This
paper presents the two types of statistics, i.e. inferential and descriptive
analysis, to precise the relationship between the dependent and independent
variables that how awareness and perceived usefulness, promotion and low
prices, delivery cost, accessibility, and visual marketing effects the
e-shopping by applying descriptive and correlation analysis.
Table 1.
Gender
|
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid
Percent
|
Cumulative
Percent
|
Valid
|
Male
|
72
|
54.5
|
54.5
|
54.5
|
Female
|
60
|
45.5
|
45.5
|
100
|
Total
|
132
|
100
|
100
|
|
Age
|
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid
Percent
|
Cumulative
Percent
|
Valid
|
Less
than 26 Year
|
36
|
27.3
|
27.3
|
27.3
|
26
- 35 Year
|
48
|
36.4
|
36.4
|
63.6
|
36
- 45 Year
|
33
|
25
|
25
|
88.6
|
46
- 55 Year
|
10
|
7.6
|
7.6
|
96.2
|
More
than 55 Year
|
5
|
3.8
|
3.8
|
100
|
Total
|
132
|
100
|
100
|
|
Status
|
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid
Percent
|
Cumulative
Percent
|
Valid
|
Married
|
83
|
62.9
|
62.9
|
62.9
|
Single
|
49
|
37.1
|
37.1
|
100
|
Total
|
132
|
100
|
100
|
|
Monthly Income
|
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Valid
Percent
|
Cumulative
Percent
|
Valid
|
Less
than 5,000 SAR
|
17
|
12.9
|
12.9
|
12.9
|
5,000
- 9,999 SAR
|
46
|
34.8
|
34.8
|
47.7
|
10,000-14,999
SAR
|
34
|
25.8
|
25.8
|
73.5
|
More
than 15,000 SAR
|
17
|
12.9
|
12.9
|
86.4
|
Non
fixed income
|
18
|
13.6
|
13.6
|
100
|
Total
|
132
|
100
|
100
|
|
Interpretation:
The above shows the frequencies of gender, it can be observed that total of 132
individuals responded to the survey; 72 respondents were males (54.5 percent of
total respondents) and 60 respondents were females (45.5 percent of total
respondents).The above table shows the frequencies of age; total of 5 groups of
age was defined, and most of the respondents belong to the age group between 26
and 35, i.e. 48 respondents and 36.4 percent of total respondents. Only 5
respondents belong to age group more than 55 years, i.e. 3.8 percent of total
respondents.
The
above table represents the marital status of the respondents; 62.9 percent of
the total respondents are married i.e., 83 respondents and 37.1 percent of
respondents are unmarried i.e., 49 respondents. The above table represents the
monthly income; it can be observed that most of the respondents belong to
income group between 5,000 - 9,999 SAR i.e. 46 out of 132 respondents and 34.8
percent while the least number of employees belong to income group less than
5,000 SAR and more than 15,000 SAR i.e. 12.9 percent and 17, 17 out of 132
respondents.
1.2
Descriptive Statistics
of Determinants of Consumers’ Preference for E-shopping in
Saudi Arabia
Table
2.
1.
Descriptive Statistics
|
|
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
E-Shopping
|
132
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
3.8773
|
.71265
|
Awareness and
Perceived Usefulness
|
132
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.0511
|
.71298
|
Promotion and
Low Prices
|
132
|
1.33
|
5.00
|
4.1010
|
.82161
|
Delivery Cost
|
132
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.1098
|
.69982
|
Accessibility
|
132
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.1515
|
.64998
|
Visual Marketing
|
132
|
1.50
|
5.00
|
4.1515
|
.71699
|
Valid N
(listwise)
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
Interpretation: The above table
represents the summary statistics of dependent and independent variables
containing the number of observations, minimum data value, maximum data value,
mean value, and standard deviation. It can be observed that all of the
variables contains 132 number of observations; the minimum data value of
e-shopping, awareness and perceived usefulness, delivery cost, and
accessibility is 2.00, while minimum value of promotion and low prices and
visual marketing is 1.33 and 1.50 respectively. In addition, the maximum value
of all variables is 5.00. The data shows that e-shopping has minimum mean value
i.e. 3.8773 and the rest of the variables have means value around 4.1.
Following the mean values, promotion and low prices have highest value of
standard deviation i.e. 0.82161 while accessibility has lowest value of
standard deviation i.e. 0.64998.
