Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Appraising the secretaries at sweetwater u case study ppt

13/11/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Appraising The Secretaries At Sweetwater U

Review attached Appraising the Secretaries at Sweetwater U case

Review the three questions at the end of the case. Think about how you might answer those questions. Now, answer these questions:

· Do you think that the experts ‘recommendations will be sufficient to get most of the administrators to fill out the rating forms properly? Why? Why not? What additional actions (if any) do you think will be necessary?

· Do you think that Vice President Winchester would be better off dropping graphic rating forms, substituting instead one of the other techniques we discussed in this chapter, such as a ranking method? Why?

· What performance appraisal system would you develop for the secretaries if you were Rob Winchester? Defend your answer.

Answer each question fully, and include relevant citations to your textbook or other articles, the lecture, or online research. Be sure to use no more than 25% copy and paste. Include your own opinions, thoughts, examples, and experiences as support for your ideas, as well.

Appraising the Secretaries at Sweetwater U

Rob Winchester, newly appointed vice president for administrative affairs at Sweetwater State University, faced a tough problem shortly after his university career began. Three weeks after he came on board in September, Sweetwater’s president, Rob’s boss, told Rob that one of his first tasks was to improve the appraisal system used to evaluate secretarial and clerical performance at Sweetwater U. The main difficulty was that the performance appraisal was traditionally tied directly to salary increases given at the end of the year. Therefore, most administrators were less than accurate when they used the graphic rating forms that were the basis of the clerical staff evaluation. In fact, what usually happened was that each administrator simply rated his or her clerk or secretary as “excellent.” This cleared the way for them to receive a maximum pay raise every year.

But the current university budget simply did not include enough money to fund another “maximum” annual raise for every staffer. Furthermore, Sweetwater’s president felt that the custom of providing invalid feedback to each secretary on his or her year’s performance was not productive, so he had asked the new vice president to revise the system. In October, Rob sent a memo to all administrators, telling them that in the future no more than half the secretaries reporting to any particular administrator could be appraised as “excellent.” This move, in effect, forced each supervisor to begin ranking his or her secretaries for quality of performance. The vice president’s memo met widespread resistance immediately—from administrators, who were afraid that many of their secretaries would begin leaving for more lucrative jobs, and from secretaries, who felt that the new system was unfair and reduced each secretary’s chance of receiving a maximum salary increase. A handful of secretaries had begun picketing outside the president’s home on the university campus. The picketing, caustic remarks by disgruntled administrators, and rumors of an impending slowdown by the secretaries (there were about 250 on campus) made Rob Winchester wonder whether he had made the right decision by setting up forced ranking. He knew, however, that there were a few performance appraisal experts in the School of Business, so he decided to set up an appointment with them to discuss the matter.

He met with them the next morning. He explained the situation as he had found it: The current appraisal system had been set up when the university first opened 10 years earlier. A committee of secretaries had developed it. Under that system, Sweetwater’s administrators filled out forms similar to the one shown in Table 9-2 . This once-a-year appraisal (in March) had run into problems almost immediately, since it was apparent from the start that administrators varied widely in their interpretations of job standards, as well as in how conscientiously they filled out the forms and supervised their secretaries. Moreover, at the end of the first year it became obvious to everyone that each secretary’s salary increase was tied directly to the March appraisal. For example, those rated “excellent” received the maximum increases, those rated “good” received smaller increases, and those given neither rating received only the standard across-the-board cost-of-living increase. Since universities in general—and Sweetwater, in particular—have paid secretaries somewhat lower salaries than those prevailing in private industry, some secretaries left in a huff that first year. From that time on, most administrators simply rated all secretaries excellent in order to reduce staff turnover, thus ensuring each a maximum increase. In the process, they also avoided the hard feelings aroused by the significant performance differences otherwise highlighted by administrators.

Two Sweetwater experts agreed to consider the problem, and in 2 weeks they came back to the vice president with the following recommendations. First, the form used to rate the secretaries was grossly insufficient. It was unclear what “excellent” or “quality of work” meant, for example. They recommended instead a form like that in Figure 9-4 . In addition, they recommended that the vice president rescind his earlier memo and no longer attempt to force university administrators to arbitrarily rate at least half their secretaries as something less than excellent. The two consultants pointed out that this was unfair, since it was quite possible that any particular administrator might have staffers who were all or virtually all excellent—or conceivably, although less likely, all below standard. The experts said that the way to get all the administrators to take the appraisal process more seriously was to stop tying it to salary increases. In other words, they recommended that every administrator fill out a form as in Figure 9-4 for each secretary at least once a year and then use this form as the basis of a counseling session. Salary increases would have to be made on some basis other than the performance appraisal, so that administrators would no longer hesitate to fill out the rating forms honestly.

Rob thanked the two experts and went back to his office to ponder their recommendations. Some of the recommendations (such as substituting the new rating form for the old) seemed to make sense. Nevertheless, he still had serious doubts as to the efficacy of any graphic rating form, particularly compared with his original, preferred forced ranking approach. The experts’ second recommendation—to stop tying the appraisals to automatic salary increases—made sense but raised at least one very practical problem: If salary increases were not to be based on performance appraisals, on what were they to be based? He began wondering whether the experts’ recommendations weren’t simply based on ivory tower theorizing.

