Table of Contents
Project
Definition/ Parameters and Risks. 3
Scope. 3
Schedule. 4
Cost 4
Question 2. 13
Planning and Costs. 13
Network Diagram.. 13
Gantt Chart 14
Net profits. 17
Question 3. 21
Managing Progress and
Spending. 21
Table. 21
Gantt Chart 23
Question 4. 25
Earned Value Analysis. 25
Detailed Calculations. 26
CPI and SPI. 27
Part B.. 29
Risk Management Register for XYZ Project 32
References
General Assessment
Part A
An iron triangle is
the word used to define the bond that emerges through the legislative process
between parliamentary committees, federal bureaucracies and interest groups.
The partnership between these three actors inevitably happens over time before
they all work together in close proximity. All of them aim to increase their
gains in the policy process and iron triangles support them. Iron triangles get
their name because when you are set up, all three elements require each other
to function. they are extremely difficult to extract. The breaking of the
triangle is not in the interests of any component.
Figure: Iron
Triangle
Automation Futures PLC is expertise referring,
diminishing, and product expansion firm with widespread knowledge in the
production, distribution of technology schemes, and commissioning(Zakharchenko, Bakulich, Potapenko, Voloshenko, &
Kharuta, 2020).
The scope of the firm is vast as it activates out of a great consultancy
preparation in workshops of Ireland and the UK, which manufactures and grows
Prefabricated workshops and automation plants for numerous consumers in Europe.
The expertise and facilities of the firm permit them to deliver solutions made
by tailors.
The company has also made a schedule to complete the
project without delay, therefore, TTF PLC founded in Germany decided to offer
Electronic parts comprising the intended inverter product which precisely
expected at power redeemable for innovative train navies. Moreover, TTF is a
chief contractor to numerous administrations and train effective firms all over
the world. The agreement is at risk and there are chances of penalty in case of
late completion of the project. (Kuzminykh, Otrokh, Voronko, & Taranenko, 2020).
The board cost for the distribution of the
Automation Plant is 58.0 million pounds, including employees and materials. If
the price of a distribution of the Mechanization Plant is fewer as compared to
the board cost, then AF PLC may be permitted to about 50 percent of the extra
whatever superior than 50 percent of the surplus may be divided half with the
customer. According to the plan, the delivery of the completed automation plan
must not get late to 18th September 2020(Bilovodska, Golysheva, Gryshchenko, & Strunz,
2017).
b)
Risk Register
Task
|
Cause
|
Risk
|
Effect
|
Security
Threats
|
Causes threats to
security to get rid of the scammers
|
May Damage System
|
All the system will
work differently if virus effects it.
|
Ensuring safety measures
|
The safety risks may
increase in the project if the protection software and proper communication
are not enhanced. The issue of managing building protection can cause
security hazards to the construction project.
|
Security Hazards
|
The construction of a
new factory may be affected due to security perils as the control software is
crucial for designing the inverter product.
The budget of the company may be disturbed due to security risks.
|
Cost of the project
|
The prices of the
construction material of the project may change during the construction;
then, this can cause a disturbance in the completion of the project.
|
A sudden increase in
costs of construction material
|
The construction
project will lack money due to an increase in the costs of construction material.
The budget of the project will disturb, and the company will discuss monetary
issues.
|
Ensuring reporting
and schedule of the plan
|
The employees may
cause errors in the planning of the scheme, and due to this, the
unpredictable errors and reporting may cause in the project. The errors may
cause due to lack of organization between documents.
|
Unpredictable errors
and reporting
|
This may affect the
scheduling of the scheme, and the project may not complete within the due
date. The disturbance of scheduling of the project may cause a disturbance to
the budget.
|
Ensuring the
coordination in the project
|
The agents of the
project may fail to coordinate and to fulfill the goals. Loose coordination
between employees may cause an increase in coordination risks.
|
Coordination risks
|
This may affect the
reputation of the company, and this may affect the scheduling and scope of
the project.