1.3
Reliability statics
of Determinants of Consumers’ Preference for E-shopping in
Saudi Arabia
Table
3.
Constructs
|
N
|
No
of item
|
Chronbach’s
Alpha
|
E Shopping
|
132
|
6
|
0.828
|
Awareness and Perceived Usefulness
|
132
|
4
|
0.736
|
Promotion and Low Prices
|
132
|
3
|
.531
|
Delivery Cost
|
132
|
4
|
0.635
|
Accessibility
|
132
|
4
|
.517
|
Visual Marketing
|
132
|
4
|
.885
|
Interpretation
This
table representing the reliability and inconsistency of the data that is
conducted from the respondents after analyzing the literature review of the
various authors. The literature review also measures the impacts of the
consumer’s behaviors on E-shopping and there are several factors that are
analyzed in this study and these all factors are affection the E-shopping. The
value of the Chron bach’s Alpha in this table represents the consistency of
data. The Chron bach’s Alpha value for E-Shopping is 0.828 it shows the data is
highly reliable because the value is greater than 0.7. The Chron bach’s Alpha
value for three variables Promotion and Low Prices, Delivery Cost and
Accessibility is less than 0.7 which shows data is moderately reliable for further
analysis.
1.4
Factor
Analysis
The
tables of the factor analysis are to larger due to this. All of these tables
are not composed in this file. These tables are given in the appendix.
1.4.1
E-Shopping
of Determinants of
Consumers’ Preference for E-shopping in Saudi Arabia
Table
7.
Factor
Analysis is better explained with the help of tables given below:
Communalities
|
|
Initial
|
In
general I shop from E-shopping stores
|
1.000
|
E-shopping
is a trend nowadays.
|
1.000
|
I
believe, E-shopping is considered as lifestyle.
|
1.000
|
Traditional
shopping is no more charming to me and people I know.
|
1.000
|
Online
shopping is more preferable for me and people I know.
|
1.000
|
A
product information quality is important in E-shopping.
|
1.000
|
A
complete detail of product information quality builds my trust to do
E-shopping.
|
1.000
|
I
always get relevant information about the product I need at online stores.
|
1.000
|
The
product quality information helps me doing E-shopping.
|
1.000
|
A
price of the products on the e-stores is always fair when compared to the
products at the traditional stores.
|
1.000
|
E-shopping
is cheaper than normal shopping.
|
1.000
|
E-shopping
provides buyer-friendly promotions and prices to the customers.
|
1.000
|
The
quality of delivery service is important for E-shopping.
|
1.000
|
E-shopping
guarantee to deliver my order safe and secure.
|
1.000
|
The
delivery cost in e-shopping is less than transport cost in normal shopping.
|
1.000
|
I
prefer the online stores that provide free delivery services over the stores
that do not.
|
1.000
|
The
purchasing services in E-shopping is more friendly than normal shopping.
|
1.000
|
The
customers who shop online get more variety as compared to customers who buy
from normal stores.
|
1.000
|
Satisfaction
reviews from customers are helpful to make purchasing decision.
|
1.000
|
There
is no time limit in e-shopping, I can buy any product at any time.
|
1.000
|
A
good visual interface in the e-shopping platforms attracts me to do
E-shopping.
|
1.000
|
My
purchasing decision from online stores highly depends on the picture quality
of the product I want to purchase.
|
1.000
|
Visual
representation of products supports my E-shopping decisions.
|
1.000
|
Online
stores deliver the exact product they show in the pictures.
|
1.000
|
Extraction
Method: Principal Component Analysis.
