Report on Data analysis Frequency Distribution table

The frequencies of the respondents have been discussed along with their particular percentages. It also explains the participation of the respondents in order to fill the questionnaire as well as participates in the survey. The frequency distribution tables of the respondents are given in documents along with the particular charts and graphs.

Interpretation: The above given table of the frequency distribution is illustrating the frequencies and percentages of the respondents who has participated in this study in effective manners. It has been represented in this table that 28.4% of the total respondents are the male who have participated in this study and the frequencies of these respondents are 71 male. The remaining 71% of the total respondents are the female that are 179 females who have participated in this study. Total this question has been answered by the 250 respondents including the frequencies of male and female. The attractive colors of the above given pie chart is also illustrating the percentages of the respondents such as; green color is representing the percentages of the female respondents meanwhile blue color shows the male respondents percentages. It is important to note that the website has been designed in a universal manner to ensure that all people can utilize it and answer the questions. First of all, from the results, it can be analyzed that bot females and males have answered the questions and their responses have been recorded. Secondly, the design of website enables disabled people, people with any type of impairment, and other issues can use the website without experiencing any type of problem. Actually, the website has been designed in such a manner to promote equality, equal opportunity, and collecting the responses of people in a more effective way. This approach helps in not only maintaining integrity but it also helps in obtaining more reliable information. In most studies, responses are obtained from only some specific people which limits the reliability of results. In this case, it has been ensures that nothing like that happens by providing an equal chance to all people. It has resulted in a diversity of opinions, which indicates that the reliability of results is higher in comparison with most studies. This approach helps in accomplishing the objectives of this research better with such a potential that cannot be possessed by a research that does not make the use of diverse results.

Interpretation: The question of the ages of the respondents has been answered by the 250 respondents as well. All of these respondents are belongs to the various ages group. 16.4% of the total respondents are belongs to the first age group that is the 14-19 years old. There are 42 respondents who are falling in the age group of the 20-30. 33 respondents from the total respondents are belonging to the age group of the 31-40. There are 51 respondents from the total respondents who are falling in the age group of the 41-50. 12.4% of the total respondents are categorized in the age group of the 51-60. Meanwhile only 4.4% respondents of the total respondents are lies in the age group of the 61-70.  Remaining 6% and 10% of the total respondents are belongs to the 71-80 and 80 plus age group.

Interpretation: One of the important questions that was asked on the website from respondents is: Do you have a disability if yes, then can you name it? This question is required. As it had been described in the previous section, there were 250 respondents to answer the questions. Out of them, 80 people responded that they had disability. It means even with the disability, they were capable of answering the question, which implies that the design of website was effective in enabling disabled people to interact with the interface and answer the questions without experiencing any difficulty. Meanwhile, 170 people determined that they did not have any disability. This difference in the number of respondents can be seen in the pie chart. The green portion of the pie chart is illustrating those people who did not have any disability. Meanwhile, the dark blue color is illustrating all those people who had a disability and they answered the question with a ‘yes.’ Even though not many people had a disability, it still indicates that disabled people were able to interact with the website. This question has been answered by the total 250 respondents and their frequencies are presented in the table. The above given table of the frequency distribution is illustrating the frequencies and percentages of the respondents who has participated in this study in effective manners. It has been represented in this table that 32% of the total respondents are the disable who have participated in this study and the frequencies of these respondents are 80 and these are disable. The remaining 68% of the total respondents are not disables that are 170 respondents of the total who have participated in this study. The attractive colors of the above given pie chart is also illustrating the percentages of the respondents such as; green color is representing the percentages of the healthy people who are not disabled meanwhile blue color shows the disabled respondents percentages.

Interpretation: Now, the question is: How much knowledge do you have regarding during an earthquake, the precautions we should take? In case of this question, options of yes and no were not provided because it would have served to not provide any information on the level of awareness or knowledge possessed by the respondents in case of disaster management. Thus, in order to properly analyse the standard or level of knowledge, three options were provided including: not at all, good information, and all information. The answers of respondents are distributed or divided among these options. It has been explained in the previous section as well that 250 respondents underwent this survey and answered the questions.

Out of them, 85 respondents determined that they did not possess any information about precautions that should be taken in case of a disaster such as earthquake. Meanwhile, 107 respondents determined that they had sufficient or good information about the precautions that must be taken. Lastly, 58 respondents responded that they had all the necessary information about precautions that must be taken in a disaster like earthquake. From these results, it would not be wrong to say that the highest percentage of respondents indicated that they had good information about precautions.

This question is representing the percentages of the respondents who have argued about the knowledge regarding the earth quack. There are 34% of the total respondents who have not knowledge about the earthquake and its precautions and these are the 85 participants. Meanwhile most of the respondents have good information about the precautions of the earth quack and these are 42.8% of the total respondents. It means there are 107 respondents who have good sort of information related to the earthquake precautions. Remaining 23% of the total respondents have all of the information about precautions of the earth quack.  A green color on the pie chart that has occupied the most of the section on the chart is representing the percentages of the respondents who have good information.

Interpretation: Another important question that is asked is: Information you get related to earthquake precautions from. As it can be seen, this question seeks to determine how people get information about earthquake precautions. In order to obtain reliable information and responses, a number of options were again provided. These options included: television or radio, newspapers, websites, and social media.

Respondents had varying answers. Out of the 250 respondents, 52 determined that they got this information from television or radio. Meanwhile, 41 respondents indicated that they got information about earthquake precautions from newspapers. 58 people determined that they got information about earthquake precautions from websites. Lastly, 47 people determined that they for information about precautions that should be taken in case of earthquake from social media. The visual representation of these responses can be seen in the chart above. Thus, it can be said that most of the people got information about earthquake precautions from different websites.

