A significant skill
that an entrepreneur must have is the ability to evaluate. Valuations are said
as an art, rather than a science. The valuation techniques are focused on specific
parts of the business namely, balance sheet, income statement and discounted
cash flows. The valuations that are done using the balance sheet attempt to
find the worth of assets that are used in the business. Valuations by balance
sheet gives three types of values i.e; the book value, the adjusted book value,
and the liquidation value. Then comes the income statement valuation technique,
it makes an attempt to value an opportunity by capitalization of its earnings
streams. This valuation uses three steps, find a company whose enterprise value
is known, and earnings in the same industry as a target. Calculate the ratio of
value to earnings for that entity. The last step is the application of this
ratio to the earnings of the last twelve months results of the target opportunity.
This is how a valuation estimate will be gained. The DCF technique says that
the value of any business is equal to the expected future cash flows that are
discounted at a rate that shows the riskiness of the cash flow streams. Four
steps are followed in this technique of valuation, the first one is the
establishing the streams of cash flows, in the second step a discount rate is
chosen, third is the determination of a terminal or ending value for the
business. In the fourth step the chosen discount rate is applied to the
projected streams of cash flows. These three techniques of valuations derive
different results for the same business opportunity and give varying estimates.
Each of these techniques is used in different circumstances and has its own advantages
and drawbacks. It is upon the discretion of the user to use it accordingly.
Company
Valuation Techniques in M&A
In an interview with the leading practitioners it was found
out how major investment banks use DCF Technique in merger and acquisitions.
The volume of M&A has exceeded from $12 trillion in the US alone in the
past decade. It was revealed that DCF method was used as a routine measure in
M&A valuations by leading practitioners. Another revelation was that, DCF
techniques are only used for information purposes and they do not serve the
purpose of decision making. This study is divided into 3 parts, the first part
comprises the approach and sample, discussion of key findings is in the second
part and third part gives the conclusion. The discounted cash flow method was
routinely used by firms in benchmarking the investments. WACC is based on
individual sources and it tells the investors the required returns based on the
opportunity cost for investing somewhere else. Three challenges were highlighted
the first being the determination of the terminal value, this was sorted out by
replacing all the cash flows that were arisen after a chosen date by a terminal
value. The second being that a single company has a range of businesses and
divisions, now businesses can either focus on a part or whole of the business.
The third challenge was that acquisitions may be affected by changes that are
occurring in the business. It was concluded that firslty the DCF framework was
in the routine use of firms for the purpose of valuations. Secondly, banks make
estimations of discount rates based on alternatives that can be availed in
financial markets. Thirdly, the application of DCF techniques requires judgment
in the business forecasts that are uncertain inherently. Fourth is that banks
think whether they can use the sum of parts valuation for companies that have
multiple businesses. Fifth, that the valuation of synergies is a challenge in
M&A due to the uncertain nature of synergies. Finally we can say that, DCF
gives information not decisions.