Assignment Problems with the paper that currently make it unpublishable

One important thing that I think the paper failed to mention is Danish cooperative laws and regulations of that era and if they helped the process of adopting new creameries any easier. As it has been seen throughout human history, that laws and regulations are either very in favor of new technologies like governments incentivize the adoption of new technologies and new ideas in many ways, or they impose new taxes, etc. and make it very difficult for people to transition from traditional to new methods which are hindrance in the adoption of new technologies and ideas. I am not an expert on the history of Danish laws and their creameries, but in humble opinion, the laws and regulations must have played a vital role in adoption to new type of creameries, and they made it possible for people to transition from more traditional methods of extracting butter as mentioned in the study to more advanced cooperative creameries. I think it’s important to give detailed reasoning of the effect of laws and regulations as it can give us insight into how the government was helpful in the adoption of newer technologies and whether we can use those models in our today world.

·         The problems that prevail in the said article which make it unpublishable. They can either relate to the approach of the study, the methodology being used, and the test runs on the data for the purposes of the analysis. It can be said that the varying results might have been obtained for the different industrial domains as well as the methodology. In case the above-said parameters are better handled, they can better provide the opportunities to make the said work publishable. This is how certain changes can have a positive impact on the overall outcomes.

·         The next problem in this paper, which is unpublishable, can’t regulator the investment in the investigation; subsequently, they have the contributions of exploit. Aside from underlying immovable expenses, which was referred to as the manufacturing of creamery and purchasing as well as generating power, investment has an absolutely moderately minor piece of the variable expenses of creation, normally with the ratio of 10 percent in turnover.

·         Moreover, these problems were also has been faced as in the form of supplying the milk, and this can become a form of weakening in the positions as well as in the form of reinforcement of feeding-winter between the retailors of dairy farmers.

Part 2:

4.        Problems with the paper that do not render the paper unpublishable

·         The next problem in this article is I think the management of the creamy reliant with the fewer amounts of suppliers, where corporative sanction the effective use of techniques.

·         Other important things that I think the paper failed to mention they were likely to give some best opportunities to avoid the suggested problems by providing them, including the investment in the process of separating cream from milk. This would be associated with the manufacturing of cream through a steam generator that provides power, which also includes the risk of ex-post extortion by the suppliers of Milk.

·         Private dairy forms can be regulated to face issues such as the regular supply of milk, and moreover, it will also provide decreased quality of milk and the reason behind these problems.

·         We may likewise anticipate that the old innovation should be dependent upon all the more pointedly consistent losses to scale. Besides, as the axis innovation was improving after some time, we would anticipate that a pattern in milk-should spread proportions. Second, for a few reasons, we would expect - given a similar innovation - that agreeable creameries had the option to utilize this innovation more productively than private creameries.

·         Since these reasons are generally identified with the hold-up intensity of providers, private creameries may likewise have been less productive than domain dairies, which were coordinated proprietor providers. Be that as it may, the last may confront guideline operator issues in draining and furthermore maybe running cream separators underneath their best limit usage in light of the fact that not every one of them really had adequately enormous crowd sizes. We should to hence additionally test whether there is an effectiveness gain from being a helpful creamery that was autonomous of the size of creation: as is clarified beneath, cooperatives were commonly more profitable than different creameries, yet they were likewise commonly bigger.

Further points

The arguments about the refer report is that cooperative creameries were the superior institutional form for several reasons Truly, the creation work presumably showed expanding returns at low volumes of milk as the axis required a specific least degree of contribution to work adequately. At that point, after a specific degree of contribution, there would be unavoidable losses as the machine's working limit was surpassed. In any case, our discovery just mirrors the way that no machines in our example were working at 'outlandish' levels of info. For typical use, the new innovation exhibited steady returns, which was not the situation for the old. Our board is uneven, and most time arrangements contain a few holes; for example, they don't have perceptions for consistently for the period they spread. Engaging insights of normal contribution to-yield proportions for the distinctive, authoritative structures utilizing the two unique advancements. Plainly, the old innovation gave, and large, more terrible proportions than the new innovation and cooperatives were, by and large, more productive than private dairies, which were overall more proficient than the domains. Authors have, in any case, not many perceptions from private creameries.