This question is representing the percentages of the respondents who have argued about the source of information regarding the earth quack. There are 20% of the total respondents who have get knowledge about the earthquake and its precautions from the other people and these are the 52 participants. Meanwhile most of the respondents have attained good information about the precautions of the earth quack from TV. Radio and these are 20 % of the total respondents.. Remaining 23% of the total respondents are getting the information about precautions of the earth quack from the website.  Meanwhile remaining 18.8 % of the total respondents are getting the information about precautions of the earth quack from the Social media Channels. A purple color on the pie chart that has occupied the most of the section on the chart is representing the percentages of the respondents who have get information from the website.

Interpretation: Another question that was asked is: How is the design of website? In order to answer this question as well, the options of yes and no were not provided according to the nature of question. Obviously, just from these options, it would not be possible to obtain relevant and required answers. Thus, to ensure that reliable answers would be provided, three options were provided including: not good, good, and very good. From these options, respondents chose their answers and it provided the required information. For instance, 85 people or respondents determined that the design of website was not good. Other than these respondents, 107 respondents indicated that the design of the website was good. Lastly, 58 people responded that the design of website was very good. It can be analysed from this information that the largest portion of respondents determined that the website design was good. However, it also indicates that further work is needed to be done on the website design for ensuring that more visitors can be satisfied by the design and they can interact effectively with the website without experiencing any difficulty.

This question has been answered by the total 250 respondents and their frequencies are presented in the table. The above given table of the frequency distribution is illustrating the frequencies and percentages of the respondents related to the design if the website. It has been represented in this table that 34% of the total respondents who said that the design of the website is not good because it is messily the frequencies of these respondents are 85. There are 42% of the total respondents who said that the design of the website is too good because it is universal design the frequencies of these respondents are 107. Meanwhile it has been stated by the remaining 23% respondents that design of the website is very good because it is physible design for disable people as well. The attractive colors of the above given pie chart is also illustrating the percentages of the respondents such as; green color is representing the percentages of the healthy people who are not disabled meanwhile blue color shows the disabled respondents percentages.

Interpretation: The next question is: How are the colors of website? The same can be said about this question as well because an answer in simple yes or no would not be sufficient enough to provide the necessary details. Therefore, rather than providing these two options, the same options as the previous question were provided in this question as well. The options to answer the question included: not good, good, and very good. Out of 250 respondents. 101 respondents determined that the colors utilized in the website are not good. Meanwhile, 95 respondents determined that the colors used in the website are good. Lastly, 95 respondents gave a response that it was very good. It can analyzed from these results that the largest portion of respondents did not like the colors that were used in the website. Although 95 respondents considered the colors very good, it is important to note that the objective is to deliver a website that meets the requirements of every person. Thus, work is required to be done to improve the colors used in the website.

This question has been answered by the total 250 respondents and their frequencies are presented in the table. The above given table of the frequency distribution is illustrating the frequencies and percentages of the respondents related to the color of the website. It has been represented in this table that 40% of the total respondents who said that the design of the website is not good because they fell it is no attractive the frequencies of these respondents are 101. There are 21.6 % of the total respondents who said that the color of the website is too good because it is developed in attractive color the frequencies of these respondents are 54. Meanwhile it has been stated by the remaining 38% respondents that color of the website is very good because an attractive colors has been used by considering the consumer’s perception. The bar chart is also illustrating the percentages of the respondents such as; high column at bar chart is representing the percentages of the people who did not like the color of the website.

Interpretation: This question has been answered by the total 250 respondents and their frequencies are presented in the table. The above given table of the frequency distribution is illustrating the frequencies and percentages of the respondents related to the images of the website. It has been represented in this table that 5.2% of the total respondents who said that the images of the website is not good because they fell it is no attractive the frequencies of these respondents are 13. There are 58% of the total respondents who said that the image of the website is too good because it is developed in attractive color the frequencies of these respondents are 147. Meanwhile it has been stated by the remaining 36% respondents that images of the website is very good because an attractive colors has been used by considering the consumer’s perception. The bar chart is also illustrating the percentages of the respondents such as; high column at bar chart is representing the percentages of the people who said that the images of the website are too good and attractive.

Interpretation: One of the most important questions asked to respondents was: How was the experience of website on your smartphone? In order to obtain relevant and useful answers from respondents, three options were given to them that included: not good, good, and every good. Out of the 250 respondents, 36 respondents determined that the experience was not good. Meanwhile, 52 respondents determined that their experience was good. Lastly, it was determined by 162 respondents that their experience was very good. From these results, it can be analyzed that most of the respondents considered the experience of website on their mobile phone to be very good. Although there some respondents considered is not good as well but the larger portion of respondents has determined it to be very good. Even if only a few respondents did not like the experience, it is quite important to ensure that necessary work is performed so that user experience can be enhanced and every device can be utilized for accessing the website and utilizing its features. In this manner, the design can be optimized and people can interact with it in a better manner.

This question has been answered by the total 250 respondents and their frequencies are presented in the table. The above given table of the frequency distribution is illustrating the frequencies and percentages of the respondents related to experiencing the website as smart applications. It has been represented in this table that 14.4% of the total respondents who said that their experiences of the website is not good because they did not feel it user friendly the frequencies of these respondents are 36. There are 20% of the total respondents who said that thy experience this website is too good because it is developed in universal design and the blind people also can used it the frequencies of these respondents are 52. Meanwhile it has been stated by the remaining 64% respondents that thy experience this website is too good because it developed in universal design and it is user friendly by considering the consumer’s perception. The bar chart is also illustrating the percentages of the respondents such as; high column at bar chart is representing the percentages of the people who said that the images of the website are very good and attractive.