|
Total Variance
Explained
|
Component
|
Initial
Eigenvalues
|
Rotation Sums of
Squared Loadings
|
Total
|
% of Variance
|
Cumulative %
|
Total
|
% of Variance
|
Cumulative %
|
1
|
7.689
|
32.039
|
32.039
|
3.549
|
14.788
|
14.788
|
2
|
2.599
|
10.829
|
42.868
|
3.243
|
13.512
|
28.300
|
3
|
1.449
|
6.038
|
48.906
|
2.722
|
11.343
|
39.643
|
4
|
1.374
|
5.724
|
54.630
|
2.618
|
10.910
|
50.553
|
5
|
1.276
|
5.315
|
59.945
|
2.254
|
9.392
|
59.945
|
6
|
1.039
|
4.328
|
64.274
|
|
|
|
7
|
.934
|
3.891
|
68.165
|
|
|
|
8
|
.871
|
3.628
|
71.793
|
|
|
|
9
|
.716
|
2.983
|
74.776
|
|
|
|
10
|
.670
|
2.792
|
77.568
|
|
|
|
11
|
.639
|
2.663
|
80.231
|
|
|
|
12
|
.603
|
2.511
|
82.742
|
|
|
|
13
|
.541
|
2.253
|
84.994
|
|
|
|
14
|
.515
|
2.145
|
87.140
|
|
|
|
15
|
.491
|
2.047
|
89.186
|
|
|
|
16
|
.428
|
1.784
|
90.970
|
|
|
|
17
|
.367
|
1.528
|
92.498
|
|
|
|
18
|
.332
|
1.382
|
93.880
|
|
|
|
19
|
.318
|
1.323
|
95.203
|
|
|
|
20
|
.300
|
1.248
|
96.452
|
|
|
|
21
|
.249
|
1.038
|
97.490
|
|
|
|
22
|
.227
|
.948
|
98.438
|
|
|
|
23
|
.209
|
.869
|
99.306
|
|
|
|
24
|
.166
|
.694
|
100.000
|
|
|
|
Extraction
Method: Principal Component Analysis.
|
Rotated
Component Matrixa
|
|
Component
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
In
general I shop from E-shopping stores
|
-.037
|
.499
|
.519
|
.086
|
.202
|
E-shopping
is a trend nowadays.
|
.494
|
-.082
|
.537
|
.258
|
.204
|
I
believe, E-shopping is considered as lifestyle.
|
.315
|
.145
|
.651
|
-.036
|
.193
|
Traditional
shopping is no more charming to me and people I know.
|
.007
|
.484
|
.676
|
-.079
|
-.024
|
Online
shopping is more preferable for me and people I know.
|
.000
|
.616
|
.529
|
.217
|
-.163
|
A
product information quality is important in E-shopping.
|
.135
|
.052
|
.075
|
.806
|
.025
|
A
complete detail of product information quality builds my trust to do
E-shopping.
|
.112
|
-.035
|
.065
|
.755
|
.192
|
I
always get relevant information about the product I need at online stores.
|
.153
|
.081
|
.608
|
.144
|
.210
|
The
product quality information helps me doing E-shopping.
|
.289
|
.067
|
.399
|
.500
|
.088
|
A
price of the products on the e-stores is always fair when compared to the
products at the traditional stores.
|
.650
|
.142
|
.338
|
.069
|
.083
|
E-shopping
is cheaper than normal shopping.
|
.776
|
.303
|
.192
|
.058
|
.038
|
E-shopping
provides buyer-friendly promotions and prices to the customers.
|
.760
|
.156
|
.126
|
.103
|
.212
|
The
quality of delivery service is important for E-shopping.
|
.515
|
.189
|
-.206
|
.522
|
.258
|
E-shopping
guarantee to deliver my order safe and secure.
|
.291
|
.574
|
.089
|
.303
|
-.051
|
The
delivery cost in e-shopping is less than transport cost in normal shopping.
|
.380
|
.697
|
-.010
|
-.056
|
.003
|
I
prefer the online stores that provide free delivery services over the stores
that do not.
|
.580
|
.182
|
-.038
|
.385
|
.101
|
The
purchasing services in E-shopping is more friendly than normal shopping.
|
.200
|
.651
|
.204
|
.018
|
.270
|
The
customers who shop online get more variety as compared to customers who buy
from normal stores.
|
.019
|
.536
|
.106
|
.354
|
.337
|
Satisfaction
reviews from customers are helpful to make purchasing decision.
|
.553
|
-.058
|
.115
|
.390
|
.355
|
There
is no time limit in e-shopping, I can buy any product at any time.
|
.404
|
-.035
|
.223
|
.190
|
.477
|
A
good visual interface in the e-shopping platforms attracts me to do
E-shopping.
|
.066
|
.278
|
.106
|
.324
|
.460
|
My
purchasing decision from online stores highly depends on the picture quality
of the product I want to purchase.
|
.130
|
.166
|
.069
|
.112
|
.830
|
Visual
representation of products supports my E-shopping decisions.
|
.319
|
.175
|
.310
|
.055
|
.599
|
Online
stores deliver the exact product they show in the pictures.
|
.054
|
.682
|
.135
|
-.176
|
.296
|
Extraction
Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser
Normalization.
|
a.
