Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Berkshire instruments case study answers

13/10/2021 Client: muhammad11 Deadline: 2 Day

Berkshire Instruments Case Study

Assignment Content
Purpose
This assignment allows students to work with issues related to the cost of capital. In addition, students will practice calculations related to capital structure and use them in making financial decisions.

Assignment Instructions
Review the Week 3 Case Study.

Complete the required activities 1 to 3 in Microsoft® Excel® or Microsoft® Word.

Submit the assignment.

FIN/486 Version 6 1

Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Berkshire Instruments

Al Hansen, the newly appointed vice president of finance of Berkshire Instruments, was eager to talk to

his investment banker about future financing for the firm. One of Al’s first assignments was to

determine the firm’s cost of capital. In assessing the weights to use in computing the cost of capital, he

examined the current balance sheet, presented in Figure 1 below.

In their discussion, Al and his investment banker determined that the current mix in the capital structure

was very close to optimal and that Berkshire Instruments should continue with it in the future. Of some

concern was the appropriate cost to assign to each of the elements in the capital structure. Al Hansen

requested that his administrative assistant provide data on what the cost to issue debt and preferred

stock had been in the past. The information is provided in Figure 2 below.

When Al got the data, he felt he was making real progress toward determining the cost of capital for the

firm. However, his investment banker indicated that he was going about the process in an incorrect

manner. The important issue is the current cost of funds, not the historical cost. The banker suggested

that a comparable firm in the industry, in terms of size and bond rating (Baa), Rollins Instruments, had

issued bonds a year and a half ago for 9.3 percent interest at a $1,000 par value, and the bonds were

currently selling for $890. The bonds had 20 years remaining to maturity. The banker also observed that

Rollings Instruments had just issued preferred stock at $60 per share, and the preferred stock paid an

annual dividend of $4.80.

In terms of cost of common equity, the banker suggested that Al Hansen use the dividend valuation

model as a first approach to determining cost of equity. Based on that approach, Al observed that

earnings were $3 a share and that 40 percent would be paid out in dividends (D1). The current stock

price was $25. Dividends in the last four years had grown from 82 cents to the current value.

The banker indicated that the under-writing cost (flotation cost) on a preferred stock issue would be

$2.60 per share and $2.00 per share on common stock. Al Hansen further observed that his firm was in a

35 percent marginal tax bracket.

With all this information in hand, Al Hansen sat down to determine his firm’s cost of capital. He was a

little confused about computing the firm’s cost of common equity. He knew there were two different

formulas: One: One for the cost of retained earnings and one for the cost of new common stock. His

investment banker suggested that he follow the normally accepted approach used in determining the

marginal cost of capital. First, determine the cost of capital for as large a capital structure as current

retained earnings will support; then, determine the cost of capital based on exclusively using new

common stock.

Copyright © 2017 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. Week 3 Case Study

FIN/486 Version 6 2

Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Figure 1 BERKSHIRE INSTRUMENTS Statement of Financial Position

December 31, 2015

Assets

Current assets:

Cash ..................................................................................... $ 400,000 Marketable securities ........................................................... 200,000 Accounts receivable ............................................................. $ 2,600,000 Less: Allowance for bad debts 300,000 2,300,000 Inventory .............................................................................. 5,500,000 Total current assets .......................................................... $ 8,400,000

Fixed Assets:

Plant and equipment, original cost ....................................... 30,700,000 Less: Accumulated depreciation ...................................... 13,200,000 Net plant and equipment ...................................................... 17,500,000 Total assets .............................................................................. $25,900,000

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Current liabilities: ....................................................................

Accounts payable ................................................................. $ 6,200,000 Accrued expenses ................................................................ 1,700,000 Total current liabilities ..................................................... 7,900,000

Long-term financing:

Bonds payable ...................................................................... $ 6,120,000 Preferred stock ..................................................................... 1,080,000 Common stock 6,300,000 Retained earnings 4,500,000 Total common equity ....................................................... 10,800,000 Total long-term financing ............................................ 18,000,000 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity ................................. $25,900,000

Figure 2

Cost of prior issues

of debt and

Security Year of Issue Amount Coupon

Rate

preferred stock Bond ............................................. 2003 $1,120,000 6.1%

Bond ............................................. 2007 3,000,000 13.8

Bond ............................................. 2013 2,000,000 8.3

Preferred stock .............................. 2008 600,000 12.0

Preferred stock .............................. 2011 480,000 7.9

} Common equity

Copyright © 2017 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. Week 3 Case Study

FIN/486 Version 6 3

Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Required Activities:

1. Determine the weighted average cost of capital based on using retained earnings in the capital structure. Note: The percentage composition in the capital structure for bonds, preferred stock, and common equity should be based on the current capital structure of long-term financing as shown in Figure 1 above (it adds up to $18 million). Common equity will represent 60 percent of financing throughout this case. Use Rollins Instruments data to calculate the cost of preferred stock and debt. Show your work on your assignment document.