|
Sustainability
Issues
|
Low sustainability
will cause higher disturbance
|
Issues with
management and workers
|
May cause disturbance
and issues
|
Network diagram is the techniques
of the operational research that is based on the graphical representations. In
this diagram, different components of the tasks are divided and the segregation
of duties are done. The components of the tasks are analyzed on the basis of
the responsibilities and workflow(Mantzaris, Walker,
Taylor, & Ehling, 2019). The main feature of the network
diagram is to identify the critical path. The network diagram for the project
is given below:
http://lovgov.weebly.com/the-government-guru/on-special-interest
Gantt chart looks like a bar charts that
projects the timeline or scheduling of a project. Gantt chart can be used in
the project scheduling and planning process as it enables the project managers
to prioritize tasks as per requirements of a project. Gantt chart shows the
estimated project completion time as well as time required for the completion
of each activity. In the following figure, Gantt Chart is projected for this project.
While
making the time schedule for the Gantt chart, it has been indicated that there
are five working days in a week, and it has been expected that the project will
end on almost 15 May 2020 if it is started on 8 July 2019. The project timing
report is given as follows:
Following
the above schedule, project completion status will be delayed because of
Christmas holidays. Project team members will require Christmas holidays therefore
this event completion status will be delayed (as per the length of holidays
allotted to project team members). An estimated holidays duration is two weeks.
All project team members will be given full-time off during these two weeks.
Although, this situation will increase the risk factor of project delays more
than two weeks. Time mismanagement and delays are highly expected. In case of
excess in time duration, budget and profit estimations will be also managed by
the organization.
Planned progress
Tasks
|
Weeks
|
Planned Performance
|
Project Starting
|
1
|
100%
|
Commissioning of
factory design
|
3
|
100%
|
Commissioning of
outline design of the factory-automation equipment
|
2
|
100%
|
Inverter product designing
|
1
|
100%
|
Extensive/Detailed
design of the factory
|
8
|
100%
|
Inverter and
automation product and equipment designing
|
8
|
100%
|
Software
commissioning and development for automation equipment
|
10
|
50%
|
Automation equipment
manufacturing
|
10
|
50%
|
Manufacturing of
units of factory (Modular)
|
9
|
56%
|
Comparison with actual
Tasks
|
Planned Performance
|
Actual Performance
|
Variance
|
Project Starting
|
100%
|
100%
|
0
|
Commissioning of
factory design
|
100%
|
100%
|
0
|
Commissioning of
outline design of the factory-automation equipment
|
100%
|
100%
|
0
|
Inverter product designing
|
100%
|
100%
|
0
|
Extensive/Detailed
design of the factory
|
100%
|
80%
|
-20%
|
Inverter and
automation product and equipment designing
|
100%
|
100%
|
0
|
Software
commissioning and development for automation equipment
|
50%
|
35%
|
-15%
|
Automation equipment
manufacturing
|
50%
|
35%
|
-15%
|
Manufacturing of
units of factory (Modular)
|
56%
|
50%
|
-6%
|
The
above chart representstheextent of the completion of the task. Tasks 1, 2, 3,
and 5 are completed as indicated by the black cross line in the time frame. At
the same time, partially completed tasks are indicated by the partial cross
over the time period.
Earned value analysis is the technique
of project management that measure the performance of the project and the
progress in objective manner(Bryde,
Unterhitzenberger, & Joby, 2018). The performance is
evaluated on the basis of planned and actual completions and criteria for the
tasks. Earned value analysis is given below:
Tasks
|
Activity Completion
Status (Planned) %
|
Activity Completion
Status (Actual) %
|
ACWP
|
BCWP
|
BCWS
|
Start- up of Project
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
200,000.00
|
200,000.00
|
200,000.00
|
Commission Design (Factory)
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
2910,00.00
|
2800,000.00
|
2910,000.00
|
OutlineCommissions(Designing
of Automatic Equipment)
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
1720,000.00
|
1600,000.00
|
1720,000.00
|
Designing of Inverter
Products
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
1530,000.00
|
1500,000.00
|
1530,000.00
|
DetaileddesigningofFactory’s
Layout
|
100.00
|
80.00
|
4080,000.00
|
3040,000.00*
|
4840,000.00*
|
Complete designing of
all components including factory layout, inverter products, and automatic
equipment.