Rotation converged in 14 iterations.
|
Component
Transformation Matrix
|
Component
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
.563
|
.461
|
.427
|
.375
|
.384
|
2
|
-.365
|
.645
|
.385
|
-.530
|
-.148
|
3
|
-.425
|
.514
|
-.491
|
.561
|
.006
|
4
|
-.565
|
-.324
|
.625
|
.415
|
.118
|
5
|
-.223
|
-.052
|
-.197
|
-.304
|
.904
|
Extraction
Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser
Normalization.
|
2.
KMO and Bartlett's Test
|
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin
Measure of Sampling Adequacy.
|
.775
|
Bartlett's Test
of Sphericity
|
Approx.
Chi-Square
|
350.797
|
df
|
15
|
Sig.
|
.000
|
Generally,
in the factor analysis, the KMO is used to measure the adequacy of the
sampling. It also utilized to measure either the response is adequate or not. It must be round about the
0.5 according to its satisfactory analysis. The Adequacy of the variables is
recommended greater than 0.5. The value of the KMO is 0.775 it means
responsible for this variable is adequate.
The significance level of Bartlett's Test of Sphericity test is less than
0.05. It shows the correlation matrix is not an identity matrix (see in
Appendix).
1.4.2
Awareness
and Perceived Usefulness
Table
8.
3.
Component Matrixa
|
|
Component
|
1
|
Product
information quality is important in E-shopping.
|
.798
|
Complete detail
of product information quality builds my trust to do E-shopping.
|
.833
|
I always get
relevant information about the product I need at online stores.
|
.790
|
The product
quality information helps me doing E-shopping.
|
.598
|
Extraction
Method: Principal Component Analysis.
|
a. 1 component
extracted.
|
In this table of the Component Matrix, the loadings of the factors are represented and it also
shows extracted values of each item in this variable of Awareness and
Perceived Usefulness. For the
four questions of these variables, one factor is extracted. There are several
other factors that are contributing to this variable, and it also referred as
the higher absolute value of loading. In this matrix the four items are divided
into two components. The loadings are represented by the gap in the tables,
which are less than 0.5, and due to this to read the table can be easier.
4.
KMO and Bartlett's Test
|
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin
Measure of Sampling Adequacy.
|
.476
|
Bartlett's Test
of Sphericity
|
Approx.
Chi-Square
|
182.713
|
df
|
6
|
Sig.
|
.000
|
Generally,
in the factor analysis, the KMO is used to measure the adequacy of the
sampling. It also utilized to measure either the response is adequate or not. It must be round about the
0.5 according to its satisfactory analysis. The Adequacy of the variables is
recommended greater than 0.5. The value of the KMO is 0.476 it means
responsible for this variable is adequate because it is roundabout 0.5. The significance level of Bartlett's Test of
Sphericity test is less than 0.05 it shows correlation matrix is not an
identity matrix (see in Appendix).
1.4.3
Promotion
and Low Prices
Table
9.
5.
Component Matrixa
|
|
Component
|
1
|
The price of the
products on the e-stores is always fair when compared to the products at the
traditional stores.
|
.565
|
E-shopping is
cheaper than normal shopping.
|
.710
|
E-shopping
provides buyer-friendly promotions and prices to the customers.
|
.866
|
Extraction
Method: Principal Component Analysis.
|
a. 1 component
extracted.
|
In
this table of the Component Matrix the
loadings of the factors are represented and it also shows extracted values of
each item in this variable of Promotion and Low Prices. For the three questions of these
variables, one factor is extracted. There are several other factors that are
contributing to this variable, and it also referred as the higher absolute
value of loading. In this matrix the four items are divided into two
components. The loadings are represented by the gap in the tables, which are
less than 0.5 and due to this to read the table can be easier.
6.
KMO and Bartlett's Test
of
Determinants of Consumers’ Preference for E-shopping in Saudi Arabia
|
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin
Measure of Sampling Adequacy.
|
.480
|
Bartlett's Test
of Sphericity
|
Approx.
