Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Balogun and hope hailey's change model

06/12/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Business Management

You are required to produce an analytical paper of c2,500 words (up to 3,000 words), based on the Ascension plc case study and the 3 questions on the next page. Your paper should demonstrate your ability to apply a range of strategic change models to gain constructive insight about the change process within the technical engineering division (TED).

The case study: The case study is on weblearn and is 3 pages long. You must base your analysis on the case study; you are NOT required to do any additional research on the organisation or industry. The questions, the assessment criteria, report structure and some suggested reading can be found on the next two pages of this briefing.

Use of tables: For each question you must apply one or more change models (as per the questions on the next page). You must create a table or diagram containing each element of the model and populate it with data from the case study using bullet points. The information in tables, diagrams or the end reference section will not be included in the word count. There are marks awarded for “application of key models using relevant data from the case”.

Discussion of table content: It is not enough to just populate the tables. For each model you must also discuss your findings (in full sentences after the table). Do not mention everything in the table. Tell the reader what the most important factors are based on your analysis. You can use the prompt notes in the questions to help e.g. to focus your discussion on the most challenging aspects of the change context for question 1. There are marks for “Discussion of findings demonstrates depth of understanding of the case and the theory and some originality in thinking.” So, if you just have the table and no discussion or discussion but no table then you will lose valuable marks.

Evidence of academic reading: for every question you must demonstrate some academic reading about the model you are using (academic text books or academic journal articles rather than internet sources). However, you should not describe the models in detail e.g. you don’t need to explain what Johnson means by ‘stories’ or ‘symbols’; it will be clear from your analysis that you understand this. You should reference your academic reading using the Harvard system (at least four different academic sources). An example could be to use the core text book and find a quote where the authors explain the purpose of the change kaleidoscope. Books and articles that will help with this are listed on the page 3 of this briefing. There are marks awarded for “evidence of academic reading. At least four different academic sources cited” so you will lose marks if you don’t do this. You must use in-text references (in the main body of your report) and an end reference list. You will lose valuable marks if you simply list four different books at the end of your paper.

Conclusions: Marks are awarded for“evidence of critical reflection on the theory and the case”. The conclusion section (see ‘paper structure’ on next page) provides a good opportunity to reflect on the main points from each of the three questions and to reflect on how well the change was managed and the usefulness of the models e.g. any strengths or limitations.

Questions

1) Apply Balogun and Hope Hailey’s Change Kaleidoscope model and Lewin’s Forcefield Analysis to the case and use this to discuss the strategic change context in December 2012, at the start of the change process.

Note: you should discuss what the most challenging aspects of the change context were and what were the most enabling or helpful aspects.

2) Apply Johnson’s Cultural Web model to the case and use this to compare and contrast the culture of TED before the change (2012) and after the change (2014). You must create a table so you can apply the web once for 2012 and once for 2014.

Note: you should discuss the most significant similarities and differences between 2012 and 2014 and how the cultural changes were achieved.

3) Critically evaluate the change process that took place at TED during 2013-14 by applying Kotter’s 8 Change Steps model.

Note: you should discuss what seemed to work well or not so well, did the process follow Kotter’s change steps or was there something more they might have done to ensure the success of the change?

Paper Structure: the paper should include,

Cover sheet - showing your student ID and the name of your class tutor

Contents page

1.0 Introduction – briefly introduce the purpose of your report (100 to 200 words)

2.0 Case Study Analysis – 3 sub-sections, one for each of the 3 main questions

(approx. 700 words per question plus any diagrams or tables)

3.0 Conclusions – summarise the main points from section 2.0 (approx. 300 words).

4.0 References – there should be at least four different academic references from text books and academic journal articles

Assessment Criteria
Criteria

Report Presentation: follows recommended structure. Logical and persuasive writing style. Well presented with good grammar and spelling. Harvard referencing style throughout. Submitted on time.

Case Study Answers: all questions answered fully. Application of key models using relevant data from the case. Discussion of findings demonstrates depth of understanding of the case and the theory and some originality in thinking. Evidence of critical reflection on the theory and the case.

