Introduction of Sensing Concept for Counting Nanoparticle Suspended
in Water
Nanoparticle suspension in the liquid like water is very
significant and unique research where their potential used is very advanced in
the coolant applications. Thermal
conductivity of the water which could also increase through the solid
particulates by the greater thermal conductivity through the parent liquid
which is also maintained the suspension. The applications of the heat transfer
where the suspension must be stable as well as it avoids the degradation and
sediment during use (Chung, et al, 2009). There is the
following method to fix the water, which had been polluted;
·
Filtration
·
UV disinfection
·
Chlorine disinfection’
·
Air stripper
Filtration is used to remove the material from the water; as well as to remove the
particulate the matter. Microorganism and the filtration devices along with the
removal of particle changes with the type of the filter. The water surface is supplied by the lot of the suspended
particle that also needed the pre-treatment
for examples coagulation before the water filtering.
Literature Review
of Sensing Concept for Counting
Nanoparticle Suspended in Water
As
described by Wu & Islam (2007) in their study that the detection of low
concentration of nanoparticles or pathogenic bioparticles on real-time is
significant for the bioterrorism and deterring infectious diseases that is
difficult to obtain for the current lab on a chip, sensitivity is achieved by
processing sophisticated or culturing time consumingly often unfeasible under
the conditions of the field. The sensor capability will be improved by
real-time particle enrichment. The research study is providing the information in
the situ nanoparticle that focuses on the approach integrated with beam identification.
From the solution bulk on the electrodes for the sense of the particles, the AC
electroosmosis is used to induce the particle convection for the fluid,
therefore, increasing the local count of the nanoparticle. The ability of the
detection of the cantilever may be highly improved as expected with preconcentrate
use. Furthermore, coating the cantilevers can also obtain multiplexing
detection along with several sensitive layers (Wu & Islam, 2007).
Tuoriniemi,
Cornelis, & Hassellöv (2012) explain the detection of the nanoparticles in
the water and liquid with the information of their characteristics. Plasma mass
spectrometry (spICPMS) were coupled by the detection capabilities of the single-particle
inductively according to the number ad the size of concentrations which are
evaluated for the silver nanoparticles case such as ca. 20-80 nm. Furthermore, it
developed an iterative algorithm where the events of particle measurement were
differentiated as the outliers from the constant dissolved ion signal if the intensity
of measure was five times bigger than the standard deviation of a complete set
of data. Although, the limiting multiple, incomplete events of particles, the
optimal dwell time for the particles of 40-80 nm was 5 ms. The overlap of the
dissolved signal, as well as the events of particles, mainly put the limit the
smallest detectable nanoparticles having size ca. 20 nm, that enhances with the
noise on both signals. The most reduced quantifiable number concentration is
restricted by the relative recurrence of incorrectly distinguished molecule
occasions, a restrain that can be decreased by obtaining more information
focuses. At last, the potential of spICPMS for the natural discovery of
nanoparticles is illustrated for a wastewater treatment plant refluent test (Tuoriniemi,
Cornelis, & Hassellöv, 2012).
As
described by Dai, et al (2018), the emulsions have been applied in the
subterranean on the larger scale enhanced the recovery process of oil,
chemistry engineering field a well as the cosmetics engineering fields. Furthermore,
it is also being focused by the current research interests on improving the
emulsion stability through involving the colloidal or the surfactants
materials. By introducing the silica nanoparticle (SNP), the main focus of this
study is to increase in the stabilization of emulsion for the hydrophilized or the
surface hydrophobized through adding OA-12 (dimethyl dodecyl amine) as well as
to reveal the behaviour of such kinds of composites on the liquid to liquid interfaces
dynamically. The nanoparticles typical dimensions are below the visible light’s
diffraction limit and that’s why they are not in the range for the optical
microscopy. The size measuring dependent Brownian motion of collective
particles is involved by the most successful method in the range of the
nanometer by changing the patterns interference with the time. Among the OA-12
and SNPs, the synergistic effect in the solution and the interface of water/oil
were also studied through the measurement of emulsion viscoelastic rheology,
interfacial rheology as well as the zeta potential. The researcher has also
identified that the modified silica nanoparticles augmented interface of
oil/water viscoelastic modulus, as well as at the same time of emulsions acquired
the stability importantly for a long time. With the increase of the ratio of
concentration among silica nanoparticle as well as OA-12, change type of
emulsion, it induced the transformation phase. The molecules of OA-12 mounting
adsorption on SNPs induce the inversions as suggested that can easily change
the balance of hydrophilic-lipophilic of the particle surfaces (Dai, et
al., 2018).