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
5970,000.00
|
5400,000.00
|
5970,000.00
|
Total
|
|
|
20,330,000.00
|
11,500,000.00
|
24,065,000.00
|
Detailed
Factory Designing
BCWP
= 3.8 (M) x 0.80 = 3.04 M
BCWS = 3.8 (M) x
0.20+ 4.08 M = 4.84 M
Development
and Commissioning of Inverter products and Automatic equipment
BCWP
= 3.4 M x0.35= 1.19 M
BCWS
= 3.4 M x 0.65 + 1.32 M = 3.4 M
Automation
EquipmentManufacturing
BCWP
= 6.5 M x 0.35 = 2.275 M
BCWS = 6.5 Mx0.65 + 2.76 M = 6.985 M
Manufacturization
of the Factory units
BCWP
= 4.00Mx0.50 =2.00M
BCWS =4 Mx0.50+ 2.75 M
BCWS = 4.75 M
Cost
Performance Index (CPI) is representing cost spend on the completed project
activities and components. The following calculation work is representing CPI
for this project.
CPI
= EV / AC
Cost
Performance Index (CPI) = 11.50 / 20.33
Cost
Performance Index (CPI) = 0.5657
Following
above calculations,the minimum required value “1” is not met by this project,
therefore, we can say that project is not cost-effective against determined
budget.
Schedule Performance Index as
abbreviated as SPI which shows the comparative analysis of actual performance
and planned performance.
Schedule
Performance Index= EV / PV
Schedule
Performance Index = 11.50 / 24.06
Schedule
Performance Index=0.48
Again
calculated value is less than minimum required limit of “1”. This situation
show that project activities are not performed well as per schedule. The following
calculation work can be used to estimate thecompletion :
Project
EV = 11.5 M
Cost
Performance Index (CPI)= 0.57
The
following calculation show “Estimate at completion till the date”
Estimate
At Completion = 23.24 / 0.5657
Estimate
at Completion = 41.08 M
Now
calculating for entire project.
Estimate
at Completion = 48.7 M / 0.5657
Estimate
at Completion = 86.09 (M)
a- Acceleration
Option
N seems to be accepted because it is offering less time with the lowest of the
cost.
The project manager must be a good communicator and
also comprehend the effects of financial changes on the project. The goal of
the scheme director is to get the desired consequences of the project at a
particular date and time, with a particular amount of resources. The proper
start and ending time of the project is crucial for the project manager and the
goal of the project manager is to fulfill the requirements of infrastructure(Prascevic & Prascevic, 2017).
The goal of the project manager is
to set the time-bound, specific, realistic, achievable, and measurable goal for
the conclusion of the plan. The goal of the scheme manager is to enhance the
performance and productivity of the scheme and to identify the reasons behind
the bad performance of the organization(Heigermoser, de Soto, Abbott, & Chua, 2019).,
The good project manager must have an inspired
vision for the completion of the task and he or she must be the best
communicator. Clear communication is crucial in a project as communication is
concerned with feedback, goals, performance, responsibility, and expectations.
A good project manager must have enthusiasm, empathy, and vigor to complete the
task. The technical abilities of the project manager must be good, for
instance, in the case study, the production line software was used. Therefore,
the project manager must have skills in technology(Belfadel & Munden). The construction
project includes various risks such as environmental risks, technical risks,
and technological risks. The good project manager must know all the
problem-solving techniques.