2. Recompute the weighted average cost of capital based on using new common stock in the capital structure. Note: The weights remain the same, only common equity is now supplied by new common stock, rather than by retained earnings. After how much new financing will this increase in the cost of capital take place? Determine this by dividing retained earnings by the percent of common equity in the capital structure. Show your work on your assignment document.

3. Write a 1 page summary that provides the following :

A. Differentiate between the methods used in question 1 above and those used in question 2 above as it relates to the results.

B. Provide your opinion on which method you would suggest and why, based on your findings. C. Add this summary below your answers to 1 and 2 above on your assignment file.

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Smart Accountants
Coursework Helper
Helping Hand
Writing Factory
Solutions Store
Best Coursework Help
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Smart Accountants

ONLINE

Smart Accountants

Hello, I an ranked top 10 freelancers in academic and contents writing. I can write and updated your personal statement with great quality and free of plagiarism

$20 Chat With Writer
Coursework Helper

ONLINE

Coursework Helper

I will cover all the points which you have mentioned in your project details.

$29 Chat With Writer
Helping Hand

ONLINE

Helping Hand

I have read and understood all your initial requirements, and I am very professional in this task.

$26 Chat With Writer
Writing Factory

ONLINE

Writing Factory

I will cover all the points which you have mentioned in your project details.

$34 Chat With Writer
Solutions Store

ONLINE

Solutions Store

I have read and understood all your initial requirements, and I am very professional in this task.

$37 Chat With Writer
Best Coursework Help

ONLINE

Best Coursework Help

I am known as Unrivaled Quality, Written to Standard, providing Plagiarism-free woork, and Always on Time

$50 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Things to be greatful for - Dupli-color selection guide australia - Wii remote cash generator - Yukl 2013 leadership in organizations pdf - What is pour plate method in microbiology - Cryptography - English Research Sumo Work - Social media platforms and your career hum 186 - Certified texas contract manager - Soontjen racing pigeons for sale - Pre demolition audit example - Oprah winfrey harvard commencement speech transcript - MBA - Main - Activity 2 - Discussion - Whitefields impact suggests that religious culture - How important groups, roles, statuses, and social networks are in the structure of society - Model of communication schramm - +91-8890675453 love marriage problem solution IN Panipat - Arden company reported the following costs and expenses - English is a crazy language article - 6 - Movie critique - Passive insufficiency vs active insufficiency - V is proportional to p-1 - Discussion 3 - Calculating total magnification of a compound light microscope - REFLECTION PAPER INSTRUCTIONS - How to write a historical context paper - Introduction to organisational behaviour pdf - Reactivity of group 2 - Critical Assignment - Bohr diagram for magnesium - Pre and clr jk flip flop - How children develop fourth edition - If equal masses of o2 and hbr are in separate - Quiz - K3 fe c2o4 3 - Tienes que mostrármelos. - How to write a change request - Tangible and intangible in architecture ppt - Memoir - Excel chapter 9 grader project multiple sheet workbook management - Adafruit 32x32 led matrix - Label the energy diagram for a two step reaction - Actron air wall controller - Goodstart intranet sign in - What is a constitutional corporation - Wk 1 discussion ethics - Air lock in tap - In a closed economy national saving equals - Course name: Info tech import in Strat Plan - Http faculty washington edu herronjc softwarefolder allelea1 html - Quiz - Public Management of Undocumented Immigrants - Chapter 21 accounting for leases solutions - Week 8 discussion - Exercise 5.1 - BUSN 602 Week 8 forum - Norsted manor farm caravan storage - The great italian trivia game - Inferential Statistics(dissertation) - Earth science lab relative dating 1 answer key - Desloratadine dosage by weight - How to write a personal interest project log - Rubber band car designs - Phenotypes of the p1 and f1 generations - What is a discourse community example - Lyson honey extractor uk - In n out marketing strategy - 5586 e houston rd woodlawn il 62898 - Breast milk factory boulder city - Research paper - Strobe light warning example - Discuss Question - "Consumer Behavior Blog Post – Would you tweet about clean hands?" - The kite runner book quotes and page numbers - Finding our way ielts reading answer - The savage inequalities of public education in new york summary - Acme bathroom exhaust fans - Fortune 100 best companies to work for non union - Reebok nfl replica jerseys a case for postponement solution - Steam distillation of essential oil lab report - Argumentative essay about bringing cellphones in school - Farewell to manzanar pdf - Queensland health annual refresher - City of whittlesea suburbs - Scientific report example high school - Signal diagram of 8085 - Process recording examples for mental health - Blumat bottle cap adapter - Discussion - Multimodal dangerous goods form - Healing the orphan heart - 132 divided by 3 - Spotify ipo method - Community interpreting level 2 - Cia world factbook gaza - Guest house drama rooh full episode - Vertical integration meant course hero - Marginal rate of technical substitution perfect substitutes