1). Introduction of
Fraud controls in local councils web
The
present work is about stakeholder’s issues faced by project management. The present
work is based on the identification of challenges and issues regarding primary
and secondary stakeholders of local government and local council system.
Stakeholders draw impact on the outcomes and management of a project or a
system. Moreover, stakeholders take an interest in a project because of certain
reasons such as monetary benefits and social strength. However, rather than taking
interest stakeholders sometimes influence project outcomes by their
contribution. Considering this, identification of stakeholders and their
concerns towards business are highly important in project management.
Introduction to Case Study
of Fraud controls in local councils web
The
case study is written on “fraud control
systems in the local council’s web." In accordance with the case
study, the risk factor regarding financial fraud was identified by the local
government and councils of Victoria and Queensland. A report based on the
auditing process of the Queensland audit office was presented in Australia that
identified high-risk factors linked with corruption and fraud. Local councils
face issues in the decision-making process because of poor risk identification and
fraud control system.
Auditor
general officer and NSW councils conducted an investigation on up-to-date fraud
controlling systems and controls of third party access. While the case study
presents that the Australian government, local councils of Queensland,
Victoria, and NWS are directly involved in the investigation process to
highlight areas of improvement to make a fraud control system highly effective
and strong for the local community. Moreover, training sessions and documented
policies were used to assist fraud control plan development.
2). Stakeholder Theory of
Fraud controls in local councils web
Stakeholders
are those who take a direct interest in the project or business operations. Stakeholders'
concerns with the final outcomes of project operations. Moreover, they also make
a contribution to the project operations by different means to ensure the accomplishment
of desired outcomes. In short, stakeholders are those who get influence from and
those who contribute to the execution of project operations with prime focus on
final direct and indirect outcomes.
Considering
the present case study of the fraud control system presented by the local councils,
several separate entities are direct and indirect stakeholders of this project.
For instance, primary stakeholders of the project are those who will contribute
to influence the outcomes of the fraud control system in NSW, Queensland, and Australian
local councils. While on the other hand, project team members, managers, and
communities in which the fraud control system would be implemented are also the
direct stakeholders of the project. Although, the communities which will take
benefit indirectly after the control of frauds in these areas are the indirect
stakeholders of this fraud control project.
2.1) Fraud Control System
of Fraud controls in local councils web
In
accordance with the case study, a survey was conducted in NSW (Australia) to
collect responses from 128 samples regarding ten attributes set out in the
audit offices fraud control improvement kit. In this survey, local, regional, rural,
and metropolitan councils took participation to represents their opinion and
responses for frauds in supplies, financial outcomes, and other managerial areas
in the kit. Key areas covered by the fraud control system kit includes investigation
systems, fraud awareness, prevention systems, ethical framework, detection
systems, responsibility structures, notification systems, leadership,
third-party management system, and fraud control policy.
2.2) Project Entity-Relationship Model
of Fraud controls in local councils web
The
project entity-relationship model represents what kind of relationship different
entities had with each other regarding this fraud control system. Different
stakeholders are the local government of Queensland, Victoria, the audit
control team, rural councils, regional council, metropolitan councils, staff
members, ICAC, and IT service providers.
3). Project Issue of
Fraud controls in local councils web
There
are some issues identified in the case study about the accomplishment of the
project. In accordance with the case study, the project has been linked with
some controllable issues. These issues can be controlled by the project
management team members. For instance, the project includes a survey about the
effectiveness of the fraud control system. Surveys require resources and full
response from the selected samples or representatives of the survey; in case
some of these provide inaccurate responses, then overall survey results can be
influenced and changed. Thus, inaccuracy is the primary issue for the survey
organization.
Following
information presented in the fraud control system case study, a particular
issue that can have an impact on the overall local government or public sector
is the inaccuracy of the auditing system. However, other than inaccuracy
another issue with the auditing system is the limited independence of the
auditing team because of internal or external control on the auditing process. Thus,
project management team organizing and managing all primary activities of this
project are responsible for taking care of inaccuracy and dependency of the
auditing system in the selected areas of implementation.
The
audit office team discussed in the case study handled this issue by ensuing fairness
and truth of financial statements and comments on entity compliance with
relevant acts and regulations. Some other issues discussed in the case study
are related to the staff views such as unethical conduct and unethical
activities.
