Loading...

Messages

Proposals

Stuck in your homework and missing deadline? Get urgent help in $10/Page with 24 hours deadline

Get Urgent Writing Help In Your Essays, Assignments, Homeworks, Dissertation, Thesis Or Coursework & Achieve A+ Grades.

Privacy Guaranteed - 100% Plagiarism Free Writing - Free Turnitin Report - Professional And Experienced Writers - 24/7 Online Support

Cemex acquisitions

18/03/2021 Client: saad24vbs Deadline: 2 Day

Copyright © 2017 Thunderbird School of Global Management, a unit of the Arizona State University Knowledge Enterprise. This case was written by Professor Michael H. Moffett for the sole purpose of providing material for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. Any reproduction, in any form, of the material in this case is prohibited unless permission is obtained from the copyright holder.

Michael H. Moffett

CEMEX and the Rinker Acquisition (B) On April 9, 2007, the board of The Rinker Group Ltd. (Australia) approved a revised offer of US$15.85 per share after CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V. (NYSE: CX)—CEMEX—raised its offer 22%.1 With the backing of management, CEMEX obtained the needed 90% of shareholders’ approval on July 10, 2007, to close the acquisition of Rinker. CEMEX funded the acquisition nearly exclusively with short-term debt, in line with its proven acquisition process. This time, however, the combined purchase price and debt financing would both prove a challenge to CEMEX for years to come.

The Rinker Deal In the weeks and months that followed, many analysts debated whether CEMEX had overpaid for Rinker. One investment bank that followed CEMEX closely, Santander, still supported the acquisition:2

Although CEMEX has had to increase its offer price for Rinker, we believe that the acquisition is still potentially accretive for CEMEX, and that the resulting valuation is still attractive. In fact, applying a conservative estimate for CEMEX’s synergies of US$130 million per year to our sensitivity model would imply a year-end target price of US$37.60 per ADR, representing a potential upside of 7.0% from current levels, plus a 2.0% expected dividend yield in 2007. However, we believe that there may be additional upside in terms of the potential synergies, once the due diligence is completed. CEMEX management stated that there are potential savings in areas such as: capex; working capital; and taxes; although they have not been able to quantify this potential as yet. Our buy rating for stock in CEMEX remains unaltered.

CEMEX believed the Rinker acquisition had a number of strong business benefits, arguing that the deal expanded its diversity and strength in the aggregates and ready-mix concrete components of the concrete value chain. It also increased CEMEX’s market share in several of the key growth markets in the U.S. marketplace, namely Florida and Arizona. Although not as important, the added business segments in Australia and China expanded CEMEX’s global reach. The combining of CEMEX and Rinker operations in the U.S. market would also offer significant cost synergies (CEMEX had expanded its estimate to more than US$400 million in potential cost synergies in 2008). As described in Exhibit 1, CEMEX defended the Rinker deal as meeting all of the company’s corporate objectives demanded of all acquisitions.

CEMEX was a seasoned professional when it came to financing acquisitions. The company had paid down its net debt (debt less cash) from US$10.4 billion to just US$5.1 billion in the two years leading up to the Rinker purchase. The acquisition would be financed entirely with debt—US$14.2 billion, and would also require CEMEX to assume US$1.3 billion of Rinker’s existing debt obligations. Lorenzo Zambrano pledged to reduce CEMEX’s total net debt to under 2.7 times its EBITDA within two years.

“The combination of CEMEX and Rinker will create value for shareholders as well as customers, particularly in growth regions in the United States,” said Lorenzo H. Zambrano, CEMEX CEO and chairman, in a statement. “We intend to regain our financial flexibility as soon as possible and return to our steady state capital structure within two years.

Lorenzo H. Zambrano, Chairman and CEO, CEMEX.

1 CEMEX agreed not to adjust (lower) the offer price as a result of the dividend paid by Rinker at the end of 2006 to all shareholders. Arguably, immediately following the payment of the dividend, Rinker’s enterprise value would theoretically fall by the amount of the dividend. 2 “CEMEX: CEMEX Increases Its Offer for Rinker by 22%,” Santander Investment, Mexico City, April 10, 2007, p. 1.

For the exclusive use of A. Robinson, 2019.

This document is authorized for use only by Ashley Robinson in FIN-336 Multinational Corporate Finance 19EW1 taught by SNHU INSTRUCTOR, Southern New Hampshire University from Jun 2019 to Nov 2019.

2 A02-17-0008

The combined firms would, however, reduce competition in specific markets according to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). As a result, the DOJ filed suit to stop the acquisition. The DOJ argued that the acquisition would lessen competition and create a monopoly in interstate trade and commerce in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act. The court found in favor of the U.S. Department of Justice on August 31, 2007, requiring CEMEX to divest a number of the acquired properties in the impacted Florida and Arizona markets. Despite shedding these selective units, the acquisition was completed.3

Homework is Completed By:

Writer Writer Name Amount Client Comments & Rating
Instant Homework Helper

ONLINE

Instant Homework Helper

$36

She helped me in last minute in a very reasonable price. She is a lifesaver, I got A+ grade in my homework, I will surely hire her again for my next assignments, Thumbs Up!

