In this chapter, the data collected is portrayed in a purposeful way to
highlight the perception of healthcare professionals about the use of MHAs for
diabetes care and management. The findings of the study as well as selected
representative quotes from the participants are presented below.
4.1.
Participant Demographics of explore
healthcare professionals’ perceptions and experiences about opportunities for
leveraging health information technology
Overall, five physicians and five nurses took part in this case study
with an age range from 35 to 50 years. Table 1 below
summarises the participants’ demographic information.
Table 1: Summary of Participant
Demographic Information
Participant
|
Gender
|
Age (yrs.)
|
Occupation/Speciality
|
Experience (yrs.)
|
Doctor 1
|
M
|
50
|
Diabetologists
|
23
|
Doctor 2
|
M
|
45
|
GP
|
20
|
Doctor 3
|
F
|
46
|
GP
|
20
|
Doctor 4
|
M
|
40
|
GP
|
15
|
Doctor 5
|
M
|
35
|
Senior Registrar
|
10
|
Nurse 1
|
F
|
45
|
Diabetes
Nurse
|
21
|
Nurse 2
|
M
|
47
|
Diabetes Nurse
|
15
|
Nurse 3
|
F
|
42
|
Podiatry
|
20
|
Nurse 4
|
F
|
41
|
Diabetes Nurse Educator
|
20
|
Nurse 5
|
F
|
43
|
Diabetes
Nurse
|
22
|
Notes: M = Male, F = Female, GP = General Physician
4.2. Healthcare
Professionals’ Perceptions of MHAs
Overall, four main themes and nineteen subthemes emerged. The main
themes included: Knowledge, MHA barriers and benefits, governance issues,
privacy, and security. The subthemes leading to the main themes were: lack of
knowledge, adherence to knowledge, patient/family knowledge, diabetes
self-management, app regulation, app standardisation, app customisation, app
reliability, app troubleshooting, app benefits, end-user feedback,
self-management training, lack of trained workforce, legislation, patient
access, technology adoption, healthcare professionals’ training, data security,
and patient privacy. The themes and subthemes can be viewed in Figure 2 below.
4.2.1.
Knowledge
4.2.1.1. Lack of knowledge of explore healthcare professionals’ perceptions and experiences about
opportunities for leveraging health information technology
There were sixteen accounts from eight participants that discussed the
issue with patients’ lack of knowledge about DSM. The study participants viewed
the lack of health knowledge as one of the most significant barriers to DSM.
The concerns highlighted by the participants included patients’ overall
literacy, health literacy, perceived seriousness of their disease, social
beliefs, not having access to reliable information, and the lack of
self-confidence. The participants of this study highlighted the lack of
knowledge as a hurdle for the use of MHAs. One of the participants noted:
“Maybe they
are not acknowledged how to use the apps” (Nurse 2).
Regarding health literacy and social beliefs, one participant noted:
“Some people
have their own beliefs like some patients do not consider honey and dates to be
bad and do not follow the diet chart or advice from the dietician or some might
not follow the instructions due to their literacy” (Doctor 1).
Regarding the patients’ literacy and perceived seriousness of their
disease, one participant noted:
“There are
many challenges, and the most challenging one might be ignorance of the patient
about his disease, for example, most of the patients like a fixed dose of
insulin and do not know how to adjust the dose according to their sugar levels”
(Doctor 3).
4.2.1.2. Adherence to knowledge of explore healthcare professionals’ perceptions and experiences about
opportunities for leveraging health information technology
Eight accounts from six participants expressed concerns that it is not
always patients’ lack of knowledge of diabetes, but sometimes it is the lack of
adherence to the knowledge delivered to them at the time of clinical visits or
educational programs. Regarding this, one of the participants noted:
“Some, even
if they are acknowledged, might lack adherence to the knowledge delivered. For
example, when we ask the patients to exercise and diet, they normally do not
abide by the recommendations. They might not follow the instructions properly
or do not turn up to learning sessions” (Doctor 1).
One participant noted that the attitude of the patient with accepting or
ignoring the advice given was an issue:
“But some,
they take advice from their friends, family, and make their own decisions on
starting a medication or stopping the medication or about diet, about herbal
medication. All this has an impact on their diabetes management because some
they stop all medication prescribed and start herbal medications to treat their
diabetes” (Doctor 3).
