Assessment on Lower than five will not provide proper diffusion of errors, but increase than 5 will affect the overlying of knowledge (user revising the similar items as preceding users) to become worsened.

 Activity no 1: Testing with 15 individuals would attain close to 100% capacity of useableness errors, it is inappropriate use of time and budget. If the budget will sanction 15users, it is enough having many tests only with five of the users, in this regard that time could be consumed reiterating on, and enhancing the design among tests to finally come out with the potent design than one test which has been done with 15 users. Very little user sizes will not be effective, since the only one person might do things with transformation than the other groups, so expanding the size of sample mainly helps to prevent outliers.

Moreover, if there have been great distinct groups of users, then more users would be required to be tested. It has been explained through an example, learner plus (the app is for dyslexia assessment) would have functionality for both instructors and students (teachers, tutors and parents) should have to be two various groups since children and Adults have broadly various behaviors and experiences.  

Activity 2: There were six problems

·         Multiple questions affectation as single question

·         There are double-ended questions

·         The question is quite prejudiced

·         The wording is wicked

·         The question is risky

·         The question is quite imprecise- not obvious on what intelligence, terrorist, disruption etc.

Moreover, the rewarded questions among the year of 1933 to 1945, had you perform any of the above (tick all that Implement)

v  Terroristic activity

v  Reconnaissance

v  Genocide

v  Interference

To what degree do you agree with the oppressions performed by Nazi Germany and his allies:

Ø  Agree

Ø  Strongly agree

Ø  Disagree

Ø  Strongly disagree

Ø  Neither agree nor disagree

Activity 3: Proper method, procedure, setup, material, measurements, members

Condition 1: Hazard booking system

Method: field study along with physical opinions to test if the latest system is quicker than the preceding system.

Materials: two of the test groups has been of 40 to 50 (both groups should be of same size), movie theater were the movie can be played, latest and old system to be utilized for testing, three of the physical observer, pen, paper, stopwatches to record timing and booking records.

Procedure: on the two distinct showings of the movie have at least two of the group which has been used the previous and new booking system distinctly, one of the groups utilize old system and the other will use new system.

1.      Getting every user to movie theatre, and ask them make the booking for any of the movie, involving coating up and waiting in line.

2.      Ave viewers setup to view how long it will take every of the individual to made their booking, consumption of time with stop watch and has been recorded with pen o the paper.

3.      Once all of the participants of the test group have been completed their booking, add up all booking times for that group and regular.

4.      Associate all of the booking times among two of the groups, the group with less booking time had one normal, fewer queue times.

Situation 2: new interference style for a game

Method: Lab study with focus group to find the efficiency, enjoyability of the interference style

Materials: a focus group of almost 10 to 12 gamers, a room to be utilized while in the testing period, as well as a video game system. for every of the tester to usage during the testing period. Moreover, tables and chair for every individual and the moderator with every.

Procedure: within the testing room, there would be 10 to 12 gaming systems along with interaction prototype.

1.      Carry every user within the room at the similar time

2.      Have the tester utilize the video game system for 30 minutes

3.      While in the testing period, the mediator would answer any of the question which can be related with their time which they spent with their interference system.

Situation 3: latest storage/management system

Method: lab study with interview on users who might use the latest and the one who have been utilized the preceding system.

Materials: 6 school teachers administration officers, staff computers + new system, chair tables for user to sit and have work as well as the list of dummy tasks and data to be input and transformed into latest system, interview and mediator to ask questions.

1. Carry every user within the room at the similar time

2.         Have the tester utilize the video game system for 30 minutes

3.         While in the testing period, the mediator would answer any of the question which can be related with their time which they spent with their interference system.