Executive Summary
of How to improve Landslide Risk Monitoring Equipment and Alarms
In Australia, there is always a problem of land
sliding during rough season. Due to this, it will become difficult to assist
proper idea about land sliding at that place. For that case, there is a need of
proper land sliding monitoring equipment. There are a lot of techniques are
used for measuring the behaviour of land during tough time. But the facts are
showing that such instruments are not reliable and proper. Due to this it will
become difficult to monitor land sliding and also many people lives. This report
is dealing with the improvement of land sliding risk monitoring equipment. This
is because through this it will become easy and simple to save a lot of lives
in a proper way. In the first section of this report, there is complete
information about the problem statement.
There will be discussion about some tools used for the
monitoring and risk management of the land sliding in Australia. But the main
fact is that there is need to add some changes in these tools. This is because
through this it will become easy to control the land sliding problem in that
country. This can be done by adding alarming system so it will become more
effective means of providing message to the management about land sliding.
Moreover, in literature review section, there is some information about the
past instruments used for monitoring land sliding problem in an effective way.
Then after this in the methodology section there is complete discussion about
these instruments in a proper way. This will discuss complete working of the
instrument used for monitoring land sliding.
Introduction
of How to improve Landslide Risk Monitoring Equipment and Alarms
It can be noted that the landslide monitoring is
extremely important. According to this case of landslide, monitoring deals with
comparing different natural conditions. These conditions include areal extent,
Surface topography, rate of movement and soil moisture. In landslide
monitoring, there is a need to access complete landslide activities at
different time. Due to this, it will help to minimize risk of land sliding. The
next important thing is that measurement of the superficial displacement deals
with the slope movement and it is representing the main method for defining
behaviour of soil. This shows that it will allow the response to trigger
different factors for checking and analysing the mitigation measures
effectiveness. It can be noted that retrieval of ground displacement is
completely based on the traditional techniques. These techniques include,
inclinometers, GPS, conventional wire extensometers, photogrammetry and
levelling. From them the latest technique is related with the photogrammetry
and terrestrial laser scanning. Moreover, another fact is that all of these
techniques are perfect. The best thing about these techniques is that they are
reliable and robust in action. Furthermore, there is requirement of proper time
for its updates (Intrieri & Giovanni Gigli, 2012).
On the other hand, it can be noted that remote sensing
images is considered as powerful tool for measuring the land sliding
displacement. This is because they are offering a synoptic view of the required
place at different time. Moreover, it can be noted that such view is also
available at different scales. The next important thing is that SAR is
considered as the best tools for accessing reasonable changes on the earth
surface. But the main problem is that the analysis of one SAR image is not
useful. This is because it will not give proper idea about the surface of
earth. Moreover, it also shows that it is not easy to separate different phase
contribution that are based on the object topography, noise inherent and other
things (Intrieri & G. Gigli, Brief communication" Landslide Early
Warning System: toolbox and general concepts, 2013).
For that case, there is need to apply two suitable
approaches for exploiting information present in the phase values of SAR
images. The first approach is related to the differential SAR interferometry.
The next one is related to the multi-interferogram SAR techniques. It can be
observed that the first approach is completely relies on the processing of two
different SAR images gain from different places at the same period. It shows
that it will obtain the phase shift according to surface distortion present
between two acquisitions. On the other hand, the second approach is completely
based on the large series. It shows that if the number of images are larger
then it will give complete robustness and accuracy in the required results.
Moreover, it also shows that the second approach is quite reliable and
authentic to use for monitoring land sliding problems (Lacasse & Nadim, 2009).
Then after some time there is rapid advancement in
both data processing algorithm and remote sensing sensors that is helping to
achieve required results in the last few years. But the main challenge is that
there is need of some improvement in the SAR technology. This is because it is
required to take images of slow moving landslides that are moving with less
than 13 mm/month. It can be noted that there are a lot of PSI techniques the
interferometric point target analysis, Coherence pixel technique, the SqueeSAR,
the small baseline subset, the persistent Scatterer pairs, the quasi-PS tech
technique and stable point network (Segoni, Lagomarsino, & Riccardo Fanti, 2018).
