Behaviors that show unprofessional or immoral conduct for a teacher

I’m studying and need help with a Business question to help me learn.

Please read the case study in it's entirety. Questions are at the end and how the paper should be formated.

Case Study 9.1 Unprofessional Conduct?

Teaching Elementary School Children with intellectual disabilities requires skill, patience, and devotion, and those who undertake this task are among the unsung heroes of our society. Their difficult and challenging work rarely brings the prestige or financial rewards it deserves. Mrs. Pettit was one of the those dedicated teachers. Licensed to teach in California, she had been working with mentally challenged children for over thirteen years when her career came to an abrupt end. Throughout that career, her competence was never questioned, and the evaluations of her school principal were always positive.

Teaching was not Pettit's only interest, however, She and her husband viewed with favor various "nonconventional sexual lifestyles," including "Wife Swapping." Because so-called sexual liberation was a hot topic at the time, the Pettits were invited to discuss their ideas on two local televisions shows. Although they wore disguises, at least one fellow teacher recognized them and discussed Mrs. Pettit's view with colleagues. A year later Pettit, then 48 years old, and her husband joined " The Swingers," a private club in Los Angeles that sponsored partied intended to promote diverse sexual activities among its members. An undercover police officer, Sergeant Berk, visited one of those parties at a private residence. Amid a welter of sexual activity, he observed Mrs. Pettit perform fellatio on 3 different men in a 1 hour period. Pettit was arrested and charges with oral copulation, which at the time contravened the California Penal code (although now it does only if one of the parties is under 18), After a plea bargain was arranged, she pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor of outraging public decency and paid a fine. The school district renewed her teaching contract the next academic year, but 2 years later, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against her. The State Board of Education found no reason to complain about her services as a teacher, and it conceded that she was unlikely to repeat her sexual misconduct. But the Board revoked her elementary school life diploma – that is, her license to teach- on the ground that by engaging in immortal an unprofessional conduct at the party, she had demonstrated that she was unfit to teach.