Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Appraising the secretaries at sweetwater u case study ppt

13/11/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Appraising The Secretaries At Sweetwater U

Review attached Appraising the Secretaries at Sweetwater U case

Review the three questions at the end of the case. Think about how you might answer those questions. Now, answer these questions:

· Do you think that the experts ‘recommendations will be sufficient to get most of the administrators to fill out the rating forms properly? Why? Why not? What additional actions (if any) do you think will be necessary?

· Do you think that Vice President Winchester would be better off dropping graphic rating forms, substituting instead one of the other techniques we discussed in this chapter, such as a ranking method? Why?

· What performance appraisal system would you develop for the secretaries if you were Rob Winchester? Defend your answer.

Answer each question fully, and include relevant citations to your textbook or other articles, the lecture, or online research. Be sure to use no more than 25% copy and paste. Include your own opinions, thoughts, examples, and experiences as support for your ideas, as well.

Appraising the Secretaries at Sweetwater U

Rob Winchester, newly appointed vice president for administrative affairs at Sweetwater State University, faced a tough problem shortly after his university career began. Three weeks after he came on board in September, Sweetwater’s president, Rob’s boss, told Rob that one of his first tasks was to improve the appraisal system used to evaluate secretarial and clerical performance at Sweetwater U. The main difficulty was that the performance appraisal was traditionally tied directly to salary increases given at the end of the year. Therefore, most administrators were less than accurate when they used the graphic rating forms that were the basis of the clerical staff evaluation. In fact, what usually happened was that each administrator simply rated his or her clerk or secretary as “excellent.” This cleared the way for them to receive a maximum pay raise every year.

But the current university budget simply did not include enough money to fund another “maximum” annual raise for every staffer. Furthermore, Sweetwater’s president felt that the custom of providing invalid feedback to each secretary on his or her year’s performance was not productive, so he had asked the new vice president to revise the system. In October, Rob sent a memo to all administrators, telling them that in the future no more than half the secretaries reporting to any particular administrator could be appraised as “excellent.” This move, in effect, forced each supervisor to begin ranking his or her secretaries for quality of performance. The vice president’s memo met widespread resistance immediately—from administrators, who were afraid that many of their secretaries would begin leaving for more lucrative jobs, and from secretaries, who felt that the new system was unfair and reduced each secretary’s chance of receiving a maximum salary increase. A handful of secretaries had begun picketing outside the president’s home on the university campus. The picketing, caustic remarks by disgruntled administrators, and rumors of an impending slowdown by the secretaries (there were about 250 on campus) made Rob Winchester wonder whether he had made the right decision by setting up forced ranking. He knew, however, that there were a few performance appraisal experts in the School of Business, so he decided to set up an appointment with them to discuss the matter.

He met with them the next morning. He explained the situation as he had found it: The current appraisal system had been set up when the university first opened 10 years earlier. A committee of secretaries had developed it. Under that system, Sweetwater’s administrators filled out forms similar to the one shown in Table 9-2 . This once-a-year appraisal (in March) had run into problems almost immediately, since it was apparent from the start that administrators varied widely in their interpretations of job standards, as well as in how conscientiously they filled out the forms and supervised their secretaries. Moreover, at the end of the first year it became obvious to everyone that each secretary’s salary increase was tied directly to the March appraisal. For example, those rated “excellent” received the maximum increases, those rated “good” received smaller increases, and those given neither rating received only the standard across-the-board cost-of-living increase. Since universities in general—and Sweetwater, in particular—have paid secretaries somewhat lower salaries than those prevailing in private industry, some secretaries left in a huff that first year. From that time on, most administrators simply rated all secretaries excellent in order to reduce staff turnover, thus ensuring each a maximum increase. In the process, they also avoided the hard feelings aroused by the significant performance differences otherwise highlighted by administrators.

Two Sweetwater experts agreed to consider the problem, and in 2 weeks they came back to the vice president with the following recommendations. First, the form used to rate the secretaries was grossly insufficient. It was unclear what “excellent” or “quality of work” meant, for example. They recommended instead a form like that in Figure 9-4 . In addition, they recommended that the vice president rescind his earlier memo and no longer attempt to force university administrators to arbitrarily rate at least half their secretaries as something less than excellent. The two consultants pointed out that this was unfair, since it was quite possible that any particular administrator might have staffers who were all or virtually all excellent—or conceivably, although less likely, all below standard. The experts said that the way to get all the administrators to take the appraisal process more seriously was to stop tying it to salary increases. In other words, they recommended that every administrator fill out a form as in Figure 9-4 for each secretary at least once a year and then use this form as the basis of a counseling session. Salary increases would have to be made on some basis other than the performance appraisal, so that administrators would no longer hesitate to fill out the rating forms honestly.

Rob thanked the two experts and went back to his office to ponder their recommendations. Some of the recommendations (such as substituting the new rating form for the old) seemed to make sense. Nevertheless, he still had serious doubts as to the efficacy of any graphic rating form, particularly compared with his original, preferred forced ranking approach. The experts’ second recommendation—to stop tying the appraisals to automatic salary increases—made sense but raised at least one very practical problem: If salary increases were not to be based on performance appraisals, on what were they to be based? He began wondering whether the experts’ recommendations weren’t simply based on ivory tower theorizing.

