Walt Disney is an American expanded
global mass media and show business corporation with the Walt Disney Studios as
its head office located in Burbank, California. For about 92 years, Walt Disney
has throughout numbers of modifications within its business. The Walt Disney Company
has been listed by Forbes with its market capital at $238.1billion (forbes.com,
n.d.). This paper aims to detail the business-level strategies of
the company and how the company utilizes its primary competencies to create and
vend its products in the market place. This paper also explains about the
corporate-level strategies of Walt Disney, the competitive environment, and
also the market cycles that surrounding the company. In the end of the paper,
the conclusion made to finalized the entire analysis of the company as well.
Business-Level
Strategies of Walt Disney Company
A business-level strategy defines as
an assimilated and synchronized set up of obligations and activities that the
company utilizes to get a competitive benefit by taking the advantage of its
main competencies in particular market place
(Ireland, Hoskisson, & Hitt, 2012). The Walt Disney Company was
using a unique differentiation in its business operations. Walt Disney was
presenting the unique presentation within its show business and entertainment
products and services to shape on the customer’s value. This business strategy
of Walt Disney was quite successful and applied for numbers of years within the
company. Based on the annual report of the company in 2014, Walt Disney
endorsed their constant success within three main strategic priorities; the
supreme creativity, the advanced technology, and also the international
expansion. Walt Disney Company’s three main priorities associate “The
Integrated Cost Leadership-Differentiation Strategy,” which is a
business-level strategy in which the differentiated products are provided
within low cost to the market place. This business-level strategy gives the
directions for the company to improve its competent and efficient business
operations while also offering the unique and different products to the
customers as well (Hitt, Ireland, & Hoskisson,
2008). “The Integrated Cost Leadership-Differentiation Strategy” is basically
a mixture of “The Cost Leadership Strategy” strategy and “The
Differentiation Strategy.”
“The
Cost Leadership Strategy” which based on creating and enhancing the new
and current processes (John R. Schermerhorn,
2010), has made Walt Disney to become more competent by providing a
competitive benefit for the company. One of the unique experiences that The
Walt Disney Company delivers is that, the company seems to not spare on any
expenses to provide the studios, theme parks, or other things for its
productions. But actually, if we take a look at behind the scenes, the company
has always made a very well-organized and competent operations for its
productions. These competent operations of Walt Disney interpret into the cost
savings for the company and perceived the customers’ value. Then the company
uses the amount from those cost savings to build and develop some innovative
attractions for its current theme parks, produce on new TV series, programs, or
movies, and also extend its theme parks as well as its resort universally,
which is also mentioned as one of its main priorities.
In
the other hand, “The Differentiation Strategy” described as a strategy that
based on growing and producing the products and services that the consumers
identify as being unique in methods and also essential for them (Ahlstrom & Bruton, 2009). Every day,
thousand numbers of customers visit the Disney theme parks and its resorts to
get a unique and exciting experience that the company offered.
Therefore,
“The
Integrated Cost Leadership-Differentiation Strategy”really benefit the
Walt Disney Company since it offers an ideal strategy for the company to use
the creativity and innovation to improve the competent operations and also the
processes that create the cost savings for the company. From here, The Walt
Disney Company could use those cost savings to make a further development for
its business as well as its universal expansion, while also providing the idea
that the company does not spare any expenses. Thus, this is actually what gives
a competitive advantage for The Walt Disney Company in the market industry.
Corporate-Level
Strategies of Walt Disney Company
A
corporate-level strategy defines as the definite actions which engaged by a
company to get a competitive benefit by choosing and handling a set of diverse
business contending in several market industries
(Furrer, 2016). The Walt Disney Company known to have at least 28
business which involved in five business sectors; studio entertainment, media
networks, parks and resorts, Disney Interactive, and also
Disney’s customer products. The company is applying the combination of “The
Related Constrained Diversification” and “The Related Linked Diversification”
strategies. We can see the use of “The Related Constrained Diversification” by
the company with the proof of the companies that Disney owned such as Disney
Music Group or also Disney ABC Television. The links among these two companies
with Walt Disney are could be considered as direct link and also categorized as
the related
constrained diversified. In the other hand, an instance for the use of “The
Related Linked Diversification” strategy could be seen from the ownership
of ESPN and also Touchstone Pictures by Walt Disney. There are claimed to be
smaller mutual assets between these two companies with Walt Disney. In the
other hand, Walt Disney could share further knowledge and primary competencies
with those two companies. Walt Disney seems to presenting a modest of
high-level of diversification along with its related constrained as
well as its related linked business. This high-level diversification
conducts for two main roles; rises the value of the company itself and secures
the company from the loss in case if any of the companies that owned by Walt
Disney has to suffer for any loss. This case was appeared in the year of 2013,
when Walt Disney was still listed with its universal profit for $45.05 billion,
while the Disney Interactive was reported to suffer the loss around $87
million. Both Disney Studio Entertainment and Disney Interactive had to suffer
the loss in profit during March 2015. In the other hand, The Walt Disney
Company for overall, has made an amazing revenue. This has shown the indication
that Walt Disney has the suitable diversity to secure the company in case if
some of its sectors suffer for the loss profit. Thus, the way that The Walt
Disney Company made it to increase its profit while also make difficult ways
for the competitors to exist in the market industry has proven that “The
Related Constrained Diversification” and “The Related Linked
Diversification” strategies are the best strategies to be used by the
company so far.
