Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline?

Get Urgent Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework Writing

100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Conclusion on The Impact of Firm Characteristics on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from Saudi PLCs

Category: Business & Management Paper Type: Dissertation & Thesis Writing Reference: APA Words: 1576

The current study evaluates the level of CSR disclosure in the firms of the Saudi listed as well as for identifying the role of six characteristics of the firm namely firm size, performance, government ownership, debt, capital raised and audit firm size on influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. As crafted a declaration that consists of 21 voluntary items to assess the CSR disclosure in the annual reports of 10 companies listed in Tadawul. Findings show that firms still have a low CSR disclosure level in the examined year.

The low levels of CSR disclosure can be a result of the low awareness of the importance of CSR information by the investors. The issue of environmental protection could have a general impact on society which could be of less priority to investors. Therefore, no substantial pressure is shown by the stakeholders to force firms to disclose more information on their CSR performance. Another main reason can relax environmental and social regulations which can be the reason behind fewer initiatives for environmental protection or employees' rights. With regards to the impact of the six firm characteristics and CSR disclosure, the present study finds a positive influence on firm size, government ownership, and performance and the CSR disclosure.

In contrast, debt, capital raised and audit firm size does not have any influence on the CSR disclosure. To the body of knowledge of CSR disclosure in developing countries, this study is contributing positively, particularly Saudi Arabia which is vital for producing the large quantity of the world's oil. The findings of the study might provide some insights to the Saudi authorities to enforce stricter policies to enhance CSR reporting.

The Saudi authorities should provide a guideline for firms and the public for giving the awareness related to the importance of CSR practices, particularly the environmental reporting as Saudi Arabia has a large oil industry which is known to be one of the most pollution producer industries. The scope of the CSR disclosure is only collected from the annual reports of 2016 for the 21 items of the index. Future studies could include more critical questions to the index that could extract more CSR information. Future studies can also use other sources of information and a more prolonged period.

Recommendations of The Impact of Firm Characteristics on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from Saudi PLCs

It is concluded that the authorities of Saudi Arabia must provide a particular guideline for the firms as well as to the public. The importance of CSR practices must be raised in society for reporting the betterment of the environment of Saudi Arabia.  Saudi Arabia is considered a rich country because of the production of oil in Saudi Arabia. The several another item can be included in the index of the study for extracting the more information related to the CSR. Many other sources of the data can also use as the future studies of the CSR disclosures.   

References of The Impact of Firm Characteristics on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from Saudi PLCs

Ali Al-Gamrh, R. A.-D. (2016). Disclosure, Firm Characteristics and Corporate Social ResponsibilityBakr. t International Business Management, 10(18), 4283-4291,.

Ali, W. F. (2017). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review. . Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, , 24(4),.

Alireza Nasiri, M. Z. (2018). The Effects of Firm Characteristics on Corporate SocialResponsibility Disclosure: Evidence from Palestine. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2222-2847.

Denis Cormier, M. M. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large Germancompanies: Economic incentives, public pressuresor institutional conditions? European Accounting Review,, 14(1), 3–39,.

Etxeberria, E. O.A. (2014). Financial Factors Influencing the Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management Disclosure: A Quantile Regression Approach. Corporate Socail resposiabilty and environmemntal mangment.

Farook, S. K. (2011). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: the case of Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research,, 2(2), 114–141.

Greener, S. (2008). Business Research Methods. Bookboon.

Hawani Wan Abd Rahman, N. M.H. (2011). CSR disclosures and its determinants: evidence from Malaysian government link companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 181–201.

Khan, H. (2010). The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting. International Journal of Law and Management, 52(2), 82–109.

Mohammad Badrul, M. a. (2015). Firm characteristics, board diversity and corporate socialresponsibility Evidence from Bangladesh. Pacific Accounting Review, 353-372.

Priyadarshanie W.A.N, L. G. (2016). THE EFFECT OF FIRM CHARACTERISTICS ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE IN SRI LANKAN BANKING SECTOR. Symposium of Accounting and Finance Researches .

Roshima Said, Y. H. (2009). The relationship between corporate socialresponsibility disclosure and corporategovernance characteristics in Malaysianpublic listed companies. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 5(2), 212-226,.

Saleh, M. Z. (2010). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership. Managerial Auditing Journal,, 25(6), 591–613.

SIRIWATPATARA, R. (2018). THE EFFECTS OF FIRM CHARACTERISTICS ON CORPORATESOCIAL RESPONSIBILITYACTIVITIES IN INDUSTRY SECTOR IN EASTERN OF THAILAND. ISERD International Conference.

W.A.N, G. L. (2016). THE EFFECT OF FIRM CHARACTERISTICS ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE IN SRI LANKAN BANKING SECTOR . Symposium of Accounting and Finance Researches.

Wang, M.-C. (2017). The Relationship between Firm Characteristics andthe Disclosure of Sustainability Reporting. sustainabilty, 9, 624.

Zulkifli, N. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership. . Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(6), , 591–613.