|
Risk
Documentation
|
Assessment
|
Response
|
Monitoring
and Control
|
Reference
|
Occurrence
|
Reason
|
Outcome
|
Likelihood
|
Influence
|
P x L
|
Strategy
|
Trigger
|
Action
|
Responsible
person/s
|
Review
Frequency
|
Status
date and general notes
|
1
|
Absence
of Subsidy
|
Economical
Restraints-distribution in uncertainty or focus to alter
|
Plan
overdue
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
Alleviate
|
Plan's
guarantors fail to confirm safe subsidy level once the strategy is obtainable
|
Demeanor
additional subsidy rounded, looking for provision since important investor
assemblies, with the decision-making guarantor
|
Plan
Director, Policymaking Guarantor
|
Monthly
|
23.11.16
Record rationalized. Substitute subsidy foundations recognized
|
|
Ensuring safety measures
|
The
protective dangers might enhance in the plan if the safety software and
appropriate message will not be incresed. The problem of organizing
constructing safety can happen safety risks to the building plan.
|
The
building of a novel shop might be pretentious because of safety dangers by
way of the regulator software is vital for scheming the inverter
invention. The economy of the business
might be troubled because of safety dangers.
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
Alleviate
|
Plan's
guarantors fail to confirm safe subsidy level once the strategy is obtainable
|
Demeanor
additional subsidy rounded, looking for provision since important investor
assemblies, with the decision-making guarantor
|
Plan
Director, Policymaking Guarantor
|
Monthly
|
23.11.16 Record rationalized. Substitute subsidy
foundations recognized.
|
|
Production line
software and poor management
|
The production line
software and poor management of the project may cause due to improper
training to the employees and a decrease in the stability of the project.
|
Poor management and
production line software of project
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
Alleviate
|
Plan's
guarantors fail to confirm safe subsidy level once the strategy is obtainable
|
Demeanor
additional subsidy rounded, looking for provision since important investor
assemblies, with the decision-making guarantor
|
Plan
Director, Policymaking Guarantor
|
Monthly
|
23.11.16 Record rationalized. Substitute subsidy
foundations recognized.
|
|
Executing
|
AF PLC may face
technical risks due to inadequate training to the workers, as this may causes
errors in the project. The lack of sites, design, and availability of
resources may cause the production of technical risks.
|
Technical risks
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
Alleviate
|
Plan's
guarantors fail to confirm safe subsidy level once the strategy is obtainable
|
Demeanor
additional subsidy rounded, looking for provision since important investor
assemblies, with the decision-making guarantor
|
Plan
Director, Policymaking Guarantor
|
Monthly
|
23.11.16
Record rationalized. Substitute subsidy foundations recognized
|
|
Ensuring environmental
sustainability
|
The environmental
risks cause due to natural disasters such as effect on change in climate on
the machinery used in the project.
|
Environmental risks
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
Mitigate
|
Plan's
guarantors fail to confirm safe subsidy level once the strategy is obtainable
|
Demeanor
additional subsidy rounded, looking for provision since important investor assemblies,
with the decision-making guarantor
|
Plan
Director, Policymaking Guarantor
|
Monthly
|
23.11.16
Record rationalized. Substitute subsidy foundations recognized
|
|
Timing of the project
|
It may cause due to
poor planning of the project and improper working of the project manager. The
construction project may complete late due to coordination issues, changes in
sequences, and late access to the projects.
|
Late completion of the
project
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
Mitigate
|
Project's
sponsors fail to ensure secure fiunding level when the plan is presented
|
Demeanor
additional subsidy rounded, looking for provision since important investor
assemblies, with the decision-making guarantor
|
Plan
Director, Policymaking Guarantor
|
Monthly
|
23.11.16 Register updated. Alternative funding
sources identified
|
|
Cost of the project
|
The prices of the
construction material of the project may change during the construction, then
this can cause a disturbance in the completion of the project.
|
A sudden increase in
costs of construction material
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
Mitigate
|
Project's
sponsors fail to ensure secure fiunding level when the plan is presented
|
Demeanor
additional subsidy rounded, looking for provision since important investor
assemblies, with the decision-making guarantor
|
Plan
Director, Policymaking Guarantor
|
Monthly
|
23.11.16
Record rationalized. Substitute subsidy foundations recognized
|
|
Ensuring reporting and
schedule of the project
|
The employees may
cause errors in the planning of the project and due to this the unpredictable
errors and reporting may cause in the project. The errors may cause due to
lack of organization between documents.