Order & Get This Solution Within 3 Hours in $25/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 3 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 6 Hours in $20/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 6 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

Order & Get This Solution Within 12 Hours in $15/Page

Custom Original Solution And Get A+ Grades

  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • Proper APA/MLA/Harvard Referencing
  • Delivery in 12 Hours After Placing Order
  • Free Turnitin Report
  • Unlimited Revisions
  • Privacy Guaranteed

6 writers have sent their proposals to do this homework:

Top Academic Tutor
Top Quality Assignments
Engineering Exam Guru
Coursework Helper
Professional Accountant
A Grade Exams
Writer Writer Name Offer Chat
Top Academic Tutor

ONLINE

Top Academic Tutor

I have read and understood all your initial requirements, and I am very professional in this task.

$29 Chat With Writer
Top Quality Assignments

ONLINE

Top Quality Assignments

Hello, I an ranked top 10 freelancers in academic and contents writing. I can write and updated your personal statement with great quality and free of plagiarism

$130 Chat With Writer
Engineering Exam Guru

ONLINE

Engineering Exam Guru

I have read and understood all your initial requirements, and I am very professional in this task.

$34 Chat With Writer
Coursework Helper

ONLINE

Coursework Helper

I have read your project details. I can do this within your deadline.

$60 Chat With Writer
Professional Accountant

ONLINE

Professional Accountant

I am known as Unrivaled Quality, Written to Standard, providing Plagiarism-free woork, and Always on Time

$142 Chat With Writer
A Grade Exams

ONLINE

A Grade Exams

Give me a chance, i will do this with my best efforts

$33 Chat With Writer

Let our expert academic writers to help you in achieving a+ grades in your homework, assignment, quiz or exam.

Similar Homework Questions

Podcast introduction script example - How to use backtrack 5 to hack wifi - Ocr nationals ict level 2 - Who was john shakespeare - Mother energy drink target market - What is the rational number equivalent to 3.12 - Access control Assignment 4 - Expedia survives by research, and Technology to read hidden emotions. - Lifeboat ethics the case against helping the poor thesis - Stats modeling the world answer key chapter 6 - Leadership Assessment 700 - 1050 Word summary - Cisco acs tacacs+ configuration example - Electronic warfare fundamentals ppt - Apply: Regression Modeling (Statistics). DAT565 - Why nursing is called a profession - Analytics mindset techwear - Four main cycles of genre movies - Order 2630329: Education - Ethno-etiology - South sydney high school - 19 coora road yowie bay - Judeo-Christian religion - 750 word paper - Ib mathematics data booklet - Current event assignment template - Customer buying criteria capsim - Avonti garrett net worth - How to ask for feedback from your manager - Rube goldberg machine website - Ephesians 3 14 21 nlt - How to calculate available seat miles - What is a thesis driven essay - Strayer university millersville md - Flat anterior bite plane - De-identification techniques in big data - 8 aesthetic principles - 21.1 infinitives and infinitive phrases answers - Madeleine leininger transcultural nursing theory ppt - Finding the Right Cleaners - Lewis dot diagram of sodium chloride - Jack nicklaus muirfield putter - Shooting dad essay - Persuasive techniques in writing - Conflict of interest nsw - Skullcandy business strategy - We don't need no education movie - Surface area of oblique pyramid - Blending problem linear programming solution - Hec paris international students - As/nzs 3500 free download - New shoes simulation marketing plan - Bouncing ball experiment lab report - Www partners aph tplus - Daves inc recently hired you as a consultant - Medical notes summarising protocol - Heald green health centre - How to run driver verifier - The common stock of leaning tower of pita inc - Religion board game ideas - Absorption costing vs direct costing - Http www bretwhissel net amortization amortize html - Small Group Communication - Two years are better than four - Topic - Determine how to cultivate millennials as leaders - Case Study - National horticulture board karnataka - Nutrition assignment for nursing - How to write a personal competencies statement for university - P - How to remove air bubbles from buret tip - NURS495prompt - Provide extensive additional information on the topic Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail and Share an applicable personal experience - Keith jesperson psychological profile - Captain beatty character traits - How does academic dishonesty undermine the purpose of graduate school - Enthalpy of reaction hess law lab - Form 3115 depreciation example - College students - Acid base titration neutralization reaction lab report - Williams institute ethics awareness inventory - Why good leaders make you feel safe essay - Jim cathcart fremantle arts centre - Examples of allusion in i have a dream speech - Aurobindo ashram eye treatment coimbatore - Research Paper: Business Process Redesign - Discussion - Solving rational inequalities worksheet - The simpsons movie alaska scene - Blogpost (Digital Marketing) - Lewis dot structure formal charge - Math1081 lab test 1 - Marketing Analysis - Research at least two journal articles (must be within the past decade) that answer one of the topics below. Write a 1,200-word report answering the topic questions - Heat transfer examples worksheet - Fluke 435 download data - Hierarchy chart in programming - Database input node in iib - Disadvantages of trenchless technology - Mun how to write a resolution