Form development of pharmaceutical dosage is the mix of science
and art with the aim of producing a dosage which is economical, stable,
patient-friendly, efficacious, and capable of delivering drug with minimal
negative effects to intended targets. In several cases, conventional forms of
administration of drug have been supplanted by advancement in delivery systems
of a novel drug. Pharmaceutical organizations are finding innovative forms of
dosage by the way of competent delivery systems since a strategic tool is
represented by them for expanding indications and markets, creating new
opportunities, and extending life cycles of products.
When it comes to the delivery of drugs to the body, the most
preferred and convenient route is oral administration. In spite of the immense
advancement in the delivery of drugs to present period from the 90s, the most
preferred route is oral to systemic circulation because of flexible
formulation, patient compliance, and cheap drug cost. The oral route is used
for administering almost ninety percent of overall drugs utilized for producing
systemic effects. Out of drugs which are orally administered, solid forms of
oral dosage represent the most preferable and convenient according to the
acceptance of patients.
In contemporary use, the most common kind of dosage in the form of
solid are tablets. They are classified on the basis of patterns of drug release,
i.e., modifier release and conventional instant release. The form of
pharmaceutical dosage is a tablet. It seems to comprise a combination of
excitements and active substances, normally in the form of power, consolidated
or compacted in solid dose from powder. Lubricants, glints, granulating
agents or binders, and diluent can be included in excitements for efficient
tab letting. Meanwhile, disintegrates are utilized for promoting break-up of
tablet in the digestive tract; pigments for making them attractive visually;
and flavors or sweeteners for enhancing the taste. Often, a polymer coating is
applied for making the tablet easier and smoother to swallow, for controlling
active ingredient’s release rate, for making it resistant to the surrounding
environment, or for enhancing the appearance of tablet [1]. Tablets with an
immediate release have several side-effects including release of an uncertain
drug. But specific sites are used for absorbing many drugs, and they need a
release at only that site for efficient absorption. Drug delivery with
sustained release and controlled release have been gaining a lot of attention
in the pharmaceutical field for achieving better therapeutic benefits like
simple and flexible formulation, patient compliance, and simplicity of dose
administration. It should be ensured that design of a DDS or drug delivery
system which is orally controlled is aimed at obtaining increased and
predictable drug bio availability. But the process of development is prevented
by various psychological factors like the inability of localizing and
restraining DDS within some specific areas of GI or gastrointestinal tract, and
variable nature of the process of gastric release. Actually, it can be predicted
that, according to the psychological state of patient and pharmaceutical
formulation design, the process of emptying can last to 12th from only a few
minutes. In turn, this variability might lead to times and unpredictable
bio availability for achieving peak levels of plasma, as most of the drugs are
absorbed in small intestine’s upper part. In addition, the transit time of
small intestine is a significant parameter for medicines which are absorbed
incompletely. Fundamental physiology of human with a description of motility
patterns, gastric emptying, and gastric emptying being influenced by
formulation variables are summarized. Retentive systems of gastropod can remain in
the region for a long time and prolong the time of drugs in terms of gastric
residence. Improvement in this retention promotes bio availability, decreases
waste of drugs, and enhances solubility for less soluble drugs in the environment
of high pH. Local delivery of drugs to small intestine and stomach are also
affected by it. In fact, Castro retention assists in providing availability of
innovative products, substantial benefits, and therapeutic possibilities for patients.
Gastric retention in the form of solid dosage might be obtained by processes of
modified shape, expansion, sedimentation, flotation, and adhesion due to
which gastric emptying is delayed. Classification of FADS or delivery system of
floating drug has been explained on the basis of these approaches [2].