|
Unpredictable errors
and reporting
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
Mitigate
|
Project's
sponsors fail to ensure secure fiunding level when the plan is presented
|
Demeanor
additional subsidy rounded, looking for provision since important investor
assemblies, with the decision-making guarantor
|
Plan
Director, Policymaking Guarantor
|
Monthly
|
23.11.16
Record rationalized. Substitute subsidy foundations recognized
|
|
Ensuring the
coordination in the project
|
The agents of the
project may fail to coordinate and to fulfill the goals. Loose coordination
between employees may cause an increase in coordination risks.
|
Coordination risks
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
Mitigate
|
Project's
sponsors fail to ensure secure fiunding level when the plan is presented
|
Demeanor
additional subsidy rounded, looking for provision since important investor
assemblies, with the decision-making guarantor
|
Plan
Director, Policymaking Guarantor
|
Monthly
|
23.11.16
Record rationalized. Substitute subsidy foundations recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor of the project
|
This may cause if the
labor of the project denies to do work and there is a shortage of labor in
the project.
|
Shortage of labor
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
Mitigate
|
Plan's
guarantors fail to confirm safe subsidy level once the strategy is obtainable
|
Demeanor
additional subsidy rounded, looking for provision since important investor
assemblies, with the decision-making guarantor
|
Plan
Director, Policymaking Guarantor
|
Monthly
|
23.11.16
Record rationalized. Substitute subsidy foundations recognized
|
|
Suppliers and
subcontractors of the project
|
The bad suppliers and
subcontractors cause issues for the management of supplying.
|
Problems with
suppliers and subcontractors
|
4
|
5
|
20
|
Mitigate
|
Plan's
guarantors fail to confirm safe subsidy level once the strategy is obtainable
|
Demeanor
additional subsidy rounded, looking for provision since important investor
assemblies, with the decision-making guarantor
|
Plan
Director, Policymaking Guarantor
|
Monthly
|
23.11.16
Record rationalized. Substitute subsidy foundations recognized
|
The goal of the project was not clearly defined and
this was due to the various issues in the project. Another challenge that I
faced was inadequate communication with the team, the aspects of the projects
did not get clear due to lack of communication. The hardest challenge that I
faced was risk assessment, as it was difficult for me to collect the data
related to the project because of a lack of period. The scope of the project
was not vast and there was also a problem of improper scheduling. Moreover, I
faced difficulties in the construction and designing of a new factory to fit
the mechanization equipment, as it is not an easy task to fit the automation
apparatus within the budget(Molodetsky, 2019). The deadline for the completion of the
project was no sufficient as there were also the chances of damages during
construction. I also face various issues while making the budget of the project
as the cost is the crucial element of the project which includes resources,
workers, and other components of the project
Part
C
Acceleration:
there are 5 ways
to accelerate the project after reviewing;
Figure: Gannt Chart Extract after review
stage
1. Accelerate
project F
Through recurring
the fixed cost of about £200K,
we suggest that project should be completed 3 weeks early. Because project F is
not just a critical point but also behind the schedule and it cause the delay
of the whole project too so the above-mentioned suggestions should be accepted.
2. Accelerate
project G
Through
incurring net expense of about £103K,
project G can be accelerated by 3 weeks. Because this project is also behind and
is assumed to be an important task so this option should be accepted in the
conjunction of the option F.
This cost is an associated cost which
increase overall project cost but support early completion of this project.
Considering this, we will ignore minimum impact of project cost and focus on
expected benefit.
Accelerate
project I
This project activity is having float for the
organization and not required by the critical path. Therefore, by accelerating
this task will not have any kind of impact on overall project activities.
Accelerate
project N
Project
N activity is requiring a delay of three weeks because of delayed completion
status of project F and G. Hereafter, higher attention is required by the firm.
Considering pre-requisite of project N activity, we can save at least one week.
In case, company plans to accept options (1&2) then this project activity
is not recommended at this point.
3.