Regarding the attitude and behaviour of the patients towards the DSME,
one participant noted:
“Compliance
is the most challenging thing. Sometimes they ignore the advice given to them” (Nurse 4).
Another issue highlighted by the participants was that patients do not
keep all the information delivered to them or merely forget; one participant
noted:
“Patients do
not retain all the points from information given to them during a clinical
visit or forget them” (Doctor 2).
4.2.1.3. Patient/family education
Ten accounts from six participants reported that it is not only the
patients who need educational programs; the family members should also be considered
regarding patient DSM and how to manage conditions such as hypoglycaemia and
whom to contact in an emergency. Regarding the patient’s education, one
participant noted:
‘The patient
should know the importance of regularly seeing his diabetic physician,
dietitians, diabetes educators, ophthalmologist, and other related
specialities. He should know the complication of diabetes and should know how
to take care of them. The patient should think about how to take care of his
foot’. (Nurse 1)
Regarding the family’s education in providing care to a family member
with diabetes, one of the participants noted:
“Patients
and it is the family’s education about the disease, lifestyle, exercise,
insulin injection technique, insulin storage and side effects of the medications
is very essential” (Doctor 3).
4.2.1.4. Diabetes self-management
Regarding DSM, twenty-two counts from ten participants appeared from the
interviews showing the importance of this theme. All the research participants
highlighted the importance and benefits of DSM. The findings also showed that
younger patients are more likely to self-manage their disease as compared to
elderly patients.
Regarding the benefits, the participants mentioned that DSM improves
HbA1c levels and delays diabetes-related complications. In support, the few
quotes of the participants are worth considering. One of the participants
noted:
“DSM of
patients. We want to work more, um, again, but really to do something very much
because that is what we are using. Like this is our field. However, I think if
you, if others, apply it and there are clinics teaching patients to self-manage
then; you can see a substantial difference. Eh, we will make the patient master
himself, not, we are the one who is mastering him means we must make the
patient take the decision” (Nurse 4).
DSM has many benefits including lowering HbA1c and delaying
complications. Regarding the benefits of DSM, one participant noted:
“Yes, DSM
for sure will improve the patient’s HbA1c level and delay the diabetes-related
complications” (Doctor 1).
Regarding the long-term effects of DSM, like improving the quality of
health, one participant noted:
“Yes. If
they manage their diabetes, they will not have complications and lead a normal
life. You know, a foot ulcer will not be incapacitating them, or they will not
lose their sight by having retinopathy or, you know, other complications like
kidney complications” (Nurse 1).
Additionally, some of the participants related to DSM compliance were
associated with age; the younger patients are sometimes better in DSM. One
participant noted:
“They do
self-manage themselves at home, as they must check their sugar levels and
titrate the insulin dose. Some young patients are particularly good at doing
this, especially with Carb calculations” (Doctor 1).
4.2.2. MHA
Barriers and Benefits of explore healthcare professionals’
perceptions and experiences about opportunities for leveraging health
information technology
4.2.2.1. App regulation of explore
healthcare professionals’ perceptions and experiences about opportunities for
leveraging health information technology
When asked about the uses of MHAs and the obstacles presented, four
counts from four participants saying that the apps used by their patients were
not regulated. Participants confirmed that their patients use the apps from the
app store, which mostly consist of health fitness apps, apps that calculate
calorie intake, and calendar apps that serve as their appointment reminder.
However, they raised concerns about the regulations of such apps. One
participant noted the following hurdle that these apps can present:
“But
patients use apps from the app store like fitness apps or apps to see the
calories of the food they take. Apps for reminders like calendars. These apps
are not regulated, and the data provided is not verified. I do not think there
is one comprehensive app that I might recommend to my patients” (Doctor 1).
Regarding regulated apps that patients can rely on and trust, one of the
participants noted:
“You know,
some apps they have the approval or are from some valid institute also they
have this approval for example from the American Heart Association or American
Diabetic Association approves it so they can use it” (Nurse 2).