Chi-Square
|
43.655
|
df
|
3
|
Sig.
|
.000
|
Generally,
in the factor analysis, the KMO is used to measure the adequacy of the
sampling. It also utilized to measure either the response is adequate or not. It must be round about the
0.5 according to its satisfactory analysis. The Adequacy of the variables is
recommended greater than 0.5. The value of the KMO is 0.480 it means
responsible for this variable is adequate because it is roundabout 0.5. The significance level of Bartlett's Test of
Sphericity test is less than 0.05. It shows the correlation matrix is not an
identity matrix (see in Appendix).
1.4.4
Delivery
Cost of
Determinants of Consumers’ Preference for E-shopping in Saudi Arabia
Table
10.
7.
Component Matrixa
|
|
Component
|
1
|
2
|
The quality of
the delivery service is important for E-shopping.
|
.845
|
-.060
|
E-shopping
guarantees to deliver my order safe and secure.
|
.840
|
.151
|
The delivery
cost in e-shopping is less than the transport cost in normal shopping
|
.865
|
-.086
|
I prefer online
stores that provide free delivery services over the stores that do not.
|
-.001
|
.993
|
Extraction
Method: Principal Component Analysis.
|
a. 2 components
extracted.
|
In
this table of the Component Matrix the
loadings of the factors are represented and it also shows extracted values of
each item in this variable of Delivery Cost. For the three questions of these variables two factors are
extracted. There are several other factors that are contributing to this
variable, and it also referred as the higher absolute value of loading. In this
matrix, the four items are divided into two components. The loadings are represented
by the gap in the tables, which are less than 0.5, and due to this to read the
table can be easier.
8.
KMO and Bartlett's Test
of
Determinants of Consumers’ Preference for E-shopping in Saudi Arabia
|
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin
Measure of Sampling Adequacy.
|
.694
|
Bartlett's Test
of Sphericity
|
Approx.
Chi-Square
|
130.645
|
df
|
6
|
Sig.
|
.000
|
Generally,
in the factor analysis, the KMO is used to measure the adequacy of the
sampling. It also utilized to measure either the response is adequate or not. It must be round about the
0.5 according to its satisfactory analysis. The Adequacy of the variables is
recommended greater than 0.5. The value of the KMO is 0.694 it means
responsible for this variable is adequate because it is around 0.5. The significance level of Bartlett's Test of
Sphericity test is less than 0.05 it shows the correlation matrix is not an
identity matrix (see in Appendix).
1.4.5
Accessibility
of Determinants of
Consumers’ Preference for E-shopping in Saudi Arabia
Table
11
9.
Component Matrixa
|
|
Component
|
1
|
2
|
The purchasing
services in E-shopping are more friendly than normal shopping.
|
.793
|
.103
|
The customers
who shop online get more variety as compared to customers who buy from normal
stores.
|
.738
|
-.146
|
Satisfaction
reviews from customers are helping to make a purchasing decision
|
.691
|
-.389
|
There is no time
limit in e-shopping. I can buy any product at any time.
|
.324
|
.907
|
Extraction
Method: Principal Component Analysis.
|
a. 2 components
extracted.
|
In
this table of the Component Matrix, the loadings of the factors are
represented, and it also shows the extracted values of each item in this
variable of Accessibility. For the three questions of these
variables two factors are extracted. There are several other factors that are
contributing to this variable, and it also referred to as the higher absolute
value of loading. In this matrix the four items are divided into two
components. The loadings are represented by the gap in the tables, which are
less than 0.5 and due to this to read the table can be easier.
10. KMO
and Bartlett's Test
|
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin
Measure of Sampling Adequacy.
|
.627
|
Bartlett's Test
of Sphericity
|
Approx.
Chi-Square
|
51.165
|
df
|
6
|
Sig.
|
.000
|
Generally,
in the factor analysis, the KMO is used to measure the adequacy of the
sampling. It also utilized to measure either the response is adequate or not. It must be round about the
0.627 according to its satisfactory analysis. The Adequacy of the variables is
recommended greater than 0.5. The value of the KMO is 0.627 it means
responsible for this variable is adequate
because it is roundabout 0.5. The
significance level of Bartlett's Test of Sphericity test is less than 0.05.
It shows the correlation matrix is not an identity matrix (see in Appendix).