Accelerate project P
Project P activity will be completed after
the completion of whole project. Therefore, organization will consider it later
(only if required). Although, this project activity is strongly recommended to
reduce cost and enforce cost-effectiveness in this project. Project P activity
can save 35 K per week.
Research
methodologies:
Information on
the selected topic was collected from random websites especially google
scholars. The research was the hybrid method using both qualitative as well as quantitative
research methodology. The objective of the study was to develop the knowledge
about the project management methodologies and so that students can develop
their interests in the study. This approach of research allowed the evaluation
of the relevance of using project management programs. STATISTICA software was
used for the data analysis. As the quantity of first-year students understudies
has been expanding, so has the requirement for experienced workforce. To oblige
this pattern, the course is group instructed to consider consistent preparing
of new personnel, just as to join normal workforce input into the progressing
cycle of progress. We consistently measure the viability of the course
including its yearly enhancements. The four areas of the course were as of late
educated by four personnel with the guide of four Teaching Assistants (TA) who
recently took the course.
This research
has reasonable ramifications, particularly for customer PM associations that
are using EVA with project groups including various firms. As customers look
for approaches to more readily screen and control execution through the
undertaking execution stage, for those that have not utilized it before EVA is
a likely alternative. However, rules to outline the plan and activity of EVA
are deficient.
·
Akhmetshin, E. M., Zakieva, R. R., Zhminko, A. E.,
Aleshko, R. A., & Makarov, A. L. (2019). Modern approaches to innovative
project management in entrepreneurship education: A review of methods and
applications in education. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education ,
1-15.
·
Belfadel,
D., & Munden, R. (n.d.). Walking on Water Term Design Project in
Fundamentals of Engineering.
·
Bilovodska,
O., Golysheva, I., Gryshchenko, O., & Strunz, H. (2017). Theoretical and
practical fundamentals of scientific and educational projects: a case of
Ukraine. Journal of International Studies .
·
Bryde,
D., Unterhitzenberger, C., & Joby, R. (2018). Conditions of success for
earned value analysis in projects. International Journal of Project
Management, .
·
Chen,
J., Liu, R., Niu, Y., & Zhu, J. (2019). Impact of product heterogeneity
and soft budget constraint on excess capacity in Chinese energy industry
based on the duopoly model. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and
Environment, .
·
Damnjanovic,
I., & Reinschmidt, K. (2020). Project Risk Management Fundamentals. Data
Analytics for Engineering and Construction Project Risk Management ,
23-41.
·
Frefer,
A. A., Mahmoud, M., Haleema, H., & Almamlook, R. (2018). Overview success
criteria and critical success factors in project management. Industrial
engineering & management , 2169-0316.
·
Heigermoser,
D., de Soto, B. G., Abbott, E. L., & Chua, D. K. (2019). BIM-based Last
Planner System tool for improving construction project management. Automation
in Construction , 246-254.
·
Kuzminykh,
V. O., Otrokh, S. I., Voronko, M. P., & Taranenko, R. A. (2020).
Fundamentals of IT project management.
·
Mantzaris,
A. V., Walker, T. G., Taylor, C. E., & Ehling, D. (2019). Adaptive
network diagram constructions for representing big data event streams on
monitoring dashboards. Journal of Big Data .
·
Molodetsky,
I. (2019). Fundamentals of Engineering Design.
·
Pokrop,
F. (2017). Fundamentals of Project Management. Quality Progress.
·
Prascevic,
N., & Prascevic, Z. (2017). Application of fuzzy AHP for ranking and
selection of alternatives in construction project management. Journal of
civil engineering and management , 1123-1135.
·
Sharon,
A., & Dori, D. (2017). Model‐Based Project‐Product Lifecycle Management
and Gantt Chart Models: A Comparative Study. Systems engineering .
·
Zakharchenko,
O. V., Bakulich, O. O., Potapenko, T. P., Voloshenko, M. O., & Kharuta,
V. S. (2020). Fundamentals of the System Simulation
Methodology'Personmachine'in Project and Program Management. International
Journal of Management (IJM) .