Executive
summary of
Shareholder Value Analysis & Financial Management
Shareholder
value analysis is a financial management approach established in the 1980s. The
aim of this approach is to create value for the shareholders. The value for the
shareholders is evaluated through the funds which flow in the organization and
with the prices of shares that keep on changing with the passage of time. For
understanding the value creation in the organization it is important to
identify and understand the areas where the value is being created. It means
that value drivers of the organization need to be identified in order to create
value for shareholders. The net profit of the organization indicates how much
profit the corporation is generating. The organization can evaluate
profitability ratios to get deep insights regarding the profitability of the
organization higher profitability means high value for shareholders and lower
profitability will definitely decrease the shareholder value. Operational
efficiency is required in the organization so that the organization can
increase its revenue, performance and overall profitability condition. If the
operational efficiency is high then it means that it will enhance the value of
the organization which will ultimately increase the shareholder value as well.
The operational efficiency has a significant impact on the cash flows from
operations which ultimately affect the shareholder value maximization. It is
always recommended by the financial analysts to keep the optimum capital
structure in the organization. The optimum capital structure not only reduces
the cost of capital but also helps the organization to manage its loans more
efficiently. The main aim of every organization is to create profit and for
creating profit it is highly necessary that the corporation must generate a significant
amount of revenue. The organizations which generate a significant amount of
revenue experience growth in their business size and profitability. The
organizations that do not experience growth in revenue experience decline in
profit and also the shareholder value reduces.
Table of contents
Introduction. 4
Shareholder
Value Analysis & Financial Management 4
Main
financial value drivers. 5
Improvement in profit margins. 5
Operational efficiency. 6
Capital structure decisions. 7
Growth in Revenue. 8
Conclusion. 8
Recommendation. 9
References. 10
Appendix. 11
Introduction of Shareholder Value
Analysis & Financial Management
The
aim of this paper is to provide deep insights regarding shareholder value
analysis and financial management. The paper summarizes how the organizations
adopted the SVA approach and why they consider this approach important for
financial management. The shareholder wealth maximization not only improves the
value of the organization but also allows the organizations to meet the
interests of its stakeholders. The stakeholders of the organization are
responsible for financing the assets of the organization. Therefore it is the
duty of the corporation to focus on the interest of the shareholders and their
profit maximization.
Operational efficiency is required in the organization so that the
organization can increase its revenue, performance and overall profitability
condition. If the operational efficiency is high then it means that it will
enhance the value of the organization which will ultimately increase the
shareholder value as well. At the beginning of the paper, a
brief introduction to the SVA has provided. In the second part of the paper key
financial value drivers are discussed which creates value in the organization
and ultimately enhances the shareholder value. In the third part of the paper,
a brief conclusion is provided which summarizes the whole paper. At the end of
the paper, the recommendation is provided for increasing the shareholder’s
wealth.
Shareholder Value Analysis & Financial Management
Shareholder
value analysis is a financial management approach established in the 1980s. The
aim of this approach is to create value for the shareholders. The value for the
shareholders is evaluated through the funds which flow in the organization and
with the prices of shares that keep on changing with the passage of time. The
SVA approach allows the organization to take such financial decisions through
which the shareholder value can be enhanced. The financial managers linked
their strategy with the strategy of its stakeholders so that their interests
can also be fulfilled accordingly.
Main financial value drivers of
Shareholder Value Analysis & Financial Management
For
understanding the value creation in the organization it is important to
identify and understand the areas where the value is being created. It means
that value drivers of the organization need to be identified in order to create
value for shareholders. If the top management of the organization does not know
what are the key value drivers of the organization than the management cannot
create value for the shareholders efficiently. It is important to understand
how the value drivers affect the cash flows of the corporation so that the
management of any organization can take the rational decision regarding the
shareholder value maximization (Spender, 2014).
Improvement in profit margins of
Shareholder Value Analysis & Financial Management
The
net profit of the organization indicates how much profit the corporation is
generating. The organization can evaluate profitability ratios to get deep
insights regarding the profitability of the organization higher profitability
means high value for shareholders and lower profitability will definitely
decrease the shareholder value. That is why the management should focus on the
profitability ratios to get deep insights regarding the performance of the
organization. In the above table, the profitability ratios of apple
organization are mentioned as an example to understand how profitability ratios
provide a quick overview regarding the shareholder value and financial
management of the organization (Chandra, 2011).