All
of these techniques are unique and essential part of the system. On the other
hand, it can be noted that the persistent Scatterer pairs technique is quite
essential. This is because through this it will become easy to take information
about the ground over large area with proper precision. The next thing is that
it will made this approach more suitable for the slope and regional scale for
huge mass movement investigations. But due to its statistical analysis of the
signals it can be noted that there is problem of phase shifting. This is
because during analysis other factor took place like topography, noise and
atmosphere (C. Michoud, Bazin, & Lars Harald Blikra, 2013).
After some changes in the technique, they are applied
to the monitor landslides. Due to this SAR is able to measure and monitor the
positon of landslide at the same time. But the main thing is that there is need
to access the archived SAR data. This is
because through that data it will become simple to study temporal variation of
the landslides in the particular area.
Despite this, it is still considered as the promising techniques for
measuring and monitoring the displacement of land. On the other hand,
characteristics of the existing satellites are putting strong image on the use
of PSI for measuring and monitoring. The
next important thing about the system is that the spatial resolution of SAR
images and the time interval between the two paths of the satellite are quite
unsuitable for monitoring. The main reason behind it is that they are related
to the fast movement of the satellite or some points are located at steep
slopes narrow valleys. It can be noted that the temporal scale is controlled
through the help of time interval between the successive acquisitions (Alfieri & Peter Salamon, 2012).
This can be explained as temporal resolution is
measured by this technology took 35 days. This kind of resolution is also
according to the resolution time of the satellite and make change according to
each day of the month. The next thing is that the main purpose of this report
is to improve the landslide risk monitoring technology through the use of PSI
and other conventional ground based technique. It can be noted that there are
many parts of Australia that are quite complex and where landslide velocity is
too much slow (Dixon & Alister Smith, 2018).
This will become extremely difficult to measure. At
this area the extension of landslide is about 1.3 km square and its volume is
about 10 million cubic meters. It shows that the change is velocity is
extremely slow over the time. But this change will become a major threat for
the building and other infrastructures. It can easily cause direct damages to
this system. Now through the help of PSI analysis by taking images of the land
in recent years. Now in the methodology section there is complete information
about the solution of this problem (Calvello & Ricardo N. D’Orsi, 2015).
Literature review of How to improve Landslide Risk
Monitoring Equipment and Alarms
App-based
intelligent landslide monitoring system of How to improve Landslide Risk Monitoring Equipment and
Alarms
According
to the author Tao et al (2019), it is conducted that design of the app based
landslides monitoring system is organized. By the continuous development of the
landslides monitoring as well as the forecasting devices along with the
landslide monitoring contents also become increasingly accurately by the
different notable achievement. Nowadays the new method which is reported for
the real time monitoring and the surface displacement due to the landslides
that is also the advanced displacement and the monitoring of the early warring.
The method for tracking the land over changes as well as assessing the various
hazards through the individuals of reservoir landslides by using the high
resolutions images. These types of landslides also depend on the balanced among
the anti-sliding force as well as the sliding force which could also use for
the accurate parameter of forecasting of land. The remote monitoring for the landslides
warning system involves into two parts; indoor equipment and field equipment. Thus
the field monitoring also pointed which could be ceasing and monitored to
acquired the continuous monitoring data which is also shown in the below figure
(Tao et al , 2019)
Figure:
Remote monitoring and warning system
Implementation
of a landslide warning system
According to the Author Intrieri et al (2012), it is conducted
that sometimes
early warning system in case of landslides are the only solution. They describe
early warning systems (EWSs) as the systems or devices which are designed to
mitigate the threat imposed to humans, public or private property and
environments. According to them an EWS has many component or other aspects from
monitoring devices which include the risk identification, emergency plans,
public awareness etc. According to them, the efficient EWS should do the
monitoring which mainly includes data gathering from different kind of
instruments like transmission or monitoring instruments. Upon data collection,
the system should be able to analyze that data and forecast about the future
depending on some threshold or other forecasting techniques. In case of any forecast
of the thread, the system should send warnings and alert regarding the
impending threat and it also be able to layout a proposed response to the
threat so that concerning authorities can tackle the threat in a better way.
