The
organization has decided to improve the efficiency and overall performance of
the organization. For this, the organization has decided to implement web-based
technologies. The corporation has chosen 4 projects for reducing the cost and
addressing the concerns of the employees and customers. The detail of the four
projects are discussed below:
Project
Titles
|
Cost
of Project
|
Potential
Benefit
|
Recreation & Wellness
|
200000
|
$30
|
Health Coverage Cost Model
|
100000
|
$20
|
Cross-selling System
|
800000
|
$1 million
|
Web Enhanced Communications
|
3 million
|
$2 million
|
For
evaluating each project, the net present value analysis, payback period analysis
and ROI have been computed. Capital budgeting techniques provide a brief
overview of the effectiveness and profitability of the project. The weighted
scoring model is also used to know which project should be given the priority (Lehmann, 2016).
2. Weighted Scoring Model of Project
Planning & Integration Management
|
|
Requirement Scores
|
Criteria
|
weight
|
Recreation & Wellness
|
Health Coverage Costs
|
Cross Selling System
|
Web Enhanced Communications
|
Cost of the project
|
40%
|
60
|
50
|
30
|
30
|
Net Savings
|
20%
|
30
|
20
|
10
|
20
|
Employee Benefit
|
10%
|
30
|
20
|
30
|
20
|
Customer Satisfaction
|
20%
|
30
|
30
|
50
|
50
|
Organizational Performance
|
10%
|
40
|
20
|
30
|
40
|
Weighted Scores
|
100%
|
43
|
34
|
30
|
32 |
A
weighted scoring model is an approach that helps the project manager to rank
strategic projects of the corporations against cost & benefit categories.
Through the weighted scoring model, the individual can find out which project
has the highest score and which project should be the utmost priority of the
corporation. In this approach, five criteria are developed, which include Cost
of each project, Net savings, Employee benefit, Customer satisfaction and
Organizational Performance. After developing the criteria’s, the weights are
assigned to each criterion. The cost of the project is assigned the highest
weight of 40% because the cost of the project matters a lot for the
organization.
The
saving which the project brings to the organization is assigned 20% weight. It
is the second highest weight assigned to any criteria. The employee benefit is
given 10% weight the organizational performance also given 10%. After assigning
the weights to the criteria, the scores are assigned to each project of the
Manage Your Health Inc. The weighted scores of the weighted scoring model show
that the recreation & wellness project has the highest score of 43, which
indicates that the corporation should pursue this project. The health Coverage
Costs Project has the second highest score of 34. Web Enhanced Communications
system has the third highest score (Kerzner, 2009).
The
above bar chart diagram is showing the results of the Weighted Scoring Model. It
can be seen that Recreation & Wellness has the highest Score (Lester, 2007).
3.
Financial Analysis of Project Planning & Integration Management
Discount rate
|
10%
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Assume the project is completed in
Year 0
| | |
Year
| | |
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Total
|
Costs
|
200,000
|
40,000
|
40,000
|
40,000
| |
Discount factor
|
1.00
|
0.91
|
0.83
|
0.75
| |
Discounted costs
|
200,000
|
36,400
|
33,200
|
30,000
|
299,600
|
| | | | | |
Benefits
|
0
|
600,000
|
600,000
|
600,000
| |
Discount factor
|
1.00
|
0.91
|
0.83
|
0.75
| |
Discounted benefits
|
0
|
546,000
|
498,000
|
450,000
|
1,494,000
|
| | | | | |
Discounted benefits - costs
|
(200,000)
|
509,600
|
464,800
|
420,000
|
1,194,400
|
Cumulative benefits - costs
|
(200,000)
|
|
774,400
|
1,194,400
| |
| | | | | |
|
399%
| | | | |
The
Present Net Value (NPV) is evaluated to know regarding the profitability of the
Project. The NPV of the Project is 119440, which is positive. The positive NPV
is the sign that the project will generate profit in the future; therefore,
investing in the project would be a good idea. The projected return on
investment (ROI) is quite high, that is 399%, which indicates that the corporation
can generate a huge amount of earning through investing in this project (Atrill, 2014). The payback
analysis is indicating that the corporation will cover its initial investment
in the first year. Through critically analyzing the Recreation & wellness
project, it can be said that investing in this project would bring a significant
amount of benefit to the organization. Therefore, the organization should
invest in this project (Higgins, 2007).
4. Project Charter of Project
Planning & Integration Management
1.0 Introduction/
Background of Project Planning & Integration Management
Manage your health is a major organization and
provides healthcare services around the world. The MYH is among the fortune
500 corporations. Recently the organization has decided to implement new
strategies which allow it to address the concerns of the employees and
customers more efficiently along with reducing the costs of the organization.
The corporation has decided to implement web-based technologies to achieve
the desired goals. Therefore the corporation has deiced to launch the Recreation
and Wellness Intranet Project.
|
2.0 Business
Objective of Project Planning & Integration Management
The
following are the key business objective of the project: Giving the employee the permission
to register for the organization's recreational programs like jogging,
soccer, bowling etc. Allowing employees to get register
for the programs which allow employees to reduce weight, stress, stop smoking
and other health-related programs. The project will allow the corporation
to monitor the data of the employees who are taking part in various pr Giving incentives to employees who
become part of the programs (Hornstein, 2015).
|
3.0 Current Situation
and Problem/Opportunity Statement of Project Planning & Integration
Management
Manage Your Health is a
major corporation who currently wants to enhance its profit by reducing the
costs. The corporation is looking for such a project which will allow the
organization to reduce its costs and improve the performance of its
employees. That is why the organization has decided to launch the Recreation and Wellness Intranet Project.