Profitability has a significant connection with shareholder wealth
maximization. Usually, investors invest in such organizations where the
investors can get a significant amount of return on their investment. For this,
the investors first evaluate the profitability and financial performance of the
corporation. The investors evaluate the profitability ratios and analyze the
financial statements of the organization to make a decision regarding their
investment. Investors know that the companies that earn high income provide
dividends on the shares. Such companies whose profitability is not good unable
to provide a dividend to the shares because they do not have enough resources
from which they can meet their shareholder’s interests (Chandra, 2011).
Operational efficiency of
Shareholder Value Analysis & Financial Management
Operational
efficiency is required in the organization so that the organization can
increase its revenue, performance and overall profitability condition. If the
operational efficiency is high then it means that it will enhance the value of
the organization which will ultimately increase the shareholder value as well.
The operational efficiency has a significant impact on the cash flows from
operations which ultimately affect the shareholder value maximization. In order
to get deep insights into the efficiency and asset management decisions, the
organization can evaluate efficiency ratios such as inventory turnover, asset
turnover, and total assets turnover to know how efficiently the organization is
utilizing its assets for generating revenue. The below table provides
efficiency ratios of Apple Corporation as an example to understand how the
efficiency of the organization can be understood (Mohana, 2011).
The operations of the corporation are directly linked with the
overall financial performance of the organization. The operations include a lot
of activities that allow the organization to generate income. Sometimes the
corporations unable to manage their operations efficiently which can increase
the costs of the corporation. When the costs of the corporation increase it
means that the company will unable to generate huge profit. That is why it is
important that the corporation should utilize its resources efficiently to
generate higher revenue. The higher revenue will definitely help the
organization to generate higher profitability. The costs of those corporations
remain low who manage their resources efficiently (Mohana, 2011).
Capital structure decisions of
Shareholder Value Analysis & Financial Management
It
is always recommended by the financial analysts to keep the optimum capital
structure in the organization. The optimum capital structure not only reduces
the cost of capital but also helps the organization to manage its loans more
efficiently. If the cost of capital is
going to be higher than the profitability of the organization will decline
which will reduce shareholder value. It is important that the organization
should finance its assets from both debt & equity so that optimum capital
structure can be created (Fridson & Alvarez, 2011).
The capital structure of the organization should be optimum because
if the organization's capital structure is not optimum than the organization
can suffer from different types of serious issues which might lead to
insolvency conditions. Sometimes the organization takes too much debt from the
financial institutions and does not think about its repayment. Repayment of too
much debt becomes difficult for the corporation and ultimately the company will
have to wind up its operations because it is not in the position to pay its
loans. That is why it is always suggested to finance the assets of the company
is such a way that it won’t affect the operations of the company (Fridson & Alvarez, 2011).
Growth in Revenue of Shareholder Value
Analysis & Financial Management
The
main aim of every organization is to create profit and for creating profit it
is highly necessary that the corporation must generate a significant amount of
revenue. The organizations which generate a significant amount of revenue
experience growth in their business size and profitability. The organizations
that do not experience growth in revenue experience decline in profit and also
the shareholder value reduces. In order to enhance the shareholder value, it is
highly necessary that the organization experience growth in sales because it is
a key driver of value creation. The below table indicates how much revenue
growth an organization has experienced in a specific time period (Pandey, 2015).
The revenue of the organization is the main source from which the
companies increase their profitability. The organization should adopt different
techniques that help organizations to increase their revenue. It is evident
that when the revenue of the organization is going to increase the profit of
the company will also increase. This means that the overall value of the
corporation will experience growth. Therefore focusing on the revenue growth is
necessary because it will tell how efficiently the corporation is managing its
operations and whether shareholder wealth is increasing or experiencing a
decline (Pandey, 2015).
Conclusion of Shareholder Value
Analysis & Financial Management
It
is concluded that for understanding the value creation in the organization it
is important to identify and understand the areas where the value is being
created. It means that value drivers of the organization need to be identified
in order to create value for shareholders. If the top management of the
organization does not know what are the key value drivers of the organization
than the management cannot create value for the shareholders efficiently. It is
always recommended by the financial analysts to keep the optimum capital
structure in the organization.
