardians' most exceedingly awful apprehensions.

As per various elucidations, at that point, Barbie advances or demoralizes conventional sex jobs, cultivates or represses sexuality, demoralizes or supports young ladies' freedom, builds up or subverts bigotry and heterosexism, decreases the significance of religion, commends free enterprise and commercialization, causes anorexia, and encourages opposition. Barbie, her pundits concur, is powerful. Be that as it may, how can she apply her impact? Probably the youngsters for the most part young ladies, obviously who play with Barbie gather implications from the doll. Since Barbie is slim, claims makers contend, she along these lines instructs young ladies that being slim is alluring. Be that as it may, how does this instructing happen? There are at any rate two issues here. The first is that the procedure by which Barbie impacts young ladies isn't explained. Do young ladies characterize Barbie in positive terms, and thusly choose they need to be slender like Barbie? Or then again does Barbie by one way or another compel their opportunity of thought, with the goal that they can't envision options in contrast to resembling Barbie? Or then again do they come to feel that society requests that they resemble Barbie? Also, how would they come to concentrate on slenderness? Barbie is grinning; for what reason don't young ladies center on joy rather than slimness as the ideal quality?

Why not censure Barbie's grin for corrective orthodontia, discouragement, and high schooler suicide? Barbie's faultfinders seldom try to clarify exactly how she applies her impact, how young ladies gather specific implications from playing with Barbie. Second, in praising slimness, Barbie barely remains solitary. Numerous parts of contemporary culture present slimness as a perfect for ladies: the design business, motion pictures and TV, promoting, magnificence pagents, the wellness and diet ventures, sex entertainment, and who realizes what else. Regardless of whether young ladies who play with Barbie-and most young ladies do-grow up to esteem thinness, how are we to gauge Barbie's relative impact in this procedure? What's more, shouldn't something be said about young men? Far less young men play a lot with Barbie, yet guys, no not as much as females, develop to esteem female slimness. The manufacturing of the Barbie toys in the World has bring a devastating change in the World because the Barbie manufacturers focus on the homosexuality and the gender inequality. So the manufacturing of the Barbie has a negative impact on the people and the society and the kids as well because it promotes the gender inequality and racism. So this has a negative impact on the popular culture as well.

Conclusion of Toys and the popular culture and how the toys effect on the kids and popular culture:

So in the need it was concluded that the toys have the impact on the kids and as well as on the popular culture as well, because the toys depicts the cultures and traditions of any areas and it defines the popular culture of an area and it depicts the reality of the world. So the toys have negative impacts on the kids more than they have the positive impacts because the toys that are developing in the modern eras are more different and have more advancements in the technology and the children re more attracted towards the toys and the usage of the boys have increases with the passage of time. But there are many types of toys which we have discussed above and these toys have negative impacts on the metal heath of the child and as well as their behavior. Because some toys depict the negative side of the word and the children are forced to see the negate side of the world, so this will have a negative effect on the children. And it is concluded that the toys are affecting the kids and the popular culture of the society. These kind of toys should be banned in the society as they have negative impacts on the health of the children as well as their mentality. If these toys will be banned and the toys with the desirable values are developed then this will have a positive impact on the people. Popular culture and the kids as well.