4.2.2.2. App standardisation
Three accounts from three participating healthcare professionals said
that apps are not standardized. Participants in this research showed concerns
about the lack of standards associated with MHAs available to patients.
Participants showed that app standardisation is low and one of the primary
reasons for this is the lack of agreed-upon standards for the development of
MHAs. The participants also agreed that if there were official apps with legal
and ethical considerations that were blended with evidence-based knowledge,
they would recommend it to their patients. Regarding this, one of the
participants noted:
“Many things
are involved. I think these apps are not standardised many ethical and legal
issues have to be seen” (Doctor 1).
Participants further showed that patients would be more eager to use
MHAs if they were based on official standards. One participant noted:
“As I told
you earlier that there should be an official app, and if I talk about my
patients, it should be patiently customised. Patients are using apps, as I
mentioned earlier, but the MoH has no app for patients. Many things have to be
addressed” (Doctor 5).
4.2.2.3. App customisation
Three accounts from three participating healthcare professionals showed
that the apps should be customised to the patient's needs. Participants of this
research highlighted that in medicine, one size does not fit all. Considering
the MHAs for medical use, healthcare professionals are looking for apps that
can be customised to fit the problem at hand. Furthermore, it was added that
MHAs which are customisable and more flexible, will be easily incorporated in
practice and readily accepted by patients. One participant noted:
“I think
these apps are not standardised and not customised to my patient's needs” (Doctor 1).
Regarding ease of use, clinicians would appreciate apps that can be
customised to their patients' needs. In this regard, another participant noted:
“If there is
an app that is flexible and customisable to my patient’s needs. I want to use
it” (Nurse 5).
4.2.2.4. App reliability
Four accounts from three participating healthcare professionals
highlighted concerns about app reliability. Participants emphasized that MHAs
qualifying for medical use should be evidence-based and should be based on
extensive research. Such apps can calculate the outcomes. Regarding this issue,
one participant noted:
“It depends
on the App and the issues I highlighted before. Are the policymakers willing to
invest in such apps and standardise them? So, how trustworthy are these apps,
and if the patients will use them?” (Doctor 1).
4.2.2.5. App troubleshooting
Additionally, four accounts highlighted the need for customer-care such
as troubleshooting. Participants noted that, regardless of the design of the
MHAs, if they were difficult to use and did not have a useful troubleshooting
feature, they were ineffective. Regarding this, one of the participants noted:
“Customer
service. Available information for the patient on the App. We can only benefit
from apps if they are easy to use, and the patient can troubleshoot it if any
issue arrives” (Doctor 1).
Regarding troubleshooting the MHAs, participants expressed concerns
about the lack of responsive customer service and troubleshooting instructions
if a problem occurs, which was described this way, by one participant:
“Who will be
the back of me if in case if I had any problem, any question, any
troubleshooting with the APP, how who will be my back up, how I can, if I lost
the data, how I can then retrieve the data. These are the challenges I think
with the new applications” (Nurse 2).
4.2.2.6. End-user feedback
Ten accounts from four participating healthcare professionals noted a
need for obtaining feedback from the patients in developing apps. They
emphasized that one of the reasons for MHAs not being wildly used is the lack
of opportunity to incorporate patient feedback. It was noted that the patients
should be involved in developing an app so that it would genuinely reflect
their needs. In this respect, one of the participants noted:
“So, it is
more likely to be suitable for the patient. So, involving the patient from an
early stage in both content and layout” (Nurse 3).
4.2.2.7. Apps’ benefits
Twenty accounts from ten participants reported benefits of the apps,
making this subtheme one of the most discussed and reported benefits of MHAs.
The most highlighted benefits were communication capabilities, source of
information, source of DSM, source of delivering DSME, patient monitoring,
clinical decision-making, and time management. As one participant noted:
“We have so
many clinical trials that confirm the effectiveness and importance of using the
technology” (Doctor 3).
In terms of the usability of the MHAs, one participant pointed out
specific examples:
“A reminder
to check their sugar. So, depending on their regimen, if they are on insulin or
oral, it will be different, their timing of checking blood sugar and a reminder
to take their medication. If it can monitor their physical activity, that will
be good. Yeah, things like that. I think it will help” (Nurse 1).