The capital structure of the organization should be optimum because
if the organization's capital structure is not optimum than the organization
can suffer from different types of serious issues which might lead to
insolvency conditions. Sometimes the organization takes too much debt from the
financial institutions and does not think about its repayment. The operations
of the corporation are directly linked with the overall financial performance
of the organization. The operations include a lot of activities that allow the
organization to generate income. Sometimes the corporations unable to manage their
operations efficiently which can increase the costs of the corporation. When
the costs of the corporation increase it means that the company will unable to
generate huge profit.
Recommendation of Shareholder
Value Analysis & Financial Management
It
is recommended to the organizations by the financial analysts to keep the optimum
capital structure in the organization. The optimum capital structure not only
reduces the cost of capital but also helps the organization to manage its loans
more efficiently. In order to enhance
the shareholder value, it is highly necessary that the organization experience
growth in sales because it is a key driver of value creation. It is recommended
to the organizations that they should evaluate financial ratios and compare
them with the ratios of other corporations to get deep insights regarding their
financial performance.
References of Shareholder Value
Analysis & Financial Management
Chandra, P., 2011. Financial Management. s.l.:Tata
McGraw-Hill Education.
Fridson, M. S. & Alvarez, F., 2011. Financial
Statement Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide. s.l.:John Wiley & Sons.
Mohana, R. P., 2011. Financial Statement Analysis and
Reporting. s.l.:PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Pandey, I., 2015. Financial Management. s.l.:Vikas
Publishing House.
Spender, J.-C., 2014. Business Strategy: Managing
Uncertainty, Opportunity, and Enterprise. s.l.:OUP Oxford.
Appendix
Key
Ratios -> Efficiency Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency
|
2010-09
|
2011-09
|
2012-09
|
2013-09
|
2014-09
|
2015-09
|
2016-09
|
2017-09
|
2018-09
|
2019-09
|
TTM
|
Days
Sales Outstanding
|
24.82
|
18.34
|
19.01
|
25.66
|
30.51
|
26.79
|
27.59
|
26.77
|
28.21
|
32.35
|
32.35
|
Days
Inventory
|
6.95
|
5.17
|
3.26
|
4.37
|
6.3
|
5.81
|
6.22
|
9.04
|
9.82
|
9.09
|
9.09
|
Payables
Period
|
81.3
|
75.48
|
74.38
|
74.54
|
85.45
|
85.57
|
101.11
|
111.72
|
116.95
|
115.2
|
115.2
|
Cash
Conversion Cycle
|
-49.53
|
-51.96
|
-52.13
|
-44.5
|
-48.64
|
-52.97
|
-67.29
|
-75.91
|
-78.92
|
-73.76
|
-73.76
|
Receivables
Turnover
|
14.71
|
19.9
|
19.2
|
14.22
|
11.96
|
13.62
|
13.23
|
13.63
|
12.94
|
11.28
|
11.28
|
Inventory
Turnover
|
52.51
|
70.53
|
112.12
|
83.45
|
57.94
|
62.82
|
58.64
|
40.37
|
37.17
|
40.13
|
40.13
|
Fixed
Assets Turnover
|
16.89
|
17.26
|
13.48
|
10.67
|
9.82
|
10.85
|
8.71
|
7.54
|
7.07
|
6.61
|
6.61
|
Asset
Turnover
|
1.06
|
1.13
|
1.07
|
0.89
|
0.83
|
0.89
|
0.7
|
0.66
|
0.72
|
0.74
|
0.74
|
Source: https://financials.morningstar.com/ratios/r.html?t=AAPL
Key
Ratios -> Financial Health
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Items (in %)
|
2010-09
|
2011-09
|
2012-09
|
2013-09
|
2014-09
|
2015-09
|
2016-09
|
2017-09
|
2018-09
|
2019-09
|
Latest
Qtr
|
Cash
& Short-Term Investments
|
34.08
|
22.3
|
16.54
|
19.59
|
10.82
|
14.32
|
20.88
|
19.76
|
18.13
|
29.71
|
29.71
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
13.2
|
10.07
|
10.62
|
9.97
|
11.74
|
10.45
|
9.11
|
9.5
|
13.4
|
13.53
|
13.53
|
Inventory
|
1.4
|
0.67
|
0.45
|
0.85
|
0.91
|
0.81
|
0.66
|
1.29
|
1.08
|
1.21
|
1.21
|
Other
Current Assets
|
6.76
|
5.62
|
5.14
|
4.99
|
6.09
|
5.19
|
2.57
|
3.71
|
3.3
|
3.65
|
3.65
|
Total
Current Assets
|
55.44
|
38.66
|
32.75
|
35.4
|
29.56
|
30.77
|
33.22
|
34.28
|
35.91
|
48.1
|
48.1
|
Net
PP&E
|
6.34
|
6.68
|
8.78
|
8.02
|
8.9
|
7.74
|
8.4
|
9
|
11.29
|
11.04
|
11.04
|
Intangibles
|
1.44
|
3.81
|
3.04
|
2.78
|
3.78
|
3.1
|
2.68
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
Other
Long-Term Assets
|
36.78
|
50.85
|
55.43
|
53.8
|
57.77
|
58.39
|
55.7
|
54.59
|
52.79
|
40.86
|
40.86
|
Total
Assets
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
Accounts
Payable
|
15.98
|
12.57
|
12.03
|
10.81
|
13.02
|
12.22
|
11.59
|
13.07
|
15.28
|
13.66
|
13.66
|
Short-Term
Debt
|
|
|
|
2.72
|
3.79
|
3.61
|
4.92
|
5.67
|
4.8
|
4.8
|
Taxes
Payable
|
0.28
|
0.98
|
0.87
|
0.58
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
Liabilities
|
5.87
|
6.46
|
1.45
|
2.06
|
2.8
|
8.67
|
6.85
|
6.86
|
|
|
|
Other
Short-Term Liabilities
|
5.43
|
4.02
|
7.54
|
7.65
|
8.31
|
3.08
|
2.51
|
2.01
|
11
|
12.77
|
12.77
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
27.56
|
24.04
|
21.89
|
21.09
|
27.37
|
27.75
|
24.56
|
26.86
|
31.95
|
31.23
|
31.23
|
Long-Term
Debt
|
|
|
8.19
|
12.5
|
18.41
|
23.45
|
25.9
|
25.63
|
27.12
|
27.12
|
Other
Long-Term Liabilities
|
8.87
|
10.13
|
10.97
|
11.03
|
12.02
|
12.76
|
12.12
|
11.52
|
13.12
|
14.92
|
14.92
|
Total
Liabilities
|
36.43
|
34.16
|
32.86
|
40.31
|
51.89
|
58.91
|
60.13
|
64.28
|
70.7
|
73.27
|
73.27
|
Total
Stockholders' Equity
|
63.57
|
65.84
|
67.14
|
59.69
|
48.11
|
41.09
|
39.87
|
35.72
|
29.3
|
26.73
|
26.73
|
Total
Liabilities & Equity
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
Key
Ratios -> Profitability | | | | | | | | | |
Margins
% of Sales | 2010-09 | 2011-09 | 2012-09 | 2013-09 | 2014-09 | 2015-09 | 2016-09 | 2017-09 | 2018-09 | 2019-09 | TTM |
Revenue | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
COGS | 60.62 | 59.52 | 56.13 | 62.38 | 61.41 | 59.94 | 60.92 | 61.53 | 61.66 | 62.18 | 62.18 |
Gross
Margin | 39.38 | 40.48 | 43.87 | 37.62 | 38.59 | 40.06 | 39.08 | 38.47 | 38.34 | 37.82 | 37.82 |
SG&A | 8.46 | 7.02 | 6.42 | 6.34 | 6.56 | 6.13 | 6.58 | 6.66 | 6.29 | 7.01 | 7.01 |
R&D | 2.73 | 2.24 | 2.16 | 2.62 | 3.3 | 3.45 | 4.66 | 5.05 | 5.36 | 6.23 | 6.23 |
Other | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating
Margin | 28.19 | 31.22 | 35.3 | 28.67 | 28.72 | 30.48 | 27.84 | 26.76 | 26.69 | 24.57 | 24.57 |
Net
Int Inc & Other | 0.24 | 0.38 | 0.33 | 0.68 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 1.2 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
