Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline?

Get Urgent Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework Writing

100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Assignment on Comparative Analysis of Woolworths and BHP for Climate Change Initiative and Disclosure

Category: Arts & Education Paper Type: Assignment Writing Reference: APA Words: 1450

Background of Comparative Analysis of Woolworths and BHP for Climate Change Initiative and Disclosure

            The world is facing various kinds of challenges in the recent era, and one of such challenges is the issue of climate change. The activities of people, as well as, the conduct of businesses are badly affecting the climate and environment of planet Earth in so many ways. It is important for everyone to understand that they can leave it to others to say that climate change is not their business; rather it is something, which affects everyone around the world. If the global average temperature will rise in such a rapid speed, then life will be difficult to live. The world will have to face many natural disasters if everyone is not ready to take responsibility. The responsibility on the shoulders of businesses around the world is very large. The business conduct and activities performed by the business organization have been affecting the climate in a vast majority, and if these organizations are ready to take initiatives to reduce their negative impact, then things can get better. The world can meet the goals of keeping the environment and climate-safe for everyone to survive (Conerly, 2019). In this paper, the focus will be given to two companies; Woolworths and BHP to see their climate change initiatives and disclosure. This comparative analysis will help to understand how things are being done on part of these two companies.

Highlighting Similarities and Differences of Woolworths and BHP Climate Efforts

            It is important to look at the sustainability efforts made by both companies to see how things are moving forward, and in which direction. First of all, Woolworths’ climate and sustainability-related efforts are going to be highlighted. The company has been focusing on its sustainability efforts to makes sure that they become as green as possible reducing their impact on climate and environment. Their sustainability strategy has focused on five major elements such as reducing plastic, food waste, energy efficiency, sustainable sourcing, as well as, animal welfare. However, the focus will be given to energy efficiency and the reduction of plastic waste. As per the sustainability report of Woolworths, the company has opted for plastic bag free strategy, and since then, the phased out a number for plastic bags is 3 billion. They also came up with a plastic straw-free strategy and managed to remove straw up to 134 million. They are also involved in recycling the plastic, and more than 380 tonnes of plastic has been recycled so for with their RedCycle recycling program. They have also made a strategy to increase their energy efficiency. Around 800 supermarkets of Woolworths are using LED lighting which is an efficient solution for lighting. The group has so many buildings to manage their business, and around 50000 solar panels are installed to be used in these buildings to fulfill energy needs. The company has made an Energy Management Center, which looks for new opportunities to make possible reductions in the use of energy (Woolworths, 2020)

            On the other hand, BHP has also focused on its sustainability efforts, and came up with a variety of initiatives in this regard. They have included sustainability in the list of their core values so that they can become environmentally responsible. The CEO of the company has said in a statement of its sustainability report 2019 that “Sustainability has long been hardwired into all the decisions we make, the actions our people take, and the processes adopted by our business across the globe” It shows their commitment towards the sustainability and climate change. According to the 2019 sustainability report of the company, they have invested around $400m for their Climate Investment Program so that efforts to make a positive impact on climate are accelerated. The company knows the importance of water so they are trying to minimize the impact of water. The withdrawal of freshwater for the company was 1% lower when it is compared with the water use of 2017. They are doing efforts to minimize the level of greenhouse gas emissions to reduce their climate impact. That’s why energy-efficient and low emission technologies are being used by the company. The greenhouse gas emission in 2019 was 3% lower as compared to the emission of 2017. The operational GHG emission in 2018 was 16.5m tonnes, which was observed at 14.7m tonnes in 2019. These numbers are showing that BHP is doing whatever possible to show compliance with the issue of climate change (BHP, 2019)

            The above disclosures given both for Woolworths and BHP are provided in their sustainability reports, which they publish each year, and continue to update their sustainability efforts on a regular basis. Looking at the facts and figures, it is evident that specific quantitative data has been provided with proven numbers to show their sustainability strategy. The qualitative statements are also there but the primary focus is to give numbers with proven results. The overall strategy of both companies looks very much similar, but there is one major difference, which can be identified through their sustainability reports. The major difference is that BHP is more focused on reducing their greenhouse gas emissions, whereas the strategy of Woolworths is focused on other variety of areas such as energy efficiency, plastic waste, food waste, etc. So, they both need to look at those areas, which are less focused, so that they can show more positive intent towards sustainability and climate change.

Discussing Findings in context of IASB Chair’s Comments

            Hans Hoogervorst is the chair of the IASB (International Accounting Standards Board). In his speech made in 2019 during the Climate-Related Financial Reporting Conference, which was held in the UK, and he talked about various elements and streams of sustainability reporting.

There are two streams for the sustainability report;

·         GRI

·         SASB (sustainability accounting standard board)

The GRI is the primary which is also focused on the external company impact of the society along with the planet and the multi-stakeholder perspective. Whereas on the other hand the 2nd stream SASB and the CDSB (“climate disclosure standard board”) as well as the (TCFD) “Taskforce for climate-related financial disclosure”. All these permits the company which is also explain a potential for the financial; sustainability impact of problem where the company itself. For the reviewed management of commentary the 2nd stream is much more relevant and the guidelines which is related to term “border financial information” and its aim to provide the context interoperation for financial statement through the primary user and its named as the provider and the investor of capital.

The two major parts of sustainability reporting as per Hans Hoogervorst is Corporate Social Responsibility, as well as, exaggerated expectations for reporting sustainability. It means that the basic thing for showing your company’s sustainability efforts is to give a detailed view of your corporate social responsibility efforts. Looking at both companies' findings, it can be said that both are giving a view of sustainability by showing their corporate social responsibility. The second thing is not to over-exaggerate the sustainability reporting, which gets it away from reality. After looking at the sustainability efforts of both companies, it can be said that expectations made by both companies are not exaggerated; rather they have made realistic expectations (IFRS, 2019)

Changes in the Future Climate-related Disclosures

            Looking at overall efforts, reporting standards and reports, it can be said that a variety of changes are required in making proper disclosures with realistic goals and results. The companies should make sure that their climate change disclosures are crystal clear in providing their objectives in a realistic manner so that future expectations can be made accordingly. Making wrong expectations with wrong and exaggerated will not only mislead the public and governments, but all other stakeholders will also be misled, which is not a good thing for the integrity of an organization. It is important to look at the sustainability reporting standards provided by the report of AASB-AUASB. When standards will be followed by these two companies, they will have to make changes in their current practices to keep things on the right track.

References of Comparative Analysis of Woolworths and BHP for Climate Change Initiative and Disclosure

BHP. (2019). BHP Sustainability Report 2019. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.bhp.com/-/media/documents/investors/annual-reports/2019/bhpsustainabilityreport2019.pdf

Conerly, B. (2019). Business Strategy For Climate Change. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/billconerly/2019/10/19/business-strategy-for-climate-change/#5beafd1e53e8

IFRS. (2019). Speech: IASB Chair on what sustainability reporting can and cannot achieve. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/2019/04/speech-iasb-chair-on-sustainability-reporting/

Woolworths. (2020). Sustainability. Retrieved April 15, 2020, from https://www.woolworths.com.au/shop/discover/sustainability

Our Top Online Essay Writers.

Discuss your homework for free! Start chat

Best Coursework Help

ONLINE

Best Coursework Help

1554 Orders Completed

Assignment Helper

ONLINE

Assignment Helper

21 Orders Completed

Financial Analyst

ONLINE

Financial Analyst

1596 Orders Completed