Questions

· 9-34. Do you think that the experts’ recommendations will be sufficient to get most of the administrators to fill out the rating forms properly? Why? Why not? What additional actions (if any) do you think will be necessary?

· 9-35. Do you think that Vice President Winchester would be better off dropping graphic rating forms, substituting instead one of the other techniques we discussed in this chapter, such as a ranking method? Why?

· 9-36. What performance appraisal system would you develop for the secretaries if you were Rob Winchester? Defend your answer.

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

ECFX Market
Chartered Accountant
Engineering Solutions
Top Essay Tutor
Top Rated Expert
Math Exam Success
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
ECFX Market

ONLINE

ECFX Market

I am an academic and research writer with having an MBA degree in business and finance. I have written many business reports on several topics and am well aware of all academic referencing styles.

$35 Chat With Writer
Chartered Accountant

ONLINE

Chartered Accountant

I have done dissertations, thesis, reports related to these topics, and I cover all the CHAPTERS accordingly and provide proper updates on the project.

$38 Chat With Writer
Engineering Solutions

ONLINE

Engineering Solutions

I am an elite class writer with more than 6 years of experience as an academic writer. I will provide you the 100 percent original and plagiarism-free content.

$25 Chat With Writer
Top Essay Tutor

ONLINE

Top Essay Tutor

I will provide you with the well organized and well research papers from different primary and secondary sources will write the content that will support your points.

$34 Chat With Writer
Top Rated Expert

ONLINE

Top Rated Expert

I have read your project details and I can provide you QUALITY WORK within your given timeline and budget.

$25 Chat With Writer
Math Exam Success

ONLINE

Math Exam Success

I will provide you with the well organized and well research papers from different primary and secondary sources will write the content that will support your points.

$41 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Which of the following calculations multiplies 23 by 0.01 - Spiritual meaning of geshem - Explain town matrix and portfolio matrix - "A" WORK DISCUSSION IN 18 HOURS - Health sciences library mcmaster university - Wk 10 - Salesperson java application part i - MIS437 - MC Wk2 - Victor g feros town planning consultants - Dr ann yoong mercy hospital - Navy equal opportunity program manual assignment 1 - Assignment - Textbook of ayurveda pdf - A case of medication error by brahmadeo dewprashad - WEEK VI PT2 - What is great bath - Chcdiv001 scenarios answers - 85.2 kg to lbs - MKTG201 Week 7 Quiz SCORE 100 PERCENT - Week 7 acct - Agassi company uses a job order cost system - Purnell and paulanka model of cultural competence - Strategic Planning & Implementation - Advantages of outsourcing project work may likely include all of the following except - Greenfield strategy advantages and disadvantages - Think critically facione 2016 pdf - What is chocolate rain about - Cultural diversity - Organise and complete daily work activities resources - Theories of punishment - Ingrid jonker poem by sally bryer - Where are the most active nonmetals located - Bescom org online payment - 8 2 2 project 3 multimedia presentation submission - Netflix leading with data the emergence of data driven video - Rina consulting d appolonia - Psychiatric notes - National dish in italy - Project - Jaycar in line switch - The tiny seed sequencing activity - Discussion - Ultrasonic testing procedure ppt - Fm 2 0 intelligence operations - Nursing progress notes cheat sheet - Rasmussen accounting - Scott v coulson 1903 - Research paper 5 pages minimum - In the word claustrophobic phob is the - Razor over comb definition - Words to santa lucia - Organization leadership - Integrated waveguide technologies mini case - How to calculate weight of debt from balance sheet - Ncle perm internet banking - Aviation security identity card - Literature evaluation table gcu - Which of the following conditions distinguishes monopolistic competition from perfect competition? - Pseudotsuga menziesii glauca pendula - Flowchart improvement process - Home work Assignment - Wk 3 - Effective Advertising Campaign Paper - Substitution reaction of cyclohexane and bromine - Advanced Ergonomics - Astrononmy - Ashford university early childhood education courses - Size 4 us baby shoes age - Essay Questions - 10 slide - Aligning Enterprise risk management: the bank of tokyo approach - Precis-and-Annotated-Bib - What is simple staining used for - Sex space and social history - Calculate quick burger's free cash flow in - Class 2 lever examples - Insurance company database design - Integrated rural development theory - MBA - Main - Activity 3 - Module 2 discussion - Cognitive Biases - Proozy sustainability - How to run a one way anova in spss - Keune tinta color chart - Cab ta uk datasheet - A vertical frictionless piston cylinder device - Emirates case study marketing management - Complete the sentences using the words provided - Convert infix to postfix using stack in java - Food web for yellowstone national park - Camino por el hospital. camino por los pasillos del hospital. camino en dirección al hospital. - Words with letters micer - Test for carbohydrates lab report conclusion - Brivo acs onsite login - What is cisco cws - Love advice tv accountability letter - Makerere university e learning - Looking at movies 4th edition chapter 1 - Dicussion #2 - Curved mirrors and the law of reflection worksheet answers - Instrumentation amplifier lab experiment