DDS or Stomach
specific drug delivery systems
Actually, drugs which have less half-lives and are absorbed easily
from GIT or gastrointestinal tract are quickly eliminated from systemic
circulation. For achieving a stable therapeutic activity, frequent drug dosing
is required. For avoiding this limitation, production of oral
controlled-sustained release is an attempt for releasing drugs slowly in
gastrointestinal tract and maintaining an effective concentration of drug for a
long time in systemic circulation. Such delivery of drug after oral
administration would be kept in the stomach while releasing it in a controlled
manner. This way, drug can be continuously supplied to absorption sites. Hence,
a system should be designed, which enables longer residence, which will
increase the time within which absorption of drug can take place in the small
intestine. For formulating a site-specific dosage form which is orally
administered and release is controlled, it is significant to obtain a prolonged
residence duration by the DDS. Whereas DDS is a better system in which drug
retention is prolonged to several hours. Conventional SS DDS's quick
gastrointestinal transit can prevent the release of drug at the gastric region
and efficacy reduction of administered drugs as stomach absorbs most of the
drugs [5,6].
Benefits of DDS
● It is possible to enhance the bio availability of different
therapeutic bodes, particularly for the ones which are metabolized in the stomach
or upper GIT by this approach of DDS compared to administration of drug
delivery which doesn’t have a long duration of retention. In addition, there
are different factors associated with transit and absorption of drugs in GIT
which serve concomitantly for influencing drug absorption magnitude.
● Sustained-release, for drugs with a less half-life, might enable
reduced dosing frequency with better patient compliance, and product flip-flop
pharmaceutics.
● There is an advantage over conventional systems because it can be
utilized for overcoming the side-effects of GRT or gastric retention time and
GET or gastric-emptying time. They are predicted to be float on gastric fluid
without influencing intrinsic rate because their density in bulk is lower in
comparison with gastric fluids.
● SSDDS can sustain, prolong, and produce drug release forms which
seem to avail simple therapy in small intestine and stomach. Thus, they are
helpful in disorder treatment related to small intestine and stomach.
● Specific, slow delivery and controlled form of dosage offer
sufficient action at the site, and hence reduces the elimination of systemic
drug exposure. Undesirable side-effects are reduced by this SSDDS.
● The fluctuation of effects and drug concentrations are minimized
by dosage forms specific to the stomach. Thus, adverse effects dependent on
concentration which are related to peak concentrations can be easily presented.
For drugs with little therapeutic index, this feature is highly significant.
● This kind of drug delivery can also reduce the body counter
activity which leads to higher efficiency of a drug.
● Fluctuation reduction in the concentration of drug makes it
possible to achieve better selective activation of receptor.
● A sustained drug model from doses specific to stomach allow an increment
in time duration over a high or critical conception and hence improves both
chemical outcomes and pharmacological effects [7-9].
Drawbacks of SSDDS
● In the acidic environment, unstable drug substances are not
suitable elements to be integrated into systems.
● In addition, the drugs which are absorbed significantly as they
pass through gastrointestinal tract, which also undergo metabolism at first
pass, are the only useful candidates.
● In the stomach, a very high fluid level is required by these
systems for delivery of drug to float and efficiently work.
● This method is not suitable for all those drugs which have
stability or solubility issues in the gastrointestinal tract.
● All those drugs which resist gastric mucosa are not suitable and
also not desirable.
● It is significant to administer the form of dosage with water up
to 200-250 ml or a full glass.
● Significant advantages are not offered by these systems over
conventional forms of drug dosage which are absorbed as they pass through
gastrointestinal tract [10].
Anatomy of
small intestine and stomach associated with SSDDS [11,12]
There are three main parts in which GIT or gastrointestinal tract
can be separated:
● Small intestine – ileum, jejunum, and duodenum
● Large intestine
● Stomach
It can be said that gastrointestinal tract is a tube of almost 9m
that can extend from anus to mouth. And its function is all about eliminating
waste products and taking nutrients by physiological processes like excretion, motility,
secretion, absorption, and digestion. There are 3 layers of muscle in the
stomach referred to as oblique muscle and it is placed in the stomach’s
proximal part, branching over higher regions and funds of gastric body.
The stomach is separated into pylorus, body, and funds. Meanwhile,
the stomach is present in the portion of abdomen’s upper left hand. Storing the
food temporarily, grinding it, and releasing it gradually into the duodenum is
its main function.
Physiology of the
Stomach
[13]
It is a large part of the digestive tube between small intestine
and esophagus. The stomach, in its empty state, is contracted and subcompact
and mucous are thrown up into layers or folds, referred to as rugger. It is
covered by four important kinds of epithelial cells which extend into glands
and gastric pits.
