It can be
noted that these dispute resolutions are used to solve different issues present
between different parties that are agreed upon the contract. It can be noted
that there are various methods will be explained one by one and then after
this, there is a selection of one method for resolving the issue.
Lawsuit: It can be noted that in this proceeding a party
or number of people are in practice with the court. This team is used in the
reference of the civil action will be conducted in the court. It is one of the
most dangerous methods to resolve any dispute present in the contract. For
solving any dispute arise between these parties both of them will be presented
in the court. Then after this, they will highlight their points to the court.
According to this fact, the judge will present the result in the court and
dispute will be resolved (Moore, 2012)
Arbitration:
It is also
considered as a method of ADR. It is also considered as one of the most important
methods to resolve any dispute present between the two parties but outside the
court. In that case, the dispute is decided by one person. This type of method
is mostly used for resolving the commercial disputes present between the
contractor and client (Allison, 1990)
Collaborative law: It is also called as collaborative practice. This
law is related to the family (Beaulier, 2020)
Mediation: It is considered as an important method to
resolve any kind of issue present between the two parties. This method will be
applied when the third party is involved in assisting disputing parties for
resolving the conflict by the use of negotiation and communication techniques (Allison, 1990)
Conciliation: This method to resolve a dispute is used by the
big parties that contain a lot of members. For this purpose, they will present points
based on the problem. Then after this other members will participate to solve
that particular problem (Sgubini, Prieditis , &
Marighetto, 2004)
Negotiation: It is one of the easiest ways to resolve
conflict present between the two parties. For that case, both of these parties
are involved in incomplete communication. The contractor and the client will
sit together and mention their points about the contract to solve the dispute.
Through negotiation, any dispute can be resolved without any difficulty (PON STAFF, 2019)
Facilitation: In this type of method, the group of people are
agreed upon their common objectives. Then according to these objectives, they
make a proper plan on how to complete it with perfection. For that case, the
particular party just have to make a proper list of the common objectives and
showed it to the next party. Then they will agree upon such objectives. After this,
they will make a proper plan for resolving any dispute present in these parties
(Spangler, 2003)
Now
according to the given scenario, the contract was held between the contractor
and a client. Due to this, there are only these ADR methods can be applied
easily include
·
Conciliation
·
Mediation
·
Negotiation
Due to this
method, both contractor and client can easily properly resolve this issue.
Now the
next thing is that through negotiation it will become easy to highlight
different issues of the contract and then after some time it will be resolved
easily without going towards the court of taking any legal action against him. On
the other hand, in such contract issues, the conciliations are usually free to
use. This is because it is considered less formal than arbitration method. Moreover,
mediation is quite similar than negotiation. It is also more effective than
negotiation. This is because in that case, the contractor can easily solve the
problem of the client without any trouble. The contractor just focuses on the
contract issue and finding the best way to solve it with its client. This can
be done more easily by taking suggestions from the client. For this propose
both the contractor and the client has to find the common ground for solving
this problem. After this, the contractor will insist on the client towards the
agreement and if the client still facing any issue he can still make changes in
it. Moreover, the contractor is not the only person that can decide on the
contract. Both parties must have to agree upon the same solution (Allison, 1990)
According
to this case, mediation ADR method will be applied by the contractor to solve
this problem effectively. Now there is a need to make a mediation document for
resolving the problem of the contract between the contractor and client.
Mediation document
Address:
Street
number:
House number:
Telephone
or mobile number:
Email:
Website:
A solution suggested
by the contractor with complete details,
Claim gave
by the client.
Solution
provided by the client
Signature of contractor
Signature of client
By solving
this document both the contractor and client are able to resolve their issue in
a proper way without going towards the court or use any legal standards.
Task 2B: According to the above situation, I have
selected the mediation method to solve this problem. This is because through
this both client and contractor are able to better understand the problem of
the contract and solve the required issue. Besides this, there are some other advantages
of this contract that will be discussed in a proper way in the given section.
One of the
best advantages of mediation is that both of the parties are directly involved
in the agreement. This means that both the contractor and the client are able
to negotiate the problem in a proper way and then according to that they will
find out the correct solution (Padhye, 2019)
The next
plus point about this agreement is that there is no need for any settlement
that will be imposed on you. This means that like in arbitration, there is a
need for a settlement when both of these parties has to settle down for
resolving any issue. This means that the contractor and client are free to give
their relative point about the agreement or contract and then further actions
can be taken easily in a proper way (Padhye, 2019)
Another
most important advantage is that all proceedings will be conducted in private.
This means there is no need to go towards the civil court to mention your point
in front of them. For that case, both contractor and client will sit together
and discuss important points regarding the contract in a proper way (Padhye, 2019)
It can be
noted that the mediation is only placed between the two parties when there is a
problem in the dispute of the agreement. Due to this, it can be easily reached
towards the other end in a quick way with the help of different communication
operations. For this purpose, there is just a need for regular negotiation
without going through the problem of court.