Jain
& Pradeep (2005) stated and explain in their study that the overnight
exposure of foams can coat the silver nanoparticles on the common polyurethane
(PU) foams by to nanoparticles solutions. Furthermore, the uniformly coated PU
foam is yielded by the air drying and repeated washing that may be utilized as
the filter for the drinking water where the contamination of bacteria of the
water surface is risky for the human health. Nanoparticles are steady on the
froth and are not washed away by water. Morphology of the froth was held after
covering. The nanoparticle restricting is because it cooperates with the
nitrogen molecule of the PU. Furthermore, it developed an iterative algorithm
where the events of particle measurement were differentiated as the outliers
from the constant dissolved ion signal if the intensity of measure was five
times bigger than the standard deviation of a complete set of data. Online
tests were led with a prototypical water channel. At a stream pace of 0.5
L/min, in which contact time was of the request for a second, the yield check
of Escherichia coli was nil when the info water had a bacterial heap of 105
colony‐forming units (CFU) per mL. In the last, the large implications may also
be had by the technology to developing countries as its effectiveness as well
as combine with low cost in its applications (Jain & Pradeep,
2005).
As
stated, and explained by Park, Park, Lee, & Cho (2009), they developed a
very effective aerosolization method for the real-time combine with the
technique of membrane filtration to identify the number as well as the size of
dissolved and suspended colloid nanoparticles the water. MF, UF or NF membranes
treated feed water after and before, and the feed water was also dried as well
as aerosolized in situ, and size and the number of the particles were
determined in the real-time. Furthermore, to analyze and evaluate the current
method, technique or approach performance, it used the NaC1 nanoparticles along
with the varying solute concentration, CaCO3 as well as Humic acid, and the standard
particles with determining number and size. It developed an iterative algorithm
where the events of particle measurement were differentiated as the outliers
from the constant dissolved ion signal if the intensity of measure was five
times bigger than the standard deviation of the complete set of data. We
additionally estimated size and number of colloidal nanoparticles in wastewater
gushing, waterway water, and seawater. We found that there exists a critical
number of nanoparticles staying significantly after UF and NF filtration,
proposing that broke down nanoparticles that made due by UF and NF filtration
may influence the fouling in RO layers in the desalination procedure. The broke
up nanoparticles are characterized here as those that are initially not in
molecule stage in feed water yet that can accelerate close to the films by
crystallization or focus polarization as molecule stage. It achieved the suspended
as well as separating dissolved nanoparticles in the water along with leading
and the current methods for the determination of their relative contribution into
the water for feed. The division of broken up nanoparticles in seawater that
survived through NF filtration in add up to molecule number is 66% whereas that
in-stream water is 44%. TEM/EDS investigation confirmed that a noteworthy sum
of broken up nanoparticles survived through UF and NF filtration, which
particular sorts of broken-down nanoparticles exist in stream water and
seawater. Into the four types, it classifies the dissolved nanoparticles in the
seawater which are: carbon-mineral rich spherical particles (C-Cu-Ca-O-Si-Mg), the
irregular particles like carbon-mineral rich (Ca-O-C-Mg-S-Cl-Si), the cubic
particles of Na-containing as well as the spherical particles of rich carbon (Park, Park,
Lee, & Cho, 2009).
Detection of Nanoparticles
and Specific properties
The
nanoparticles detection as well as their specific properties measurement linked
and essential for two distinguished reasons. To detect the nanoparticles and
their particular properties, the methods are needed and measure their
physicochemical properties in the media in which ecosystems and human have uncovered
them such as water. To access the risk of nanoparticles, some methods are also
available that support this study. For this purpose, the tools such as sensors are
required in relevant medium including fluids and especially in the water.
