Case study on performance appraisal with questions and answers

CLC - Performance Appraisal At Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals To People Development - Case Study

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

Read the Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development case study located in Topic Materials. In your teams, discuss the assessment of employees within the Telespazio organization. Develop a written description (750-1,000 words) discussing current evaluation methods, how the organization uses the appraisal assessments to identify employee roles, the current appraisal systems, performance ratings, and Telespazio's practices for performing appraisal interviews. As a group, decide what changes or strategies could be implemented to Telespazio's current performance appraisal practices. Include an appraisal tool that would benefit the company and an effective method for performing an appraisal interview. Describe the benefits of using both the appraisal tool and appraisal interview in the performance appraisal practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful

CLC - Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development - Case Study

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00%

3 Satisfactory 79.00%

4 Good 87.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

70.0 %Content

20.0 %Current Appraisal Methods

The description does not include the current appraisal method.

The description includes the current appraisal method, but it is incomplete or lacks details.

The description includes the current appraisal method and briefly identifies roles and performance ratings of employees.

The description includes a detailed current appraisal method and identifies roles and performance ratings of employees with at least one example of current practices.

The description includes a comprehensive appraisal method to include all required elements within the assignment with at least one example of current practices.

25.0 %Changes or Strategies for Telespazio

The description does not include changes or strategies for the company.

The description includes some changes or strategies for the company, but they are incomplete or lack details.

The description includes changes or strategies for Telespazio to implement for its performance appraisal practices.

The description includes detailed changes or strategies for Telespazio to implement for its performance appraisal practices and includes at least one example of the change.

The description includes detailed changes or strategies for Telespazio to implement for its performance appraisal practices and includes at least one example of the change.

25.0 %Appraisal Tool and Appraisal Interview

The description does not include appraisal tools or an appraisal interview method.

The description includes either the appraisal tool or the appraisal interview method, but it is incomplete or lacks details.

The description includes mention of both an appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in the performance appraisal practices of the organization.

The description includes detailed suggestions for both an appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in the performance appraisal practices of the organization.

The description includes thorough suggestions for both an appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in the performance appraisal practices of the organization. In addition, the description addresses the benefit of using the appraisal tool and interview method as a part of the performance appraisal practice.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage