The
environmental history shows that people were more associated with the endless
forest, snow capped mountains, myriad lakes, prairie, games and abundant fish.
The contemporary picture gallery of Canada contains more distracting images
such as polluted waterways, melting ice caps, deforestation, depleted
fisheries, and other environmental issues. The drastic issues are defined by
chronological and thematic approaches. Macdowell and Laurel Sefton worked to
explore the human interactions with the origin and lands. The interaction defines
damaging conditions and current environmental crisis. The issues illustrated by
exploration of past are certainly different from many perspectives.
The
traces of colonials in Canada and the other national developments that are
carried out in the recent era are facing environmental problems such as climate
changes, urban sprawl, and collapse of fisheries. The studies show that human
interaction with the environment results in changing the provocative new
features that need to be defined with less complexity in the environmental
problems. The aboriginal European contact with the people caused variation in
the cultural and environmental conditions and the significant issues raised by
the movement of wildlife, plants and people (Hirschman & Mogford,
2010).
The
environment was then transformed according to the perspective of the people.
Such as fur trade caused slaughtered millions of animals and destroyed the
ecosystem. As a result of modern people action, the aboriginal people were left
with very little sustainable conditions. The trade was facing political and
economic developments and there as a new wave of settling in the ecosystem.
Canada remains a grim narrative in the wildlife history with the higher
variation in the natural ecosystem and environmental system.
MODULE 2: The Industrial Revolution
2. Drawing on the readings and
content items from Module 2, explain and describe the Industrial Revolution.
Where and when did it happen, why was it ‘revolutionary,’ and what was were the
technologies that were associated with it. Briefly list and explain the major
social and environmental effects of the Industrial Revolution. 400 -750)
The general history
discussed here started with the human past on the planet. The political
historians analyzed the phenomenon and social histories that can be categorized
in different classes such as economic conditions, race, gender and ethnicity.
For the environmental historians the nature of the human development and social
life are both different. The historians focused on the interdependent
relationship between the natural world and the human beings with their
environment. The environmental history is, however, relatively new that emerged
in past 1970s and 1980s and got attention of humans for how they reached this
planet. Some histories of Canada suggest the relationship between conflicts and
trade. Canadian environmental history puts in different perspective of that are
complex and are often reciprocal to the human societies. In the era of the
increasing awareness, the Canadians are becoming aware of the environmental
policies and actions. The study of history interplays a major role that force
towards different conditions such as changing ideas, political factors,
resource issues and usages, pattern settlement, and ecology.
The size and selectivity of
the immigrant community in Canada was disproportionate to the residence in the
large cities. The half of the manufacturing workers in 1920 and third
generation were included as immigrants in the industries (Kim, 2012). The two third of
the workers in the manufacturing sector were from the immigrants and they were
having better working conditions with higher wages. The industrial revolution
was might be slow and it closed the doors to the mass immigrations in 1920s. The
increased recruitment in industries was from the native born workers in the
industrial cities in middle decades of 20th century (Hirschman & Mogford,
2010).
MODULE 3: The Consumer Revolution
3. Describe and explain how
and why Cancun, Mexico was created as a tourist destination. Identify and
explain the social and environmental impacts of tourism in the state of
Quintana Roo, Mexico, also known as the “Mayan Rivieria” (500 words or less).
Students may also consider consulting Juarez (2002) for additional context and
support in answering this question.
The books of Canadian history recast
different context such as environment and encourages the students to understand
different concepts such as bioregionalism, ecological theory, and
environmentalism. The theories are related to understanding of patterns of new
Canadian settlement, sensibilities, resource use and changing conditions of
environment. The work on history contributes in the critical analysis of
environmental changes and how it causes adverse impact on the human life. The
comprehensive illustration of Canadian history helps in contextualization of
major factors.
The coastal tourism was
often considered as a process to generate foreign revenues due to its fact of
engendering the environmental and social impacts. The growth of Cancun in the
Mexican state of Quintana Roo was late in 1960s. There were different social
and, physical and financial considerations that impact suggest the centralized
planning process (Hirschman & Mogford,
2010).
The factors that induced impact on the tourism of the state are changes in the
land usage, population, control, emphasis, tourism market, penetration of
foreign market, weak regulatory enforcement, and short-term economic gain. The
tourism there is now ranked as second or third most important industry in
Quintana Roo state (Hirschman & Mogford,
2010).
The tourism revenues are
1/3 and 90% of whole industries. There are different social and environmental
factors that are often largely documented in the world. The source of
attraction for the tourist is abundant natural and cultural attractions and
different organizations are working together to improve and maintain these
tourist places. The most prominent organizations include national council for tourism,
and they developed national tourism development plan in 1961 and 1962 (Murray, 2007).
4. Identify and differentiate
the key themes, messages, and symbols communicated in post-2007 oil sands
advertisements. Summarize and describe how oil sands advertising is
‘greenwashed’, and explain how environmental activists have protested this.
(400-750 words)
Canada
always used industry advertisement campaign to develop a strong environment.
The key focus and the objective of the industry is to provide visual commitment
that restore, preserve, and reclaim the natural environment. Different
subsequent campaigns worked individually and collectively to undertake the
multidimensional strategy of campaign. The prominent consideration is to
celebrate the oil ubiquity and the consumer culture, different advertisement
strategies were used such as key themes, symbols, and short messages. The most
common method was to use thematic and visual advertisement methods. It was
first introduced in 2006 before the 2007 oil sands advertisement (Kim, 2012).
The
example of greenwashing of oil is Canadian multinational oil and gas
corporation and they indicate that products are reducing greenhouse gas
emissions and in actual these products were increasing the greenhouse gas
emissions. The advertainment strategy used in this way is illegal according to
the standard guidelines of advertisement. The reason is that the companies are
addressing misleading claims. The reason
is that the greenwashing is not good for the environment and companies claim
that the product and services are helping the users to safe environment. The
Canadian oil sands that were derived from the sands were dirty due the
lifecycle of greenhouse gas emissions (Kim, 2012).
The emission is released over the course of
refining, consumption, production, and transportation. The conservative
estimates show one barrels of tar sand crude oil results as production of 17
percent emissions. The greenhouse gas emission from Canadian oil sands is
estimated as 82%. Therefore, using this strategy could be misleading as
majority of people find it wrong (Kim, 2012).
References of A Brief History of
Humans and the Environment
Hirschman, C., & Mogford, E. (2010). Immigration and the
American Industrial Revolution From 1880 to 1920. Soc Sci Res., 38(04),
897-920.
Kim, R. (2012). Refining Advertisements of the Canadian
Tar Sands. Seattle journal for social justice, 10(02), 845-850.
Murray, G. (2007). Constructing Paradise: The Impacts
of Big Tourism in the Mexican Coastal Zone. Coastal Management, 35(01),
339-355.