Assumptions that needs to
be made regarding this case study are that every leader is fully aware of the
different tactics and terms along with the facts that what is challenging and
what is beneficial for their firm and for this they need to be given free hand.
What
are the facts of case?
Facts of this case study
are that there are number of different companies in different areas and they
work according to their own requirement and budget. Boston Consulting Group is
the one in this case study that argues with different companies and it has also
resolved three different trade-offs that in general are linked with the growth
of corporate. This case study has highlighted some of the points through which
the companies can increase their debt and can grow financially as well. (Singh, 2018)
What
are the problems in the case study?
Different firms and
companies based on the rapidly developing economies that are shaking up
constantly to the order of established economy. This has been recently
published by the BCG.
BCG argues about a store
Walmart, they have reserved the high margin products along with the services
for the special market segments and there are chances that they will be much
more expensive to the services. The BCG makes an argument here that some of the
global challenges have been successfully capable to have margin and volume
both. They have the low direct costs of the labor and material. (Black, 2018)
Many of the emerging
markets also makes an argument that different firms don’t understand the
emerging market.
What
alternatives are available given the resources?
Alternatives that are
available to the given resources are the leader themselves. BCG no doubt looks
after the firms and tell them what things are advantageous and which ones are
not. But the alternative resource for this is the leader of every firm on their
own.
What action
do you recommend?
Actions that I recommend
or suggest are that every firm or organization has their own set of rules and
every organization has their own executive leader who knows what is best for
their organization or firm. So this should be the responsibility of leader to
look after the firm and analyze the things that are better or challenging for
them.
What
are the facts of the case?
Facts of this case are
that two different coal mining companies have been mentioned. One is in Australia
by the name of Felix and the other one is in China by the name of Yanzhou. The
coal mining company in China by the name of Yanzhou have made an agreement or
scheme for the Felix Company and now the investors of the Felix Company are
much under pressure to accept the scheme. (He, 2019)
What
assumptions must you make regarding the case?
Assumptions that I have
made regarding the case that china is the one that consumes ample amount of the
coal and now the Company Yanzhou is looking out for the tactics through which
they can obtain coal from other resources as well especially outside the china
and Australia had been their target for getting coal.
What
is the problem? There may be many problems. Try to prioritize them.
The very first problem
that I witnessed in the case is the scheme or agreement that was being made by
the Yanzhou Company was on the previous prices but when they introduced it to
the Felix Company in Australia price of the coal was increased along with the
value of Australian dollar as well and the shareholders were in much pressure.
Other problem that I witnessed in the case is most of the natural resources in
china are being fulfilled by the coal like electricity and all these things and
as the tax increased and they have to fulfill their needs no matter what they
are desperately looking for some of the companies of coal who can provide them
coal so that they can fulfill their needs. (CHENG, 2017)
What
alternatives are available given the resources?
There is no as such
alternative that is available for both of the companies especially for the
Yanzhou china coal mining company because china is the one that use the coal in
ample amount and if they don’t get enough coal all of their work would be
definitely stopped.
What
action do you recommend?
Investors need to look
for the better options and they should bot get under pressure when situation
gets tensed or the things that have been discussed in the case study. No doubt
China is a country that wants a coal in ample amount but on the other side it
should also look out for the other countries as well. Both of these companies
should have discussed each and everything beforehand to make things go right on
the track and make sure nothing goes wrong and everything remain settled apart
from the high prices or demand of coal.
What
are the facts of the case?
Facts of the case are
that Pakistan International Airlines have been explained in detail that how
beneficial this airline is for Pakistan and how it is playing its role in the
economy growth, export and import purposes as well. This was the very first airline
and it served number of different people through its services. This airline
Company is also having number of different associations or relations with the
other ones like Ibrahim Makran Pvt. LTD along with Honeywell finance department
as well. They all had good connections with one another. (Farooq, 2019)
What
assumptions must you make regarding the case?
Assumptions that needs to
be made regarding the case are that Pakistan International Airlines is one of
the most national flag carrier of the Islamic republic of Pakistan and no
matter what or how the services are being provided by this airline now we
should always have a positive impact of this airline on our minds and along
with this that it works really great and positive for the growth of our economy
along with another factor that it plays a positive role in the import and
export purposes as well.
What
is the problem? There may be many problems. Try to prioritize them.
Honeywell finance
department was attempting different efforts to reduce the net working capital
while the main goal or aim of the department was to reduce world wise DSR rates
from the 55 days to the 45 days.
PIA had been constantly
put on the hold by the collections department along with the forcing marketing,
staff representatives for the pressing of agents who in return pressed PIA for
the sake of payment.
What
alternatives are available given the resources?
Alternatives that are
available to the given resources are that they proposed a contract. Local
currency request was also the result of the clause for the payment of 20% in
advance. US based airline trading companies should distort the actual local
payment terms.
What
action do you recommend?
Things that I recommend
here are that PIA should work with full energy to keep all the things going and
make sure everyone gets happy and satisfied by their services. All of the
spread between all of the individual customers within different regions need to
be extremely large. All of the disputed invoices also need to be included.
Amount should be mentioned for all the services, products and the exchanges as
well.