Questions

· 9-34. Do you think that the experts’ recommendations will be sufficient to get most of the administrators to fill out the rating forms properly? Why? Why not? What additional actions (if any) do you think will be necessary?

· 9-35. Do you think that Vice President Winchester would be better off dropping graphic rating forms, substituting instead one of the other techniques we discussed in this chapter, such as a ranking method? Why?

· 9-36. What performance appraisal system would you develop for the secretaries if you were Rob Winchester? Defend your answer.

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

ECFX Market
Chartered Accountant
Engineering Solutions
Top Essay Tutor
Top Rated Expert
Math Exam Success
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
ECFX Market

ONLINE

ECFX Market

I am an academic and research writer with having an MBA degree in business and finance. I have written many business reports on several topics and am well aware of all academic referencing styles.

$35 Chat With Writer
Chartered Accountant

ONLINE

Chartered Accountant

I have done dissertations, thesis, reports related to these topics, and I cover all the CHAPTERS accordingly and provide proper updates on the project.

$38 Chat With Writer
Engineering Solutions

ONLINE

Engineering Solutions

I am an elite class writer with more than 6 years of experience as an academic writer. I will provide you the 100 percent original and plagiarism-free content.

$25 Chat With Writer
Top Essay Tutor

ONLINE

Top Essay Tutor

I will provide you with the well organized and well research papers from different primary and secondary sources will write the content that will support your points.

$34 Chat With Writer
Top Rated Expert

ONLINE

Top Rated Expert

I have read your project details and I can provide you QUALITY WORK within your given timeline and budget.

$25 Chat With Writer
Math Exam Success

ONLINE

Math Exam Success

I will provide you with the well organized and well research papers from different primary and secondary sources will write the content that will support your points.

$41 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Philosophy101 - Myitlab answers excel chapter 2 - Chess math is fun - Internal factors affecting seed germination - 4.05 the great depression - Bitcoin Economics - Partnerships are quasi-taxable organizations. this means that they - Earned value management case study - Murder rhetorically speaking - Mims online fed uni - Property management system interface - Percentage of acetic acid in vinegar by titration - Global project - Wyatt vs stickney - Hostess seating rotation chart - Revised Project Proposal - Australian guide to healthy eating background - Crime scene that is the original location of a crime - The jessica banks case - 8 parts of speech song - Nucleophilic addition reaction of grignard reagent - Fiata terms and conditions - Leadership Theory Analysis paper - Why doesn't atticus help carry out maudie's furniture - China open door policy - Loss minimization in insurance - Boy's life by howard korder script - Discipline and punishment difference - J&l railroad case study solution - Reflection Course (Due 24 Hours) - Dyadic therapy definition - Oak creek furniture factory a custom furniture - Regis university email server - Waiting for godot script - Bsbmgt616 develop and implement strategic plans assessment 1 - My very own room lesson plan - Cisco network services orchestrator - Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation - Sally macdonald fox 26 houston age - Jlg analyzer level 1 code - Blissful breeze manufactures and sells ceiling fans - The book thief bombing of himmel street quotes - Grace lutheran college rothwell campus - Proposed Recommended Order - MAT 510 Week 2 - Week2 dis eco - Sound audio manufactures and sells audio equipment - 123 bus timetable cairns - WAS THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION A PUBLIC HEALTH DISASTER OR BOON?" DISCUSS - Alternative assessment - Essay - Marketing Plan - Cashflow statement - Is modern culture ruining childhood essay - Crow lake by mary lawson summary - HELP - Sex tablet beximco pharma - 14 email etiquette rules every professional should know - Consider some of the main areas that have once been the topic of scrutiny and viewed as abnormal but - The ugly duckling lesson - Tavani ethics and technology pdf - Stata working with dates - Genetically handed down crossword clue - Consumer behavior a strategic approach - Run length encoding ppt - MIS WK 6 PPT. - What is an agile mis infrastructure - Articulate the PR-Asian Ideologies (Plagiarism Checked) Submit Assignment - Successful Domestic Company Goes Global! - Archies cab in bayonne nj - Excel module 4 sam exam - Practical connection assignment - Legal Reg, Compliance, Invest (ISOL-633-M40) - Full Term - Discussion - Gerd soap note - Genazzano fcj college fees - Lagrange error bound proof - If you had one shot or one opportunity - Discussion question, 150 words, APA style,at least two recent reference citations(2019-2020) - Grafton district golf club - Growth pole theory in regional planning ppt - 24 slot single phase motor winding diagram - Human Resource Mang. (for tutorjass) - Bank management printers inc produces luxury checkbooks - Homes4u vale of glamorgan - Http www personalitypage com intj html - Discovering physical geography pdf - Identify the sentence that contains a noun clause in italics - Nestle chocolate factory locations - The pediatrician described jason's pharynx - Size 55 swarovski ring - Question to be answered - Unit 8 Journal - Week 7 - Hand over hand assistance - Support independence and wellbeing in aged care - Astronomy alive bentleigh vic - What have you learned from this assignment - Wall street movie blue star - A financial advisor has recommended two possible - The best christmas pageant ever chapter 2