Avocado and artichoke view of human nature

The Artichoke Version

Instructions

The Artichoke Version of the Self
Write a 2–3-page paper explaining the artichoke idea of the self. Remember to explain specific theories with supporting citations from the textbook and online lectures. (Here is a guide to help you with APA-style citations.)

As you develop your response, you might find some of the following questions to be relevant:

What is the existential idea of the self?
What do you make of the feminist, existential, and non-Western critiques of/alternatives to the essentialist/avocado self? Are there any problems with the idea that human beings are fundamentally rational creatures?

Rubric Assessment

Top of Form

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria

No Submission

0 points

0 %

Emerging (F through D range) (1–6)

6 points

6 %

Satisfactory (C range) (7)

7 points

7 %

Proficient (B range) (8)

8 points

8 %

Exemplary (A range) (9–10)

10 points

10 %

Explained the artichoke version of the self

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Shows little or no understanding of assignment concepts

Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment concepts with some inability to fully articulate them

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply most assignments concepts

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts

/ 10

/ 10

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Explained the basic ideas of existentialism

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Shows little or no understanding of assignment concepts

Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment concepts with some inability to fully articulate them

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply most assignments concepts

Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts

/ 10

/ 10

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Discussed some of the problems with the avocado idea of the self

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Work does not meet assignment expectations; no clear purpose is provided

Assignment meets expectations with minimal depth and breath; the discussion of main ideas is vague

Assignment meets expectations with most components being addressed in good depth and breadth; the purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment

Assignment meets or exceeds expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breath; a comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment

/ 10

/ 10

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Substantiated content with the course texts

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Work is not substantiated by sources or sources supplied do not have credibility

Summarizes information gleaned from the course texts to support major points, but does not synthesize; provides minimal justification to support major topics

Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from the course texts to support major points presented

Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from the course texts to support major points presented

/ 10

/ 10

*

Criterion score has been overridden

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria

No Submission

0 points

0 %

Emerging (F through D range) (1–2)

2 points

2 %

Satisfactory (C range) (3)

3 points

3 %

Proficient (B range) (4)

4 points

4 %

Exemplary (A range) (5)

5 points

5 %

Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

Errors in basic writing conventions are sufficiently numerous to prevent reader comprehension

Submission contains incoherent or inconsistent presentation of ideas, which prevents understanding the majority of author’s overall intent

The reader can follow the author’s overall intent as stated; there may be errors in basic writing conventions but these do not interfere with reader comprehension

The writer’s overall argument and language are clear and focused, leaving the reader with no confusion about author’s intent; the text is basically error free

/ 5

/ 5

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Used APA formatted citations and references, and used correct structural formatting

Add Feedback

Student did not submit assignment

No attempt at Academic/APA formatting

Academic/APA format is attempted but errors are distracting

Using Academic/APA format, accurately; errors are noticeable but minor

Using Academic/APA format proficiently; text is basically error free

/ 5

/ 5

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Rubric Total Score Total Total Score

Clear Override

/ 50

/ 50

*

Criterion score has been overridden

Overall Score

Overall Score

No Submission0 points minimum

Clear Override

Emerging (F through D range)1 point minimum

Clear Override

Satisfactory (C range)35 points minimum

Clear Override

Proficient (B range)40 points minimum

Clear Override

Exemplary (A range)45 points minimum

Clear Override

Overall Feedback

Close

Bottom of Form

[{'c_rubricpreview

[{'3':['grid','page

gUHKFSM3XhvZl

76367882715721