Bolman and deal structural frame

Structural Configurations For Organizations

Assignment 1:—Structural Configurations for Organizations

Henry Mintzberg (1980) introduced a new way to explain structural configurations by “clustering various functions into groupings and showing their relative size and clout in response to different missions and external challenges” (Bolman & Deal, 2009, p. 78). Other authors offer different ways of looking at this topic.

Using the University online library resources, locate a minimum of four different scholarly sources that offer different approaches on structural configurations for organizations.

Complete the following:

Pick two extra approaches, one of those being Sally Helgesen’s (1995) “The Web of Inclusion.”
From the manager’s standpoint, examine the different approaches and provide the pros and cons of each one of them when compared to Mintzberg’s proposal.
Write your initial response in a minimum of 400 words. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

By Thursday, January 9, 2014, post your responses to the appropriate Discussion Area.

Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (2009). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership(4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Helgesen, S. (1995). The Web of Inclusion: A New Architecture for Building Great Organizations. New York: Currency/Doubleday.

Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5's: A synthesis of the research on organization design.Management Science, 26(3), 322–341.

Assignment 2: Home Depot Analysis

For this assignment, you will review an article describing a situation in which a business leader used a management approach that proved to be unsuccessful. You will write an analysis that covers the requirements listed in the directions below.

Directions:

Review the following:

Charan, R. (2006). Home Depot’s blueprint for culture change. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 60–70.
https://login.libproxy.edmc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.edmc.edu
/docview/227840443?accountid=34899
Using the University online library resources, locate at least 2 different scholarly sources on the topic.

Write a paper that covers the following:

Explain what led to an unsuccessful outcome at Home Depot.
Analyze the Home Depot scenario utilizing the four-frame model (i.e., Structure, HR, Political, and Symbolic).
Explain which frames were more useful in your analysis and justify your reasoning.
Explain an experience you have faced in your own career that is similar to the situation presented in this case. Analyze the approach taken and assess its success.
Write a 2–3-page paper in Word format. Utilize at least two scholarly sources in support. Your paper should be written in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

By Sunday, January 12, 2014, deliver your assignment to the M2: Assignment 2 Dropbox.

Unit 2: Module 2 - The Structural Perspective and its Origins

http://myeclassonline.com/ec/courses/AUO_files/AU_img.gifThe Structural Perspective and its Origins

http://myeclassonline.com/ec/courses/AUO_files/AU_spacer.gif

The structural frame is based on a variety of assumptions that affect leadership following this frame. Structural leaders emphasize rationality, analysis, logic, facts, and data. They are likely to believe strongly in the importance of clear structure and well-developed management systems. A good leader is someone who thinks clearly, makes the appropriate decisions, has good analytic skills, and can design structures and systems that get the job done.” (Bolman & Deal, 2009, p. 47).

The structural frame has its origins in the works of different prominent managers, such as the following:

· Frederick Taylor (1911)

· Henry Fayol (1919)

· Max Weber (1922

Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (2009). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership(4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Unit 2: Module 2 - Structural Configurations

http://myeclassonline.com/ec/courses/AUO_files/AU_img.gifStructural Configurations

http://myeclassonline.com/ec/courses/AUO_files/AU_spacer.gif

Structure is not only an organizational chart. It encompasses all relationships in terms of authority, goals, job descriptions, expectations, and interactions among all stakeholders, both internal and external.

The choice of the right structure is crucial for achieving success. A bad structure can waste resources, and lead to low productivity due to employee dissatisfaction. The right structure can make employees feel responsible and motivate them to collaborate toward the success of the company, through the achievement of individual and common goals. With the right structure, motivation (both intrinsic and extrinsic) is more likely to be present, as well as cohesion and teamwork. The importance of teamwork is shared at all levels of the organization, with increasing levels of empowerment and delegation, so all members really feel they belong and are accountable for achieving the stated common goals.

Two issues are central to structural design: how to allocate work (differentiation) and how to coordinate diverse efforts once responsibilities have been delegated (integration). When the coordination of efforts is more hierarchical, a top-down model is followed, and it is labeled vertical coordination. If the coordination is more informal and flexible, and uses task forces and other forms of coordination on the same level, it is labeled lateral coordination.

Different models of structural configurations have been proposed in the literature, including the Five Organizational Types by Mintzberg (1980) and the Web of Inclusion by Helgesen (1995).

Mintzberg's Five Organizational Types are as follows:

· Entrepreneurial organization

· Machine organization (bureaucracy)

· Professional organization

· Divisional (diversified) organization

· Innovative organization ("adhocracy")

In the Web of Inclusion, Helgesen defines an approach that relies on organizational structures that are not standard hierarchies led from the top down, but instead more circular in structure and led from the center.

Mintzberg, H. (1980, March). Structure in 5's: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Science, 26(3), 322—341.

Helgesen, S. (1995). The web of inclusion: A new architecture for building great organizations (1st ed.). New York, NY: Currency/Doubleday.

Unit 2: Module 2 - The Power of Teams and Teamwork

http://myeclassonline.com/ec/courses/AUO_files/AU_img.gifThe Power of Teams and Teamwork

http://myeclassonline.com/ec/courses/AUO_files/AU_spacer.gif

Teams are vital to organizational performance, but they need to be well organized and structured in order to be effective. All roles should be clearly defined and the relationships among team members should be communicated properly. Situational variables affecting teams include goals to be achieved, division of work, decision-making processes, and coordination of efforts.

There are different structural configurations to be considered according to the situation being faced. Basic configurations include the following:

· One Boss

· Dual Authority

· Simple Hierarchy

· Circle Network

· All Channel Network

High-performance teams can help organizations achieve their goals and lead them to a path of success. They are able to adapt to specific needs or opportunities that should be utilized. Such teams are capable to not only divide the work, but also deploy the utmost purpose into goals that are Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-bound (SMART). They have a number of members that is manageable and diverse, with complementary skills and strengths, and see themselves as collectively accountable and responsible for achieving all goals.

Module Wrap Up

In this module, you explored the structural frame and learned about its origin and assumptions. You also learned about different structural configurations and understood the role of high-performance teams and teamwork in an organization's success.

In the assignments for this module, you will analyze different approaches on structural configurations for organizations from a manager's standpoint. You will also review a situation from a business article and do an analysis of why the managerial approach used for the situation failed.