The
second issue associates with the chemical or physical properties linked with the
nanoparticles based on nanoparticles detection in the media. The nanoparticles properties
range of potential relevance to the assessment of risk highlights the needs of
the principles for the sensitive methods for detection. The nanoparticles typical
dimensions are below the visible light’s diffraction limit and that’s why they are
not in the range for the optical microscopy. The detection of the single
chromophore is possible in the low concentration liquids like water, as well as
the single chromophore detection is into the scanning near field optical
microscopy feature of sub-wavelength can be analyzed. Furthermore, by the
classic analytic methods for the macroscopic amounts of material, the
nanoparticle’s chemical composition could be accessible. The individual
nanoparticles chemical analysis in the dilute environment was impossible for a
long time because of low mass.
Nanoparticles Detection in a liquid
medium
The
nanoparticle direct detection in the liquid media such as water looks the same
kind of physical obstacles as detected in gas media. The size measuring dependent
Brownian motion of collective particles is involved by the most successful
method in the range of the nanometer by changing the patterns interference with
the time. Although, the lower detection limit of 3nm is reached by the
commercially available instruments. By using different significant technique
containing Raman scattering, resonant light scattering and the optical
chromophore counting techniques, as well as the cross-section cuts and the microscopic
precipitates analysis. To identify the compounds, it has used the very
sensitive methods in the mass spectrometry, electrochemistry as well as Rutherford
backscattering.
There
are several types of techniques present which are offline as well as complex
sample preparation techniques. It is also possible to count the online low
concentration particle through the use of magnetic nanoparticles as tracers,
quantum dots or the fluorescent molecules. Although, the choice of chromophores
and the nanoparticles put further limits on the system.
To
investigate the size, structure as well as the shape of the nanoparticle, the
scanning Electron microscopy (SEM) method is used. It can also determine the chemical
compositions when equipped with the Electron Dispersive Spectrometer. For the
chemical analysis, the Xray microanalysis system is not always suitable because
it can only perform the substance identification or detection on the level of the
element as well as it cannot be quantified. Furthermore, it can also analyze the
very high nanoparticle's vapour pressure to the strong vacuum system that required
for the X-ray microanalysis. It has
been progressed by the related techniques and the SEM resolution below 10 nm
because of the cold electron sources implementation in the latest instruments. Furthermore,
the resolution of SEM has also been improved in the high-resolution
transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) approaches, or the Scanning
transmission electron microscopy (STEM) that can be collected again for the highly
powerful approaches analytically through the use of X-ray analysis and the
electron probes analysis.
Type of particles
of Sensing Concept for Counting
Nanoparticle Suspended in Water
The type of nanoparticles identified in
this section which is classified on the basis of size, physical as well as
chemical properties. The nanoparticles which are identified and discussed in
the document are metal nanoparticles. These nanoparticles can also be
synthesized by chemical method. In the chemical methods, reducing the metal ion
precursor in the liquid through the chemical reducing agents, obtain the metal
nanoparticles in to the water or liquid. These particles has also the ability
to adsorb the tiny molecules as well as they also have the high energy of surface.
The identified nanoparticles has also the applications in the areas of the
research, imaging as well as detection of the biomolecules, the bioanalytical
applications as well as into the environmental applications. For instance, it
uses the gold nanoparticles for coating the sample before the evaluation in
SEM. To increase the electronic stream, it is usually done, that can be very
helpful in the analysis to obtain the images in high quality.
Method of detecting and Counting
of Suspended Particle
According
to the study, the suspended particle in the water can be measured as well as
calculated using a particles counter suspended in the water. Furthermore, the
results of this experiment for counting the number of nanoparticles in water
with that turbidity. According to the diagram given below, it removed the
nephelometric turbidity in the same type of degree as the optimum suspended particles.
The finer particles' dominating effect on the counting turbidity is also discussed
in the study.
The entire filtration process consists of different
levels of removability of coarser particles. The ending of each cycle provides
significant removability of the particles and ends at the turbidity levels. the
rationalization can be done for the fall in the efficiency regarding the
removal of coarser particles. The increasing deposit content of the bed result
as fall in the bed porosity. On the contrary, the decreasing porosity leads to
an increase in the flow rate between the grains and eventually the shear stress
is increased. In case of going beyond the shear stress limit, the bed face
sudden fall and removal of particles. Comparing the removal time limit, the
coarser particles are removed earlier as compared to the finer particles. Hence
considering the outcome of comparison and reports, the removal efficiency of
the particles is of the size range of as to 25 micrometres is 4 hours and
deteriorates of 15 to 25 micrometres is 6 hours. the difference in the removal
efficiency appears only in the last hours. measuring the time efficiency of
removing the particles enables to count the particles expected in the solution.
the colloidal solution of nanoparticles becomes the turbid solution.