The most important part of designing any EWS is the identification of risk for
which the geomechanical and geological knowledge is a must so that system knows
what parameters should be monitored and how to weight different parameter for
better risk assessment. The authors argue that the most important, critical and
difficult part of any EWS is the response of people i.e. how people will react
in case of a threat. It is very difficult for people to know how to react in a
case of threat and people training must be a part of any effective EWS. The
also argue the correct education of people to be the most cost-effective way of
reducing the risk. The authors also present the case of Torgivannetto landslide
which is the city of Assisi, Italy. The identified the two highway roads named
Provincial road 249/1 and Regional Road 444 to at the most risk as these roads
connect Assisi to the surrounding towns. Different simulations showed that in a
case of rock fall the Provincial road would be destroyed due to which the
surrounding streets were closed for several months. They mention how effective
monitoring and effective response became a big factor in saving a lot of lives
and livelihood of people and also resulted in saving the property (Intrieri et al, 2012).
Strategies
of landslide early warning system
In
this article it has be suggested by Qingjia et
al (2018), some of the strategies has been presented which is related
with the domestic landslide early warning system and operations in all over the universe. In the initial
part of study,
it has been mentioned that some
of the components has been explained which is related with information for
experts and stakeholders which has been included in the structure and
operations of LEWSs. In this landslide threats
can be decreased by adopting
various qualification methods
and this is mainly divided
into two classification structural works and non-structural actions. Despite from this there are operational monitoring system has also presented which gives the information
which has been used to these problems once the risks of landslide passed.
As well as it has also been observed that landslide early warning system become
more applicable in latest years which mainly hold the decrease economical and
atmospheric influence than the structural interventions
(Qingjia et al , 2018).
Landslide
monitoring experiences of
How to improve Landslide Risk Monitoring Equipment and Alarms
According to the Author Angeli et al (2000),
it is conducted that about the landslides monitoring experiences. The landslide
presented the great variability which is not the typological and it’s from the
geometrical and the kinematics standpoints. Every landslide is thus characterized
through the methods which is developed and evaluate the various types of sensor
which would also set-up by the number of location and the measurements points by
the sampling frequency parameters. The disarrangement of hydrogeological is one
of great destructive natural events which striking the various civilian
populations for the urban settlements along with the infrastructures of the
worldwide in every year. Natural phenomena monitoring also needed by the
significance of the scientific community thus using the adequate monitoring
system which is the powerful tool for the understanding of the kinematic
aspects of the movements of mass as well as it also permits correct
interpretation along with the analysis. The morphological point of view which is the
possible distinguish for the flat upper accumulations area as well as the lower
accumulation area is also consisting by the main flow and there are two kilometer’s
longs by the steep narrow which discharge the channel and connecting by these
two area. The creation of latest socio-economic system which gives for the
accomplishment of various operations. The environment safety system gives the
quick attainment of measurement of data which observed landslides procedure and
analysis of the distributed of monitoring outcomes between users and
controllers of security of various aspects (Angeli et al , 2000).
Acoustic emission landslide warning system
According to the Author Dixon et al (2018), it is conducted
that the
current detection systems for landslides are very complex and at the same time
are also very expensive which makes them of no use to low or middle-income
countries. They propose a novel acoustic emission (AE) monitoring system which
can detect the accelerating slope and give warnings in case of a potential
slope. The early warning in case of a landslide is crucial to saving a lot of
lives and also saving public and private property and in case of low to middle
income countries this becomes even of greater importance because of their lower
GDP. The argue that as the currency and state of the art monitoring system cannot
be used in low to middle income countries due to their sophistication and cost,
so it more common there to use simple systems like regional rainfall trigger.
These systems are not very good at giving site specific warning as the data
these systems provide can misrepresent the actual site readings. They also
argue that a simple and cost-efficient monitoring system proposed by Sassa et
al. is not in wide use. They propose a novel, simple, low-cost and yet at the
same time robust instrumentation which can leverage acoustic emission
monitoring and it will give early warnings in case of a landslide, which can
result in an effective response and the most vulnerable people can be saved.
Acoustic emissions are elastic stress waves which are generation in case the
materials are deformed and they are propagated using solid phase. As the
frequency of these waves are very high so they audible by human ear. The waves
along with slope alarm can give early indication of a potential landslide.
Problem Statement
of How to improve Landslide Risk Monitoring Equipment and Alarms
The
research has been based on the native species which plays the significant role
in the improved efficiency of consistency of testing tools upper layers of
slope which will never been mentioned before. There is a need to improve the
tools so that these tools could be used in the better measurement of the risk.
Improvements in the monitoring and alarming tools are as much necessary as the
use of the tool as if measurement is not accurate then there are chances to get
heavy loss due to land sliding.