1. G cells- which secrete
gastric.
2. Chief cells- which
secrete pepsin.
3. Parietal cells- which secrete
H Cl.
4. Mucous cells- alkaline
mucus is secreted by it.
Gastric empty rate and
gastric motility
There exist two unique patterns of gastrointestinal secretion and
motility to fed and fasted state. The bio availability of drugs which are orally
administered depends on the feeding state. Meanwhile, in the fasted state, an
inter-digestive group of electric events characterize it, referred to as
migrating motor or hydroelectric cycle complex. It is separated into four phases
including:
● Basal phase or phase I –it lasts to 60-40 min with uncommon
contractions.
● Preburust phase or phase II – it lasts to 60-40 min with
intermittent contractions and potential.
● Burst phase or phase III –it lasts to 6-4 min. Regular and intense
contraction takes place in this period for short periods. Because of these
contractions, undigested food is seemingly swept to intestine from stomach.
Housekeeper waves is the term which is used for it.
● Phase IV –It lasts to 5-0 min and it takes place between phases I
and III for almost 2 consecutive cycles. After a mixed meal is ingested, the
contraction pattern changes to fasted state from fed; these patterns decrease
the size of particles of food to less than 1 millimetre; and the nit is pushed
to pylorus in the form of suspension. During the state of fed, MM onset is
delayed which seems to result in a decrement of GER.
Different factors influencing
gastric retention [14-16]
Densities- it is significant for dosage form density to be less
than gastric content density (1.004g/ml).
Dosage Size- diameter of dosage form which is over 7.5mm has more
residence timing in comparison with the diameter of 9.9mm.
Shape –tetrahedron shape seems to reside in the stomach for a
longer time in comparison with other devices of the same size.
Multiple or single unit formulation- formulation of multiple unit
indicates a more predictable profile of release and insignificant impairing of
capability because of unit failure, enabling unit co-administration with
different profiles of release or containing unsuitable substances while
permitting a larger safety margin against the failure of dosage form in
comparison with dosage form of a single unit.
Unfed or fed state- GI motility, under different fasting
conditions, is characterized by periods of motor activity which takes place
every 2-1.5 hours. Undigested material is swept by MMC from the stomach and if
formulation timing coincides with the timing of MMC, the timing of unit can be
quite short but MMC, in the fast state, is delayed while the GRT is prolonged.
Meal nature- feeding of fatty acids or indigestible polymers can
change the pattern of motility to a fed state, hence drug release is prolonged
and GET is decreased.
Caloric content- Specifically, GRT can be raised by almost 10-4
times with meals which are high in fat and protein.
Frequency of feed- It is possible to increase GRT to even 400 min
when given successive meals as compared with an individual meal because of MMC
at low frequency.
Gender- The mean GRT in men is less in comparison with race and
age-matched counterparts in spite of body surface, weight, and height.
Age- Individuals with age over seventy have a longer GRT.
Administration of concomitant drug –GRT can be prolonged by
different anticholinergics like codeine and opiates.
List of drugs suitable in
formulating as SSDDS [17]
Generally, suitable candidates for dosage forms which are gastro
retentive are molecules which have an inefficient colonic absorption. They are
characterized by efficient absorption properties at GIT’s upper part.
•
Drugs which act locally.
e.g., drugs for Misoprostol, H. Pylroi viz., and antacids.
•
In the stomach, drugs which are absorbed primarily.
e.g., Amoxicillin
•
At alkaline pH, drugs which are soluble inefficiently.
e.g., Verapamil,
Diazepam, and Furosemideetc.
•
Those drugs which have a narrow absorption window.
e.g., Levodopa,
Methotrexate, and Cyclosporine among others.
•
Drugs which are rapidly absorbed from GIT.
e.g., Tetracycline and Metonidazole.
•
All drugs which degrade in colons.
e.g., Metformin HCl,
Ranitidine etc.
•
Drugs which seem to disturb colonic microbes.
e.g., different
antibiotics against pylori helicobacter.
Un-suitable drugs for
formulating as SSDDS [18]
Following are the unsuitable candidates:
•
All drugs which have little solubility.
Phenytoin is an example.