Appendices

Appendix 1

·         Firm profile and general information

The firms are operating in the countries are located as

Markets serving nature

On the several related information

The firms' activities scopes and size

impacts of the environmental and social indicators

·         Environmental information

The safety and quality of the product

To the ISO 14001 the main operating operations

Suppliers and transports environmental impacts

Consumption of the use of energy and electricity

resources of eth used materials

·         Employees information

diversification of the employees according to gender

employees lines of business distribution

employees training and education program

Policy statement for equal opportunity

pay awards and disable employees

·         Community information

The supported education program

supporting initiatives and projects for community

Scholarship program for the students' recruitment

supporting camping of government

Medical research and supporting program

 

Appendix 2

Independent Variables

Size

Performance

Government ownership

Raised Capital

Audit Firm size

Debt

       1,215,551

48.78%

47.79%

           729,847

0

           485,704

       2,257,068

-6.13%

5.00%

       1,095,417

0

       1,161,651

   322,455,422

14.13%

70.00%

   163,921,633

0

   158,533,789

     33,993,194

-6.21%

8.69%

       8,351,082

0

     25,642,112

       1,237,422

7.58%

15.89%

       1,216,901

0

             20,521

     19,764,530

4.39%

51.00%

     16,737,430

0

       3,027,100

       5,863,370

-7.53%

7.91%

       5,358,765

0

           504,605

     40,311,290

10.63%

35.00%

     13,908,046

0

     26,403,244

       2,730,733

-15.09%

9.17%

       2,028,883

0

           701,850

       2,418,230

-22.60%

7.69%

       1,631,730

0

           786,500

Appendix 3

·         Firm profile and general information

 

The firms are operating in the countries are located as

Markets serving nature

On the several related information

The firm's activities scopes and size

impacts of the environmental and social indicators

 

56

33

23

50

27

 

48

66

72

54

46

 

79

38

43

28

72

 

79

67

74

67

47

 

73

64

79

42

27

 

44

66

64

25

70

 

30

56

46

59

28

 

46

49

64

37

26

 

42

66

64

43

75

 

40

56

57

61

22

 

53.7

56.1

58.6

46.6

44

 

·         Environmental information

 

The safety and quality of the product

To the ISO 14001 the main operating operations

Suppliers and transports environmental impacts

Consumption of the use of energy and electricity

resources of eth used materials

 

42

79

61

21

51

 

50

65

30

20

70

 

71

40

29

56

33

 

37

75

35

63

80

 

31

45

62

34

75

 

37

53

64

48

28

 

63

31

73

66

67

 

33

53

73

35

39

 

43

52

65

64

71

 

70

52

70

71

79

 

47.7

54.5

56.2

47.8

59.3

 

·         Employees information

 

diversification of the employees according to gender

employees’ lines of business distribution

employees training and education program

Policy statement for equal opportunity

pay awards and disable employees

 

36

58

21

46

47

 

67

24

54

58

24

 

65

48

48

51

41

 

62

65

28

35

54

 

58

54

45

26

34

 

60

54

61

21

61

 

31

53

70

33

32

 

27

34

34

24

72

 

69

42

77

33

80

 

30

70

23

29

26

 

50.5

50.2

46.1

35.6

47.1

 

·         Community information

 

The supported education program

supporting initiatives and projects for community

Scholarship program for the student's recruitment

supporting camping of government

Medical research and supporting program

 

30

51

71

40

42

 

65

49

64

22

64

 

80

25

51

64

48

 

22

28

76

48

53

 

52

46

31

59

54

 

49

28

65

52

46

 

26

64

72

24

44

 

44

74

74

79

26

 

66

50

34

43

80

 

47

72

28

65

55

 

48.1

48.7

56.6

49.6

51.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix4

 

Summary

Number

Firm

Size

Performance

Government ownership

Raised Capital

Audit Firm size

1

SSP

       1,215,551

48.78%

47.79%

           729,847

                 -

2

CHEMANOL

       2,257,068

-6.13%

5.00%

       1,095,417

                 -

3

SABIC

   322,455,422

14.13%

70.00%

   163,921,633

                 -

4

TASNEE

     33,993,194

-6.21%

8.69%

       8,351,082

                 -

5

Alujain

       1,237,422

7.58%

15.89%

       1,216,901

                 -

6

YANSAB

     19,764,530

4.39%

51.00%

     16,737,430

                 -

7

Sahara

       5,863,370

-7.53%

7.91%

       5,358,765

                 -

8

Saudi Kayan

     40,311,290

10.63%

35.00%

     13,908,046

                 -

9

Najran Cement

       2,730,733

-15.09%

9.17%

       2,028,883

                 -

10

Jouf Cement

       2,418,230

-22.60%

7.69%

       1,631,730

                 -

Debt

CSR

 

485,704

44

 

1,161,651

51

 

158,533,789

51

 

25,642,112

55

 

20,521

50

 

3,027,100

50

 

504,605

48

 

26,403,244

47

 

701,850

58

 

786,500

51

 

 

 

Our Top Online Essay Writers.

Discuss your homework for free! Start chat

Top Rated Expert

ONLINE

Top Rated Expert

1869 Orders Completed

ECFX Market

ONLINE

Ecfx Market

63 Orders Completed

Assignments Hut

ONLINE

Assignments Hut

1428 Orders Completed