Scholarship: evidence of academic reading. At least four different academic sources cited.

Recommended academic sources

ALL THE MODELS REFERRED TO IN THE QUESTIONS CAN BE FOUND IN:

Johnson, G. Whittington, R. and Scholes, K. Angwin, D. and Regner, P. (2013) Exploring Strategy, Edition 10, Pearson and in session 18, 19 and 20 of the module. However, Kotter’s Change Steps is not listed in full in the book so a better source for that is:

Kotter, J. (1995) 'Leading Change: Why Transformation efforts fail' Harvard Business Review, March-April 96 Vol. 73(2) pp.59-67 (available online through the library catalogue)

Some further suggested sources of academic reading include:

Hailey, V. H., & Balogun, J. (2002). Devising Context Sensitive Approaches To Change: The Example of Glaxo Wellcome. Long Range Planning, 35(2), 153-178. (further reading on the change kaleidoscope - available online through the library catalogue)

Balogun, J. and Hope Hailey, V. (2009) Exploring Strategic Change, 3rd edition, Prentice Hall (further reading on the change kaleidoscope)

Johnson, G. (1992). "Managing strategic change— strategy, culture and action." Long Range Planning, 25(1), 28-36. (further reading on the cultural web - available online through the library catalogue)

Johnson, G. (2000). "Strategy through a Cultural Lens." Management Learning, 31(4), 403-426. (further reading on the cultural web - available online through the library catalogue)

Strategy: Choices and Change

Assessment Brief: Individual Strategic Change Case Study Analysis

(60% of module mark)

You are required to produce an analytical paper of c2,500 words (up to 3,000 words), based on the Ascension plc case study and the 3 questions on the next page. Your paper should demonstrate your ability to apply a range of strategic change models to gain constructive insight about the change process within the technical engineering division (TED).

The case study: The case study is on weblearn and is 3 pages long. You must base your analysis on the case study; you are NOT required to do any additional research on the organisation or industry. The questions, the assessment criteria, report structure and some suggested reading can be found on the next two pages of this briefing.

Use of tables: For each question you must apply one or more change models (as per the questions on the next page). You must create a table or diagram containing each element of the model and populate it with data from the case study using bullet points. The information in tables, diagrams or the end reference section will not be included in the word count. There are marks awarded for “application of key models using relevant data from the case”.

Discussion of table content: It is not enough to just populate the tables. For each model you must also discuss your findings (in full sentences after the table). Do not mention everything in the table. Tell the reader what the most important factors are based on your analysis. You can use the prompt notes in the questions to help e.g. to focus your discussion on the most challenging aspects of the change context for question 1. There are marks for “Discussion of findings demonstrates depth of understanding of the case and the theory and some originality in thinking.” So, if you just have the table and no discussion or discussion but no table then you will lose valuable marks.

Evidence of academic reading: for every question you must demonstrate some academic reading about the model you are using (academic text books or academic journal articles rather than internet sources). However, you should not describe the models in detail e.g. you don’t need to explain what Johnson means by ‘stories’ or ‘symbols’; it will be clear from your analysis that you understand this. You should reference your academic reading using the Harvard system (at least four different academic sources). An example could be to use the core text book and find a quote where the authors explain the purpose of the change kaleidoscope. Books and articles that will help with this are listed on the page 3 of this briefing. There are marks awarded for “evidence of academic reading. At least four different academic sources cited” so you will lose marks if you don’t do this. You must use in-text references (in the main body of your report) and an end reference list. You will lose valuable marks if you simply list four different books at the end of your paper.

Conclusions: Marks are awarded for “evidence of critical reflection on the theory and the case”. The conclusion section (see ‘paper structure’ on next page) provides a good opportunity to reflect on the main points from each of the three questions and to reflect on how well the change was managed and the usefulness of the models e.g. any strengths or limitations.