1.4.6
Visual
Marketing
Table
12
11. Component
Matrixa
|
|
Component
|
1
|
A good visual
interface in the e-shopping platforms attracts me to do E-shopping.
|
.947
|
My purchasing
decision from online stores highly depends on the picture quality of the
product I want to purchase.
|
.810
|
Visual
representation of products supports my E-shopping decisions.
|
.743
|
Online stores
deliver the exact product they show in the pictures
|
.947
|
Extraction
Method: Principal Component Analysis.
|
a. 1 component
extracted.
|
In
this table of the Component Matrix the
loadings of the factors are represented, and it also shows extracted values of
each item in this variable of Visual Marketing. For the five questions of these variables one factor is
extracted. There are several other factors that are contributing to this
variable, and it also referred to as the higher absolute value of loading. In
this matrix the five items are divided into one component. The loadings are
represented by the gap in the tables which are less than 0.5 and due to this to
read the table can be easier.
1.5
Regression analysis
Table
4.
12. Model
Summary
|
Model
|
R
|
R Square
|
Adjusted R
Square
|
Std. The error
of the Estimate
|
1
|
.983a
|
.966
|
.965
|
.10473
|
a. Predictors:
(Constant), Visual Marketing, Awareness and Perceived Usefulness,
Accessibility, Delivery Cost, Promotion and Low Prices
|
Table5.
13. ANOVAa
|
Model
|
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
Mean Square
|
F
|
Sig.
|
1
|
Regression
|
39.305
|
5
|
7.861
|
716.736
|
.000b
|
Residual
|
1.382
|
126
|
.011
|
|
|
Total
|
40.687
|
131
|
|
|
|
a. Dependent
Variable: Shopping
|
b. Predictors:
(Constant), Visual Marketing, Awareness and Perceived Usefulness,
Accessibility, Delivery Cost, Promotion and Low Prices
|
Table 6.
14. Coefficientsa
|
Model
|
Unstandardized
Coefficients
|
Standardized
Coefficients
|
t
|
Sig.
|
B
|
Std. Error
|
Beta
|
1
|
(Constant)
|
.054
|
.103
|
|
-.526
|
.600
|
Awareness and
Perceived Usefulness
|
.123
|
.021
|
.131
|
5.725
|
.000
|
Promotion and
Low Prices
|
.467
|
.034
|
.462
|
13.726
|
.000
|
Delivery Cost
|
.512
|
.032
|
.487
|
15.776
|
.000
|
Accessibility
|
.80
|
.020
|
.077
|
4.019
|
.000
|
Visual Marketing
|
.10
|
.014
|
.013
|
.672
|
.503
|
a. Dependent
Variable: Shopping
|
Interpretation
For constructing the regression equation of the least
square, it has found a =0. 054 and b = .123, -.467, .512, .80, and 10 in the
regression analysis of the coefficient table. The regression equation for the
least square is;
Y
= .054+ .123X1+.467x2+.467?+.512?+.80?+.10
In the above-given analysis the value of the
coefficient of the variables is representing that there is positive
relationship between all independent variables and dependent variable
(E-Shopping). It shows by enhancing the input the output will be increased
automatically. The level of the significance for all variables is highly
significant except for one variable (Visual Marketing). Because the value of
Visual Marketing is 0.503, and it greater than 0.05meanwhile the values for several
other variables are 0.000, and these are less than 0.05. It shows all of the
independent variables have positive significant relationship with the dependent
variables.
The module summary table represents the effect of
independent variables on the dependent variable, and in this table the value of
the Adjusted R square 0.965, which shows due to the 1% change in independent
variables, the dependent variable E-shopping will be changed96%. It means by enhancing all of these factors,
the trend of the E-shopping can be increased.
The
F statistic is the regression mean square (MSR) divided by the residual mean
square (MSE). If the significance value of the F statistic is small (smaller
than say 0.05), then the independent variables do a good job explaining the
variation in the dependent variable. The significance value of the F statics is
0.000.
If the significance value of F is larger than say
0.05, then the independent variables do not explain the variation in the
dependent variable, and the null hypothesis that all the population values for
the regression coefficients are 0 is accepted. After checking for the model
fit, we might want to know the relative importance of each IV in predicting.
DV.
The unstandardized (B) coefficients are the coefficients of the estimated
regression model.