The
current study evaluates the level of CSR disclosure in the firms of the Saudi
listed as well as for identifying the
role of six characteristics of the firm namely firm size, performance,
government ownership, debt, capital raised and audit firm size on influencing
the extent of CSR disclosure. As crafted a declaration that consists of 21 voluntary
items to assess the CSR disclosure in the annual reports of 10 companies listed
in Tadawul. Findings show that firms still have a low CSR disclosure level in
the examined year.
The
low levels of CSR disclosure can be a result of the low awareness of the
importance of CSR information by the investors. The issue of environmental
protection could have a general impact on society which could be of less
priority to investors. Therefore, no substantial
pressure is shown by the stakeholders to force firms to disclose more
information on their CSR performance. Another main reason can relax environmental and social regulations
which can be the reason behind fewer initiatives for environmental protection
or employees' rights. With regards to the impact of the six firm
characteristics and CSR disclosure, the present study finds a positive
influence on firm size, government
ownership, and performance and the CSR
disclosure.
In contrast, debt, capital raised
and audit firm size does not have any
influence on the CSR disclosure. To the body of knowledge of CSR disclosure in
developing countries, this study is
contributing positively, particularly Saudi Arabia which is vital for producing the large quantity of the
world's oil. The findings of the study might provide some insights to the Saudi
authorities to enforce stricter policies to enhance CSR reporting.
The
Saudi authorities should provide a guideline for firms and the public for giving the awareness related to the importance
of CSR practices, particularly the environmental reporting as Saudi Arabia has
a large oil industry which is known to be one of the most pollution producer
industries. The scope of the CSR disclosure is
only collected from the annual reports of 2016 for the 21 items of the
index. Future studies could include more critical
questions to the index that could extract
more CSR information. Future studies can also use other sources of information
and a more prolonged period.
Recommendations of The
Impact of Firm Characteristics on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure:
Evidence from Saudi PLCs
It
is concluded that the authorities of Saudi Arabia must provide a particular guideline for the firms as well as to the
public. The importance of CSR practices
must be raised in society for reporting the betterment of the environment of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia
is considered a rich country because of the production of oil in Saudi Arabia. The several
another item can be included in the index of the study for extracting the more
information related to the CSR. Many other sources of the data can also use as the future studies of the
CSR disclosures.
References
of The Impact of Firm Characteristics on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure:
Evidence from Saudi PLCs
Ali Al-Gamrh, R. A.-D. (2016). Disclosure, Firm
Characteristics and Corporate Social ResponsibilityBakr. t International
Business Management, 10(18), 4283-4291,.
Ali, W. F. (2017). Determinants of Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A
Literature Review. . Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental
Management, , 24(4),.
Alireza Nasiri, M. Z. (2018). The Effects of Firm
Characteristics on Corporate SocialResponsibility Disclosure: Evidence from
Palestine. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2222-2847.
Denis Cormier, M. M. (2005). Environmental disclosure
quality in large Germancompanies: Economic incentives, public pressuresor
institutional conditions? European Accounting Review,, 14(1), 3–39,.
Etxeberria, E. O.‐A. (2014). Financial Factors Influencing the Quality
of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management Disclosure: A
Quantile Regression Approach. Corporate Socail resposiabilty and
environmemntal mangment.
Farook, S. K. (2011). Determinants of corporate social
responsibility disclosure: the case of Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic
Accounting and Business Research,, 2(2), 114–141.
Greener, S. (2008). Business Research Methods.
Bookboon.
Hawani Wan Abd Rahman, N. M.‐H. (2011). CSR
disclosures and its determinants: evidence from Malaysian government link
companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 181–201.
Khan, H. (2010). The effect of corporate governance
elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting. International
Journal of Law and Management, 52(2), 82–109.
Mohammad Badrul, M. a. (2015). Firm characteristics,
board diversity and corporate socialresponsibility Evidence from Bangladesh. Pacific
Accounting Review, 353-372.
Priyadarshanie W.A.N, L. G. (2016). THE EFFECT OF FIRM
CHARACTERISTICS ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE IN SRI LANKAN
BANKING SECTOR. Symposium of Accounting and Finance Researches .
Roshima Said, Y. H. (2009). The relationship between
corporate socialresponsibility disclosure and corporategovernance
characteristics in Malaysianpublic listed companies. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
JOURNAL, 5(2), 212-226,.
Saleh, M. Z. (2010). Corporate social responsibility
disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership. Managerial Auditing
Journal,, 25(6), 591–613.
SIRIWATPATARA, R. (2018). THE EFFECTS OF FIRM
CHARACTERISTICS ON CORPORATESOCIAL RESPONSIBILITYACTIVITIES IN INDUSTRY SECTOR
IN EASTERN OF THAILAND. ISERD International Conference.
W.A.N, G. L. (2016). THE EFFECT OF FIRM
CHARACTERISTICS ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE IN SRI LANKAN
BANKING SECTOR . Symposium of Accounting and Finance Researches.
Wang, M.-C. (2017). The Relationship between Firm Characteristics
andthe Disclosure of Sustainability Reporting. sustainabilty, 9, 624.
Zulkifli, N. M. (2010). Corporate social
responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership. . Managerial
Auditing Journal, 25(6), , 591–613.
Appendices