Questions

1) Apply Balogun and Hope Hailey’s Change Kaleidoscope model and Lewin’s Forcefield Analysis to the case and use this to discuss the strategic change context in December 2012, at the start of the change process.

Note: you should discuss what the most challenging aspects of the change context were and what were the most enabling or helpful aspects.

2) Apply Johnson’s Cultural Web model to the case and use this to compare and contrast the culture of TED before the change (2012) and after the change (2014). You must create a table so you can apply the web once for 2012 and once for 2014.

Note: you should discuss the most significant similarities and differences between 2012 and 2014 and how the cultural changes were achieved.

3) Critically evaluate the change process that took place at TED during 2013-14 by applying Kotter’s 8 Change Steps model.

Note: you should discuss what seemed to work well or not so well, did the process follow Kotter’s change steps or was there something more they might have done to ensure the success of the change?

Paper Structure: the paper should include,

Cover sheet - showing your student ID and the name of your class tutor

Contents page

1.0 Introduction – briefly introduce the purpose of your report (100 to 200 words)

2.0 Case Study Analysis – 3 sub-sections, one for each of the 3 main questions

(approx. 700 words per question plus any diagrams or tables)

3.0 Conclusions – summarise the main points from section 2.0 (approx. 300 words).

4.0 References – there should be at least four different academic references from text books and academic journal articles

Assessment Criteria
Criteria

Report Presentation: follows recommended structure. Logical and persuasive writing style. Well presented with good grammar and spelling. Harvard referencing style throughout. Submitted on time.

Case Study Answers: all questions answered fully. Application of key models using relevant data from the case. Discussion of findings demonstrates depth of understanding of the case and the theory and some originality in thinking. Evidence of critical reflection on the theory and the case.

Scholarship: evidence of academic reading. At least four different academic sources cited.

Recommended academic sources

ALL THE MODELS REFERRED TO IN THE QUESTIONS CAN BE FOUND IN:

Johnson, G. Whittington, R. and Scholes, K. Angwin, D. and Regner, P. (2013) Exploring Strategy, Edition 10, Pearson and in session 18, 19 and 20 of the module. However, Kotter’s Change Steps is not listed in full in the book so a better source for that is:

Kotter, J. (1995) 'Leading Change: Why Transformation efforts fail' Harvard Business Review, March-April 96 Vol. 73(2) pp.59-67 (available online through the library catalogue)

Some further suggested sources of academic reading include:

Hailey, V. H., & Balogun, J. (2002). Devising Context Sensitive Approaches To Change: The Example of Glaxo Wellcome. Long Range Planning, 35(2), 153-178. (further reading on the change kaleidoscope - available online through the library catalogue)

Balogun, J. and Hope Hailey, V. (2009) Exploring Strategic Change, 3rd edition, Prentice Hall (further reading on the change kaleidoscope)

Johnson, G. (1992). "Managing strategic change— strategy, culture and action." Long Range Planning, 25(1), 28-36. (further reading on the cultural web - available online through the library catalogue)

Johnson, G. (2000). "Strategy through a Cultural Lens." Management Learning, 31(4), 403-426. (further reading on the cultural web - available online through the library catalogue)

Kotter, J. (2012) Leading Change, Harvard Business Review Press (further reading on Kotter’s change steps)

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Top Grade Tutor
Top Writing Guru
Essay Writing Help
Engineering Guru
Assignment Guru
Fatimah Syeda
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Top Grade Tutor

ONLINE

Top Grade Tutor

I have written research reports, assignments, thesis, research proposals, and dissertations for different level students and on different subjects.

$42 Chat With Writer
Top Writing Guru

ONLINE

Top Writing Guru

I am a professional and experienced writer and I have written research reports, proposals, essays, thesis and dissertations on a variety of topics.

$34 Chat With Writer
Essay Writing Help

ONLINE

Essay Writing Help

I am a PhD writer with 10 years of experience. I will be delivering high-quality, plagiarism-free work to you in the minimum amount of time. Waiting for your message.

