Introduction of
Implementation of Bike Sharing Scheme:
The system of bike
sharing is increasingly growing out throughout the world. The success of bike
sharing programs can be seen by the measure of how the trips that are through
automobile are reducing, it causes decrease in traffic congestion, and it
results in improve in health of the bike riders through this program. Bike
sharing has the ability to show the permanent change in cultural habits far
away from the automobiles and it shift toward bicycles in order to create
flexible and carbon free transportation alternative. This trend is spreading in
many institutes and universities and corporate campuses and even in resorts,
into the local commercial installation.
But still not all bike
sharing programs end up successful. Some campuses and universities are unable
to achieve their goal and they even hardly lasted for even their first year.
This paper will be giving
many approaches in order to implement bike share in our culture. This paper
will help in selecting the best approach according to the requirements and will
give many ideas that can help in achieving success for this program.
A cultural shift
of
Implementation of Bike Sharing Scheme:
Such programs related to
bike sharing give clear explanation that how can we decrease our dependency on
transportation that is based on fossil fuel, by giving us safe, committed,
reliable and affordable transportation system. Each program will end up with
different goals. There are some examples of some successful programs;
·
Almost 42% of the Bicycle user demonstrate
that they happily replaced cars with bikes rides (Denver B-Cycle, 2010)
·
It reduces traffic of parica to almost 5%
in its initial year (Bremner, C., and Tourres, M., 2008)
·
Bicycle allow them to move around freely
and more easily, said by 89% of valib’ users (Velib', 2008)
·
Almost 400 to 500 jobs are related to
Montreal's Bixi (Bixi, 2010)
·
There is almost 44% increase in use of
bicycle in initial year after the introduction of bike sharing (Buhrmann, S.,
2008)
Implementation options of
Bike Sharing Scheme:
After the selection for
the goal of the project, now its time to arrange your requirement, abilities
and budgets along with what is available. Here we are explaining 4 appropriate
approaches for the implementation of bike sharing in the environment of
universities and campus, along with pros and cons of every approach. It all
depends on the condition we are applying on;
·
Ad Hoc
·
Bike Corral
·
Kiosk-Based
·
Automated Key Boxes
Ad Hoc Bicycle Sharing
It is a kind of
straightforward path that give us an access to a pool bicycle sharing. It all
depends on the integrity of the person to utilize and give care to the bike in
its most bets way. Ad Hoc system emphasizes on informal design of the bicycle.
With this approach bikes are spread and distributed along the campus and
facility. Bikes are given with some typically symbol with paint or market so it
can be differentiated as those bikes which are for share. Bikes cannot get
locked and so anyone can use it freely at any time and at any place. With the
help of this approach, not a big infra structure is required to get initiated
with the work – just the need of some bikes. For those who has low budget, this
option is quite possible or maybe not. But still it is easy to apply but this
approach has low chances of success, reliability, and longevity as proven with
time.
The most important
benefit of using this implementation is the cost. This approach is least
expensive in order to implement share bike system. There is no need of
technology and support by the system. But the main loss with this approach is
1) no check and balance about the user of the bike 2) no permanent location for
bike, as they can be left anywhere 3) more chances for bikes to get stollen 4)
if bikes are not made for safety there is more exposure for liability
Bike Corral Style Bike
Sharing
This is non automated and
reasonably more formalized in order to manage the share system. So, in this
approach bike are kept in permanent location like in the center of the lobby of
any building or like student center in the campus. This approach is quite like
the system of operation in libraries where there is simple check out and check
in system at the desk to manage. This approach also allows the campus to check
balance that how many people are using this approach and for how long. This
also gave the opportunity to campus to register for the approach using.
This approach allows more
responsible control and check and balance as compared to Ad Hoc system by
having the chance of tracking that who is using the bike and it also give the
central place for bike. Very much less expensive technology is required for
this system and manpower like active student as manpower. The disadvantage is
1) more resources for arranging a staff in centralized location for
accountability purpose which also include the cost along with it. 2) it reduces
the convivence because the user will need to pick up and drop the bike at the
same position during the hours of working even if that location is not feasible
for the user.
Automated Key Boxes of
Bike Sharing Scheme
This is the more advanced
approach in managing the bike sharing scheme and even the management of the
system usage and access. Bike station along with electronic key boxes that can
have access to control the bikes are used in geographically dispersed areas.
They are located near center of activities or the centralized location like
libraries, or campus or dining halls as well as beside parking lots and many
other locations. Bikes can be placed in permanent location where user can have
access to its benefits.
The access to the system
is controlled and managed by the administrative software. They can
electronically lock and release the bikes to its users. Every user will have
their own personal password to have access to the bike. When the user will need
the bike, they give the automated key boxer its pass code so that the user will
have the access to the bike in order to borrow it for a while.
The advantage of
automated key boxer is 1) they do not need any bike station; it only requires
standard racks in order to keep the bike standing. 2) the system is accessible
24/7. 3) they are with locks so they can be safe at anyplace 4) the automated
nature makes the management very easy and feasible and within approach of
everyone.
The disadvantages include
1) this is a very expensive approach as compared to other approaches 2) user
will need to pick and drop the bike at the usual place 3) every bike will be
needing its own key box. 4) the system will be needing local management and
monitoring system.
Kiosk-Based Bicycle
sharing
This approach is more recognizable
by automated bike station and it control electronically. They are at permanent
location around the campus. The electronics may differ along with the system
but they have robust backend software in order to manage the overall system of
the bike. They have ability to register new users and accept their payment.
This approach is secure and available to everyone.