It has also been mentioned that some of the monitoring system and instruments
has been studied here which is related with the landslide and slope mainly but
it must be innovative and compatible in the measuring
of risk. The proposed tools
must be helpful to take the accurate measurement of the risk
and could be save the risk of landslide loss.
Research Question
of How to improve Landslide Risk Monitoring Equipment and Alarms
The
study is based on the research about the upper layers of the stability that
affect the slope of land. How effective are landslide risk management
initiatives at encouraging community members to manage their risk? What
landslide risk interventions or programs are you aware of in your community?
What additional tools are required to assessing landslide risk to improve
the early warning
system? What is the method for replication of landslide susceptibility?
Can FBG be used for land slide early warning system?
Methodology
of How to improve Landslide Risk Monitoring Equipment and Alarms
For performing the methodology, quantitative data will
be used. This data will be collected through geotechnical monitoring of the
place. For that case, there are about six inclinometers and 11 piezometers are
used. These equipment are used for monitoring the landslide movement. Moreover,
they are installed in the main landslide perimeter. According to this some in
clinometric measurements are taken in a perfect order. The next thing is that
its measurement interval was about 12 months and after this three more
instruments are added in the system. They are monitoring and measuring the
displacement for about 14 months. This shows that all of these inclinometers
are failed to reach the target (Tofani & Federico Raspini, 2013).
The data will be shown in the table given below
Number of inclinometers
|
Mean velocity measured in mm/ year
|
Displacement of land in mm
|
Sliding surface depth measure in meter
|
11
|
57.8
|
300
|
9
|
12
|
33.8
|
34
|
8
|
13
|
34.4
|
123
|
7
|
14
|
34.3
|
120
|
22
|
The table is showing that inclinometric measurement
are allowing reconstruction of the sliding surface depth, due to this, it is
going to affect the main layer of eh material. It can be observed that this
layer is composed of colluvium soil made. Another fact is that layer of clay
material is located in the soil and it is showing a slip surface. The next
thing is that monitoring of land slide surface is showing the slip surface and
it is located at the 10 meter depth. But it is not possible because in general
this depth of the slip surface is increased from upper to lower side of the
landslide (Gomez & Purdie, 2016).
Figure: Image of the land sliding
and showing surfaces in the form of colluvium soil, weathered bedrock and
bedrock
It can be noted that the
inclinometer is measuring the cumulative displacement according to the
reference period. This shows that the velocity is extremely high at the top
surface of the land and it is measured by inclinometer. Moreover, it is also
showing that this measurement is carried out from the past five years.
Data
from PSI of How to improve
Landslide Risk Monitoring Equipment and Alarms
Another
fact is that monitoring of land slide area of the particular place is carried
out through long stakes of SAR images. It shows that SAR is taken images in the
C band and also it contains a wavelength of 5 cm and its frequency is about 5.3
GHz. Another fact is that all of these four stacks are processed through the
help of PSInSAR approach. It is considered as the first technique for measuring
the radar imagery properly. For analyzing the displacement result a mode is
used, and it is called as APSA. This mode is involved in making four different
datasets of each stack properly and leading towards the new generation of
reducing velocity maps. It is dividing the velocity data set into different
parts. Moreover, due to this mode it will become easy to collect point wise
data at different positions. Another fact that interferometric analysis is
converted into multi-interferometric then it will become easy for the system to
generate displacement time series for radar targets. The accuracy of this
equipment is ranges from 1 mm to 3 mm and it used in single measurement system.
Advance
equipment used for measuring the land sliding is showing the information about the new system for minimizing the
effect of land sliding. For that case, there is a need of proper information
about the geographical knowledge. According to the above methodology proper
information is gained about the risk management of the monitoring method. It is
showing that system is not able to measure the velocity of land that is slower
than 13 mm per month. Now after this, there is need to add a proper monitoring
system for the new system.
Moreover, it shows that the monitoring system with get
data from different parts of the land. This data is collected in the form of
velocity, depth and area of the required place. On the other hand, there is
decision box and it will ensure the reputation of data collected through this
instrument. It is showing that if the data is according to the specified bound
then it will move towards again data acquisition stage and collect data. But
now the other fact is that if it is not collecting the data according to the
requirement. Furthermore, there are some problems present in the instrument.
For that purpose, this instrument will move towards the troubleshooting stage
and measure the required problem and perform the data acquisition stage again.