Another participant concluded:
“This will
be good for patients. Phone
apps will be good for patients who have a smartphone. A spoken lecture is good
for patients that cannot read” (Nurse 3).
MHAs were also perceived as a source of communication. As one
participant explained:
“So whenever
you are you checking your blood glucose, then monthly, weekly or for every
frequently you can connect to the, uh, to the, uh, to the computer and all your
data automatically will be transferred to this app, this app doing multiple
jobs for you, making different kinds of reports and the graph report charts
showing to you the maximum, minimum. Moreover, you can share it easily with
others, like your doctor or with the educator or keep the history for yourself.
Also, this is some examples of the useful application that I saw” (Doctor 4).
4.2.3.
Governance Issues
4.2.3.1. Self-management training
Healthcare professionals discussed patients training on several
occasions. The researcher found four accounts from four participants
highlighting the need for DSM training for patients. It was emphasised that the
patient should be trained in the management of diabetes through a healthy
lifestyle, carb calculations for better blood sugar control and better regulation
of medicine dosage, techniques, sites for insulin injection, and what to do in
case of hypoglycaemia. However, due to overcrowding at diabetes clinics, the
caregivers are unable to spare time to provide DSME. The following quotes might
highlight the views of the participants. One participant noted
“In Kuwait,
we have the para-clinic [inaudible] government para clinic is very crowded.
They are very crowded and the doctor, the time that the doctors are spending
with the patients is very less and minimal. So, they do not have enough time to
educate people” (Nurse 2).
Talking about DSME, one of the participants noted:
“Evidence-based
guidelines in mind. Moreover, hopefully, if I do all of that, the patients will
get the right advice, their DSM will improve, and the long-term complications
will be reduced” (Nurse 3).
4.2.3.2. Lack of trained workforce of explore healthcare professionals’ perceptions and experiences about
opportunities for leveraging health information technology
Ten accounts from six participants reported that there is an
insufficiently trained workforce in Kuwait regarding DSME. As discussed
previously under the theme of knowledge, lack of knowledge is one of the most
significant barriers in the way of DSM and is linked to the insufficiently trained
workforce as highlighted by quotes from research participants. One of the
participants noted:
“Number of
healthcare providers should be increased, especially diabetic educators” (Doctor 1).
When asked about solutions to this problem, the participants responded
that the number of caregivers must be increased. One of the participants noted:
“To have
enough dietitians and diabetes educators who can teach the patients, to have
podiatrists because I think this is a big gap in ministry. They do not have podiatrists
to check the patients' feet and to educate them on how to prevent foot
complications” (Nurse 1).
Another solution might be the use of MHAs to educate the patients about
DSM through DSME, keeping in mind the theoretical building blocks for DSM. About
this, one of the participants noted:
“Another way
of doing it might be through apps, giving patients the evidence-based
information. There are many studies to
support that, especially when these apps target changing human behaviours” (Doctor 4).
4.2.3.3. Legislation of explore
healthcare professionals’ perceptions and experiences about opportunities for
leveraging health information technology
Twelve reports from four participants highlighted the need for
policymakers to engage in and encourage the practitioners to use technology to
improve patient care. About this, one participant noted:
“It depends
on the App and the issues I highlighted before. Are the policymakers willing to
invest in such apps and standardise them?” (Doctor 1).
Another participant highlighted:
“Managers in
MoH, policymakers in MoH and I would recommend them because if they are not
encouraging practitioners to use this technology to improve their patient care,
then that is an obstacle” (Nurse 3).
4.2.3.4.
Patient access of explore healthcare
professionals’ perceptions and experiences about opportunities for leveraging
health information technology
Three accounts from three participants showed concerns that in Kuwait,
patients do not have access to evidence-based information and then the
available information is not reliable. Regarding the MHAs as a source of
information, the participants replied with positivity and wished if they can
have something to empower the patients for DSM. One of the participants noted:
“Um, uh,
where patients can find information. You know, as if I think about, the
National Health Service (NHS) for example, there is a web page on for the NHS,
which covers all kinds of conditions and gives many advises. In addition, this
is evidence-based and associated with national guidelines. Is this; is there
the same thing for Kuwait? I do not think there is” (Nurse 3).