$20 Chat With Writer
Engineering Guru

ONLINE

Engineering Guru

I will be delighted to work on your project. As an experienced writer, I can provide you top quality, well researched, concise and error-free work within your provided deadline at very reasonable prices.

$33 Chat With Writer
Assignment Guru

ONLINE

Assignment Guru

I have assisted scholars, business persons, startups, entrepreneurs, marketers, managers etc in their, pitches, presentations, market research, business plans etc.

$43 Chat With Writer
Fatimah Syeda

ONLINE

Fatimah Syeda

I am a professional and experienced writer and I have written research reports, proposals, essays, thesis and dissertations on a variety of topics.

$15 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

What is self control according to the bible - Required Practical Connection Assignment - Diagnosis made easier 2nd edition pdf - What does novated lease mean - Pooping moose candy dispenser plans - Painful testimony assassin's creed odyssey - Continental airlines case study data warehouse - Annotated Bibliography on Interstitial Cystitis - What email protocol does marina and rita’s cupcakes use and why is it important? - Elite sports medicine jobs - List the steps in processing transactions in the correct order - How to build a medieval castle model - How to calculate bcr in excel - Order 2124009: Create a framework for developing one’s own ethical and moral philosophy. - Due tomorrow - Argumentative essay on the use of mobile phones in schools - Imoprtance of strategic IT planning 5 - Wifi range extender jaycar - Paramount clean edge razor - Math Questions - Week 5 Discussion 1 - Short paragraph - Comprehensive accounting problem with solution - Aes uses a feistel structure - Clustering - Barn owl food web - Week 3 bus - Cloud Computing - Tracks quotes and page numbers - Burglar alarm keypad 9800 - Under armour brand positioning statement - Analyze paper - Humanities discussion - Estelle and carroll funeral directors mudgee - Family Assessment Part II - PICOT - Yanomamo chagnon 6th edition pdf - Ceres gardening company - Ronald nash faith and reason - Bee sugar syrup ratio - Making off without payment - Grade 3 spelling words week 1 - Organizational Analysis Wk 2 - Apply: Signature Assignment: Organizational Analysis - Proc sql format character - Ethics and business low - System analysis and design template - Comprehensive accounting problem with solution - Families of elements worksheet answer key - Cinnamon soho kingly street - Action research vs traditional research - Fisher price company information - Mn national guard open vacancy - Difference between stanza and paragraph - Banca monte dei paschi di siena spa annual report - Dakabin dump opening hours - What was beneatha's attitude towards god - Organizational design for dunkin donuts - Bus 419 discussion - Models of career development ppt - Catholic church queenscliff mass times - Business ethics - Motte and bailey castles - Yellow perch external anatomy - Operation Security - Nosotros preferimos comprar las entradas tickets para el museo - Countries with autocracy based governments have - Discussion 6 - Protective measures for fault protection - Human resource exam - ACC 601 Managerial Accounting Group Case 3 - Gaga sherbetter - Bates visual guide to physical examination cardiovascular - Sociology o level marking scheme - Prepare a 10 minute presentation on organizational culture and values - Poorest regions in uk - Fraser island map camping zones - Seven domains of attractive opportunities - Azimuthal equidistant projection advantages and disadvantages - Hydraulic lift project report - Sequence diagram for online shopping - Gender schema theory ppt - Discussion(CC) - How to evaluate a good dance - How to connect function generator in multisim - Gordon rule essay example - Chay - Main - Dis 7 - 2 - Anz eftpos network attach in progress - UKUPHILA WELLNESS CENTER +27835179056 SAFE PILLS ABORTION IN Warner Beach Westville Winkelspruit Phoenix Chatsworth benoni limpopo - Bsl 2 waste disposal - DISCUSSION - First angle of projection - Leandria johnson brother philip johnson - We are only what we always were page number - Caada dash risk assessment - UNIT 2 ASSIGNMENT - BHA415 Module 1 Discussion Post 1 - Financial management concepts and applications by stephen foerster pdf - How to add known traveler number to existing delta reservation - Spartan cheese stealing ritual - Internation 5 ok