Discussion on the Fast tracking and crashing in project management

As it has been known that fast tracking is the technique in which activities will be perform under a sequence utilizing the actual schedule and it has been performed in parallel. In some other words it can also be said that fast tracking as a project has bene taken as in the meaning of actions which has been work on instantaneously despite from waiting for every piece to be done distinctly. Despite from this fast tracking would only be implemented if the activities which has been presented in the question would really (Long, 2016) be covered. As well as if anyone required to bandage a schedule then they should take into account about this technique mainly because fast tracking mainly did not include any type of cost. This technique is simply rearranging the activities in their actual schedule. On the other hand, crashing is the technique which has been utilized while the fast-tracking technique did not save more time on the project schedule. As well as along with this technique resources have been added within the project up to the least possible cost. In this schedule and cost tradeoffs and these has been analyzed to evaluate and how to get the highest amount of compression for the recent cost of increment. Moreover, it has been noticed that crashing is (Ballesteros & Elamrousy, 2019) quite effective due to more resources which has been added in to the project. The crashing technique analyzes and classified activities on the reduced crash in each cost which is unit per time, which sanction the team working the project to investigate the activities which would be able to deliver most valuable.

In this it has been mentioned that the reality of project management is that which is required to poultice the project schedule and to give the project’s product, services and findings sooner than actual planned. Schedule are consistently subjected to modify, in most of the cases it has been said that schedules often get longer as be contrasting to getting shorter, and it can negatively affect the actual schedule just because the project team would not be able to complete it in the given time. After viewing all these situations, the project manager should have the professional duties to ensure that project is obtained through proper planning. As well as if anyone required to bandage a schedule then they should take into account about this technique mainly because fast tracking mainly did not include any type of cost. This technique is simply rearranging the activities in their actual schedule. In tis they should have to utilize schedule compression technique to evaluate the required project completing date which could be meet. As well as the projects loose associates the serious path with an compulsory date which has been given by the organization, if the project loose has been negative, then they have an option to moreover perform crashing or fast-track to make sure that the project has been  completed on the given time as required by the administration. thus, there would not be any variations in the complex way. (Ballesteros P. , 2017)The two significant Schedule Compression Techniques (Fast-Tracking and Crashing) has been utilized by the Project Manager while in the lifecycle of the Project from Project Beginning to the Project Conclusion to bring back the project in streak with the Agenda Starting point without altering the project Possibility.

References on  Fast tracking and crashing in project management

Ballesteros, P. (2017). Modelling the boundaries of project fast-tracking. Automation in Construction , 231-241.

Ballesteros, P., & Elamrousy, M. K. (2019). Non-linear time-cost trade-off models of activity crashing: Application to construction scheduling and project compression with fast-tracking. Automation in Construction , 229-240.

Long, N. (2016). Fast-tracking and crashing projects: Comprehensive analysis of reasons and of implementation strategies. springer .