Different methods are devised to calculate the number of
nanoparticles in the water solution. the interaction between the
electromagnetic field and nanoparticles are used for sensing the single nano
photon limit of the digital resolution counting and detection through the
absorption, intrinsic dielectric permittivity, and scattering. The size of the
nanoparticles in water can be measured by several ways including electron beam
microscopy, stimulated emission depletion microscopy (STED), confocal
fluorescence microscopy, photo-activated localization microscopy, (PALM),
super-resolution methods (SIM), stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy
(STORM). These techniques are used to observe the presence, feature and size of
the nanometer-scale objects. These approaches are capable to measure the size
and image of the nanoparticles. Imaging the nanoparticles enable the counting
within the field of view. The presence of nanoparticles on the perimeter of the
WSG sensor is used based on the capability of scattering the light and light
propagate in the reverse direction that case single initial WSG model. The
process depends on the ability to resolve the wavelength shifts that range from
0.1 pm to several nanometers for the different combinations of modal volumes
that generated broad interest with the variety of geometries such as spheres,
disks, bottles, droplets, bubbles, and capillaries. The important factors in
the accurate determination of the nanoparticle numbers are dependent on the
molar concentration. The goal of analytical methods is to calculate the
concentration based conditions under light absorption and direct sensing. The
methods adopt different mechanisms and have limited certainties for the size of
the nanoparticles.
Figure 1 above
illustrates the relationship between time and the number of particles in the
solution in the filtration process. The graphical representation shows that the
number of particles in the filtration process decreases based on the size of
the particle.
Calculating Volume/ Size
of Nanoparticle
One to the most useful method is DLS that subsequently
depends on the size and concentration of distribution of nanoparticles. In this
method, the light intensity of scattering light is changed after being scattered
from the nanoparticles. In the case of monodispersed nanoparticle solution, the
intensity of the light scattered from the solution is directly proportional to
the number of nanoparticles in the solution. the method is an efficient way to
measure the number of particles by using DLS determination technique for the
concentration of nanoparticles. The method is based on the photon count rate
that indicates the possible number of nanoparticles in the solution. The photon
count rate can be defined as the number of photons that are detected per second
by using the DLS system. the unit of the detected number of photons per second
by DLS is kilo counts per second (KCPS). In the condition of concentration
range, the photon count rate is directly proportional to the intensity of the
scattered light from the colloidal dispersions
Here, I define the
intensity of scattered light, P is the photon count rate, and B is a constant.
The intensity provides information about the number of particles that is the
concentration and size of the particles based on the scattering conditions. In
case the nanoparticles are small as compared to the Rayleigh scattering then
the limitations of scattered light intensity induce impact on the outcomes of
the measurements. Equation 2 is given below that measure the concertation of
the nanoparticles in the solution (Shang & Gao, 2015).
In the above equation 2, is the intensity of the incident light, is the angle of light scattered, R is the
distance between the particle and the point at which it is observed, m defines
the refractive index ratio of the particles with the medium, d is the
nanoparticle diameter, and C is the nanoparticle concentration in the fluid.
The parameters are used from the DLS instrument. Therefore,
based on the recorded information, the equation reduces to equation 3,
Here the parameter is the instrument coefficient, P is photon
count rate that is proportional to the number of concentration of nanoparticles
as C. the photon count rate and calibration curve both are used to measure the
photon count rate and this method can be applied to several prerequisites. In
the process, both solvent and nanoparticles are unknown samples and detection
of each component is based on the effective refractive index m and size of
nanoparticle as d in the photon. The second method is by using DLS instrument automatically
optimize the attenuation factor. The actual rate is then defined based on calculated
reported count rate and divided by the attenuation factor. In this process
first, the colloidal solution is prepared, and a linear calibration curve is
used between P and C. in some previous works, the results from the DLS
measurement are consistent with the results of total atoms (Zucker, Ortenzio, & Boyes, 2015). The limitation of
the method is mainly linked with the number of internal references and the DLS
method cannot distinguish between two different particles. The ideal method of
analysis is based on the unknown sample with the nanoparticle concentration.