EBT
Margin | 28.42 | 31.6 | 35.63 | 29.35 | 29.26 | 31.03 | 28.46 | 27.96 | 27.45 | 25.27 | 25.27 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Profitability | 2010-09 | 2011-09 | 2012-09 | 2013-09 | 2014-09 | 2015-09 | 2016-09 | 2017-09 | 2018-09 | 2019-09 | TTM |
Tax
Rate % | 24.42 | 24.22 | 25.16 | 26.15 | 26.13 | 26.37 | 25.56 | 24.56 | 18.34 | 15.94 | 15.94 |
Net
Margin % | 21.48 | 23.95 | 26.67 | 21.67 | 21.61 | 22.85 | 21.19 | 21.09 | 22.41 | 21.24 | 21.24 |
Asset
Turnover (Average) | 1.06 | 1.13 | 1.07 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.7 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
Return
on Assets % | 22.84 | 27.07 | 28.54 | 19.34 | 18.01 | 20.45 | 14.93 | 13.87 | 16.07 | 15.69 | 15.69 |
Financial
Leverage (Average) | 1.57 | 1.52 | 1.49 | 1.68 | 2.08 | 2.43 | 2.51 | 2.8 | 3.41 | 3.74 | 3.74 |
Return
on Equity % | 35.28 | 41.67 | 42.84 | 30.64 | 33.61 | 46.25 | 36.9 | 36.87 | 49.36 | 55.92 | 55.92 |
Return
on Invested Capital % | 34.77 | 41.13 | 42.12 | 26.17 | 26.28 | 31.5 | 22.13 | 20.05 | 24.5 | 25.82 | 25.82 |
Interest
Coverage | | | 369.79 | 140.28 | 99.93 | 43.15 | 28.59 | 23.5 | 19.38 | 19.38 |
Key
Ratios -> Growth | | | | | | | | | |
| 2010-09 | 2011-09 | 2012-09 | 2013-09 | 2014-09 | 2015-09 | 2016-09 | 2017-09 | 2018-09 | 2019-09 | Latest
Qtr |
Revenue
% | | | | | | | | | | |
Year
over Year | 52.02 | 65.96 | 44.58 | 9.2 | 6.95 | 27.86 | -7.73 | 6.3 | 15.86 | -2.04 | 1.81 |
3-Year
Average | 39.54 | 49.37 | 53.94 | 37.86 | 19.08 | 14.3 | 8.06 | 7.84 | 4.35 | 6.46 | |
5-Year
Average | 36.17 | 41.16 | 45.49 | 39.39 | 33.63 | 29.08 | 14.78 | 7.93 | 9.22 | 7.31 | |
10-Year
Average | 23.37 | 35.05 | 39.17 | 39.31 | 36.27 | 32.58 | 27.29 | 25.31 | 23.38 | 19.75 | |
Operating
Income % | | | | | | | | | | |
Year
over Year | 56.6 | 83.79 | 63.48 | -11.3 | 7.15 | 35.67 | -15.73 | 2.2 | 15.57 | -9.83 | -3.06 |
3-Year
Average | 60.96 | 75.28 | 67.57 | 38.65 | 15.82 | 8.84 | 7 | 5.32 | -0.16 | 2.12 | |
5-Year
Average | 61.96 | 68.97 | 65.8 | 50.84 | 34.93 | 31.11 | 12.18 | 2.12 | 7.67 | 4.02 | |
10-Year
Average | 42.78 | | 102.35 | 113.41 | 65.1 | 45.72 | 37.68 | 30.12 | 27.44 | 18.47 | |
Net
Income % | | | | | | | | | | |
Year
over Year | 70.16 | 84.99 | 60.99 | -11.25 | 6.68 | 35.14 | -14.43 | 5.83 | 23.12 | -7.18 | |
3-Year
Average | 58.85 | 75.03 | 71.77 | 38.26 | 15.08 | 8.56 | 7.25 | 6.96 | 3.69 | 6.54 | |
5-Year
Average | 60.03 | 67.11 | 64.2 | 50.27 | 36.84 | 30.67 | 12 | 2.99 | 9.96 | 6.94 | |
10-Year
Average | 33.39 | | 90.88 | 87.49 | 64.28 | 44.61 | 36.81 | 30.04 | 28.54 | 20.97 | |
EPS % | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year
over Year | 66.85 | 82.71 | 59.5 | -9.97 | 13.58 | 42.95 | -9.87 | 10.83 | 29.32 | -0.17 | 4.12 |
3-Year
Average | 56.8 | 72.85 | 69.41 | 37.92 | 17.71 | 13.49 | 13.53 | 12.61 | 8.91 | 12.68 | |
5-Year
Average | 57.56 | 64.9 | 62.22 | 49.29 | 37.82 | 33.62 | 16.01 | 7.87 | 15.97 | 13.01 | |
10-Year
Average | 30.11 | | 85.81 | 82.88 | 62.35 | 45.1 | 38.31 | 32.28 | 31.58 | 24.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |