Report on Compare and contrast the Classical theories of Management with those of the Contingency theorists.

There are different thoughts of schools of the management according to the variety of two recent schools directions that examine the classical and contingency theory of thoughts. The approaches of the organization are to impact on the management of the business in the today’s world. There are important contingencies and classical theories of the management that are used from third previous decades to know about the level of Management. When is frankly visit to factor that is used to understand about the productivity of the business therefore, it is important for the managers and their leaders to understand the basic queries that are used to achieve the goals of the organization. The classical management theories and approaches were more productive and the centric approach that word world in 19^th and 20^th century to introduce in the factory work and the machine worked for the production. There are many problems that are aroused. Manager developed solution to increase management efficiency under the different categories, such as administrative principal, implementation of different organizational structure and the scientific management. There are less concerned with the neo-classical management theory is extended version of traditional classical theory that is used in the production Department.

The merged behavior of the management Sciences are used to solve the problem that are caused by the practice in the classical terms of the human emotions and the needs of the organization. There are remarkable services of Max Weber, Henry foyol and other management experts that play better role in the scientific management. There is different leadership styles that are used in the area of mistake and efficiency are required to complete the project. To become an effective and great leader, it is required to adopt the vision and passionate of the employees to innovate the ideas and the existence of the customers in the market. Similarly, there are different to classical theories such as sociologist and social psychologists that based on the human interaction and the relation in the workplace. The psychologist studies about the person’s behavior and attitudes in the workplace. They are suggested to change work environment and conditions that are less influencing productivity and the social relationship between the persons.

There are different theories of modern management that our concept based on the forms to adapt strategies according to the market dynamics and more transformations. In the nature of Organizations are the open system that are based around the environment changes and the modern management theories are highlighted with the different complex human capital theories to concern about the complexities of the needs and behavior of the employees (Otley, 1980).

The classical theory suggested on the managerial abilities to monitor and predict the behavior of the workers and offered to increase the reliability and communication channels to disregard human relations. The neoclassical theory of Management suggested that there should be motivated and diversified environment of workplace that is based on the fulfillment of food requirements of the workers and the customers. Moreover, the behavior of the social factors or under human resource must be according to predictions of the managers. The communication and took correspondence between the employees and the management. Most people, according to the business function. The modern management theory recommends that interaction between managerial strategies and principle must be empowered according to the deal of the optimization difficulties (Möller & Halinen., 2000).

The management has different options to choose the techniques and style of the management to analyze the style and different strategies of the management. Traditional classical theory is based on the concentration and motivational factors of the employees and historical beliefs of the persons. As a result, the new classical theory talks about the human needs and motivation of the empires that highlight the in requirement and the behavior of the issues such as the traditional classical theory and the human factor organizational detail of the management. The classical approach took into account the psychological and mechanical factors here to disregard the behavior of the employees and the workers.

According to neoclassical approach of jewelry, it is based on the qualities and emotions of the employees that are used by the social relations between the workforces. It requires aiming the employees to meet the objectives of the company, to ascertain the goals and relationship to achieve the goals in the material list form. However, in neoclassical theory, the company should Democratic rules based and human relationship is informal and they should know they should be not any. Organize stick organizational structure between the employees and employer. While traditional classical theory is based on the rational economic view that is based on the regional economic benefits and other aspect of the neo classical theory is based on the social persons and the relationship of management that identifies the complexities or in the organization. It also covers the complications or and other problems that are covered by the diversification of the needs and the requirements of the customers (Donaldson, 2001).

As concerned with the assumptions and the theories that are concerned with the management and management relies on the rational economic view of the organization, it increased the monetary rewards for the organization. There is better performance of employees that are offered incentives and selector’s actions of the financial benefits of the. Workforce this to recommend that the increase in productivity should be followed by the utility of the burgers and they work wholeheartedly if the motivation and the reward make sure that workers are will be rewarded with their work (Smith & Lewis, 2011).

The classical management theory assumed that there is different principles and guidelines that are used by the management to guide to the workers in the organization. However, there are different objectives of operations and structure of the management that requires implementing the change in the individual business goals. Classical theory assume that their employees or the main asset and tools of the business and there must be valuable sources that could be made to gain the objectives of the business. It focuses on several assumptions such as organizations exist to achieve goals to appropriate operational structure to meet the goals and form most effectively of the ethical and rational approach. Organizational problems are often caused by the different structures that are sold to redesign and recognize their different aspects of the modern management.

The theory of modern management is based on the complex perspective that are used to variable element in the business. With regard to manage and Design the organization, the classical theory focus on the hierarchical sequence of organizational structure and the different levels of the management to increase the productivity of the company. Employees are the air bottom level and therefore the task and performance are seen by supervisor and then directed to the managers. And at the end, employees are reset to work according to the instructions of the managers and HOD. At this level, employees are expected to follow specific guidelines according to the maximization of productivity, and they work blindly according to the instructions. The classical negligence about the important determinants of the work force and the behavior of the employees are non economic in nature. Therefore there is also change in inspirations of the attitudes of the employees and focus on the career development of the workforce.

It is also recommended to the manager to adopt transformational leadership style to get the objectives of the employees and the organization that are wholeheartedly working could make possible to achieve that goal to different theory focused on the motivation and supporting employees in the financial and non financial incentives. For instance, there are measured that could satisfy the self actualization needs under demands of the employees it with the different aspects such as place recognition and job security etc.

Modern management theory offers different kind of approaches to manage and design organization, which are the system approach and contingency approach. The system approach gives managers to take overview of the organization. Rather than only focusing on the individual systems. The individual system recommends that managers are not responsible for the activities of their Department as in traditional method to work entirely on the organization. Furthermore, according to them best recommendation and situation of the circumstances there are to resolve to attend the organizational goals and it's just the measure to most developed the skills and identify the key factors that are used to attain the goals (Sauser, Reilly, & Shenhar, 2009).

Modern management theory is emphasizing on the meeting of different needs of organization and individuals to solve the difficult problems in the best manners. On the other hand, the other approaches, such as the classical theory and modern business theories that are used to learn about increase of efficiency and business without the concentration of facing the employees benefits. The functional approach is based on the deduction and description about the new classical theory adopted by the centered approach person and in the deductive nature. There are different challenges of classical and neoclassical theories that are both focused to get them particular expect in the modern business. However the descriptions of modern theories are based on the human behaviors that are considered in the earlier theories. All that he expects of dark magician are used to get better opportunity in the strategies and to attempt the different School of Management principle with the various acceptability of the conditions of current situation of the organization.

References of Management theories

Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage,.

Möller, K., & Halinen., A. (2000). Relationship marketing theory: its roots and direction. Journal of marketing management , 1 (16), 29-54.

Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: achievement and prognosis. In Readings in accounting for management control, pp. 83-106. Springer, Boston, MA .

Sauser, B. J., Reilly, R. R., & Shenhar, A. J. (2009). Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights–A comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter loss. International Journal of Project Management , 27 (7), 665-679.

Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of management Review , 36 (2), 381-403.