•
All those which are unstable in gastric environment.
Erythromycin is an
example.
•
All those drugs which are utilized for selective release in
colons.
e.g., corticosteroids
and 5- aminosalicylic acid are the examples.
SSDDS Marketed Products[19-23]
Sl.No.
|
Name of the product
|
Type of SSDDS
|
Drug in the dosage form
|
References
|
1
|
(PropalHBS) MadoparHBS
|
Benserazide, levodopa,
and floating capsule
|
Floating capsules of
CR
|
19
|
2
|
Valrelease
|
Diazepam and floating
capsule
|
Floating Capsules
|
20
|
3
|
Amalgate
Float Coat
|
Floating gel and Floating
antacid
|
Floating dosage forms
|
21
|
4
|
Topalkan
|
Magnesium, aluminum,
and floating antacid combination
|
Preparation of
effervescent floating liquid
|
22
|
5
|
Conviron
|
Ferrous sulphate
|
FDDS colloidal gel
forming
|
22
|
6
|
Cifran OD
|
Ciprofloxacine
|
Floating form of
gas generation
|
22
|
7
|
Cytotech
|
Misoprostol
|
Bilayer floating
capsules
|
23
|
8
|
Liquid
Gaviscone
|
Alginate mixture
|
Suppressing reflux of
gastro esophageal and alleviating heartburn
|
23
|
Classification of SSDDS [24-26]
A. Effervescent systems
•
Systems of gas generation
•
Systems containing volatile liquid
B. Non-effervescent systems:
•
Compartment
system
•
Microporous
or Delivery Device of Intragastric Floating Drug
•
Hollow
microballoons/microspheres
•
Alginate
beds
•
Barrier
system of colloidal gel
A. Effervescent Systems:
Actually, these matrix kinds of different systems are developed
with the assistance of swellable polymers like chitosan and methylcellulose,
and other effervescent compounds like citric acid, tartaric acid, and sodium
bicarbonate. They are developed in such a manner that when they come in contact
with gastric contents, carbon dioxide is liberated while gas is entrapped in
the form of swollen hydrocolloids which offer float properties to forms of
dosage.
•
Gas-generating Systems:
Effervescent reactions are utilized by these delivery systems
between bicarbonate/carbonate salts and tartaric/citric acid for liberating
carbon dioxide, which is trapped in the layer of hydrocolloid. Thus, its
specific gravity is decreased and the ability of floating is developed.
•
Volatile liquid
containing systems:
Actually, the GRT of a DDS can be controlled in integrating an
inflatable chamber containing liquid, which gasifies at the temperature of body
for causing chamber inflation in the stomach. The device might even have a bio-erodible
plug of Polyethylene and PVA among others which dissolve gradually and cause the
inflatable chamber to let go of gas while collapsing after a specific time for
permitting inflatable systems’ spontaneous ejection.
B. Non-effervescent
systems:
A swellable cellulose type or gelforming like polystyrene,
polymethacrylate, polycarbonate, polysaccharides, and hydrocolloids are
utilized by non-effervescent forms of floating dosage. The method of
formulation involves a simple procedure of mixing the gel-forming hydrocolloid
and drug. This dosage form, after oral administration, swells when it comes in
contact with different gastric fluids and < 1 of bulk density is attained. Buoyancy
is imparted by the swollen matrix to form of dosage by the air which is trapped
within swollen matrix. This structure serves as a reservoir and enables
sustained drug release through a gelatinous mass.
•
Systems of colloidal gel
barrier
HBSTM
or hydrodynamical balance system was designed first
by Tossounian and Sheth in 1975. Drugs are contained in such systems with
hydrocolloids which are meant to float on contents of the stomach. A high-level
gel-forming hydrocolloid is incorporated by this system likePolysacchrides,
NaCMC, HPMC, HEC and polymers which form matrix-like polystyrene, polyacylates,
and polycarbophil integrated either in capsules or tablets. On contacting
gastric fluid, hydrocolloid in systems forms and hydrates a gel barrier around
the surface of gel. Buoyancy is conferred by the air which is trapped by
swollen polymers maintaining a density which is less than one [24].
