Introduction of Multicomponent
distillation project
In the chemical mixture, different
thermodynamic properties are often dependent on the state properties including
pressure, temperature, and saturation conditions (V/F). Considering the
properties of two states when third one is fixed by the thermodynamic
equilibrium. The prime concern of the project is to measure the multicomponent
hydrocarbon system at the fixed feed temperature and with the variation in the
operating pressure that can be used to explore the impact of design and
operation of distillation column (Maples, 2000).
Purpose of Multicomponent distillation
project
The purpose of the present project
is to introduce a multicomponent distillation column design setup with the help
of AspenPlus simulation software. Different conditions are considered for the
operation and use of simulation results and calculated data to find different
aspects of operating systems and pressure on the column design as well as
performance.
Data analytics of
Multicomponent distillation project
The column specification
calculations are carried out for 99.9% recovery of propylene (LK) and 99.9%
recovery of n-butane (HK) in the bottoms. The mass balance and constraint
elementary process is based on working of pump, reactor, absorber, and
distillation column. Pure propylene is feed into the absorber E, then component
F will reduce vapor feed and stream Se will be absorbed by 100% fraction. In
the distillation process of AspenPlus simulation (figure 1) the component C, D,
A, B, E are in the decreasing order relative to volatility. In AspenPlus we
added two main component constraints to the flowsheet and the mole fraction is
measured. The convergence algorithm was developed to measure the increase in
maximum number of iteration operations in RADFRAC columns that obtain the exact
measurement of convergence. Most of the light gases were forwarded to the flash
drum and tray tower recovered 99% n-butane and propylene. Considering the data,
it is obvious that LNKs appear only in the distillate while HKNs of the process
are in the bottom products only. The mass flow rate, composition and split
fraction of propylene and n-butane 102 lbmol/hr, 638 lbmol/hr, 0.579, 0.403,
0.001, and 0.999 are respectively. The
operating pressure changes to 1, 5, 15, and 20 atm that hypothesize the product
stream with the changes in the condenser or reboiler duties and rate of change
of temperature in the process. The operational cost will be changed by
increasing and decreasing pressure. The P -T envelopes are used to determine
energy cost and how changes in the pressure will induce impact on the column
temperature. in the distillation process in a unit operation to separate the
liquid mixtures the process is to extract high purity product. The propylene is
the bottom fractional recovery element that is also known as key element and it
is volatile therefore it is called light key (LK) and n-butane is least
volatile in the process therefore it is called heavy key (HK). The process used
widely accepted method that is referred as Fenske- underwood Gilliland (FUG)
method.
|
Column 1
|
Column 2
|
Number of trays
|
20
|
10
|
Feed tray location
|
15
|
10
|
Condenser pressure
|
5 atm
|
15 atm
|
Reflux ratio
|
0.1
|
09
|
Conclusion
The process is simulated by using
AspenPlus software and models are considered under certain conditions. The data
analytics section provides enough information about the process simulation,
components, flowrates, and design specifications. The two constraints can be
achieved by having alteration in the vapor pressure at FLASH 1 and FLASH2.
NRTL-RK property is used for calculation. The two liquid phase split is
observed as expected. On each run of simulation, the pressure values were
changed that replaced the existing data and measured new conditions under the
specified input values.
Reference of Multicomponent distillation project
Maples, R. (2000). Petroleum Refinery Process
Economics. Penn wall books.
Appendix of Multicomponent distillation project
Preliminary calculation
Mass
balances
Column
specification of Multicomponent distillation project
Total feed flow
|
Ethane
|
Ethylene
|
Propane
|
Propylene
|
n-butane
|
P-pentane
|
n-hexane
|
1600
|
146
|
54
|
582
|
102
|
638
|
59
|
19
|
P = 1 atm simulation
conditions
|
|
Condenser pressure (atm)
|
1
|
Reboiler pressure (atm)
|
1.2
|
Assumed per tray (psi)
|
0.1
|
Feed temperature (C )
|
20
|
Feed pressure (atm)
|
1.2
|
Column design
parameters
|
Sieve trays
|
|
Fraction of flooding
|
0.8
|
Component
|
Product flowrates
|
Composition
|
Split fractions
|
PROPYLENE
|
102
|
0.579
|
0.001
|
N-BUTANE
|
638
|
0.403
|
0.999
|
Feasible P – T conditions
Fenske
equation to determine N