4). Project Stakeholder Management’s Plan of Fraud controls in local councils web
Project
stakeholder’s management plan includes four major steps to be followed. These
steps are Stakeholders Identification, Stakeholders Analysis, Stakeholder
Engagement, and Stakeholder Monitor. These steps are discussed below in detail
with a focus on case study information (Ducros & Fernet, 2010).
Stakeholders Identification
Stakeholder
|
Description
|
Influence
|
Contribution
|
Internal or External
|
Staff Member
|
Working
on project
|
High_
influence project outcomes
|
Employees
contribute by working on a project to control the fraud system in local
councils
|
Internal
|
Project Managers
|
Managing
project activities and resources
|
High_
manage and control the whole project
|
Project
managers ensure planning, controlling, scheduling, monitoring, hiring, and
all other activities in the project.
|
Internal
|
Regional, Rural, and
Metropolitan Councils
|
Having
issues related to frauds
|
High
_ fraud influence reputation and image
|
Council
members develop plans to identify and control fraud systems
|
Internal
|
Australian Government
|
Set
rules for frauds
|
Moderate_
get influence in monetary and non-monetary terms from frauds.
|
The
government set policies, rules, and evaluation systems under which local
governments bring improvement in operational outcomes.
|
External
|
Auditors Team
|
Work
on Audit
|
High_
finds frauds of the project team as well council system
|
Identify
possible frauds, manipulations, and gaps for improvement by reviewing
financial statements and other reports.
|
External
|
Public sector
|
Public
sector requires a fair and fraud-free system.
|
Not
high __ public directly deals with the council; therefore, they also get
influence.
|
Raise
voice against frauds and set ethical standards.
|
External
|
IT Team
|
IT
team worked on IT tasks
|
Low_
|
|
Internal
|
Corrupt Team members
|
Make
fraudulent
|
High_
influence financial outcomes and take unethical benefits
|
Resist
against fraud control systems for their personal benefits and advantages.
|
Internal
|
Stakeholders Analysis
of Fraud controls in local councils web
Stakeholder’s
analysis is taken with the support of a grid descriptive system. In this model,
all stakeholders are mapped in the grid in accordance with stakeholder’s
interests and stakeholder’s power regarding the project (Davidson, 2000; Visual-paradigm.com, 2019). In the following
map, various stakeholders of the project are presented with two dimensions. These
stakeholders are further presented as supportive, resistant, and neutral
stakeholders. Staff, IT teams, project managers, and councils are supportive
stakeholders. While fraud team members are resistant stakeholders regarding
this project as it would go against their personal benefits.
Stakeholder Engagement
of Fraud controls in local councils web
The overarching term is “Stakeholder
engagement,” which encompasses the great range of activities as well as
interactions by the stakeholder by the project cycle. The ongoing process which
might be involves to changes the degree by the following elements;
·
Planning and stakeholder analysis
·
Dissemination of information and disclosure
·
Meaningful participation and consultations
·
Grievance redress and dispute resolutions
·
Investment of stakeholder in evaluation and
monitoring
·
Ongoing reporting affected the communities of
stakeholder
The scale of stakeholder as well as intensity for the
stakeholder engagement which changes the types of project and the complexity
along with the potential risks plus its impacts (Brokenshire & al, 2011).
Information Disclosure of Fraud controls in
local councils web
In the Fraud controls
in local councils web the information disclosure which refers the timely
provisions, and it has accessible information regarding their projects along
with the environment and the potential impacts of the stakeholder where the
order is to facilities the meaningful , informed and the effective designs of
projects along with the implementation. A requirement of the stakeholder
engagements contains the disclosure of the screen reporting of Fraud controls in the local council’s web (Info.undp.org, 2017).
Stakeholder Monitor
of Fraud controls in local councils web
The stakeholder monitoring process
can be further subdivided into three parts including inputs, Tools and
techniques, and outputs. Input is the
stakeholder and owners of Fraud controls in the local council’s web. Tools and techniques are the strategies used
for the maintenance of the database in the registry. The process of reviewing,
tracking and Control and monitor of Fraud controls in the local council’s web reporting the progress which meets the objectives performances
in the plan of project management (Pickett, 2102). The techniques,
tools as well as inputs along with the outputs for the Fraud controls in the local council’s web is depicted in the below
figure;
By the management accountant, the
training is received which is a very good basis that was also implementing the antifraud
programmed. The understanding is very broad for the business process which is
expected for the management accountant and it is the significant assets along
with the knowledge of the procedures and the systems which must be placed in the
organization, and it permits the effects along with them efficiently. The
wonderful thing is Hindsight where the fraud is always obvious for the
fraudster colleagues after the various events and the statements with the
internal auditors also taken through the various policies and investigatory
bodies which is frequently highlighted by common fraud indicators.