•
Alginate beads:
Multi-unit forms of floating dosage have been produced from
dried-freeze calcium alginate. And spherical beads of almost 2.5 mm in
roundness or diameter can be developed by dropping a solution of sodium
alginate into calcium chloride solution, causing it to be precipitated. Then,
the beads are separated, dried-freeze at -40 Celsius, and frozen in the liquid
nitrogen, leading the development of porous system, which is capable of
maintaining a floating cover for more than twelve hours.
•
Hollow microspheres:
Microballoons or hollow microspheres, consisting of ibuprofen in
outer shells were developed by a competent method of emulsion-solvent
diffusion. The drug solution of ethanol dichloromethane and enteric acrylic
polymer was seemingly poured into a PVA’s agitated solution which was
controlled thermally at 40 Celsius. Dispersed polymer droplets are generated in
the gas phase by dichloromethane evaporation in the internal cavities of
polymers with drugs. Over the surface of dissolution media, microballoons
consistently flow for over twelve hours [25].
•
Microporous/ Intragastriccompartment
system:
In the microporous compartment, the system which is composed of
drug reservoir is encapsulated with pores on the bottom and top surfaces. Reservoir
compartment’s peripheral walls were sealed for preventing contact of stomach
walls with the undissolved drug. Novel retentive form of levodopa gastro is
seemingly based on polymeric unfolding membranes which integrate high rigidity
with extended dimensions. It was folded into gelatin capsules. It was shown in
vitro studies that unfolded forms reached within fifteen minutes after precise
administration and it was confirmed in beagle drugs. For approximately two
hours, the unfolded form stayed. And it was concluded that this form of dosage
could optimize therapy of narrow window absorption. But there are chances of
polymeric films getting stuck in esophagus and becoming the cause of intense
discomfort to drug related wounds, and rigid dosage form’s repeated
administration might result in gastric obstructions [26].
Approaches to increase GRT
or gastric retention time in SSDDS
In the stomach, prolonged time of gastric retention could be
beneficial for local action in small intestine’s upper part e.g., peptic ulcer
treatment etc. Over past years, various gastroretentive or stomach specific
delivery approaches have been developed and designed which include:
a)
HBS or Hydrodynamically Balanced Systems
b) Systems with low-density
c)
Gas-generating systems
d) Systems which form raft
e)
Floating systems.
f)
Systems which are bioadhesive liposomal
g)
Ion Exchange Resins
h) Superporous Hydrogels
i)
Expanding and Swelling Systems
j)
Mucoadhesive or Bioadhesive systems
k) Systems with
high-density
a)
High-density systems
~3 g/cm3 as a density of systems is retained in stomach
rugae and can withstand its several peristaltic movements. With over 2.4–2.8
g/cm3 of threshold density, such systems can be simply retained in stomach’s
lower part. Meanwhile, sedimentation has been selected as a mechanism of
retention for pellets which are small enough for being retained in the folds or
rugae of stomach near the region of pyloric, which is an organ part with the lowest
position in a straight posture. Meanwhile, dense pellets entrapped in rugae(approximately
3g/cm3)tend toendure the peristaltic movements of walls of stomach. The transit
time of GI can be extended to 25 from 5.8 hours, depending less on pellet
diameter and more on density. Densities near threshold density appear to be
important for the extension of residence time. Some commonly utilized
excipients include iron powder, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, and barium
sulphate etc. Density is increased by 1.5–2.4g/cm3by these materials
[27-30].
b) Mucoadhesiveor BioadhesiveSystems
Mucoadhesion is a term which is utilized commonly for describing
an interaction between the layer of mucin which lines the bioadhesive polymer
and GIT. BDDS or bioadhesive drug delivery systems are utilized like a delivery
device for enhancing drug absorption in lumen in a spite-specific way. This
method includes a utilization of bioadhesive polymers, which can stick to the stomach
epithelial surface [31]. Hence, they increase the time of gastric retention. Bioadhesion
can be described through several concepts:
● Theory of absorptions which explains that it is because of either
hydrogen bonding or Vander Waal forces.
● Attractive electrostatic forces are proposed by the electron
theory between bioadhesive material and network of glycoprotein mucin.