The standard method uses the refractive index. As the fundamental characteristics
of nanoparticles are volume, concentration, and mass. The volume of the
nanoparticle can be measured based on its dimensions. The dimension can be
measured by using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Pastor, Long, Li, & Manoto, 2018). The volume measurement is also based on the
type and shape of the nanoparticle. Following equations 3, 4,5 and 6 provide
formulism for the volume measurement.
In most of the cases, the
density of nanoparticles is bulk density and mass calculation is assumed based
on the mass of material from which the nanoparticles are made of. Table 1 below
provides fundamental information about the density of the nanoparticles.
Table 1:Density of the nanoparticle with comparison to the
bulk density
Material
|
Nanoparticles
|
Bulk
density
|
Gold
|
19.32
|
Same
|
Silica
|
2.05
|
2.65
|
Silver
|
10.5
|
Same
|
Platinum
|
21.45
|
Same
|
Use of Nanoparticles in
Different Applications
In the biomedical applications, nanoparticles are used
for the imaging, biosensing, antimicrobial, and drug delivery process. In the
environmental applications, nanoparticles were used for the bioremediation and
the diverse containment of water treatment. Besides these applications,
nanoparticles are used to produce clean energy. The semiconductor nanoparticles
are used in electronic devices, photocatalysis, photo-optics, and water
splitting applications (Jain & Pradeep, 2005).
Conclusion of Sensing Concept for Counting Nanoparticle Suspended
in Water
The primary concern of the present work was to measure
accurately nanoparticle concentration. Different technologies are devised to
measure the concentration of all nanoparticles with the size limitation of 1
nm, the simple setup and easy to operate is another feature of these methods. The
capability to measure the concentration of nanoparticles is based on the
physical properties such as extinction coefficient and scattering coefficient.
The simple and accurate measurement of concentration, size, and volume of
nanoparticles is helpful to transform the way from which nanoparticles are
assessed, functionalized, and expand the impact of nanotechnology in the many
fields such as catalysis, electronics, photonics, and medicine.
References of Sensing Concept for Counting Nanoparticle Suspended
in Water
Chung, et al , S.
(2009). Characterization of ZnO nanoparticle suspension in water: Effectiveness
of ultrasonic dispersion. Powder Technology, 194(1-2), 75–80.
Dai, C., Li, H., Zhao, M., Wu, Y.,
You, Q., Sun, Y., . . . Xu, K. (2018). Emulsion behavior control and stability
study through decorating silica nano-particle with dimethyldodecylamine oxide
at n-heptane/water interface. Chemical Engineering Science, 73-82.
Jain, P., & Pradeep, T. (2005).
Potential of silver nanoparticle‐coated polyurethane foam as an antibacterial
water filter. Biotechnology and Bioengineering.
Park, K., Park, J. Y., Lee, S., &
Cho, J. (2009). Measurement of size and number of suspended and dissolved
nanoparticles in water for evaluation of colloidal fouling in RO membranes. Desalination,
78-89.
Pastor, M. Á., Long, K. D., Li, N.,
& Manoto, S. L. (2018). Detection and Digital Resolution Counting of
Nanoparticles with Optical Resonators and Applications in Biosensing. Conference
paper, 01(02), 01-10.
Shang, J., & Gao, X. (2015).
Nanoparticle Counting: Towards Accurate Determination of the Molar
Concentration. Chem Soc Rev, 43(21), 7267-7278.
Tuoriniemi, J., Cornelis, G., &
Hassellöv, M. (2012). Size discrimination and detection capabilities of
single-particle ICPMS for environmental analysis of silver nanoparticles. Analytical
chemistry, 3965-3972.
Wu, J., & Islam, N. (2007). A
simple method to integrate in situ nano-particle focusing with cantilever
detection. IEEE Sensors Journal, 957-958.
Zucker, R. M., Ortenzio, J. N., &
Boyes, W. K. (2015). Characterization, detection, and counting of metal
nanoparticles using flow cytometry. Cytometry, 89(02), 01-10.