The next tools are the necessary
mindset where the fraud is always possible by the healthy amount of the skepticism
professional which is also maintained the supposing potential for fraud. The
process for monitoring fraud control is now working excessive overtime without
taking leave. There are different tools along with everyday techniques that are
available for helping to identify the irregularities that might the fraud
control as well as researches the ammonal for the decision whether the actions
ensure the researches which is allowed to identifying the detecting case of fraud
control. The registry is required to consider different initiative steps and
models. In order to improve the data accuracy,
they require the usage of computers, trained and well-organized staff
members, and to conduct an audit by NSW Police Force policies to mitigate this
risk.
It is very significant to examine
the system in the place as well as also identify with several weaknesses which
could also provide the opportunities for a fraudster. For the identifications
of the abnormal patterns along with the trends, the ratio analysis is also
used. There are the different identification techniques which could also automate
and it creating the process which is more efficient. The detection system of
the fraud control must be monitor by the stakeholder and it will update the
regular which keeps the same by changing the technology along with the new manipulations
methods.
Conclusion of Fraud
controls in local councils web
Summing up all the discussion, it
is concluded that the report is about the “Fraud
controls in the local council’s web.”
In this report, access the different for the integrity reports which are available
for the registry of the Fraud controls on the local council’s web. For the
day-by-day transitions, the basis of data is analyzed through operational procedures
where the shortcoming procedure is available along with the guidance and the polices.
Moreover, stakeholders take an interest in a project because of certain reasons
such as monetary benefits and social strength
A
report based on the auditing process of the Queensland audit office was
presented in Australia that identified high-risk factors linked with corruption
and fraud. Local councils face issues in the decision-making process because of
poor risk identification and fraud control system. There are some issues
identified in the case study about the accomplishment of the project. In the
fraud control system case study, a particular issue that can have an impact on a
local government or public sector is the inaccuracy of the auditing system. The
entire requirement and the objectives of the report in which the proper details
are achieved.
References
of Fraud controls in local councils web
Boutwell, J. & Klare, M. T., 2000. Light
Weapons and Civil Conflict: Controlling the Tools of Violence. s.l.:Rowman
& Littlefield.
Brokenshire, J. &
al, e., 2011. The Local Government Fraud Strategy, s.l.: Fighting Fraud
Locally Oversight Board.
Carter, G. L., 2012. Guns
in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture, and the
Law, 2nd Edition [3 volumes]: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture,
and the Law. s.l.:ABC-CLIO.
Davidson, J. P., 2000. Project
Management. s.l.:Breathing Space Institute.
Deckert, A. &
Sarre, R., 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of Australian and New Zealand
Criminology, Crime and Justice. s.l.:Springer.
Ducros, M. &
Fernet, G., 2010. Project Management Guide. s.l.:Editions TECHNIP.
Hemenway, D., 2006. Private
Guns, Public Health. s.l.:University of Michigan Press.
Info.undp.org, 2017. Guidance
Note UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (SES) Stakeholder Engagement. [Online]
Available at: https://info.undp.org/sites/bpps/SES_Toolkit/SES%20Document%20Library/Uploaded%20October%202016/Final%20UNDP%20SES%20Stakeholder%20Engagement%20GN_Oct2017.pdf
[Accessed October 2017].
Ludwig, J. & Cook,
P. J., 2004. Evaluating Gun Policy: Effects on Crime and Violence. s.l.:Brookings
Institution Press.
Pickett, K. H. S.,
2102. Fraud Smart. illustrated, reprint ed. s.l.:John Wiley & Sons.
Visual-paradigm.com,
2019. What is PMBOK in Project Management?. [Online]
Available at: https://www.visual-paradigm.com/guide/pmbok/what-is-pmbok/
Webster, D. W. &
Vernick, J. S., 2013. Reducing Gun Violence in America: Informing Policy
with Evidence and Analysis. s.l.:JHU Press.
Wilson, H. L., 2007. Guns,
gun control, and elections: the politics and policy of firearms. s.l.:Rowman
& Littlefield,.