● In addition, the wetting theory is based on the capability of
bioadhesive polymers of developing and spreading intimate contact with
different mucous layers, and finally, physical entanglement is proposed by
diffusion theory of polymer chains and mucin strands, or conversion of mucin
strands into polymer substrate’s porous structure.
● Physical entanglement is proposed by the diffusion theory of
polymer chains, mucin strands, or mucin strand interpretation into the polymer
substrate’s porous structure [32,33].
c) Expanding and Swelling
Systems
Expanding and swelling systems are forms of dosage that swell to a
certain extent which prevents their exit from pylorus. Consequently, a form of
dosage is retained for a long time in stomach. These systems might be referred
as systems of plug type since a tendency is exhibited by them to be logged at
pyloric sphincter. Controlled drug release and swelling might be achieved on the
contact of DDS with gastric fluid; water is imbibed by polymer and swells. The
presence of chemical-physical crosslinks results in swelling of polymer in the
network of hydrophilic polymer. Gastric retention is enabled by the bulk while
maintaining the stomach in a state of fed, reducing housekeeper waves. Swelling
hydrogels or medicated polymer sheets are examples of such DDS. A balance
between the extent and rate of swelling and erosion rate of polymer is
significant in achieving optimum benefits and avoiding negative impacts [34,35].
d) Super porous Hydrogels
It can be said that in this approach, for improving the GRT or
gastric retention time, super porous hydrogels of an average size of pore
larger than 100 micrometer, swell to the size of equilibrium within only a
minute because of quick water uptake by capillary wetting through various
interconnected pores. These pores are also open. To a large size, they swell
with ratio of swelling: hundred or more than hundred, and are intended to have
enough mechanical power for withstanding pressure of gastric contractions. Actually,
this is acquired by co-processing with croscarmellose sodium, which is a
hydrophilic particulate material. It is capable of creating a dispersed phase
within the consistent matrix of polymer during the process of synthesis. The
composites of superporous hydrogel seem to stay in the upper part of GIT for
more than a day. In the field, recent advancements have led to hybrids of
superporous hydrogel, which are developed with the addition of water or
hydrophilic dispersible polymer which can be cross-linked after the formation
of superporous hydrogel. Some examples of hybrid agents involve polysaccharides
like chitosan, pectin, and sodium alginate [36].
e) Ion-Exchange Resins
Generally, a coated ion bead formulation of ion exchange has been
determined to have different gastric retentive characteristics, which was
supplied with bicarbonates. Resins of ion exchange are loaded with bicarbonates
and a drug which is negatively charged is connected to the resin, then the
resultant beads were encapsulated in a specific semipermeable membrane for
overcoming the immediate reduction of carbon dioxide. Upon entering the acidic
stomach environment, exchange of bicarbonate and chloride ion occurred. Due to
it, carbon dioxide gas was released and was trapped in the layer or membrane,
thus carrying beads towards the surface of gastric content and developing a
layer of floating beads, in contrast with uncoated beads.
f) Bio adhesive Liposomal Systems
We can say that such systems are developed by polymer coating for
facilitating enteral absorption of drugs which are not absorbed properly.
Generally, liposomes are coated with different mucoadhesive polymers like
carboxymethylcithosan, carbocymethyl chitin, carbopol, and chitosan. When
mucoadhesion occurs in liposomes, it enhances the retention timing of dosage [37,38].
g) Floating Drug Delivery
Systems
FDDS is one of the most significant approaches utilized in
achieving gastric retention for obtaining efficient drug bioavailability. The
system of delivery is desirable for different drugs with a window of absorption
in the stomach or in small intestine’s upper part. These systems seem to have a
bulk density which is lower than that of fluids in the stomach and thus remain
floating in the stomach without influencing GET for a longer time. As the
system is floating on the surface, the release of drug takes place slowly at a
rate which is deemed suitable. It results in an increment in GRT along with
better control of overall fluctuations in the concentration of plasma drug [39].
Following are the most important requirements for an FDDS:
● A specific gravity which is lower than contents in stomach, should
be maintained by it (1.004 gm/cm3).
● A cohesive barrier of gel should be formed by it.