About communication and access to reliable data on of the participants
noted:
“MHAs might
be one of the latest trends in communication and is increasing at a fast rate.
We can utilize this to educate our patients and provide them with reliable
information” (Doctor 5).
The
financial burden of MHAs was highlighted by only one of the participants in
this research saying:
“Who will pay for
the subscription of these MHAs? Will it be sponsored by MoH? This is an
important point for us physician while prescribing such apps to our patients as
all will not be able to pay” (Doctor 4).
4.2.3.5. Technology adoption of explore healthcare professionals’ perceptions and experiences about
opportunities for leveraging health information technology
Four accounts from three participants highlighted that the adoption of
technology is slow in Kuwait. The participants of the study commented on the
adoption of the MHAs is slow. The reasons for this have been discussed in the
findings of this study under various themes. Here the researcher-highlighted
one of the reasons to it is the confidence of the healthcare giver in MHAs.
Although they were of the view that this can transform the healthcare system
but, unfortunately, healthcare has not harvested the real benefits of it. One
participant noted:
“Well,
People these days do use technology. These days’ smartphones are a must-have
thing life without one is unimaginable. People like apps and do use them often
to do their everyday activities. I think technology has revolutionised the
world, but unfortunately, the healthcare is lacking behind in harvesting the
true benefits of it” (Doctor 1).
Healthcare professionals showed hesitance in recommending MHAs to their
patients. When asked what the reasons behind this, one participant responded
with the following:
“I think
that these apps are lacking in studies that clearly show the beneficial
outcomes” (Doctor 2).
4.2.3.6. Healthcare professionals’ training of explore healthcare professionals’ perceptions and experiences about
opportunities for leveraging health information technology
In emphasising the need for training of healthcare professionals, four
accounts from four participants were noted. It is highlighted by the
participants that it is essential to have well-trained staff to provide DSME to
patients. Regarding this, one participant noted:
“We have to
develop the education department in all the diabetic clinics around Kuwait with
the self-trained and certified diabetic educator besides the doctors” (Nurse 2).
Another participant noted:
“We need to
have the doctors and the nurses in ministry clinics properly educated about
diabetes management and what are the latest guidelines on all diabetes
management, starting from insulin storage to injection techniques to
medications. There are so many new medications that are coming up, and they
need to know of them” (Nurse 5).
4.2.4. Privacy
and Security
4.2.4.1. Data security of explore
healthcare professionals’ perceptions and experiences about opportunities for
leveraging health information technology
Six accounts from four participants reported security issues with using
the apps. This topic was important as some of the participants considered this
a hurdle to the use of MHAs. The participants were of the view that there are
many MHAs available, but they are not confident of privacy and security. One of
the participants noted:
“Like data
security, patient privacy, standardisation, ease of use, patient customised
like for the patient with disabilities, data backup, quality control” (Doctor 1).
MHAs collect patients’ health-related details and these patient details
by nature and law are sensitive. Therefore, the security of data held by MHAs
is of immense importance and in this regard one of the participants noted:
“Yeah. Like
their data like medical history and all to be, you know, hacked or leaked
to...you know, in unwanted hands” (Nurse 1).
When asked about the barriers of recommending MHAs to patients, one of
the participants noted:
“Maybe
adoption of the technology, security of the applications, its integration with
the system” (Doctor 2).
4.2.4.2. Patient privacy of explore
healthcare professionals’ perceptions and experiences about opportunities for
leveraging health information technology
Four accounts from four participants had a specific concern about the
patient's privacy. The participants showed concerns as the MHAs are increasing
at a fast rate, particular care should be taken about the privacy of the
patients. If the patients are not confident of their privacy being considered,
they might not use the apps as these apps to operate need access to the data
stored on the device of the user and which can be sensitive data. This does put
the user under serious threat. About this one of the participants noted:
“Sometimes
maybe they think if they store there sometime their confidentiality of the apps
also important. They think if they a store or they share with uh, it, they are
afraid of about the confidentiality because these also can be a challenge” (Nurse 2).
Linking statement here – I don’t expect you to summarise these all again
as it would be long / repetitive but something that leads into your discussions
below