Competitive
Environment of Walt Disney Company
Even though the Walt Disney Company
has been proven as a well-diversified company, but there is always a room for
competitors. The competitors for the company are mentioned such as Twenty-First
Century Fox, Time Warner, and also Comcast-NBC. The Comcast-NBC even has
encountered the sector of theme park and resorts with opening some innovative
themed such as Wizarding World of Harry Potter which attracted many customers.
Therefore, Comcast-NBC could be consider as the most significant competitor for
Walt Disney. In the other hand, Twenty-First Century Fox also has created its
theme park which in the year of 2016 as well. In fact, in the theme park and
resort sector, Walt Disney seems already set up the standard for the
competitors to follow. The competitors companies really work out in the theme
park and resorts sector to win the tough competition with Walt Disney in the
market industry. Both Walt Disney and Comcast-NBC appear to use the same form
of “The
Integrated Cost Leadership-Differentiation Strategy” strategy. Both of
them are figuring out the most efficient approach to functioning their business
operations while also offering a value perception to their customers as well. However,
since Walt Disney is already famous on the eyes of public for various milestones,
the company could improve the creativity and innovation by using the support of
the latest technology will able to make the company still exist and even
improve its future development as well (Gamble,
Peteraf, & Thompson, 2014).
Market
Cycles of Walt Disney Company
A slow cycle market which defined as
a duration of time in which the competitive benefits of a company are secured
and protected from getting duplicated and the high cost of duplication (Mohr, Sengupta, & Slater, 2010) seems to
be demonstrated from the business operations by Walt Disney. For instance, the
entire characters which produced by Walt Disney such as Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck,
Minnie Mouse, and also Goofy, they all are secured and protected by the
copyright, and also the patent and trademark laws. In the other hand, within a
fast cycle market which the competitive benefits of the company are not secured
and protected from getting duplicated and also the cost of duplication is
claimed to be cheap, then Walt Disney might not able to make the copyright or
the patent and trademark laws to secure and protect their products. This will
make it easier for other competitors to duplicate their products. For this
reason, being in a slow cycle market is giving a huge difference for Walt
Disney in performing their business, and also to get exist in the market
industry as well. Therefore, The Walt Disney Company needs to maintain its business
as well as its corporate strategies to support the company on falling to the
fast cycle market.
Conclusion
on Walt Disney Company
The Walt Disney Company which has
famous for about 92 years in the entertainment industry has proven how the
company made to survive in the tough competition. The success of the company is
supported by the appropriate and suitable “The Integrated Cost
Leadership-Differentiation Strategy” business-level strategy that
benefit The Walt Disney Company since the strategy offers an ideal strategy for
the company to use the creativity and innovation to improve the competent
operations and also the processes that create the cost savings for the company.
The company is also applying the combination of “The Related Constrained
Diversification” and “The Related Linked Diversification” strategies
into its business operations practices. The practice of “The Related Constrained
Diversification” by the Walt Disney is proven with some companies that
Disney owned such as Disney Music Group or also Disney ABC Television.
Meanwhile, the practice of “The Related Linked Diversification”
strategy presented from the ownership of ESPN and also Touchstone Pictures by
Walt Disney. These two corporate-level strategies have made the company able to
increase its profit while also make difficult ways for the competitors to exist
in the market industry.
However, Walt Disney still has to
face the tough competition in the entertainment industry. Many competitors have
come and take part in the showbiz business. One of them that considered to be
the most significant competitor for Walt Disney is mentioned as Comcast-NBC which
appeared to use the same form of “The Integrated Cost
Leadership-Differentiation Strategy” strategy. The good thing is, Walt
Disney has being present in the slow cycle market which secured and protected
its product with copyrights or patent and trademark laws. These two regulations
shelter the famous products of Walt Disney such as Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck,
and other product from getting duplicated by other competitors. The Walt Disney
Company now just needs to make sure that the company will able to maintain its
business as well as its corporate strategies to stay exist in the entertainment
industry, and also for the future development of the company as well.
References of Walt Disney Company
Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2009). International
Management: Strategy and Culture in the Emerging World. Cengage Learning.
forbes.com. (n.d.). #8 Walt Disney. Retrieved from
https://www.forbes.com/companies/walt-disney/#7776ee573073
Furrer, O. (2016). Corporate Level Strategy: Theory and
Applications. Routledge.
Gamble, J. E., Peteraf, M. A., & Thompson, A. A. (2014). Essentials
of strategic management: The quest for competitive advantage.
Hitt, M., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. (2008). Strategic
Management: Competitiveness and Globalization, Concepts. Cengage Learning.
Ireland, R. D., Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. (2012). Understanding
Business Strategy Concepts Plus. Cengage Learning.
John R. Schermerhorn, J. (2010). Management. John
Wiley & Sons.
Mohr, J. J., Sengupta, S., & Slater, S. F. (2010). Marketing
of High-technology Products and Innovations. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Sources
Apa format