● Contents should be released slowly for serving as a reservoir or
source [40,41].
h) Raft forming systems
Systems of raft forming have gotten a lot of attention for drug
delivery for different gastrointestinal-associated disorders and infections. Floating
rafts have been utilized in treating GERD or gastroesophageal reflux disease. Actually,
the mechanism involved in the formation of raft involves the development of
cohesive viscous gel in a contact with gastric fluids, wherein each and every
portion of liquid seems to swell to form a consistent layer, referred to as a
raft. It floats on fluids of the stomach because it has a low density formed by
the development of carbon dioxide. Normally, ingredients of this system include
alkaline bicarbonates and gel-forming substances which are responsible for carbon
dioxide formation to make systems less dense and offer floating properties. A
floating system of antacid raft has been explained by Jorgen et al. A gel forming element is included
in this system of sodium bicarbonate and an acid neutralizer which creates a
raft or gel of foaming sodium alginate. When it comes in a contact with fluids
of stomach, it floats on these fluids while preventing the reflux of contents
of stomach into esophagus by serving as a barrier between esophagus and stomach
[42,43].
i)
(Effervescent) Gas Generating Systems
We can say that in this system, float ability can be acquired by
gas bubble generation. They are generated in such a manner that when in contact
with the acidic contents of stomach, carbon dioxide is liberated and it is
entrapped in hydro colloids, which offers floating properties to dosage. In nitro, the time of lag before unit
floats is less than one minute and floating is extended to 10-8 hours. Multiplayer
or bi layer systems have been created in which recipients and drugs can be
independently formulated, and unit for generating gas can be integrated into
any layer of MUS or multiple unit systems, which evades the emptying process of
all-or-nothing in systems of single unit [44].
j) Low Density Systems
Systems which generate gas seem to suffer from time of lag before
floating on the contents of stomach, during which the form of dosage might undergo
initial evacuation through the part of pyloric sphincter. Therefore, systems
with low density and immediate buoyancy have been produced. They are made up of
materials which have low-density and are capable of entrapping air or oil. Most
examples of MUS are micro balloons, floating pellets, emulate beads,
micro particles, and hollow beads [45].
k) HBC or Hydro dynamically balanced systems
Such systems are suited best for drugs with a better solubility in
an acidic environment and sites of absorption in the small intestine’s upper
part. For remaining in the stomach for a longer period of time, dosage forms
must have a density less than unity. And they have to stay in the stomach while
maintaining its structural integrity and releasing drug constantly from the
dosage. These systems are individual-unit dosage forms which contain a single
or more than one hydrophilic polymer which can form gel. In the development of
these systems, some commonly utilized recipients include clinical acid, agar,
polystyrene, polyacrylamide, polymorphic, Nacre or sodium carboxylic
cellulose, HP C or hydroponically cellulose, HE or hydrothermal cellulose, and
HP or hydroponically methyl cellulose[46,47]
SSDDS and market’s
industrial aspects.
SSDDS are capable of overcoming side-effects related to oral
delivery of drug by beating naturally-occurring physiological principles. Several
gastroretentive procedures have been created in the past, but some of them
achieved practical effectiveness. Disease states’ pharmacotherapy can be
amended by repurposing of drug through GRDDS. Furthermore, assessment of the
influence of fasted and fed condition on product performance must be carried
out during the initial phases of development. Technology of dual working will
be a possible way of overcoming side-effects related to GRDDS. Prior to the
development of product, principles of process and scaleup validation should be
considered for improving market availability and quality of SSDDS. Information
about regulatory aspects will be helpful in delivering a product to markets in
a cost-efficient way and short-time.
Influence of BaSO4 on floating
Barium sulfate is utilized by x-ray imaging as an implemented
contrast material of X-ray for diagnostic or imaging purposes because of its
mass attenuation coefficient. Barium sulfate is actually a yellowish to white
powder having specifications of low solubility, high specific gravity, opacity,
and inertness. It is utilized only rectally or orally. This element is not metabolized
or absorbed in physiological conditions and is seemingly erected through feces
in an unchanged form. Visualization is improved by barium sulfate on images of
X-ray, as barium sulfate’s X-ray attenuation offers an eligible contrast in
imaging of CT [48].