The next
fact is that during the mediation process both the parties have the service of
an experienced person. From that person, they can easily take regular
suggestions about the problem and decide according to that. For that case, it
will be extremely simple for both parties to find out the common ground in a
quick way without any trouble. This shows that both the contractor and client
are able to make decisions without any sort of difficulty (Feinberg, 1989)
There are
another one of the best advantages of this method and it is related to the cost
factor. It can be noted that the cost of the agreement will be reduced in this
method. This is because it can be noted that for accepting this particular
contract both parties are not required to go towards the court for further
proceeding. This shows that both the contractor and the client are not required
to pass through the court or arbitration process for the agreement (Madison Law, 2017)
Furthermore,
the next important thing is that if the mediator is going for the alternative
solution for the given problem then it will be completely accepted by both
parties. This means that if the client is using the alternative method like the
negotiation for solving the problem then there is no need to go through the
court process for the sake of agreement.
It can be
noted that if the parties are using the lawsuit method for resolving their
issue related to the contract then there will be no change of reestablishment between
the two parties. Both of them will never make any contract together. But the
power of mediation is extremely high. This is because due to this both parties
can easily re-establish their relationship in an effective way. This is because
there will be no requirement of any court action. Both the parties are just
required to negotiate with each other until the dispute is resolved between
them.
Another
advantage is that if the mediation is not successful between the two parties
then there will be no need to pass through the legal process. For that just you
are required to discuss important points in a proper way and take actions on
them.
The experience about the dispute method
According
to my point of view, mediation is the best solution for reclosing dispute in
the agreement between the client and contractor. According to this given
scenario of the contract, if the contractor and clients just agree upon the
given point then it will become simple to resolve the issue properly. According
to my experience in analysing and comparing the contract, clauses are extremely
positive. This is because they have used the mediation method to solve this
problem. There are some ways through which both parties are able to contribute
to dispute avoidance and resolution between the contract and the client. It
shows that if these members are able to make a regular decision with the help
of this contract then there will be no trouble in solving this problem. The
contract is based on the future of the contractor and client. Due to this fact,
if they are using negotiation and mediation method then this contract can
easily solve this problem without going towards the court. It can be noted that
the mediation is only placed between the two parties when there is a problem in
the dispute of the agreement. For that case, it will be extremely simple for both parties to find out
the common ground in a quick way without any trouble. This shows that both the
contractor and client are able to make decisions without any sort of
difficulty. It can be noted that the cost of the agreement will be reduced in
this method. This is because it can be noted that for accepting this particular
contract both parties are not required to go towards the court for further
proceeding. Both of
them will never make any contract together. But the power of mediation is
extremely high. This is because due to this both parties can easily
re-establish their relationship in an effective way. This is because there will
be no requirement of any court action. It will give a positive indication about
the given problem of the contract (Knickle, McNaughton, &
Downar, 2012)
References Appraise
different methods of dispute resolution
Allison, J. R. (1990). Five Ways to Keep Disputes
Out of Court. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from
https://hbr.org/1990/01/five-ways-to-keep-disputes-out-of-court
Beaulier, M. (2020). What is Collaborative Law?
Retrieved March 31, 2020, from https://www.mediate.com/articles/beaulier1.cfm
Feinberg, K. R. (1989). Mediation - A Preferred
Method of Dispute. Pepperdine Law Review, 16(5).
Knickle, K., McNaughton, N., & Downar, J.
(2012). Beyond winning: mediation, conflict resolution, and non-rational
sources of conflict in the ICU. Critical Care, 16(3).
Madison Law. (2017). Five Benefits of Mediation.
Retrieved March 31, 2020, from
https://madisonlawapc.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Five-Benefits-of-Mediation-Web.pdf
Moore, L. C. (2012). Litigation 101 - What Happens
In A Lawsuit? Retrieved March 31, 2020, from
https://www.fosterswift.com/communications-Litigation-101-What-Happens-In-A-Lawsuit.html
Padhye, A. (2019). Mediation As An Effective ADR
Mechanism. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from https://www.mediate.com/articles/padhye-mediation-effective.cfm
PON STAFF. (2019). Alternative Dispute Resolution
(ADR) Techniques: Negotiating Conditions. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from
https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/dispute-resolution/negotiating-terms-and-conditions-to-reach-an-agreement/
Sgubini, A., Prieditis , M., & Marighetto, A.
(2004). Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation: differences and
similarities from an International and Italian business perspective.
Retrieved March 31, 2020, from https://www.mediate.com/articles/sgubinia2.cfm
Spangler, B. (2003). Facilitation. Retrieved
March 31, 2020, from https://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/facilitation