In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:
- Summarize the key points of both experiential family therapy and narrative family therapy.
- Compare experiential family therapy to narrative family therapy, noting the strengths and weakness of each.
- Provide a description of a family that you think experiential family therapy would be appropriate, explain why, and justify your response using the Learning Resources.
- Note: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references.
Part 2: Family Genogram
Develop a genogram for the client family you selected. The genogram should extend back at least three generations (parents, grandparents, and great grandparents).
Rubric:
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.--
Excellent (90-100) 27 (27%) - 30 (30%)Good (80-89) 24 (24%) - 26 (26%)Fair (70-79) 21 (21%) - 23 (23%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) - 20 (20%)
Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.--
Excellent (90-100) 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Good (80-89) 4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Fair (70-79) 3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student's ability to:
Understand and interpret the assignment's key concepts.--
Excellent (90-100) 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)Good (80-89) 8 (8%) - 8 (8%)Fair (70-79) 7 (7%) - 7 (7%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student's ability to:
Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.--
Excellent (90-100) 18 (18%) - 20 (20%)Good (80-89) 16 (16%) - 17 (17%)Fair (70-79) 14 (14%) - 15 (15%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student's ability to:
Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.--
Excellent (90-100) 18 (18%) - 20 (20%)Good (80-89) 16 (16%) - 17 (17%)Fair (70-79) 14 (14%) - 15 (15%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.--
Excellent (90-100) 8 (8%) - 8 (8%)Good (80-89) 7 (7%) - 7 (7%)Fair (70-79) 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) - 5 (5%)
Written Expression and Formatting
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation--
Excellent (90-100) 7 (7%) - 7 (7%)Good (80-89) 6 (6%) - 6 (6%)Fair (70-79) 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) - 4 (4%)