Moreover, if data is not according to the requirement then it will show the
warning. Then according to this warning, alarm setup will be start and then
according to this emergency plans are taken as response. This is used to
overcome the problem of risk management.
Conclusion of
How to improve Landslide Risk Monitoring Equipment and Alarms
Summing
up all the discussion from above, it is concluded that there is need of
improvement in the land sliding risk monitoring. This is because through this
it will become simple and easy to overcome the land sliding risk at the
particular area. According to
this case of landslide, monitoring deals with comparing different natural
conditions. These conditions include areal extent, Surface topography, rate of
movement and soil moisture. In landslide monitoring, there is a need to access
complete landslide activities at different time. From them the latest technique
is related with the photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning. The next
important thing is that SAR is considered as the best tools for accessing
reasonable changes on the earth surface. But the main problem is that the
analysis of one SAR image is not useful.
But the main challenge is that there is need of some improvement in the
SAR technology. This is because it is required to take images of slow moving
landslides that are moving with less than 13 mm/month. The next thing is that
it will made this approach more suitable for the slope and regional scale for
huge mass movement investigations. But due to its statistical analysis of the
signals it can be noted that there is problem of phase shifting
On the other hand, characteristics of the existing satellites are
putting strong image on the use of PSI for measuring and monitoring. For that case, there are about six
inclinometers and 11 piezometers are used. These equipment are used for
monitoring the landslide movement. Moreover, they are installed in the main
landslide perimeter.This shows that the velocity is extremely
high at the top surface of the land and it is measured by inclinometer.
Moreover, it is also showing that this measurement is carried out from the past
five years.
References
of How to improve Landslide Risk Monitoring Equipment and Alarms
Alfieri, L., & Peter Salamon, F. P. (2012).
Operational early warning systems for water-related hazards in Europe. Environmental
Science & Policy 21.
Angeli et al , M. G. (2000). A critical review of landslide
monitoring experiences. Engineering Geology, 55(3), 133–147.
C. Michoud, Bazin, S., & Lars Harald Blikra, M.-H. D.
(2013). Experiences from site-specific landslide early warning systems.
Calvello, M., & Ricardo N. D’Orsi, L. P. (2015). The
community-based alert and alarm system for rainfall induced landslides in Rio
de Janeiro, Brazil. In Engineering Geology for Society and Territory-Volume .
Dixon et al , N. (2018). An acoustic emission landslide early
warning system for communities in low-income and middle-income countries. Landslides,
15(8), 1631–1644.
Dixon, N., & Alister Smith, J. A. (2018). An acoustic
emission landslide early warning system for communities in low-income and
middle-income countries. Landslides 15.
Gomez, C., & Purdie, H. (2016). UAV-based photogrammetry
and geocomputing for hazards and disaster risk monitoring–a review. Geoenvironmental
Disasters 3,.
Intrieri et al, E. (2012). Design and implementation of a
landslide early warning system. Engineering Geology, 147-148, 124–136.
Intrieri, E., & G. Gigli, N. C. (2013). Brief
communication" Landslide Early Warning System: toolbox and general
concepts.
Intrieri, E., & Giovanni Gigli, F. M. (2012). Design and
implementation of a landslide early warning system. Engineering Geology.
Lacasse, S., & Nadim, F. (2009). Landslide risk
assessment and mitigation strategy. In Landslides–disaster risk reduction,.
Qingjia et al , M. (2018). Design of Simple Landslide
Monitoring System. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
Segoni, S., Lagomarsino, D., & Riccardo Fanti, a. N.
(2018). Brief communication: Using averaged soil moisture estimates to improve
the performances of a regional-scale landslide early warning system. Natural
Hazards and Earth System Sciences .
Tao et al , Z. (2019). Design and operation of App-based
intelligent landslide monitoring system: the case of Three Gorges Reservoir
Region. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk,, 10(1), 1209–1226.
Tofani, V., & Federico Raspini, F. C. (2013). Persistent
Scatterer Interferometry (PSI) technique for landslide characterization and
monitoring. Remote Sensing .
Gantt chart
Action Plan
|
|
|
Action Steps
|
Week 1
|
Week 2
|
Week 3
|
Week 4
|
Week 5
|
Week 6
|
Week 7
|
Week 8
|
Week 9
|
Week 10
|
1
|
Proposal report
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
Start of progress report
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Introduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Literature review
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Problem statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Research question
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Methodology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Conclusion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|