This will allow the organization to save $30 per employee through which the costs
of the organizations will reduce significantly.
|
4.0 Critical Assumption and
Constraints of Project Planning & Integration Management
The
key constraints/ Assumptions of the project are mentioned below: The project cost is assumed to be
$200,000. The cost of the project may increases if the economic conditions
change dramatically. Any project team member can leave
the project, which might cause a problem in delivering the project on time. The technical issues can arise in
the execution phase.
|
5.0 Analysis of Option and
Recommendation of Project Planning & Integration Management
For
implementing web-based technologies, the organization will have to recruit
technical experts in the project team. Furthermore, the financial analyst
must be included who would estimate the cost & benefit of the project. It
is recommended that the corporation evaluate all the four project to know
about their profitability and overall benefit. The capital budgeting
techniques such as NPV, IRR and payback period can be utilized to know the
profitability.
|
6.0 Preliminary Project
Requirements of Project Planning & Integration Management
The
key requirements of the project are explained below: Selecting the project manager Creation of Project Plan Preparation of the project Budget Creation of Project Team
|
7.0 Budget Estimate and
Financial Analysis of Project Planning & Integration Management
The
budget of the project is estimated to be $200,000. For evaluating the cost
& benefit of the project, the net present value analysis will be
performed. The net present value will provide detail information about the
project benefit & profitability. The payback period analysis will be
performed to know the time period of initial investment recovery. Furthermore,
ROI (return on investment) will be computed for having detailed financial
analysis. In the Exhibit, the financial analysis of the project is provided (Pandey, 2015).
|
8.0 Schedule Estimate of Project
Planning & Integration Management
The
project will be completed in the 6 month period. All the activities of the
project will be performed within the 6 month period.
|
9.0 Potential Risks of Project
Planning & Integration Management
There
are many risks which should be included while planning the project. The first
major risk of the project is that the cost of the project can increase due to
the change in prices of the material required in the project. Furthermore,
the team members who are working for the project might become unavailable due
to any reason. This can cause a problem for the project to deliver on time.
|
10.0 Exhibits of Project
Planning & Integration Management
Discount rate
|
10%
| | | | | | | | | | |
Assume the
project is completed in Year 0
| | |
Year
| | | |
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Total
|
Costs
|
200,000
|
40,000
|
40,000
|
40,000
| |
Discount factor
|
1.00
|
0.91
|
0.83
|
0.75
| |
Discounted costs
|
200,000
|
36,400
|
33,200
|
30,000
|
299,600
| | | | | | |
Benefits
|
0
|
600,000
|
600,000
|
600,000
| |
Discount factor
|
1.00
|
0.91
|
0.83
|
0.75
| |
Discounted
benefits
|
0
|
546,000
|
498,000
|
450,000
|
1,494,000
| | | | | | |
Discounted
benefits - costs
|
(200,000)
|
509,600
|
464,800
|
420,000
|
1,194,400
|
Cumulative
benefits - costs
|
(200,000)
|
|
774,400
|
1,194,400
| | | | | | | |
|
399%
| | | | |
|
5. Change Request of Project Planning
& Integration Management
Project Details:
|
Project Name:
Recreation and
Wellness Intranet Project
|
Request #:
|
Date of Request:
|
Requested By: Project Manager
|
Request Description:
|
Due to the unavailability of the technical
experts, it has become mandatory to recruit new technical experts for the
project.
|
Reasons for this Change
Request:
|
After the technical expert leaves the project
team, the project is experiencing a delay, and if the project did not recruit
a new expert in the team, than the project will not be delivered on time.
|
Options considered to implement the
change:
|
The HR team of the organization will take
interview of the candidates who are suitable for the project and then will be
recruited in the project team.
|
Impact of each option (Cost, Scope,
Schedule, Quality):
|
The
cost of the project will increase, which will have an impact on the scope of
the project. Furthermore, the quality of the project will enhance due to the
availability of the experts.
|
Chosen solution:
|
Recruitment
of the new expert as replacement of the old team member is the solution to
the problem.
|
Approval Signature(s) and Date(s):
|
|
References
of Project Planning & Integration Management
Atrill, P., (2014). Financial Management for
Decision Makers (7 ed.). Pearson Higher Ed.
Higgins. (2007). Analysis
for Financial Management. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Hornstein, H. A., (2015).
The integration of project management and organizational change management is
now a necessity. 33, 291–298.
Kerzner, H., (2009). Project
Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling.
John Wiley & Sons.
Lehmann, O. F., (2016). Situational
Project Management: The Dynamics of Success and Failure . CRC Press.
Lester, A., (2007). Project
Management, Planning and Control: Managing Engineering, Construction and
Manufacturing Projects to PMI, APM and BSI Standards. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Pandey, I. (2015). Financial
Management. Vikas Publishing House.